ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02413008

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryVariation in Serum Levels of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)from baseline to 12 weeks of treatmentChange from Baseline (mean screening-baseline) to Week 12 in Serum Levels of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) compare to natural physiological variability (screening-baseline variation)
SecondaryVariation in Serum Levels of FSH at Week 1, Week 3 and Week 8Change from baseline to week 1, week 3 and week 8
Change from Baseline (mean screening-baseline) to Week 1, Week 3 and Week 8 in Serum Levels of Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) compare to natural physiological variability ( screening-baseline variation)
SecondaryVariation in Serum Levels of Luteinizing Hormone (LH)Change from baseline to week 1, week 3, week 8 and week 12Change from (mean screening-baseline) in plasma levels of LH to Week 1, Week 3, Week 8 and Week 12 in Serum Levels of LH compare to natural physiological variability ( screening-baseline variation)
SecondaryVariation in Plasma Levels of EstriolChange from baseline to week 1, week 3, week 8 and week 12Change in plasma levels of estriol at weeks 1, 3, 8 and 12 compared to baseline
SecondaryVariation in Plasma Levels of EstradiolChange from baseline to week 1, week 3, week 8 and week 12Change in plasma levels of estradiol at weeks 1, 3, 8 and 12 compared to baseline.
SecondaryVariation in Plasma Levels of EstronaChange from baseline to week 1, week 3, week 8 and week 12Change in plasma levels of estrona at weeks 1, 3, 8 and 12 compared to baseline.
SecondaryChanges in Vaginal pH Between Baseline and Week 3 and Week 12week 3 and week 12 vs baselineMeasurement of vaginal pH on the vaginal secretion using a reactive strip and compare pH value between baseline and the diferent timepoints
SecondaryChanges in Dyspareuniaweek 3 and week 12 vs baseline
Changes in dyspareunia from baseline to week 3 and week 12 Each symptom will be scored in a numeric scale from 0 to 3, as shown 0 Absence. The symptom is not present 1. The symptom is of mild intensity, without interfering in the patient's activity 2. The symptom is of moderate intensity, causing obvious discomfort to the patient 3. The symptom is stated as very irritating and severe in intensity
SecondaryChange in Pruritus or Itching From Baseline to Week 3 and Week 12Change from baseline to week 3 and week 12
Change in pruritus or itching from baseline to week 3 and week 12 Each symptom will be scored in a numeric scale from 0 to 3, as shown below: 0 Absence. The symptom is not present 1. The symptom is of mild intensity, without interfering in the patient's activity 2. The symptom is of moderate intensity, causing obvious discomfort to the patient 3. The symptom is stated as very irritating and severe in intensity
SecondaryChanges in Vaginal Drynessweek 3 and week 12 vs baseline
Change in vaginal dryness puntuation score from baseline to w3 and w12 Each symptom will be scored in a numeric scale from 0 to 3, as shown below: 0 Absence. The symptom is not present 1. The symptom is of mild intensity, without interfering in the patient's activity 2. The symptom is of moderate intensity, causing obvious discomfort to the patient 3. The symptom is stated as very irritating and severe in intensity
SecondaryChanges in Total Score of Symptoms of Vaginal Atrophyweek 3 and week 12 vs baseline
Changes in Symptoms of vaginal atrophy (vaginal dryness, dyspareunia and pruritus) at week 3 and week 12 vs baseline. Each symptom will be scored in a numeric scale from 0 to 3, as shown below: 0 Absence. The symptom is not present 1. The symptom is of mild intensity, without interfering in the patient's activity 2. The symptom is of moderate intensity, causing obvious discomfort to the patient 3. The symptom is stated as very irritating and severe in intensity A Global Symptoms Score will be calculated by summing the intensities of all the three symptoms of vaginal atrophy in a certain time point, thus ranging between 0 and 9.
SecondaryChanges in Dryness of the Mucosaweek 3 and week 12 vs baseline
It will be scored by the investigator on a numerical scale in accordance with their presence and degree of severity as follows: 0 Absence. The sign is not present. 1. The sign is present and is considered a mild alteration 2. The sign is present and is considered a moderate alteration 3. The sign is present and is considered a severe alteration
SecondaryChanges in Fragility of the Mucosa [Time Frame: Week 3 and Week 12 vs Baseline]from baseline to week 3 and 12
It will be scored by the investigator on a numerical scale in accordance with their presence and degree of severity as follows: 0 Absence. The sign is not present. 1. The sign is present and is considered a mild alteration 2. The sign is present and is considered a moderate alteration 3. The sign is present and is considered a severe alteration
SecondaryChanges in Vaginal Mucosa With Flattening of Folds or Thinningweek 3 and week 12 vs baseline
It will be scored by the investigator on a numerical scale in accordance with their presence and degree of severity as follows: 0 Absence. The sign is not present. 1. The sign is present and is considered a mild alteration 2. The sign is present and is considered a moderate alteration 3. The sign is present and is considered a severe alteration
SecondaryChanges in Total Score of Signs of Vaginal Atrophy Between Week 3 and Week 12 to Baselineweek 3 and week 12 vs baseline
The signs evaluated Will be the following: vaginal mucosa with flattening of folds or thinning, dryness of the mucosa and Fragility of the mucosa. It will be scored by the investigator on a numerical scale in accordance with their presence and degree of severity as follows: 0 Absence. The sign is not present. 1. The sign is present and is considered a mild alteration 2. The sign is present and is considered a moderate alteration 3. The sign is present and is considered a severe alteration A Total Signs Score will be calculated by summing the intensities of all the three signs of vaginal atrophy in a certain time point, thus ranging between 0 and 9.
SecondaryChanges in Vaginal Maturation Valueweek 3 and week 12 vs baseline
Vaginal cytology sample to evaluate the vaginal Maturation Value. For the cytologic evaluation, the number of parabasal, intermediate and superficial cells will be calculated in duplicate on 100 consecutive cells of vaginal cytology. The average of the two percentages obtained for each cell type will be calculated, which will serve to determine the maturation value (MV) based on the following formula: 0.2 x (% parabasal) + 0.6 x (% intermediate) + 1.0 x (% superficial).

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02413008/registered