ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02424734

Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Ceftaroline in Paediatrics With Late-Onset Sepsis

NCT02424734, Phase 2, Terminated, Pfizer; results first posted 2018-07-17

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Ceftaroline in Paediatrics With Late-Onset Sepsis. Trials, record NCT02424734. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02424734

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Ceftaroline in Paediatrics With Late-Onset Sepsis
NCT number
NCT02424734
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
11 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Conditions
Late-onset Sepsis
Interventions
Ceftaroline Fosamil, Ampicillin, Aminoglycoside
First posted
2015-04-23
Last updated
2018-09-13
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2014-003243-34
Results first posted
2018-07-17

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs)Baseline up to SFU visit (up to a maximum study duration of 49 days)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to study follow-up (SFU) visit (28 to 35 days after last dose of study treatment) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs.
SecondaryPlasma Concentration of Ceftaroline FosamilAt the end of infusion (EOI)
Data was not summarized and provided for individual participants only and reported in this end point for only those participants who had concentrations above limit of quantification (LOQ). LOQ was 50 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL).
SecondaryPlasma Concentration of CeftarolineAt EOI, 15 minutes to 2 hours, 3 to 4 hours and 5 to 7 hours after EOI
Ceftaroline fosamil was the prodrug of ceftaroline. Data was not summarized and provided for individual participants only and reported in this end point for only those participants who had concentrations above LOQ at any specific time-point. LOQ was 50 ng/mL
SecondaryPlasma Concentration of Ceftaroline M-1At EOI, 15 minutes to 2 hours, 3 to 4 hours and 5 to 7 hours after EOI
Ceftaroline M-1 was the inactive metabolite of ceftaroline. Data was not summarized and provided for individual participants only and reported in this end point for only those participants who had concentrations above LOQ at any specific time-point. LOQ was 50 ng/mL
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Favorable Clinical ResponseEOT visit (up to Day 15), TOC visit (up to Day 29)
Clinical response was assessed by the investigator as Cure, Failure or Indeterminate at End of treatment (EOT) and Test of Cure (TOC). Favorable clinical response was defined as clinical response of Cure (defined as resolution of all acute signs and symptoms of Late-onset sepsis \[LOS\] or improvement to such an extent that no further antibacterial therapy is required). EOT visit occurred within 24 hours after the end of last infusion. TOC visit occurred within 8 to 15 days after the last dose of study therapy.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological ResponseEOT visit (up to Day 15), TOC visit (up to Day 29)
Microbiological response was determining programmatically and assessed at the participants level at EOT and TOC. Microbiological response was defined as Favorable (Eradication or Presumed Eradication), Unfavorable (Persistence or Presumed Persistence) or Indeterminate (participant's clinical response is Indeterminate and no microbiological culture data is available). Eradication defined as absence of the original baseline pathogen from the source specimen; presumed eradication was defined when source specimen was not available to culture and the participant was assessed as a clinical cure (resolution of all acute signs and symptoms of LOS or improvement to such an extent that no further antibacterial therapy was required). EOT visit occurred within 24 hours after the end of last infusion. TOC visit occurred within 8 to 15 days after last dose of study drug.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs)Baseline up to SFU visit (up to a maximum study duration of 49 days)Safety analysis set consisted of all enrolled participants for whom informed consent form was signed and received any amount of ceftaroline fosamil.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPlasma Concentration of Ceftaroline FosamilAt the end of infusion (EOI)
Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all participants who received a known amount of ceftaroline fosamil, were randomized to a PK sample collection schedule, and had at least 1 PK sample collected.
ng/mLNUMBER
SECONDARYPlasma Concentration of CeftarolineAt EOI, 15 minutes to 2 hours, 3 to 4 hours and 5 to 7 hours after EOIPK analysis set included all participants who received a known amount of ceftaroline fosamil, were randomized to a PK sample collection schedule, and had at least 1 PK sample collected.ng/mLNUMBER
SECONDARYPlasma Concentration of Ceftaroline M-1At EOI, 15 minutes to 2 hours, 3 to 4 hours and 5 to 7 hours after EOIThe PK analysis set will include all participants who received a known amount of ceftaroline fosamil, were randomized to a PK sample collection schedule, and had at least 1 PK sample collected.ng/mLNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Favorable Clinical ResponseEOT visit (up to Day 15), TOC visit (up to Day 29)
Modified ITT analysis set: participants who received ceftaroline fosamil and met minimal disease criteria of late-onset sepsis (diagnosis of sepsis within 36 hours before enrolment \[defined as presence of \>=2 clinical criteria, \>=1 laboratory criteria in presence of or as a result of suspected /proven bacterial infection that requires IV therapy\]).
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Favorable Microbiological ResponseEOT visit (up to Day 15), TOC visit (up to Day 29)
Modified ITT analysis set: participants who received ceftaroline fosamil and met minimal disease criteria of late-onset sepsis (diagnosis of sepsis within 36 hours before enrolment \[defined as presence of \>=2 clinical criteria, \>=1 laboratory criteria in presence of or as a result of suspected /proven bacterial infection that requires IV therapy).
percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group62

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs)Ceftaroline Fosamil: Young InfantsAEs1Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs)Ceftaroline Fosamil: Term NeonatesAEs3Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs)Ceftaroline Fosamil: Preterm NeonatesAEs1Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs)Ceftaroline Fosamil: Young InfantsSAEs0Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs)Ceftaroline Fosamil: Term NeonatesSAEs0Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs)Ceftaroline Fosamil: Preterm NeonatesSAEs1Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs)Ceftaroline Fosamil: Young InfantsDiscontinuations Due to AEs0Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs)Ceftaroline Fosamil: Term NeonatesDiscontinuations Due to AEs0Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs)Ceftaroline Fosamil: Preterm NeonatesDiscontinuations Due to AEs0Participants
Plasma Concentration of Ceftaroline FosamilCeftaroline Fosamil: All ParticipantsParticipant 167.7ng/mL

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCeftaroline Fosamil: Young Infants4
Overall StudySTARTEDCeftaroline Fosamil: Term Neonates5
Overall StudySTARTEDCeftaroline Fosamil: Preterm Neonates2
Overall StudyTreatedCeftaroline Fosamil: Young Infants4
Overall StudyTreatedCeftaroline Fosamil: Term Neonates5
Overall StudyTreatedCeftaroline Fosamil: Preterm Neonates2
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCeftaroline Fosamil: Young Infants2
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCeftaroline Fosamil: Term Neonates3
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCeftaroline Fosamil: Preterm Neonates2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCeftaroline Fosamil: Young Infants2

Adverse events27

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersCeftaroline Fosamil: Young Infants14
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersCeftaroline Fosamil: Term Neonates15
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersCeftaroline Fosamil: Preterm Neonates02
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCeftaroline Fosamil: Young Infants04
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCeftaroline Fosamil: Term Neonates05
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCeftaroline Fosamil: Preterm Neonates12
otherCerebral cystNervous system disordersCeftaroline Fosamil: Young Infants04
otherCerebral cystNervous system disordersCeftaroline Fosamil: Term Neonates15
otherCerebral cystNervous system disordersCeftaroline Fosamil: Preterm Neonates02
otherDermatitisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersCeftaroline Fosamil: Young Infants04

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCeftaroline Fosamil: Young Infants04
Total, all-cause mortalityCeftaroline Fosamil: Term Neonates05
Total, all-cause mortalityCeftaroline Fosamil: Preterm Neonates02
Total, other adverse eventsCeftaroline Fosamil: Young Infants14
Total, other adverse eventsCeftaroline Fosamil: Term Neonates35
Total, other adverse eventsCeftaroline Fosamil: Preterm Neonates12
Total, serious adverse eventsCeftaroline Fosamil: Young Infants04
Total, serious adverse eventsCeftaroline Fosamil: Term Neonates05
Total, serious adverse eventsCeftaroline Fosamil: Preterm Neonates12

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
32091493DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02424734

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02424734/results?page=2