ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02485899

An Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of BMN 190 in Patients With CLN2 Disease

NCT02485899, Phase 1, Phase 2, Completed, BioMarin Pharmaceutical; results first posted 2022-08-24

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. An Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of BMN 190 in Patients With CLN2 Disease. Trials, record NCT02485899. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02485899

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
An Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of BMN 190 in Patients With CLN2 Disease
NCT number
NCT02485899
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1, Phase 2
Enrollment
23 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
BioMarin Pharmaceutical
Conditions
Jansky-Bielschowsky Disease, Batten Disease, Late-Infantile Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis Type 2, CLN2 Disease, CLN2 Disorder
Interventions
BMN 190, Intracerebroventricular (ICV) access device
First posted
2015-06-30
Last updated
2022-08-24
Results first posted
2022-08-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProbability of Unreversed 2-point Decline in Motor-language (ML) Score or Score of 0Up to Week 289
Motor and Language are each 0-3 point subscales in which 3 represents best function and 0 represents loss of function. Thus, the 0-6 point ML score was used as the primary mode of evaluation of loss of function. In 190-201, the primary endpoint was a responder endpoint: unreversed ML 2-point decline or score of 0 at Week 48 compared to the 50% rate expected in natural history using the 1-sample binomial test. For 190-202, the primary endpoint was revised to assess response over the full duration of follow-up. It is not clear, given the variable follow-up much greater than 48 weeks, what response rate is expected in natural history. For this reason, the assessment of the primary endpoint is based on comparing to natural history data and using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model with covariate adjustment (i.e., baseline ML score and age as continuous covariates, and genotype \[common alleles\] and sex as categorical covariates).
PrimaryProbability of Unreversed Motor-language (ML) Score of Zero.Up to Week 289
Motor and Language are each 0-3 point subscales in which 3 represents best function and 0 represents loss of function. Thus, the 0-6 point ML score was used as the primary mode of evaluation of loss of function. In 190-201, the primary endpoint was a responder endpoint: unreversed ML 2-point decline or score of 0 at Week 48 compared to the 50% rate expected in natural history using the 1-sample binomial test. For 190-202, the primary endpoint was revised to assess response over the full duration of follow-up. It is not clear, given the variable follow-up much greater than 48 weeks, what response rate is expected in natural history. For this reason, the assessment of the primary endpoint is based on comparing to natural history data and using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model with covariate adjustment (baseline ML score, age, genotype \[common alleles\], and sex).
SecondaryWhole Brain VolumeBaseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observationPercentage change from Baseline to Last Observation: Whole Brain volume
SecondaryVolume of Cerebrospinal FluidBaseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observationPercentage Change from Baseline to last observation: Volume of cerebrospinal fluid
SecondaryVolume of Total Cortical Gray MatterBaseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observationPercentage Change from Baseline to last observation: Volume of total cortical gray matter
SecondaryTotal White Matter VolumeBaseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observationPercentage Change from Baseline to last observation: Total white matter volume
SecondaryWhole Brain Apparent Diffusion CoefficientBaseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observationChange from Baseline to last observation Whole brain apparent diffusion coefficient

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProbability of Unreversed 2-point Decline in Motor-language (ML) Score or Score of 0Up to Week 289
BMN 190-202: 24 subjects were enrolled in 190-201 at 5 clinic sites worldwide. One subject terminated from 190-201 after a single infusion and is not included in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population for 190-202. Study 190-202 final efficacy results include pooled data from the complete dataset from Study 190-201 \& Study 190-202 for all subjects who received \>1 dose (N=23).~NH: 42 subjects from DEM-CHILD database satisfying the criteria listed in the Arm/Group description below.
Probability of declineNUMBER
PRIMARYProbability of Unreversed Motor-language (ML) Score of Zero.Up to Week 289
BMN 190-202: 24 subjects were enrolled in 190-201 at 5 clinic sites worldwide. One subject terminated from 190-201 after a single infusion and is not included in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population for 190-202. Study 190-202 final efficacy results include pooled data from the complete dataset from Study 190-201 \& Study 190-202 for all subjects who received \>1 dose (N=23).~NH: 42 subjects from DEM-CHILD database satisfying the criteria listed in the Arm/Group description below.
Probability of declineNUMBER
SECONDARYWhole Brain VolumeBaseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observation
BMN 190-202: 24 subjects were enrolled in 190-201 at 5 clinic sites worldwide. One subject terminated from 190-201 after a single infusion and is not included in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population for 190-202. Study 190-202 final efficacy results include pooled data from the complete dataset from Study 190-201 \& Study 190-202 for all subjects who received \>1 dose (N=23).
percentage changeMEAN
SECONDARYVolume of Cerebrospinal FluidBaseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observation
BMN 190-202: 24 subjects were enrolled in 190-201 at 5 clinic sites worldwide. One subject terminated from 190-201 after a single infusion and is not included in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population for 190-202. Study 190-202 final efficacy results include pooled data from the complete dataset from Study 190-201 \& Study 190-202 for all subjects who received \>1 dose (N=23).
percentage changeMEAN
SECONDARYVolume of Total Cortical Gray MatterBaseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observation
BMN 190-202: 24 subjects were enrolled in 190-201 at 5 clinic sites worldwide. One subject terminated from 190-201 after a single infusion and is not included in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population for 190-202. Study 190-202 final efficacy results include pooled data from the complete dataset from Study 190-201 \& Study 190-202 for all subjects who received \>1 dose (N=23).
percentage changeMEAN
SECONDARYTotal White Matter VolumeBaseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observation
BMN 190-202: 24 subjects were enrolled in 190-201 at 5 clinic sites worldwide. One subject terminated from 190-201 after a single infusion and is not included in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population for 190-202. Study 190-202 final efficacy results include pooled data from the complete dataset from Study 190-201 \& Study 190-202 for all subjects who received \>1 dose (N=23).
percentage changeMEAN
SECONDARYWhole Brain Apparent Diffusion CoefficientBaseline (Week 1 of BMN 190-201) to Week 289 / Last observation
BMN 190-202: 24 subjects were enrolled in 190-201 at 5 clinic sites worldwide. One subject terminated from 190-201 after a single infusion and is not included in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population for 190-202. Study 190-202 final efficacy results include pooled data from the complete dataset from Study 190-201 \& Study 190-202 for all subjects who received \>1 dose (N=23).
mm^2/sMEAN

Results by group29

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Probability of Unreversed 2-point Decline in Motor-language (ML) Score or Score of 0BMN 190-202 (300 mg)Probability of decline: Week 490.1395% Confidence Interval 0.04 to 0.35Probability of decline
Probability of Unreversed 2-point Decline in Motor-language (ML) Score or Score of 0Natural History ComparatorProbability of decline: Week 490.4895% Confidence Interval 0.34 to 0.64Probability of decline
Probability of Unreversed 2-point Decline in Motor-language (ML) Score or Score of 0BMN 190-202 (300 mg)Probability of decline: Week 970.2295% Confidence Interval 0.10 to 0.45Probability of decline
Probability of Unreversed 2-point Decline in Motor-language (ML) Score or Score of 0Natural History ComparatorProbability of decline: Week 970.9195% Confidence Interval 0.79 to 0.98Probability of decline
Probability of Unreversed 2-point Decline in Motor-language (ML) Score or Score of 0BMN 190-202 (300 mg)Probability of decline: Week 1450.2295% Confidence Interval 0.10 to 0.45Probability of decline
Probability of Unreversed 2-point Decline in Motor-language (ML) Score or Score of 0Natural History ComparatorProbability of decline: Week 1450.9795% Confidence Interval 0.87 to 1.00Probability of decline
Probability of Unreversed 2-point Decline in Motor-language (ML) Score or Score of 0BMN 190-202 (300 mg)Probability of decline: Week 1930.2695% Confidence Interval 0.13 to 0.50Probability of decline
Probability of Unreversed 2-point Decline in Motor-language (ML) Score or Score of 0Natural History ComparatorProbability of decline: Week 1930.9795% Confidence Interval 0.87 to 1.00Probability of decline
Probability of Unreversed 2-point Decline in Motor-language (ML) Score or Score of 0BMN 190-202 (300 mg)Probability of decline: Week 2410.4095% Confidence Interval 0.23 to 0.63Probability of decline
Probability of Unreversed 2-point Decline in Motor-language (ML) Score or Score of 0Natural History ComparatorProbability of decline: Week 2411.0095% Confidence Interval 0.87 to 1.00Probability of decline

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTED190-202 (300 mg)24
Overall StudySTARTEDNatural History Comparator42
Overall StudyCOMPLETED190-202 (300 mg)17
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDNatural History Comparator42
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETED190-202 (300 mg)7
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDNatural History Comparator0

Adverse events178

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHypotensionVascular disordersBMN 190-202 (300 mg)3243
otherHaematomaVascular disordersBMN 190-202 (300 mg)2242
otherTooth extractionSurgical and medical proceduresBMN 190-202 (300 mg)3243
otherSkin papillomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)BMN 190-202 (300 mg)2242
otherHypersensitivityImmune system disordersBMN 190-202 (300 mg)102416
otherSeasonal allergyImmune system disordersBMN 190-202 (300 mg)3244
otherPyrexiaGeneral disordersBMN 190-202 (300 mg)2024219
otherGait disturbanceGeneral disordersBMN 190-202 (300 mg)122415
otherAbasiaGeneral disordersBMN 190-202 (300 mg)3243
otherComplication associated with deviceGeneral disordersBMN 190-202 (300 mg)3243

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityBMN 190-202 (300 mg)024
Total, other adverse eventsBMN 190-202 (300 mg)2424
Total, serious adverse eventsBMN 190-202 (300 mg)2124

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
29688815DERIVEDPubMed
33980287DERIVEDPubMed
38101904DERIVEDPubMed
38776275DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02485899

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02485899/results?page=2