ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02373137

Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial

NCT02373137, Phase 4, Unknown, Oregon Health and Science University; results first posted 2019-07-02

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial. Trials, record NCT02373137. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02373137

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial
NCT number
NCT02373137
Status
Unknown
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
38 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Oregon Health and Science University
Conditions
Keratoplasty, Grafting, Corneal, Transplantation, Corneal, Transplantation, Cornea, Keratoplasty, Lamellar
Interventions
DSAEK, DMEK, Endoserter, Prednisolone, Ofloxacin, Tropicamide, Phenylephrine, Jones Tube
First posted
2015-02-26
Last updated
2020-11-25
Results first posted
2019-07-02

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryBest Spectacle-Corrected Visual Acuity6 months
The BSCVA was recorded at 4 meters by a masked refractionist certified for the study using a protocol adapted from the Age-Related Eye Disease Study using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts: chart R(2110), chart 1(2111), and chart 2(2112) (Precision Vision, Woodstock, IL).
SecondaryBest Spectacle-Corrected Visual Acuity3 and 12 months
The BSCVA was recorded at 4 meters by a masked refractionist certified for the study using a protocol adapted from the Age-Related Eye Disease Study using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts: chart R(2110), chart 1(2111), and chart 2(2112) (Precision Vision, Woodstock, IL).
SecondaryBest Spectacle-Corrected Visual Acuity24 Months
The BSCVA was recorded at 4 meters by a masked refractionist certified for the study using a protocol adapted from the Age-Related Eye Disease Study using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts: chart R(2110), chart 1(2111), and chart 2(2112) (Precision Vision, Woodstock, IL).
SecondaryEndothelial Cell Count3, 6, 12 months
SecondaryEndothelial Cell Count24 months
SecondaryCorneal Higher-Order Aberrations3, 6, 12 months
Corneal anterior and posterior surface higher-order aberrations (HOA) were measured with Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam) before surgery and at 3, 6, and 12 months post-operatively. Zernike orders 3-8 were calculated at 4.0- and 6.0-mm-diameter optical zones. The results reported here represent total HOA (Sum of Zernike orders 3-8). Note a single observation was not available for one eye in the DMEK group at 6 months, this was analyzed with last observation carried forward.
SecondaryCorneal Higher-Order Aberrations24 monthsAs measured by Pentacam
SecondaryInterface Haze3, 6, 12 monthsAs measured by Pentacam densitometry
SecondaryInterface Haze24 monthsAs measured by Pentacam densitometry
SecondaryNational Eye Institute - Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ)Baseline, 12 months
The National Eye Institute has developed the validated Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ) to assess the effect of ocular conditions and vision on patient quality of life. The answers to the questionnaire are transformed into sub-scales, including: general health, general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social functioning, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision, peripheral vision. Participants are assigned a numerical value for each sub-scale based on their answers between 0-100, where higher numbers indicate better visual function. These sub-scales are then combined according to National Eye Institute guidelines into an overall composite score for each participant. This overall composite score is also on a scale of 0-100, where higher numbers indicate better visual function. Composite score based on National Eye Institute guidelines.

Outcomes16

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYBest Spectacle-Corrected Visual Acuity6 monthsOne patient lost to followuplogMARMEAN
SECONDARYBest Spectacle-Corrected Visual Acuity3 and 12 monthslogMARMEAN
SECONDARYBest Spectacle-Corrected Visual Acuity24 MonthsLogMarMEAN
SECONDARYEndothelial Cell Count3, 6, 12 monthscells/mm^2MEAN
SECONDARYEndothelial Cell Count24 monthscells/mm^2MEAN
SECONDARYCorneal Higher-Order Aberrations3, 6, 12 monthsroot mean square in micrometersMEAN
SECONDARYCorneal Higher-Order Aberrations24 monthsroot mean square in micrometersMEAN
SECONDARYInterface Haze3, 6, 12 monthseyesNUMBER
SECONDARYInterface Haze24 monthseyesNUMBER
SECONDARYNational Eye Institute - Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ)Baseline, 12 months
For this analysis, all second eyes (enrolled eyes belonging to a patient that had enrolled their other eye and already had surgery on that eye as part of this study) were removed. For this reason the total number of eyes equals the total number of participants.
Composite scores on a scaleMEAN

Results by group102

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Best Spectacle-Corrected Visual AcuityUT-DSAEK0.22Standard Deviation 0.16logMAR
Best Spectacle-Corrected Visual AcuityDMEK0.05Standard Deviation 0.11logMAR
Best Spectacle-Corrected Visual AcuityUT-DSAEK3 Months0.24Standard Deviation 0.21logMAR
Best Spectacle-Corrected Visual AcuityDMEK3 Months0.11Standard Deviation 0.13logMAR
Best Spectacle-Corrected Visual AcuityUT-DSAEK12 Months0.16Standard Deviation 0.18logMAR
Best Spectacle-Corrected Visual AcuityDMEK12 Months0.04Standard Deviation 0.12logMAR
Best Spectacle-Corrected Visual AcuityUT-DSAEK0.15Standard Deviation 0.15LogMar
Best Spectacle-Corrected Visual AcuityDMEK0.09Standard Deviation 0.16LogMar
Endothelial Cell CountUT-DSAEK3 Months2114Standard Deviation 357cells/mm^2
Endothelial Cell CountDMEK3 Months2037Standard Deviation 495cells/mm^2

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDUT-DSAEK1925
Overall StudySTARTEDDMEK1925
Overall Study3-Month Follow-UpUT-DSAEK1925
Overall Study3-Month Follow-UpDMEK1925
Overall Study6-Month Follow-UpUT-DSAEK1925
Overall Study6-Month Follow-UpDMEK1824
Overall Study12-Month Follow-UpUT-DSAEK1925
Overall Study12-Month Follow-UpDMEK1925
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDUT-DSAEK1824
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDMEK1823

Adverse events30

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherGlaucoma (nonsurgical)Eye disordersUT-DSAEK225
otherGlaucoma (nonsurgical)Eye disordersDMEK225
otherGlaucoma (surgical)Eye disordersUT-DSAEK125
otherGlaucoma (surgical)Eye disordersDMEK125
otherGraft displacementEye disordersUT-DSAEK125
otherGraft displacementEye disordersDMEK025
otherGraft failureEye disordersUT-DSAEK125
otherGraft failureEye disordersDMEK125
otherGraft rejectionEye disordersUT-DSAEK025
otherGraft rejectionEye disordersDMEK025

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityUT-DSAEK025
Total, all-cause mortalityDMEK025
Total, other adverse eventsUT-DSAEK925
Total, other adverse eventsDMEK725
Total, serious adverse eventsUT-DSAEK025
Total, serious adverse eventsDMEK025

Papers10

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
18520497BACKGROUNDPubMed
19182768BACKGROUNDPubMed
21598430BACKGROUNDPubMed
21872938BACKGROUNDPubMed
22084160BACKGROUNDPubMed
22197439BACKGROUNDPubMed
23466268BACKGROUNDPubMed
24104929BACKGROUNDPubMed
29945801DERIVEDPubMed
31046075DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
UT-DSAEK vs DMEK: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
UT-DSAEK vs DMEK: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02373137

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02373137/results?page=2