ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02442765

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of AVP-786 for the Treatment of Agitation in Patients With Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type

NCT02442765, Phase 3, Completed, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.; results first posted 2023-02-13

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of AVP-786 for the Treatment of Agitation in Patients With Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type. Trials, record NCT02442765. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02442765

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of AVP-786 for the Treatment of Agitation in Patients With Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type
NCT number
NCT02442765
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
387 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
Conditions
Agitation in Patients With Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type
Interventions
AVP-786, Placebo
First posted
2015-05-13
Last updated
2023-02-13
Results first posted
2023-02-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes21

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryStage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) Composite Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Baseline, Week 6; Stage 2: Baseline (Week 6), Week 12
The CMAI score is used to assess the frequency of manifestations of agitated behaviors in participants. The CMAI consists of 29 agitated behaviors that are rated on a 7-point scale of frequency: 1, never; 2, less than once a week; 3, once or twice a week; 4, several times a week; 5, once or twice a day; 6, several times a day; 7, several times an hour. The CMAI total score ranges from 29 to 203. Higher scores indicate worsening of the condition. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.
SecondaryLeast Squares Mean Modified Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (mADCS-CGIC)-Agitation Score at Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1 Week 6; Stage 2 Week 12
The intent of the ADCS version of the CGIC is to provide a means to reliably assess the global impression of change from Baseline in a clinical trial. The mADCS-CGIC is a modification of the ADCS-CGIC instrument that focuses specifically on agitation. The participants are asked to rate their impression of change from Baseline as: 1, marked improvement; 2, moderate improvement; 3, minimal improvement; 4, no change; 5, minimal worsening; 6, moderate worsening; 7, marked worsening. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment prior to Stage 1 randomization. Treatment effects were estimated at each stage by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with fixed effects for treatment, Baseline CMAI Total score, and in the Stage 1 model, Baseline NPI AA (≤ 6 versus \[vs\] \> 6), risk assessments for falls (normal/mild vs moderate/severe), Baseline concomitant use of antipsychotic medications (yes vs no). Missing values were imputed by last observation carried forward (LOCF) within each stage.
SecondaryStage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Agitation/Aggression Domain Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Baseline, Week 6; Stage 2: Baseline (Week 6), Week 12
The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. The Agitation/Aggression domain is designed to collect information on the behavioral aspects of agitation/aggression in participants with probable Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and clinically meaningful agitation secondary to AD. Each NPI domain is rated by the caregiver for symptom frequency and severity. Symptom frequency is rated as: 1, occasionally; 2, often; 3, frequently; 4, very frequently. Symptom severity is rated as: 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe. The total domain score is calculated as the frequency score multiplied by the severity score and thus ranges from 1 to 12. Higher scores indicate worsening symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.
SecondaryStage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the NPI Caregiver Distress Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Baseline, Week 6; Stage 2: Baseline (Week 6), Week 12
The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate caregiver distress. Each NPI domain is rated by the caregiver for symptom frequency and severity. Symptom frequency is rated as: 1, occasionally; 2, often; 3, frequently; 4, very frequently. Symptom severity is rated as: 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, marked severe. The total caregiver distress score is calculated as the frequency score multiplied by the severity score and thus ranges from 1 to 12. Higher scores indicate worsening symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.
SecondaryStage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the NPI Aberrant Motor Behavior Domain Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Baseline, Week 6; Stage 2: Baseline (Week 6), Week 12
The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate aberrant motor behavior. Each NPI domain is rated by the caregiver for symptom frequency and severity. Symptom frequency is rated as: 1, occasionally; 2, often; 3, frequently; 4, very frequently. Symptom severity is rated as: 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe. The total domain score is calculated as the frequency score multiplied by the severity score and thus ranges from 1 to 12. Higher scores indicate worsening of the symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.
SecondaryStage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Baseline, Week 6; Stage 2: Baseline (Week 6), Week 12
The ZBI is a 22-item scale used to assess the impact of a participant with dementia and also other illnesses on the caregiver's burden. For each item of the scale, the caregiver indicates how often they feel the burden (never, rarely, sometimes, quite frequently, or nearly always). The score ranges from 0 to 88 and is determined by adding the numbered responses of the individual items. Higher scores indicate greater caregiver distress. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score. Treatment effects were estimated at each stage by ANCOVA with fixed effects for treatment, Baseline, and in the Stage 1 model, Baseline NPI AA (≤ 6 versus \> 6), risk assessments for falls (normal/mild versus moderate/severe), Baseline concomitant use of antipsychotic medications (yes versus no). Missing values were imputed by LOCF within each stage.
SecondaryStage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the NPI Irritability/Lability Domain Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Baseline, Week 6; Stage 2: Baseline (Week 6), Week 12
The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains, including the irritability/lability domain score. Each NPI domain is rated by the caregiver for symptom frequency and severity. Symptom frequency is rated as: 1, occasionally; 2, often; 3, frequently; 4, very frequently. Symptom severity is rated as: 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe. The total domain score is calculated as the frequency score multiplied by the severity score and thus ranges from 1 to 12. Higher scores indicate worsening of the symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.
SecondaryStage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the NPI Total Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Baseline, Week 6; Stage 2: Baseline (Week 6), Week 12
NPI evaluates both frequency and severity of 12 neuropsychiatric disturbances including delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/lability, motor disturbance, nighttime behaviors, as well as appetite/eating. Total domain score= frequency x severity and thus ranges from 1 to 12. NPI domain is rated by caregiver for symptom frequency and severity. Frequency is rated as: 1=occasionally, 2=often, 3= frequently, and 4=very frequently. Severity is rated as: 1=mild; 2= moderate, and 3=severe. Frequency and severity rating scales has defined anchor points to enhance reliability of caregiver responses. Caregiver distress is rated for each positive neuropsychiatric symptom using following anchored scores. It is rated as 0=not at all, 1=minimal, 3=moderate, 4=severe, 5=very severe. Total score is calculated by adding the individual Item scores, to yield a possible total scores of 0 to 144.
SecondaryStage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGIS)-Agitation Domain Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Baseline, Week 6; Stage 2: Baseline (Week 6), Week 12
The CGIS-Agitation is an observer-rated scale that measures illness severity. CGIS is used to assess the severity of agitation. The CGIS score is rated on a 7-point scale (1 = normal, not at all ill; 7 = among the most extremely ill participants). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score. Treatment effects were estimated at each stage by ANCOVA with fixed effects for treatment, Baseline, and in the Stage 1 model, Baseline NPI AA (≤ 6 versus \> 6), risk assessments for falls (normal/mild versus moderate/severe), Baseline concomitant use of antipsychotic medications (yes versus no). Missing values were imputed by LOCF within each stage.
SecondaryStage 1 and Stage 2: Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) Rating at Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Baseline, Week 6; Stage 2: Baseline (Week 6), Week 12
The ADCS-CGIC rating scale provides a reliable means to assess change from a Baseline level of global function within the time frame of the trial. ADCS-CGIC-Overall focuses on the clinician's observations of change in the participant's cognitive, functional, and behavioral performance. The ADCS-CGIC-Overall responses (1-7) are rated as: 1 = marked improvement, 2 = moderate improvement, 3 = minimal improvement, 4 = no change, 5 = minimal worsening, 6 = moderate worsening, or 7 = marked worsening. Treatment effects were estimated at each stage by ANCOVA with fixed effects for treatment, Baseline CMAI Total score, and in the Stage 1 model, Baseline NPI AA (≤ 6 versus \> 6), risk assessments for falls (normal/mild versus moderate/severe), Baseline concomitant use of antipsychotic medications (yes versus no). Missing values were imputed by LOCF within each stage.

Outcomes21

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYStage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) Composite Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Baseline, Week 6; Stage 2: Baseline (Week 6), Week 12
Stage 1 Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population: all participants randomized in Stage 1 who had at least 1 post-Baseline efficacy assessment. Stage 2 mITT Population: all participants randomized in Stage 2 who had at least 1 efficacy assessment in Stage 2. Data were reported for only those participants contributing data to the analysis.
units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYLeast Squares Mean Modified Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (mADCS-CGIC)-Agitation Score at Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1 Week 6; Stage 2 Week 12Stage 1 and Stage 2 mITT Populations. Data were reported for only those participants contributing data to the analysis.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYStage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Agitation/Aggression Domain Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Baseline, Week 6; Stage 2: Baseline (Week 6), Week 12Stage 1 and Stage 2 mITT Populations. Data were reported for only those participants contributing data to the analysis.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYStage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the NPI Caregiver Distress Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Baseline, Week 6; Stage 2: Baseline (Week 6), Week 12Stage 1 and Stage 2 mITT Populations. Data were reported for only those participants contributing data to the analysis.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYStage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the NPI Aberrant Motor Behavior Domain Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Baseline, Week 6; Stage 2: Baseline (Week 6), Week 12Stage 1 and Stage 2 mITT Populations. Data were reported for only those participants contributing data to the analysis.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYStage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Baseline, Week 6; Stage 2: Baseline (Week 6), Week 12Stage 1 and Stage 2 mITT Populations. Overall number of participants analyzed are the number of participants with data available for analysis at given time point.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYStage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the NPI Irritability/Lability Domain Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Baseline, Week 6; Stage 2: Baseline (Week 6), Week 12Stage 1 and Stage 2: mITT Populations. Data were reported for only those participants contributing data to the analysis.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYStage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the NPI Total Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Baseline, Week 6; Stage 2: Baseline (Week 6), Week 12Stage 1 and Stage 2 mITT Populations. Data were reported for only those participants contributing data to the analysis.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYStage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Illness (CGIS)-Agitation Domain Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Baseline, Week 6; Stage 2: Baseline (Week 6), Week 12Stage 1 and Stage 2 mITT Populations. Data were reported for only those participants contributing data to the analysis.units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYStage 1 and Stage 2: Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) Rating at Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Baseline, Week 6; Stage 2: Baseline (Week 6), Week 12Stage 1 and Stage 2 mITT Populations. Data were reported for only those participants contributing data to the analysis.units on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group233

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Stage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) Composite Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: PlaceboStage 1 Baseline73.9Standard Deviation 22.23units on a scale
Stage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) Composite Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: AVP-786-18 (d6-DM 18 mg/Q 4.9 mg)Stage 1 Baseline72.3Standard Deviation 23.08units on a scale
Stage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) Composite Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: AVP-786-28 (d6-DM 28 mg/Q 4.9 mg)Stage 1 Baseline71.7Standard Deviation 23.57units on a scale
Stage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) Composite Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: PlaceboChange from Baseline at Week 6-10.7Standard Deviation 15.29units on a scale
Stage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) Composite Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: AVP-786-18 (d6-DM 18 mg/Q 4.9 mg)Change from Baseline at Week 6-13.9Standard Deviation 16.70units on a scale
Stage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) Composite Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: AVP-786-28 (d6-DM 28 mg/Q 4.9 mg)Change from Baseline at Week 6-10.3Standard Deviation 13.54units on a scale
Stage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) Composite Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Placebo Non-responders to Stage 2: PlaceboStage 2 Baseline66.0Standard Deviation 24.71units on a scale
Stage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) Composite Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Placebo Non-responders to Stage 2: AVP-786-18 (d6-DM 18 mg/Q 4.9 mg)Stage 2 Baseline68.9Standard Deviation 20.79units on a scale
Stage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) Composite Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Placebo Non-responders to Stage 2: AVP-786-28 (d6-DM 28 mg/Q 4.9 mg)Stage 2 Baseline65.3Standard Deviation 19.36units on a scale
Stage 1 and Stage 2: Change From Baseline in the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) Composite Score to Week 6 and Week 12Stage 1: Placebo Non-responders to Stage 2: PlaceboChange from Baseline at Week 12-1.6Standard Deviation 11.08units on a scale

Participant flow48

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Stage 1- (Days 1 to 42)STARTEDStage 1: Placebo194
Stage 1- (Days 1 to 42)STARTEDStage 1: AVP-786-18 (d6-DM 18 mg/Q 4.9 mg)96
Stage 1- (Days 1 to 42)STARTEDStage 1: AVP-786-28 (d6-DM 28 mg/Q 4.9 mg)97
Stage 1- (Days 1 to 42)STARTEDStage 2: Placebo0
Stage 1- (Days 1 to 42)STARTEDStage 1: Placebo to: Stage 2: AVP-786-28 d6-DM 18 mg/Q 4.9 mg0
Stage 1- (Days 1 to 42)STARTEDStage 1: Placebo to: Stage 2: AVP-786-28 d6 DM 28 mg/Q 4.9 mg0
Stage 1- (Days 1 to 42)STARTEDStage 1: AVP-786-18 (d6-DM 18 mg/Q 4.9 mg) to: Stage 2: AVP-786-18 (d6-DM 18 mg/Q 4.9 mg)0
Stage 1- (Days 1 to 42)STARTEDStage 1: AVP-786-28 (d6-DM 28 mg/Q 4.9 mg) to Stage 2: AVP-786-28 (d6-DM 28 mg/Q 4.9 mg)0
Stage 1- (Days 1 to 42)COMPLETEDStage 1: Placebo194
Stage 1- (Days 1 to 42)COMPLETEDStage 1: AVP-786-18 (d6-DM 18 mg/Q 4.9 mg)96

Adverse events666

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo0194
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersAVP-786-181156
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersAVP-786-282159
otherIron deficiency anaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo0194
otherIron deficiency anaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAVP-786-180156
otherIron deficiency anaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAVP-786-281159
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo0194
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAVP-786-181156
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAVP-786-280159
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo0194

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo1194
Total, all-cause mortalityAVP-786-183156
Total, all-cause mortalityAVP-786-281159
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo84194
Total, other adverse eventsAVP-786-1878156
Total, other adverse eventsAVP-786-2871159
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo6194
Total, serious adverse eventsAVP-786-1817156
Total, serious adverse eventsAVP-786-287159

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02442765

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02442765/registered?page=2