ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02424539

A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Sprays (FFNS) 55 Microgram (mcg) and 110 mcg in Chinese Pediatric Subjects With Allergic Rhinitis (AR)

NCT02424539, Phase 4, Completed, GlaxoSmithKline; results first posted 2019-02-06

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Sprays (FFNS) 55 Microgram (mcg) and 110 mcg in Chinese Pediatric Subjects With Allergic Rhinitis (AR). Trials, record NCT02424539. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02424539

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Sprays (FFNS) 55 Microgram (mcg) and 110 mcg in Chinese Pediatric Subjects With Allergic Rhinitis (AR)
NCT number
NCT02424539
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
358 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Conditions
Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial and Seasonal, Rhinitis, Allergic
Interventions
FFNS, Placebo
First posted
2015-04-23
Last updated
2021-01-11
Results first posted
2019-02-06

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes19

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline in Daily, Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (rTNSS) Over the First 2 Weeks Treatment PeriodBaseline and up to Week 2
TNSS is a composite score of the four components (nasal congestion, itching, rhinorrhea and sneezing) with a total score of 0 to 12. A higher score means a worse nasal symptom. The score of each component ranges from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptoms). Participants were instructed to provide scores in a reflective manner using their diary. The daily rTNSS was the average of the morning rTNSS and evening rTNSS assessments. The daily scores were averaged to calculate the overall/total score. The morning reflective assessment was performed prior to administering the morning dose. The evening reflective assessment was performed approximately 12 hours after dosing but before bedtime. Baseline scores obtained over "4 days prior to randomization" were average of the last 8 rTNSS assessments (4 AM assessments, 4 PM assessments) over the consecutive four 24-hours periods prior to randomization. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Showing Response to the Therapy After the First 2 Weeks Treatment on a 7-point Categorical ScaleWeek 2
Response was defined as effectiveness of study medication for relieving allergic rhinitis symptoms over the entire treatment period. Overall response to therapy was evaluated using the 7-point categorical scale ranging from 1 (significantly improved) to 7 (significantly worse). Number of participants showing response to therapy after the first 2 weeks have been presented. Only those participants with response to therapy over the entire treatment period were included in the analysis.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline of Intranasal Finding Score by Anterior Rhinoscopy at the First 2 WeeksBaseline and up to Week 2
The nasal concha mucosa symptoms score was used to evaluate change in anterior rhinoscopy. It is a composite score of four components including swelling of inferior nasal concha mucosa, color of inferior nasal concha mucosa, watery secretion volume and description of rhinorrhea. Severity of each of the component was assessed using the scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe). The 4 components were averaged to obtain a total score which ranges from 0 to 12 where a higher score means a worse nasal symptom. Baseline was defined as 4 days prior to randomization, including the morning symptom assessment on the randomization date. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were included in the analysis.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline Over the First 2 Weeks in the Daily, Reflective Total Ocular Symptoms Score (rTOSS)Baseline and up to Week 2
TOSS is a composite score of the three components (eye itching and burning, eye watering and eye redness) with a total score of 0 to 9. Higher score means a worse symptom. The score of each component ranges from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptoms). The daily scores were averaged to calculate the overall/total score. Participants were instructed to provide scores and document their symptoms in a reflective manner twice daily using their diary at the same time of reflective nasal symptoms assessment. Baseline scores obtained over "4 days prior to randomization" were average of the last 8 rTNSS assessments (4 AM assessments, 4 PM assessments) over the consecutive four 24-hours periods prior to randomization. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Rescue Loratadine Use (Mean Rescue-free Days) Over the First 2 Weeks Treatment PeriodBaseline and up to Week 2
Loratadine was provided as a rescue medication to use if needed throughout the study treatment period. Participants were asked to document loratadine rescue medication use on the daily treatment diary. Baseline was defined as 4 days prior to randomization, including the morning symptom assessment on the randomization date. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Daily rTNSS Over the 4 Weeks Treatment PeriodBaseline and up to Week 4
TNSS is a composite score of the four components (nasal congestion, itching, rhinorrhea and sneezing) with a total score of 0 to 12. A higher score means a worse nasal symptom. The score of each component ranges from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptoms). Participants were instructed to provide scores in a reflective manner using their diary. The daily rTNSS was the average of the morning rTNSS and evening rTNSS assessments. The daily scores were averaged to calculate the overall/total score. The morning reflective assessment was performed prior to administering the morning dose. The evening reflective assessment was performed approximately 12 hours after dosing but before bedtime. Baseline scores obtained over "4 days prior to randomization" were average of the last 8 rTNSS assessments (4 AM assessments, 4 PM assessments) over the consecutive four 24-hours periods prior to randomization. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Showing Response to the Therapy After 4 Weeks Treatment on a 7-point Categorical ScaleWeek 4
Response was defined as effectiveness of study medication for relieving allergic rhinitis symptoms over the entire treatment period. Overall response to therapy was evaluated using the 7-point categorical scale ranging from 1 (significantly improved) to 7 (significantly worse). Number of participants showing response to therapy after the first 4 weeks have been presented. Only those participants with response to therapy over the entire treatment period were included in the analysis.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline of Intranasal Finding Score by Anterior Rhinoscopy at the First 4 WeeksBaseline and up to Week 4
The nasal concha mucosa symptoms score was used to evaluate change in anterior rhinoscopy. It is a composite score of four components including swelling of inferior nasal concha mucosa, color of inferior nasal concha mucosa, watery secretion volume and description of rhinorrhea. Severity of each of the component was assessed using the scale ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe). The 4 components were averaged to obtain a total score which ranges from 0 to 12 where a higher score means a worse nasal symptom. Baseline was defined as 4 days prior to randomization, including the morning symptom assessment on the randomization date. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Only those participants with data available at the specified time points were included in the analysis.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in the Daily rTOSS Over the 4 Weeks Treatment PeriodBaseline and up to Week 4
TOSS is a composite score of the three components (eye itching and burning, eye watering and eye redness) with a total score of 0 to 9. Higher score means a worse symptom. The score of each component ranges from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (severe symptoms). The daily scores were averaged to calculate the overall/total score. Participants were instructed to provide scores and document their symptoms in a reflective manner twice daily using their diary at the same time of reflective nasal symptoms assessment. Baseline scores obtained over "4 days prior to randomization" were average of the last 8 rTNSS assessments (4 AM assessments, 4 PM assessments) over the consecutive four 24-hours periods prior to randomization. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Rescue Loratadine Use (Mean Rescue-free Days) Over the First 4 Weeks Treatment PeriodBaseline and up to Week 4
Loratadine was provided as a rescue medication to use if needed throughout the study treatment period. Participants were asked to document loratadine rescue medication use on the daily treatment diary. Baseline was defined as 4 days prior to randomization, including the morning symptom assessment on the randomization date. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.

Outcomes19

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYMean Change From Baseline in Daily, Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (rTNSS) Over the First 2 Weeks Treatment PeriodBaseline and up to Week 2Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Population comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.Scores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Showing Response to the Therapy After the First 2 Weeks Treatment on a 7-point Categorical ScaleWeek 2ITT PopulationParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline of Intranasal Finding Score by Anterior Rhinoscopy at the First 2 WeeksBaseline and up to Week 2ITT PopulationScores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline Over the First 2 Weeks in the Daily, Reflective Total Ocular Symptoms Score (rTOSS)Baseline and up to Week 2ITT PopulationScores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Rescue Loratadine Use (Mean Rescue-free Days) Over the First 2 Weeks Treatment PeriodBaseline and up to Week 2ITT PopulationDaysLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Daily rTNSS Over the 4 Weeks Treatment PeriodBaseline and up to Week 4ITT PopulationScores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Showing Response to the Therapy After 4 Weeks Treatment on a 7-point Categorical ScaleWeek 4ITT PopulationParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline of Intranasal Finding Score by Anterior Rhinoscopy at the First 4 WeeksBaseline and up to Week 4ITT PopulationScores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in the Daily rTOSS Over the 4 Weeks Treatment PeriodBaseline and up to Week 4ITT PopulationScores on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in Rescue Loratadine Use (Mean Rescue-free Days) Over the First 4 Weeks Treatment PeriodBaseline and up to Week 4ITT PopulationDaysLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group297

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Mean Change From Baseline in Daily, Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (rTNSS) Over the First 2 Weeks Treatment PeriodPlacebo-1.95Standard Error 0.16Scores on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Daily, Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (rTNSS) Over the First 2 Weeks Treatment PeriodFF 55 µg QD-3.18Standard Error 0.16Scores on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Daily, Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (rTNSS) Over the First 2 Weeks Treatment PeriodFF 110 µg QD-3.28Standard Error 0.16Scores on a scale
Number of Participants Showing Response to the Therapy After the First 2 Weeks Treatment on a 7-point Categorical ScalePlaceboSignificantly improved13Participants
Number of Participants Showing Response to the Therapy After the First 2 Weeks Treatment on a 7-point Categorical ScaleFF 55 µg QDSignificantly improved38Participants
Number of Participants Showing Response to the Therapy After the First 2 Weeks Treatment on a 7-point Categorical ScaleFF 110 µg QDSignificantly improved51Participants
Number of Participants Showing Response to the Therapy After the First 2 Weeks Treatment on a 7-point Categorical ScalePlaceboModerately improved30Participants
Number of Participants Showing Response to the Therapy After the First 2 Weeks Treatment on a 7-point Categorical ScaleFF 55 µg QDModerately improved48Participants
Number of Participants Showing Response to the Therapy After the First 2 Weeks Treatment on a 7-point Categorical ScaleFF 110 µg QDModerately improved33Participants
Number of Participants Showing Response to the Therapy After the First 2 Weeks Treatment on a 7-point Categorical ScalePlaceboMildly improved45Participants

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo120
Overall StudySTARTEDFF 55 µg QD119
Overall StudySTARTEDFF 110 µg QD119
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo106
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDFF 55 µg QD111
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDFF 110 µg QD111
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo14
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDFF 55 µg QD8
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDFF 110 µg QD8

Adverse events240

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo15120
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsFF 55 µg QD26119
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsFF 110 µg QD19119
otherSinusitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo1120
otherSinusitisInfections and infestationsFF 55 µg QD4119
otherSinusitisInfections and infestationsFF 110 µg QD1119
otherTonsillitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo1120
otherTonsillitisInfections and infestationsFF 55 µg QD2119
otherTonsillitisInfections and infestationsFF 110 µg QD2119
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo2120

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo0120
Total, all-cause mortalityFF 55 µg QD0119
Total, all-cause mortalityFF 110 µg QD0119
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo51120
Total, other adverse eventsFF 55 µg QD52119
Total, other adverse eventsFF 110 µg QD65119
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo0120
Total, serious adverse eventsFF 55 µg QD0119
Total, serious adverse eventsFF 110 µg QD1119

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
33007780BACKGROUND

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02424539

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02424539/results?page=2