ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02465359

Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin for Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP)

NCT02465359, Not applicable, Completed, University of South Florida; results first posted 2024-10-08

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin for Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP). Trials, record NCT02465359. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02465359

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin for Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP)
NCT number
NCT02465359
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
15 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
University of South Florida
Conditions
Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy
Interventions
Immune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)
First posted
2015-06-08
Last updated
2024-10-08
Results first posted
2024-10-08
Limitations and caveats
Small, open-label trial; lacks immunoglobulin G (IgG)-dependency test; predictors of poor QOL were not substratified during analysis of the primary and secondary endpoints; lack of baseline IVIg observation period.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryRelapse of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) Symptoms24 weeks
This outcome measure, referred to as the relapse of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) symptoms, is a measure of how many participants experiences CIDP symptoms causing them to withdraw prematurely from the study. This is a count of participant withdrawals compared to the number of participants who completed the study.
SecondaryMean Change in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Domain: Physical Functioning Between Week 24 and Screening24 weeks
The short form 36 (SF-36) is a health status profile designed to measure health status and outcomes of patients. Per the paper from Burholt and Nash (2011) scoring and domains are as follows:" The SF-36 is a 36 item scale, which measures eight domains of health status: physical functioning (10 items); physical role limitations (four items); bodily pain (two items); general health perceptions (five items); energy/vitality (four items); social functioning (two items); emotional role limitations (three items) and mental health (five items). A scoring algorithm is used to convert the raw scores into the eight dimensions listed above. The scores are transformed to range from zero where the respondent has the worst possible health to 100 where the respondent is in the best possible health." For this particular outcome measure, only the domain pertaining to physical functioning is shown, listed as the mean change from screening to 24 weeks.
SecondaryMean Change in Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS) From Screening to Week 2424 weeks
The Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS) is an instrument answered by the patient to assess overall disability through assessing activity and social participation limitations in patients with inflammatory neuropathies. It is a 24-item scale, with each item representing a common, daily activity. The patient assigns a score between 0 and 2 to each item as follows: 0 = impossible to perform 1. = performed with difficulty 2. = easily performed The total raw score on the I-RODS (0-48 max) is transformed to a final score (0-100), with a lower score indicating worse outcomes. Here the outcome measure is the mean change between screening and week 24, as calculated from transformed total I-RODS score. A negative change between week 24 and screening, or a reduction in I-RODS score, indicates a worsening of the patient's perceived daily functioning, as measured by the I-RODS.
SecondaryMean Change in Chronic Acquired Polyneuropathy Patient-Reported Index (CAP-PRI) Between Week 24 and Screening24 weeks
The Chronic Acquired Polyneuropathy Patient-Reported Index (CAP-PRI) is used to evaluate quality of life in patients with polyneuropathy. The scale consists of 15 items, resulting in a single-score with 4 life domains (physical, social, pain and emotional well-being). Each item assessed is scored 0-2 (0= not at all, 1 = a little bit, 2 = a lot). Max score possible is 30 with a higher score indicating worse outcomes. This outcome measure was evaluated at screening and week 24 by determining the mean change between these two time points. A negative score would indicate an improvement as perceived by the participant.
SecondaryTreatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)24 weeks
The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) is used to assess the patient's treatment satisfaction with intravenous immune globulin (IVIg) compared to the use of subcutaneous immune globulin (SCIg). There are 14 items and the TSQM addresses four domains: effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction. Questions are scored from one (least satisfied) to five or seven (most satisfied), with the exception of item 4 relating to side effects (scored yes/no, 1 or 0, respectively). Item scores are summed to give four domain scores, which are in turn transformed to a scale of 0-100. Higher scores indicate higher treatment satisfaction.
SecondaryMean Change in Short Form 36 Domain: Role Limitations-physical Between Screening and Week 2424 weeks
The short form 36 (SF-36) is a health status profile designed to measure health status and outcomes of patients. Per the paper from Burholt and Nash (2011) scoring and domains are as follows:" The SF-36 is a 36 item scale, which measures eight domains of health status: physical functioning (10 items); physical role limitations (four items); bodily pain (two items); general health perceptions (five items); energy/vitality (four items); social functioning (two items); emotional role limitations (three items) and mental health (five items). A scoring algorithm is used to convert the raw scores into the eight dimensions listed above. The scores are transformed to range from zero where the respondent has the worst possible health to 100 where the respondent is in the best possible health." For this particular outcome measure, only the domain pertaining to "role limitations-physical" is shown, listed as the mean change between screening to 24 weeks.
SecondaryMean Change in Short Form 36 Domain: Role Limitations - Emotional (Between Week 24 and Screening)24 weeks
The short form 36 (SF-36) measure health status of patients. Per Burholt and Nash (2011) scoring and domains are as follows:" The SF-36 is a 36 item scale, which measures eight domains of health status: physical functioning (10 items); physical role limitations (four items); bodily pain (two items); general health perceptions (five items); energy/vitality (four items); social functioning (two items); emotional role limitations (three items) and mental health (five items). A scoring algorithm is used to convert the raw scores into the eight dimensions listed above. The scores are transformed to range from zero where the respondent has the worst possible health to 100 where the respondent is in the best possible health." For this particular outcome measure, only the domain pertaining to "role limitations-emotional" is shown, listed as the mean change from screening to 24 weeks. A negative value for this measure indicates a worsening of role limitations related to emotional health.
SecondaryMean Change in Short Form 36 Domain: Energy/Fatigue Between Screening and Week 2424 weeks
The short form 36 (SF-36) is a health status profile designed to measure health status and outcomes of patients. Per the paper from Burholt and Nash (2011) scoring and domains are as follows:" The SF-36 is a 36 item scale, which measures eight domains of health status: physical functioning (10 items); physical role limitations (four items); bodily pain (two items); general health perceptions (five items); energy/vitality (four items); social functioning (two items); emotional role limitations (three items) and mental health (five items). A scoring algorithm is used to convert the raw scores into the eight dimensions listed above. The scores are transformed to range from zero where the respondent has the worst possible health to 100 where the respondent is in the best possible health." For this particular outcome measure, only the domain pertaining to "energy/fatigue" is shown, listed as the mean change between screening and 24 weeks.
SecondaryMean Change in Short Form 36 Domain: Emotional Well-being Between Screening and 24 Weeks24 weeks
The short form 36 (SF-36) is a health status profile designed to measure health status and outcomes of patients. Per the paper from Burholt and Nash (2011) scoring and domains are as follows:" The SF-36 is a 36 item scale, which measures eight domains of health status: physical functioning (10 items); physical role limitations (four items); bodily pain (two items); general health perceptions (five items); energy/vitality (four items); social functioning (two items); emotional role limitations (three items) and mental health (five items). A scoring algorithm is used to convert the raw scores into the eight dimensions listed above. The scores are transformed to range from zero where the respondent has the worst possible health to 100 where the respondent is in the best possible health." For this particular outcome measure, only the domain pertaining to "emotional well-being" is shown, listed as the mean change between screening and 24 weeks.
SecondaryMean Change in Short Form 36 Domain: Social Functioning Between Screening and Week 2424 weeks
The short form 36 (SF-36) is a health status profile designed to measure health status and outcomes of patients. Per the paper from Burholt and Nash (2011) scoring and domains are as follows:" The SF-36 is a 36 item scale, which measures eight domains of health status: physical functioning (10 items); physical role limitations (four items); bodily pain (two items); general health perceptions (five items); energy/vitality (four items); social functioning (two items); emotional role limitations (three items) and mental health (five items). A scoring algorithm is used to convert the raw scores into the eight dimensions listed above. The scores are transformed to range from zero where the respondent has the worst possible health to 100 where the respondent is in the best possible health." For this particular outcome measure, only the domain pertaining to "social functioning" is shown, listed as the mean change between screening and 24 weeks.

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYRelapse of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) Symptoms24 weeksParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYMean Change in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Domain: Physical Functioning Between Week 24 and Screening24 weeksscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change in Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS) From Screening to Week 2424 weeksunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change in Chronic Acquired Polyneuropathy Patient-Reported Index (CAP-PRI) Between Week 24 and Screening24 weeksunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYTreatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)24 weeksunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change in Short Form 36 Domain: Role Limitations-physical Between Screening and Week 2424 weeksscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change in Short Form 36 Domain: Role Limitations - Emotional (Between Week 24 and Screening)24 weeksscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change in Short Form 36 Domain: Energy/Fatigue Between Screening and Week 2424 weeksscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change in Short Form 36 Domain: Emotional Well-being Between Screening and 24 Weeks24 weeksscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYMean Change in Short Form 36 Domain: Social Functioning Between Screening and Week 2424 weeksscore on a scaleMEAN

Results by group15

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Relapse of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) SymptomsImmune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)withdrew prematurely3Participants
Relapse of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (CIDP) SymptomsImmune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)completed study12Participants
Mean Change in Short Form 36 (SF-36) Domain: Physical Functioning Between Week 24 and ScreeningImmune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)095% Confidence Interval -0.12 to 0.12score on a scale
Mean Change in Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS) From Screening to Week 24Immune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)-1.595% Confidence Interval -4.6 to 1.6units on a scale
Mean Change in Chronic Acquired Polyneuropathy Patient-Reported Index (CAP-PRI) Between Week 24 and ScreeningImmune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)-4.395% Confidence Interval -7.7 to -0.9units on a scale
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)Immune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)10.395% Confidence Interval 4.3 to 16.2units on a scale
Mean Change in Short Form 36 Domain: Role Limitations-physical Between Screening and Week 24Immune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)0.2495% Confidence Interval 0.03 to 0.46score on a scale
Mean Change in Short Form 36 Domain: Role Limitations - Emotional (Between Week 24 and Screening)Immune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)-0.0195% Confidence Interval -0.27 to 0.24score on a scale
Mean Change in Short Form 36 Domain: Energy/Fatigue Between Screening and Week 24Immune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)0.0995% Confidence Interval 0.00 to 0.18score on a scale
Mean Change in Short Form 36 Domain: Emotional Well-being Between Screening and 24 WeeksImmune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)0.0395% Confidence Interval -0.04 to 0.09score on a scale

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDImmune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)15
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDImmune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)12
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDImmune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)3

Adverse events32

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherPain at infusion siteGeneral disordersImmune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)1315
otherTransient swelling at site of infusionGeneral disordersImmune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)1215
otherRedness at site of infusionGeneral disordersImmune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)1115
otherInduration at site of infusionGeneral disordersImmune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)715
otherItching at site of infusionGeneral disordersImmune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)715
otherNumbnessGeneral disordersImmune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)515
otherBruising at site of infusionGeneral disordersImmune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)515
otherIncreased ExhaustionGeneral disordersImmune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)415
otherHedache/MigraneNervous system disordersImmune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)415
otherLocal heat at site of infusionSkin and subcutaneous tissue disordersImmune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)315

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityImmune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)015
Total, other adverse eventsImmune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)1315
Total, serious adverse eventsImmune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)015

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02465359

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02465359/events?page=2