ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02427646

Kinematic-guided BoNT-A Treatment for ET and PD Tremor

NCT02427646, Phase 2, Unknown, Western University, Canada; results first posted 2019-08-20

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Kinematic-guided BoNT-A Treatment for ET and PD Tremor. Trials, record NCT02427646. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02427646

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Kinematic-guided BoNT-A Treatment for ET and PD Tremor
NCT number
NCT02427646
Status
Unknown
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
54 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Western University, Canada
Conditions
Tremor
Interventions
BoNT-A
First posted
2015-04-28
Last updated
2019-08-20
Results first posted
2019-08-20
Limitations and caveats
A specialized quality of life relating to tremor in PD participants would be more appropriate due to other symptoms PD patients experience. Blinded studies are not possible as muscle weakness can be easily recognized by patients and investigators

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes2

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryClinical Tremor Rating Scale (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale)0 to 96 weeks
Improvement in hand tremor as determined by a reduction of \>8 points on a standardized clinical assessment tool (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Assessment Scale) pre and post Xeomin® injection using kinematic guided injection parameters for both IPD and ET. Lower scores indicate a better outcome. Means and standard deviations are provided in the data tables. FTM minimum and maximum scores range from 0 to 92 FTM points.
SecondaryKinematic Tremor Severity96 weeks
For two subgroups of participants: (A) those with a \> 8 point improvement on the tremor rating scale and (B) those with a change ≤ 8 points on the tremor rating scale, Group A will have 50% reduction in overall tremor amplitude as measured by kinematics. Kinematic measures were graphically represented as mean angular RMS amplitude and standard deviations of the population at the wrist over three trials during scripted task. Kinematic tremor analysis is shown in angular root mean square (RMS) amplitudes

Outcomes2

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYClinical Tremor Rating Scale (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale)0 to 96 weeksMean total FTM score was compared from baseline to each time-point. Here we state the baseline and final visit scores per groupscores on total FTM scaleMEAN
SECONDARYKinematic Tremor Severity96 weeksMean kinematic tremor amplitude was compared from baseline to each time-point. Here we state the baseline and final visit tremor amplitudes per groupAngular root mean square amplitudeMEAN

Results by group8

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Clinical Tremor Rating Scale (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale)Essential Tremor TreatmentWeek 030.6Standard Deviation 5.5scores on total FTM scale
Clinical Tremor Rating Scale (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale)Parkinson Disease Tremor TreatmentWeek 019.4Standard Deviation 2.7scores on total FTM scale
Clinical Tremor Rating Scale (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale)Essential Tremor TreatmentWeek 9614.9Standard Deviation 3.5scores on total FTM scale
Clinical Tremor Rating Scale (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale)Parkinson Disease Tremor TreatmentWeek 9614.1Standard Deviation 3.4scores on total FTM scale
Kinematic Tremor SeverityET BoNT-A TreatmentWeek 00.73Standard Deviation 0.69Angular root mean square amplitude
Kinematic Tremor SeverityPD Tremor BoNT-A TreatmentWeek 01.04Standard Deviation 0.27Angular root mean square amplitude
Kinematic Tremor SeverityET BoNT-A TreatmentWeek 960.15Standard Deviation 0.26Angular root mean square amplitude
Kinematic Tremor SeverityPD Tremor BoNT-A TreatmentWeek 960.33Standard Deviation 0.11Angular root mean square amplitude

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDEssential Tremor Treatment24
Overall StudySTARTEDParkinson Disease Tremor Treatment28
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEssential Tremor Treatment16
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDParkinson Disease Tremor Treatment14
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEssential Tremor Treatment8
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDParkinson Disease Tremor Treatment14

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEssential Tremor Treatment024
Total, all-cause mortalityParkinson Disease Tremor Treatment028
Total, other adverse eventsEssential Tremor Treatment024
Total, other adverse eventsParkinson Disease Tremor Treatment028
Total, serious adverse eventsEssential Tremor Treatment024
Total, serious adverse eventsParkinson Disease Tremor Treatment028

Papers9

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
1579114BACKGROUNDPubMed
7845399BACKGROUNDPubMed
7936237BACKGROUNDPubMed
8723140BACKGROUNDPubMed
9380055BACKGROUNDPubMed
11402109BACKGROUNDPubMed
17117170BACKGROUNDPubMed
20567945BACKGROUNDPubMed
27101283DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Essential Tremor Treatment vs Parkinson Disease Tremor Treatment: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Essential Tremor Treatment vs Parkinson Disease Tremor Treatment: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02427646

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02427646/registered