Trial · NCT02461693
Evaluating the Role of Expectations in Response to Caffeine Consumption: An RCT
NCT02461693, Not applicable, Completed, University of Alabama at Birmingham; results first posted 2017-07-12
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Evaluating the Role of Expectations in Response to Caffeine Consumption: An RCT. Trials, record NCT02461693. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02461693
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Evaluating the Role of Expectations in Response to Caffeine Consumption: An RCT
- NCT number
- NCT02461693
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Not applicable
- Enrollment
- 205 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Conditions
- Caffeine, Affect, Cognitive Ability, General, Mood
- Interventions
- Caffeine, Placebo
- First posted
- 2015-06-03
- Last updated
- 2017-07-12
- Results first posted
- 2017-07-12
- Limitations and caveats
- Please refer to our publication in Psyhcological Methods
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes4
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Mood State Score on POMS-2 Test | 30 minutes post pill consumption | Profile of Mood States (POMS-2)- "Volunteers rated a series of 65 mood-related adjectives with regard to how they were feeling "right now" on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The adjectives factor into six mood sub-scales: Tension-Anxiety; Depression-Dejection; Anger-Hostility; Vigor-Activity; Fatigue-Inertia; Confusion-Bewilderment and a Total Mood Disturbance score which aggregates the six sub-scales into a single variable." - from our publication. The minimum and maximum possible raw scores were: 0 and 40 for Tension-Anxiety, 0 and 52 for Depression-Dejection, 0 and 44 for Anger-Hostility, 0 and 36 for Vigor-Aactivity, 0 and 24 for Fatigue-Inertia, 0 and 40 for Confusion-Bewilderment, -36 and 200 for Total Mood Disturbance, and 0 and 24 for Friendliness. For Friendliness and Vigor-Activity, the more positively a person feels, the higher the score. For all other sub-scales and Total Mood Disturbance, the more negatively a person feels, the higher the score. |
| Primary | Vigilance Score on Computer-based Test Using Random, Visual Stimulus: Proportion Correct (Out of 60) | 45 to 105 minutes post pill consumption | Scanning Visual Vigilance Test. "This test assesses vigilance, ability to sustain attention during long, boring, continuous tasks that generate minimal cognitive load (Fine et al, 1994; Lieberman et al, 1998; 2002). The volunteer continuously scans a computer screen to detect an infrequent, difficult-to-detect stimulus that appears at random intervals and locations for 2 s. On average, a stimulus was presented once per minute. Upon detection of the stimulus, the volunteer pressed the space bar as rapidly as possible. Whether a stimulus was detected and time required for detection was recorded. Responses before or after stimulus occurrence were false alarms. The test lasted 60 minutes." - from our publication |
| Primary | Vigilance Score on Computer-based Test Using Random, Visual Stimulus: Number Correct, Number of False Alarm Hits | 45 to 105 minutes post pill consumption | Scanning Visual Vigilance Test. "This test assesses vigilance, ability to sustain attention during long, boring, continuous tasks that generate minimal cognitive load (Fine et al, 1994; Lieberman et al, 1998; 2002). The volunteer continuously scans a computer screen to detect an infrequent, difficult-to-detect stimulus that appears at random intervals and locations for 2 s. On average, a stimulus was presented once per minute. Upon detection of the stimulus, the volunteer pressed the space bar as rapidly as possible. Whether a stimulus was detected and time required for detection was recorded. Responses before or after stimulus occurrence were false alarms. The test lasted 60 minutes." - from our publication |
| Primary | Vigilance Score on Computer-based Test Using Random, Visual Stimulus: Mean Time to a Correct Hit | 45 to 105 minutes post pill consumption | Scanning Visual Vigilance Test. "This test assesses vigilance, ability to sustain attention during long, boring, continuous tasks that generate minimal cognitive load (Fine et al, 1994; Lieberman et al, 1998; 2002). The volunteer continuously scans a computer screen to detect an infrequent, difficult-to-detect stimulus that appears at random intervals and locations for 2 s. On average, a stimulus was presented once per minute. Upon detection of the stimulus, the volunteer pressed the space bar as rapidly as possible. Whether a stimulus was detected and time required for detection was recorded. Responses before or after stimulus occurrence were false alarms. The test lasted 60 minutes." - from our publication |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes4
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Mood State Score on POMS-2 Test | 30 minutes post pill consumption | Results are of raw data as presented in our publication | units on a scale | MEAN |
| PRIMARY | Vigilance Score on Computer-based Test Using Random, Visual Stimulus: Proportion Correct (Out of 60) | 45 to 105 minutes post pill consumption | One participant who received the caffeine pill had to use the restroom during the vigilance testing period and had to stop the test. Due to a technicality of the computer program, her data for the vigilance test was not available for analysis. | Proportion correct | MEAN |
| PRIMARY | Vigilance Score on Computer-based Test Using Random, Visual Stimulus: Number Correct, Number of False Alarm Hits | 45 to 105 minutes post pill consumption | One participant who received the caffeine pill had to use the restroom during the vigilance testing period and had to stop the test. Due to a technicality of the computer program, her data for the vigilance test was not available for analysis. | counts | MEAN |
| PRIMARY | Vigilance Score on Computer-based Test Using Random, Visual Stimulus: Mean Time to a Correct Hit | 45 to 105 minutes post pill consumption | One participant who received the caffeine pill had to use the restroom during the vigilance testing period and had to stop the test. Due to a technicality of the computer program, her data for the vigilance test was not available for analysis. | seconds | MEAN |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Results by group24
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mood State Score on POMS-2 Test | Caffeine | Total Mood Displacement | 2.63 | Standard Error 1.98 | units on a scale |
| Mood State Score on POMS-2 Test | Placebo | Total Mood Displacement | 14.08 | Standard Error 2.86 | units on a scale |
| Mood State Score on POMS-2 Test | Caffeine | Anger-Hostility | 2.19 | Standard Error 0.38 | units on a scale |
| Mood State Score on POMS-2 Test | Placebo | Anger-Hostility | 2.54 | Standard Error 0.46 | units on a scale |
| Mood State Score on POMS-2 Test | Caffeine | Confusion-Bewilderment | 6.23 | Standard Error 0.48 | units on a scale |
| Mood State Score on POMS-2 Test | Placebo | Confusion-Bewilderment | 7.00 | Standard Error 0.53 | units on a scale |
| Mood State Score on POMS-2 Test | Caffeine | Depression-Dejection | 1.87 | Standard Error 0.35 | units on a scale |
| Mood State Score on POMS-2 Test | Placebo | Depression-Dejection | 3.15 | Standard Error 0.61 | units on a scale |
| Mood State Score on POMS-2 Test | Caffeine | Fatigue-Inertia | 4.44 | Standard Error 0.49 | units on a scale |
| Mood State Score on POMS-2 Test | Placebo | Fatigue-Inertia | 6.65 | Standard Error 0.68 | units on a scale |
1 to 10 of 24Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 24 results by groupParticipant flow6
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | STARTED | Caffeine | 103 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Placebo | 102 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Caffeine | 103 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Placebo | 102 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Caffeine | 0 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Placebo | 0 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Adverse events0
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
None in this release.
Adverse event totals6
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | Caffeine | ||
| Total, all-cause mortality | Placebo | ||
| Total, other adverse events | Caffeine | 0 | 103 |
| Total, other adverse events | Placebo | 0 | 102 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Caffeine | 0 | 103 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Placebo | 0 | 102 |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Papers1
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
| PMID | Listed as |
|---|---|
| 28406674 | RESULT |
Source PubMed
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons1
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
| Comparison |
|---|
| Caffeine vs Placebo: serious adverse events |
Source Trial comparisons
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02461693
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02461693/results?page=2