Trial · NCT02451137
Registered outcomes13
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
1 to 13 of 13
Download this page as JSON| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Individualized Glycated Hemoglobin Target Attainment Per Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) Criteria Without Documented Symptomatic(Blood Glucose <=70 mg/dL [<=3.9 mmol/L]) and/or Severe Hypoglycemia | Baseline to Month 6 | HEDIS criteria: Individualized HbA1c target \<8% if age \>= 65 years or presence of medical comorbidities, or otherwise \<7%. Severe hypoglycaemia was an event in which the participant required the assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycaemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of \<=70 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (\<=3.9 millimoles per litre \[mmol/L\]). Analysis was performed using all post-baseline data available on the 6 month randomized period (defined as time from randomization up to Day 180 or discontinuation date, whichever comes earlier). |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Month 6 and Month 12 | Baseline, Month 6, Month 12 | Change in HbA1c was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Month 6 and Month 12 values. Adjusted Least Squares (LS) means and Standard Errors (SE) were obtained using Mixed Effect Model with Repeated Measures (MMRM ) with fixed categorical effects of treatment arm, visit, treatment arm-by-visit interaction, randomization strata of HbA1c target (\<8% / \<7%), SU use (yes/no), GLP-1 RA use (yes/no), as well as baseline HbA1c (as continuous) and baseline HbA1c-by-visit interaction. |
| Secondary | Treatment Persistence Measured by Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) | At Month 6 and Month 12 | Treatment persistence was determined based on vendor claims database that would be responsible for managing and administration of the study drugs. Medication use was assessed by MPR and persistence measures based on data collected by the smart card vendor (date of fill or refill and quantity of medication dispensed for 30-day supply). The MPR was assessed based on total number of days of supply divided by the total number of days in 6 or 12 months period. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Reaching Individualized HbA1c Target Without Documented Symptomatic <3.0 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL) and/or Severe Hypoglycemia During the 6-Month Randomized Period | Baseline to Month 6 | HEDIS criteria for Individualized HbA1c target: \<8% if age \>= 65 years or presence of medical comorbidities, or otherwise \<7%. Severe hypoglycaemia was an event in which the participant required the assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycaemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of \<54 mg/dL (3.0 mmol/L). |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Reaching Individualized HbA1c Target Without Documented Symptomatic <=3.9 mmol/L (<= 70 mg/dL) and <3.0 mmol/L (< 54 mg/dL) and/or Severe Hypoglycemia During the 12-Month Randomized Period | Baseline to Month 12 | HEDIS criteria for Individualized HbA1c target: \<8% if age \>= 65 years or presence of medical comorbidities, or otherwise \<7%. Severe hypoglycaemia was an event in which the participant required the assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycaemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of \<=3.9 mmol/L (\<=70 mg/dL) and \< 3.0 mmol/L (\< 54 mg/dL). |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Month 6 and Month 12 | Baseline, Month 6, Month 12 | Change in FPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Month 6 and Month 12 values. Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained using MMRM model with fixed categorical effects of treatment arm, randomization strata of HbA1c target (\<8% / \<7%), SU use (yes/no), GLP-1 RA use (yes/no), as well as baseline FPG (as continuous) and baseline FPG-by-visit interaction. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Month 6 and Month 12 | Baseline, Month 6, Month 12 | Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained using MMRM model with fixed categorical effects of treatment arm, visit, treatment arm-by-visit interaction, randomization strata of HbA1c target (\<8% / \<7%), SU use (yes/no), GLP-1 RA use (yes/no), as well as baseline weight (as continuous) and baseline weight-by-visit interaction. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Basal Insulin Dose at Month 6 and Month 12 | Baseline, Month 6, Month 12 | Change in basal insulin dose was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Month 6 and Month 12 values. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Responders (Participants and Provider) Who Reported "Excellent" or "Good" Responses to Global Effectiveness Scale (GES) Question at Month 6, and Month 12 | At Month 6, Month 12 | Participant and Physician (Provider) reported GES for this diabetes study. The GES assessed impact of treatment on scale ranges as: excellent (complete control of diabetes), good (marked improvement of diabetes), moderate (discernible, but limited improvement in diabetes), poor (no appreciable change in diabetes), or worsening of condition (worsening of diabetes). There was no score expressed by numbers and no change measured over the time of the study. Percentage of participants and providers who reported "excellent" or "good" on the GES at Month 6 and Month 12 are reported here. |
| Secondary | Scores of Total Treatment Satisfaction, Hyperglycemia Perception, and Hypoglycemia Perception From Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Status Version (DTSQs) at Baseline, Month 6, Month 12 | At Baseline, Month 6, Month 12 | DTSQs is a validated questionnaire to assess participant's satisfaction with their diabetes treatment. It consists of 8 items, each answered on a Likert scale of 0 to 6. Responses of 6 questions (Items 1, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8) were summarized to derive total treatment satisfaction score, such that a higher score was indicative of better satisfaction. Total treatment satisfaction score is the sum of items 1, 4-8 scores and ranged from 0 (no satisfaction) to 36 (improvement in treatment satisfaction). Item 2 and Item 3 scores were used for hyperglycemia perception and hypoglycemia perception respectively, where lower scores indicated better health outcome. Perceived frequency of hyperglycemia score (Item 2) and perceived frequency of hypoglycemia score (Item 3) range from 0 (none of the time) to 6 (most of time), where lower scores indicated more satisfaction/better health outcome. |
| Secondary | Scores of Total Treatment Satisfaction, Hyperglycemia Perception, and Hypoglycemia Perception From Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Change Version (DTSQc) at Month 12 | At Month 12 | DTSQc version evaluates the change in treatment satisfaction at Month 12 as compared to the start of the study . It consists of 8 items, each answered on a Likert scale from -3 to +3. The sum of treatment satisfaction scores (items 1, 4, 5, 6, 7,and 8) ranged from score -18 (deterioration in treatment satisfaction) to +18 (improvement in treatment satisfaction). Perceived frequency of hypoglycemia and perceived frequency of hyperglycemia score ranges from score -3 (fewer problems) to +3 (more problems). |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Hospitalizations, Emergency Rooms and Specialty Visits From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 | From Baseline to Month 6 and Month 12 | Percentage of participants with hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and specialty visits during the 6-month and 12-month randomized period were reported. The 12-month randomized period was defined as the time from randomization up to Day 365 or discontinuation date, whichever comes earlier. |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Hypoglycemia Event (Any Time of the Day, Nocturnal) Per Type of Hypoglycaemia During the Month 6 and Month 12 on Treatment Period | Up to Month 6 and Month 12 | Severe hypoglycaemia was an event in which the participant required the assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycaemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of \<=70 mg/dL (\<=3.9 mmol/L) or \<54 mg/dL (3.0 mmol/L). |
Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this list from software.
Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02451137/registered