ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02391961

Study and Treatment of Visual Dysfunction and Motor Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis

NCT02391961, Phase 2, Completed, VA Office of Research and Development; results first posted 2020-09-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study and Treatment of Visual Dysfunction and Motor Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis. Trials, record NCT02391961. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02391961

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study and Treatment of Visual Dysfunction and Motor Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis
NCT number
NCT02391961
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
23 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Conditions
Multiple Sclerosis, Internuclear Ophthalmoplegia, Fatigue
Interventions
Dalfampridine, Placebo
First posted
2015-03-18
Last updated
2020-09-04
Results first posted
2020-09-04

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPulse Size Ratio (PSR): Abducting/Adducting Eye Ratio for Saccadic Peak Velocity.Average PSR values were taken on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks), on each visit before (baseline) and three hours after taking the study pill.
For each saccade made by the subject, the ratio of the maximum velocity (deg/sec) of the eye moving away from the nose and of the eye moving towards the nose was calculated. Subjects' horizontal saccades were recorded for 10 minutes, and an average of PSR for all saccades recorded was taken.
PrimaryPulse Time Delay (PTD): Time Difference Between Onset of the Saccade in the Adducting Eye and Onset of the Saccade in the Abducting Eye.Average PTD values were taken on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks), on each visit before (baseline) and three hours after taking the study pill.
For each saccade made by the subject, we calculated the difference (in sec) between the onset (based on a velocity threshold) of the movement in the adducting eye (the eye moving towards the nose) and the onset of the movement in the abducting eye (the eye moving away from the nose). Subjects' horizontal saccades were recorded for 10 minutes, and an average of PTD for all saccades recorded was taken.
SecondaryReading Acuity (RA)Average RA values were taken on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks), on each visit before (baseline) and three hours after taking the study pill.MNREAD acuity charts for reading acuity (RA)
SecondaryMaximum Reading Speed (MRS)Average MRS values were taken on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks), on each visit before (baseline) and three hours after taking the study pill.MNREAD acuity charts for reading speed (maximum reading speed, MRS)
SecondaryGait AssessmentMeasures were taken on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks), on each visit before (baseline) and three hours after taking the study pill.25-foot Walk Test (FWT)
SecondaryNational Eye Institute (NEI) Visual Function Questionnaire 25 (VFQ-25)VFQ25 was administered on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks).We used a validated questionnaire to assess visual disability, the National Eye Institute (NEI) Visual Function Questionnaire 25. Min value 0; Max value 100; Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Secondary10-Item Neuro-Ophthalmic Supplement (NOS)10-Item NOS was administered on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks).We used a validated questionnaire to assess visual disability, the 10-Item Neuro-Ophthalmic Supplement. Min value 0; Max value 100; Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPulse Size Ratio (PSR): Abducting/Adducting Eye Ratio for Saccadic Peak Velocity.Average PSR values were taken on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks), on each visit before (baseline) and three hours after taking the study pill.
Some participants withdrew after visit 1, visit 2 or 3. (1) more participant was not included in the final analysis as missing a datapoint (baseline data at Visit 2). Thus, the number above (12) is the number of participants who completed the full protocol from visit 1 to visit 4.
ratioMEAN
PRIMARYPulse Time Delay (PTD): Time Difference Between Onset of the Saccade in the Adducting Eye and Onset of the Saccade in the Abducting Eye.Average PTD values were taken on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks), on each visit before (baseline) and three hours after taking the study pill.
Some participants withdrew after visit 1, visit 2 or 3. (1) more participant was not included in the final analysis as missing a datapoint (baseline data at Visit 2). Thus, the number above (12) is the number of participants who completed the full protocol from visit 1 to visit 4.
secondsMEAN
SECONDARYReading Acuity (RA)Average RA values were taken on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks), on each visit before (baseline) and three hours after taking the study pill.logMAR for RAMEAN
SECONDARYMaximum Reading Speed (MRS)Average MRS values were taken on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks), on each visit before (baseline) and three hours after taking the study pill.words per minuteMEAN
SECONDARYGait AssessmentMeasures were taken on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks), on each visit before (baseline) and three hours after taking the study pill.secondsMEAN
SECONDARYNational Eye Institute (NEI) Visual Function Questionnaire 25 (VFQ-25)VFQ25 was administered on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks).score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARY10-Item Neuro-Ophthalmic Supplement (NOS)10-Item NOS was administered on day of visit 2 (after 4 weeks) and on day of visit 4 (after 10 weeks).score on a scaleMEAN

Results by group24

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Pulse Size Ratio (PSR): Abducting/Adducting Eye Ratio for Saccadic Peak Velocity.Dalfampridineaverage pulse size ratio baseline1.914Standard Deviation 0.454ratio
Pulse Size Ratio (PSR): Abducting/Adducting Eye Ratio for Saccadic Peak Velocity.Placeboaverage pulse size ratio baseline1.937Standard Deviation 0.553ratio
Pulse Size Ratio (PSR): Abducting/Adducting Eye Ratio for Saccadic Peak Velocity.Dalfampridineaverage pulse size ratio after 3 hours1.805Standard Deviation 0.451ratio
Pulse Size Ratio (PSR): Abducting/Adducting Eye Ratio for Saccadic Peak Velocity.Placeboaverage pulse size ratio after 3 hours1.898Standard Deviation 0.508ratio
Pulse Time Delay (PTD): Time Difference Between Onset of the Saccade in the Adducting Eye and Onset of the Saccade in the Abducting Eye.DalfampridineAverage PTD at baseline0.007Standard Deviation 0.005seconds
Pulse Time Delay (PTD): Time Difference Between Onset of the Saccade in the Adducting Eye and Onset of the Saccade in the Abducting Eye.PlaceboAverage PTD at baseline0.007Standard Deviation 0.005seconds
Pulse Time Delay (PTD): Time Difference Between Onset of the Saccade in the Adducting Eye and Onset of the Saccade in the Abducting Eye.DalfampridineAverage PTD after 3 hours0.008Standard Deviation 0.004seconds
Pulse Time Delay (PTD): Time Difference Between Onset of the Saccade in the Adducting Eye and Onset of the Saccade in the Abducting Eye.PlaceboAverage PTD after 3 hours0.008Standard Deviation 0.004seconds
Reading Acuity (RA)DalfampridineRA at baseline0.111Standard Deviation 0.117logMAR for RA
Reading Acuity (RA)PlaceboRA at baseline0.108Standard Deviation 0.138logMAR for RA

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
First Intervention (4 Weeks)STARTEDDalfampridine, Then Placebo10
First Intervention (4 Weeks)STARTEDPlacebo, Then Dalfampridine9
First Intervention (4 Weeks)COMPLETEDDalfampridine, Then Placebo8
First Intervention (4 Weeks)COMPLETEDPlacebo, Then Dalfampridine9
First Intervention (4 Weeks)NOT COMPLETEDDalfampridine, Then Placebo2
First Intervention (4 Weeks)NOT COMPLETEDPlacebo, Then Dalfampridine0
Washout (2 Weeks)STARTEDDalfampridine, Then Placebo8
Washout (2 Weeks)STARTEDPlacebo, Then Dalfampridine9
Washout (2 Weeks)COMPLETEDDalfampridine, Then Placebo7
Washout (2 Weeks)COMPLETEDPlacebo, Then Dalfampridine8

Adverse events4

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherknown mild side effect of medicationGastrointestinal disordersDalfampridine1171
otherknown mild side effect of medicationGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo0150
otherknown side effect of medicationNervous system disordersDalfampridine1171
otherknown side effect of medicationNervous system disordersPlacebo0150

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDalfampridine017
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo015
Total, other adverse eventsDalfampridine217
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo015
Total, serious adverse eventsDalfampridine017
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo015

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
29467711BACKGROUND

Source PubMed

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
IK2RX001180Study and Treatment of Visual Dysfunction and Motor Fatigue in Multiple SclerosisSERRA, ALESSANDROLOUIS STOKES CLEVELAND VA MEDICAL CENTERVeterans Affairs2015 to 2020

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Dalfampridine vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Dalfampridine vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02391961

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02391961/results?page=2