ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02384460

ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa

NCT02384460, Phase 3, Completed, Scioderm, Inc.; results first posted 2018-10-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa. Trials, record NCT02384460. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02384460

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
ESSENCE Study: Efficacy and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa
NCT number
NCT02384460
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
169 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Scioderm, Inc.
Conditions
Epidermolysis Bullosa
Interventions
SD-101-6.0 cream, Placebo (SD-101-0.0) cream
First posted
2015-03-10
Last updated
2020-04-09
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2014-002288-14
Results first posted
2018-10-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryTime To Complete Target Wound Closure Within 3 MonthsFrom baseline to Month 3 visit
Target wounds were monitored at each study visit for complete closure, defined as skin re-epithelialization without drainage. Time to target wound closure was measured from the date of the first administration of the study drug to the date of target wound closure. Participants were censored if they did not have a response within 3 months, or withdrew earlier before the confirmation of their target wound closing. This primary end point displays the mean time to complete target wound closure, analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach.
PrimaryThe Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Complete Closure Of Their Target Wound Within 3 MonthsFrom baseline to Month 3 visit
Target wounds were monitored at each study visit for complete closure, defined as skin re-epithelialization without drainage. Participants were considered responders if they experienced complete wound closure at the Week 2 or Months 1, 2, or 3 visits. If a target wound was documented to have closed at a given visit, it was considered closed at all subsequent visits. This primary end point displays the percentage of participants from the ITT population who had complete target wound closure by the end of the study period (that is, 3 months). Analysis was performed on participants with post-baseline wound closure data.
SecondaryPercentage Of Participants Experiencing Complete Closure Of Their Target Wound At Month 1 And Month 2 VisitsFrom baseline to Month 1 and Month 2 visits
Target wounds were monitored at each study visit for complete closure, defined as skin re-epithelialization without drainage. The percentage of participants who completed target wound closure at the Month 1 and Month 2 study visits is displayed. If a target wound was documented to have closed at a given visit, it was considered closed at all subsequent visits.
SecondaryChange From Baseline In Body Surface Area Index (BSAI) Of Lesional Skin At Month 3 VisitBaseline, Month 3 visit
Lesional skin was defined as areas that contained any of the following: blisters, erosions, ulcerations, scabbing, bullae, or eschars, as well as areas that were weeping, sloughing, oozing, crusted, or denuded. BSAI was calculated as a percentage, ranging from 0% to 100%, of affected body surface area, recorded for each defined body region (that is, head/neck, upper limbs, trunk \[includes groin\], and lower limbs), multiplied by the weighting factor, then summed for all body regions.
SecondaryChange From Baseline In BSAI Of Total Body Wound Burden At Month 3 VisitBaseline, Month 3 visit
Total body wound burden was calculated using BSAI. A wound defined as an open area on the skin (that is, epidermal covering disrupted). BSAI was calculated as a percentage, ranging from 0% to 100%, of affected body surface area, recorded for each defined body region (that is, head/neck, upper limbs, lower limbs, trunk \[includes groin\]), and multiplied by the weighting factor, then summed for all body regions.
SecondaryChange From Baseline In Itching Score At Day 7Baseline, Day 7
Itching was assessed using the 5-point Itch Man Pruritus Assessment Tool. For participants up to 5 years of age, itching was assessed using caretaker's response and participants 6 years of age and older self-reported their itching assessments based on the following scores: 0=Comfortable, no itch; 1=itches a little, does not interfere with activity; 2=itches more, sometimes interferes with activity; 3=itches a lot, difficult to be still, concentrate; 4=itches most terribly, impossible to sit still or concentrate. Itching scores were categorized into 3 groups based on improvement; Improved or No Itching, Not Improved, and Missing. An itching score reduction from baseline greater than or equal to 1 point on the scale was classed as improved.
SecondaryChange From Baseline In Pain Score At Day 7Baseline, Day 7
Change in pain assessed at Day 7 compared to baseline was measured using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) behavioral scale for participants 1 month to 3 years of age. Each of the 5 FLACC categories was scored from 0 to 2, which resulted in a total score between 0 and 10 with 0=Relaxed and comfortable, 1 to 3=Mild discomfort, 4 to 6=Moderate pain, and 7 to 10=Severe discomfort/pain. For participants 4 years of age and older, the "Wong Faces Pain Scale" was used. This scale shows a series of faces ranging from a happy face at 0, which represents "no hurt," to a crying face at 10, which represents "hurts worst". Pain scores were categorized into 3 groups based on improvement: Improved or No Pain, Not Improved, and Missing. A pain score reduction from baseline greater than or equal to 2 points on the scale was classed as improved.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYTime To Complete Target Wound Closure Within 3 MonthsFrom baseline to Month 3 visitITT population with post-baseline wound closure data and whose target wound had closed within 3 months.daysMEAN
PRIMARYThe Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Complete Closure Of Their Target Wound Within 3 MonthsFrom baseline to Month 3 visitITT population with post-baseline wound closure data and whose target wound had closed within 3 months.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage Of Participants Experiencing Complete Closure Of Their Target Wound At Month 1 And Month 2 VisitsFrom baseline to Month 1 and Month 2 visitsAnalysis was performed on participants from the ITT population with post-baseline wound closure data.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline In Body Surface Area Index (BSAI) Of Lesional Skin At Month 3 VisitBaseline, Month 3 visitAnalysis was performed on the ITT population. The ITT population included all randomized participants.Percentage change in BSAILEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline In BSAI Of Total Body Wound Burden At Month 3 VisitBaseline, Month 3 visitAnalysis was performed on the ITT population. The ITT population included all randomized participants.Percentage change in BSAILEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline In Itching Score At Day 7Baseline, Day 7Analysis was performed on the ITT population. The ITT population included all randomized participants.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline In Pain Score At Day 7Baseline, Day 7Analysis was performed on the ITT population. The ITT population included all randomized participants.units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group16

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Time To Complete Target Wound Closure Within 3 MonthsSD-101-6.0 Cream41.6Standard Deviation 25.50days
Time To Complete Target Wound Closure Within 3 MonthsPlacebo (SD-101-0.0) Cream53.6Standard Deviation 28.59days
The Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Complete Closure Of Their Target Wound Within 3 MonthsSD-101-6.0 Cream49.4percentage of participants
The Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Complete Closure Of Their Target Wound Within 3 MonthsPlacebo (SD-101-0.0) Cream53.6percentage of participants
Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Complete Closure Of Their Target Wound At Month 1 And Month 2 VisitsSD-101-6.0 CreamMonth 131.6percentage of participants
Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Complete Closure Of Their Target Wound At Month 1 And Month 2 VisitsPlacebo (SD-101-0.0) CreamMonth 122.6percentage of participants
Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Complete Closure Of Their Target Wound At Month 1 And Month 2 VisitsSD-101-6.0 CreamMonth 243.0percentage of participants
Percentage Of Participants Experiencing Complete Closure Of Their Target Wound At Month 1 And Month 2 VisitsPlacebo (SD-101-0.0) CreamMonth 242.9percentage of participants
Change From Baseline In Body Surface Area Index (BSAI) Of Lesional Skin At Month 3 VisitSD-101-6.0 Cream-4.637Standard Error 1.404Percentage change in BSAI
Change From Baseline In Body Surface Area Index (BSAI) Of Lesional Skin At Month 3 VisitPlacebo (SD-101-0.0) Cream-5.319Standard Error 1.354Percentage change in BSAI

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDSD-101-6.0 Cream82
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo (SD-101-0.0) Cream87
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugSD-101-6.0 Cream82
Overall StudyReceived at Least 1 Dose of Study DrugPlacebo (SD-101-0.0) Cream87
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDSD-101-6.0 Cream75
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo (SD-101-0.0) Cream80
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDSD-101-6.0 Cream7
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo (SD-101-0.0) Cream7

Adverse events74

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSD-101-6.0 Cream382
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo (SD-101-0.0) Cream287
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersSD-101-6.0 Cream282
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo (SD-101-0.0) Cream287
otherPainGeneral disordersSD-101-6.0 Cream182
otherPainGeneral disordersPlacebo (SD-101-0.0) Cream487
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersSD-101-6.0 Cream582
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersPlacebo (SD-101-0.0) Cream987
otherEar infectionInfections and infestationsSD-101-6.0 Cream182
otherEar infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo (SD-101-0.0) Cream487

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalitySD-101-6.0 Cream082
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo (SD-101-0.0) Cream187
Total, other adverse eventsSD-101-6.0 Cream4982
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo (SD-101-0.0) Cream4687
Total, serious adverse eventsSD-101-6.0 Cream482
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo (SD-101-0.0) Cream887

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
32576219DERIVEDPubMed
32693833DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
SD-101-6.0 Cream vs Placebo (SD-101-0.0) Cream: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
SD-101-6.0 Cream vs Placebo (SD-101-0.0) Cream: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02384460

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02384460/events?page=2