ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02377921

Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate Sialic Acid in Patients With Glucosamine (UDP-N-acetyl)-2-epimerase Myopathy (GNEM) or Hereditary Inclusion Body Myopathy (HIBM)

NCT02377921, Phase 3, Completed, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc; results first posted 2018-07-09

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate Sialic Acid in Patients With Glucosamine (UDP-N-acetyl)-2-epimerase Myopathy (GNEM) or Hereditary Inclusion Body Myopathy (HIBM). Trials, record NCT02377921. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02377921

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate Sialic Acid in Patients With Glucosamine (UDP-N-acetyl)-2-epimerase Myopathy (GNEM) or Hereditary Inclusion Body Myopathy (HIBM)
NCT number
NCT02377921
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
89 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc
Conditions
Hereditary Inclusion Body Myopathy, Distal Myopathy With Rimmed Vacuoles, Distal Myopathy, Nonaka Type, GNE Myopathy
Interventions
aceneuramic acid extended-release (Ace-ER), Placebo
First posted
2015-03-04
Last updated
2019-06-27
Results first posted
2018-07-09

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in UEC Score (Total Force in kg) at Week 48Baseline, Week 48
Muscle strength based on the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) against a dynamometer was measured bilaterally in the following upper extremity muscle groups: gross grip, shoulder abductors, elbow flexors, and elbow extensors. The UEC is derived from the sum of the average of the right and left total force values (measured in kg).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Muscle Strength in the Knee Extensors at Week 48Baseline, Week 48Lower extremity muscle strength in the knee extensors was measured by dynamometry. Bilateral total force was defined as the average of the right and left force values (measured in kg).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in LEC Score (Total Force in kg) at Week 48Baseline, Week 48
Muscle strength based on MVIC against a dynamometer was measured bilaterally in the following lower extremity muscle groups: knee flexors, hip flexors, hip extensors, hip abductors and hip adductors. The LEC is derived from the sum of the average of the right and left total force values (measured in kg).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in GNEM FAS Mobility Domain Score at Week 48Baseline, Week 48
Lower extremity use and function was assessed using the Mobility domain of the GNEM-FAS instrument a disease-specific measure developed to assess the functional impact of changes in muscle strength on mobility (reflective of the lower extremities). This mobility score ranges from 0 to 40 with higher scores representing greater mobility.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Number of Lifts in the 30 Second Weighted Arm Lift Test at Week 48Baseline, Week 48
Upper extremity function was assessed using a weighted arm lift test performed bilaterally. The number of times the participant can raise a 1 kg weight above the head in a 30-second period was recorded.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Number of Stands in the Sit to Stand Test at Week 48Baseline, Week 48Lower extremity function was assessed using a sit-to-stand test. The number of times the participant can rise from a seated to a standing position in a 30-second period was recorded.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Meters Walked in the 6MWT at Week 48Baseline, Week 48The total distance walked (meters) in a 6-minute period was measured.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Meters Walked in the 6MWT at Week 48Baseline, Week 48The total distance walked (meters) in a 6-minute period was measured, and the percent predicted distance based on normative data for age and gender was estimated.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in GNEM FAS Upper Extremity Domain Score at Week 48Baseline, Week 48
Upper extremity use and function was assessed using the Mobility domain of the GNEM-FAS instrument a disease-specific measure developed to assess the functional impact of changes in muscle strength on mobility (reflective of the upper extremities). This mobility score ranges from 0 to 40 with higher scores representing greater mobility.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in UEC Score (Total Force in kg) at Week 48Baseline, Week 48Primary Analysis Set: participants who had a Baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measurement.kgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Muscle Strength in the Knee Extensors at Week 48Baseline, Week 48Primary Analysis Set: participants who had a Baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measurement.kgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in LEC Score (Total Force in kg) at Week 48Baseline, Week 48Primary Analysis Set: participants who had a Baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measurement.kgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in GNEM FAS Mobility Domain Score at Week 48Baseline, Week 48Primary Analysis Set: participants who had a Baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measurement.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Number of Lifts in the 30 Second Weighted Arm Lift Test at Week 48Baseline, Week 48Primary Analysis Set: participants who had a Baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measurement.arm liftsLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Number of Stands in the Sit to Stand Test at Week 48Baseline, Week 48Primary Analysis Set: participants who had a Baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measurement.standsLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Meters Walked in the 6MWT at Week 48Baseline, Week 48Primary Analysis Set: participants who had a Baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measurement.metersLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Percent Predicted Meters Walked in the 6MWT at Week 48Baseline, Week 48Primary Analysis Set: participants who had a Baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measurement.percentage of predicted metersLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in GNEM FAS Upper Extremity Domain Score at Week 48Baseline, Week 48Primary Analysis Set: participants who had a Baseline and at least 1 postbaseline measurement.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group18

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in UEC Score (Total Force in kg) at Week 48Ace-ER 6 g/Day-2.2595% Confidence Interval -3.77 to -0.74kg
Change From Baseline in UEC Score (Total Force in kg) at Week 48Placebo-2.9995% Confidence Interval -4.69 to -1.28kg
Change From Baseline in Muscle Strength in the Knee Extensors at Week 48Ace-ER 6 g/Day0.0595% Confidence Interval -1.19 to 1.29kg
Change From Baseline in Muscle Strength in the Knee Extensors at Week 48Placebo0.4595% Confidence Interval -1.20 to 2.10kg
Change From Baseline in LEC Score (Total Force in kg) at Week 48Ace-ER 6 g/Day-1.9295% Confidence Interval -4.49 to 0.65kg
Change From Baseline in LEC Score (Total Force in kg) at Week 48Placebo-0.4495% Confidence Interval -3.96 to 3.09kg
Change From Baseline in GNEM FAS Mobility Domain Score at Week 48Ace-ER 6 g/Day-2.4995% Confidence Interval -3.56 to -1.42units on a scale
Change From Baseline in GNEM FAS Mobility Domain Score at Week 48Placebo-1.7795% Confidence Interval -2.59 to -0.95units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Number of Lifts in the 30 Second Weighted Arm Lift Test at Week 48Ace-ER 6 g/Day0.0395% Confidence Interval -2.19 to 2.26arm lifts
Change From Baseline in Number of Lifts in the 30 Second Weighted Arm Lift Test at Week 48Placebo2.7995% Confidence Interval 0.21 to 5.38arm lifts

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAce-ER 6 g/Day45
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo44
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAce-ER 6 g/Day44
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo43
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAce-ER 6 g/Day1
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo1

Adverse events66

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersAce-ER 6 g/Day445
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo444
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersAce-ER 6 g/Day1045
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo344
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersAce-ER 6 g/Day845
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo644
otherFlatulenceGastrointestinal disordersAce-ER 6 g/Day645
otherFlatulenceGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo544
otherFrequent bowel movementsGastrointestinal disordersAce-ER 6 g/Day345
otherFrequent bowel movementsGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo044

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAce-ER 6 g/Day045
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo044
Total, other adverse eventsAce-ER 6 g/Day3845
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo3044
Total, serious adverse eventsAce-ER 6 g/Day245
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo144

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
31036580RESULTPubMed
33874971DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Ace-ER 6 g/Day vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Ace-ER 6 g/Day vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02377921

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02377921/events?page=2