ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02493517

Efficacy and Safety of Lanreotide Autogel® 60, 90 or 120 mg With Lanreotide 40 mg Prolonged Release (PR) in Acromegaly

NCT02493517, Phase 3, Completed, Ipsen; results first posted 2018-12-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of Lanreotide Autogel® 60, 90 or 120 mg With Lanreotide 40 mg Prolonged Release (PR) in Acromegaly. Trials, record NCT02493517. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02493517

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of Lanreotide Autogel® 60, 90 or 120 mg With Lanreotide 40 mg Prolonged Release (PR) in Acromegaly
NCT number
NCT02493517
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
128 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Ipsen
Conditions
Acromegaly
Interventions
Lanreotide Autogel®, Lanreotide Acetate
First posted
2015-07-09
Last updated
2019-01-29
Results first posted
2018-12-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryStandardised Mean Change From Baseline in Age-adjusted IGF-1 Levels at the EOST/EW VisitBaseline to EOST/EW Visit (up to Week 33 for the lanreotide Autogel group and up to Week 32 for the lanreotide PR group).
The standardised mean change from Baseline in age-adjusted log-transformed IGF-1 standard deviation score (SDS) at EOST/EW is presented for subjects treated with both lanreotide Autogel and lanreotide PR. Back-transformed results are presented in addition to the results without back-transformation. For each subject the IGF-1 SDS value was calculated based on the z-score derivation: IGF-1 SDS = (IGF-1 - mean)/ standard deviation (SD), with mean and SD derived from the upper limit of normal (ULN) and lower limit of normal (LLN) margins for each age category. ULN = Mean + 2 SD; LLN = Mean - 2 SD. The SDS indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean. A SDS of 0 is equal to the mean with negative numbers indicating values lower than the mean and positive values higher. A negative change in the SDS indicates a decrease in the mean age-adjusted IGF-1 values.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Normal Age-adjusted IGF-1 Levels at the EOST/EW VisitBaseline to EOST/EW Visit (up to Week 33 for the lanreotide Autogel group and up to Week 32 for the lanreotide PR group).
The percentage of subjects with normal age-adjusted IGF-1 levels at the EOST/EW Visit is presented for subjects treated with Lanreotide Autogel and Lanreotide PR. At baseline, all subjects had abnormal IGF-1 levels as per protocol entry criteria.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With GH ≤2.5 Micrograms Per Litre (mcg/L) at the EOST/EW VisitBaseline to EOST/EW Visit (up to Week 33 for the lanreotide Autogel group and up to Week 32 for the lanreotide PR group).
The percentage of subjects with GH ≤2.5 mcg/L at the EOST/EW Visit is presented for subjects treated with lanreotide Autogel and lanreotide PR. At baseline, all subjects had GH levels \>2.5 mcg/L as per protocol entry criteria.
SecondaryThe Percentage of Subjects With GH ≤1 mcg/L at the EOST/EW VisitBaseline to EOST/EW Visit (up to Week 33 for the lanreotide Autogel group and up to Week 32 for the lanreotide PR group).
The percentage of subjects with GH ≤1 mcg/L at the EOST/EW Visit is presented for subjects treated with lanreotide Autogel and lanreotide PR. At baseline, all subjects had GH levels \>2.5 mcg/L as per protocol entry criteria.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With Normal Age-adjusted IGF-1 Levels and Who Have GH Levels >1 mcg/L and ≤2.5 mcg/L at the EOST/EW VisitBaseline to EOST/EW Visit (up to Week 33 for the lanreotide Autogel group and up to Week 32 for the lanreotide PR group).
The percentage of subjects with normal age-adjusted IGF-1 levels and who have GH levels \>1 mcg/L but ≤2.5 mcg/L at the EOST/EW Visit is presented for subjects treated with lanreotide Autogel and lanreotide PR. The calculation of percentages was based on the overall ITT population. At baseline, all subjects had abnormal IGF-1 levels and GH levels \>2.5 mcg/L as per protocol entry criteria.
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in GH Values at the EOST/EW VisitBaseline to EOST/EW Visit (up to Week 33 for the lanreotide Autogel group and up to Week 32 for the lanreotide PR group).The mean change from baseline in GH values at the EOST/EW Visit is presented for subjects treated with lanreotide Autogel and lanreotide PR.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With at Least 20% Reduction in Tumour Volume at EOST/EW Visit Compared to BaselineBaseline to EOST/EW Visit (up to Week 33 for the lanreotide Autogel group and up to Week 32 for the lanreotide PR group).
The percentage of subjects with at least a 20% reduction in the solid component of the tumour volume at the EOST/EW Visit compared to baseline is presented for the subgroup of subjects who had solid tumours at baseline. The tumour volume was measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at Screening and at the EOST/EW Visit, and then assessed by two independent blinded readers.
SecondaryMedian Percentage Change From Baseline in Tumour Volume at the EOST/EW VisitBaseline to EOST/EW Visit (up to Week 33 for the lanreotide Autogel group and up to Week 32 for the lanreotide PR group).
The median percentage change in the solid component of the tumour volume from baseline to the EOST/EW Visit is presented. The tumour volume was measured by MRI at Screening and at the EOST/EW Visit, and then assessed by two independent blinded readers.
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With at Least One Symptom of Acromegaly at Week 13 and at the EOST/EW Visit Compared to BaselineBaseline, Week 13 Visit and EOST/EW Visit (up to Week 33 for the lanreotide Autogel group and up to Week 32 for the lanreotide PR group).
The percentage of subjects with at least one symptom of acromegaly at Week 13 and at the EOST/EW Visit compared with baseline is presented for subjects treated with lanreotide Autogel and lanreotide PR. The symptoms of acromegaly monitored included: headache, excessive perspiration, fatigue, soft tissue swelling and arthralgia.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYStandardised Mean Change From Baseline in Age-adjusted IGF-1 Levels at the EOST/EW VisitBaseline to EOST/EW Visit (up to Week 33 for the lanreotide Autogel group and up to Week 32 for the lanreotide PR group).
The Per Protocol population consisted of all subjects who were randomised and treated with at least one baseline and at least one postbaseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter and for whom no major protocol deviations occurred with impact on efficacy assessment.
SDSLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects With Normal Age-adjusted IGF-1 Levels at the EOST/EW VisitBaseline to EOST/EW Visit (up to Week 33 for the lanreotide Autogel group and up to Week 32 for the lanreotide PR group).
The Intention-To-Treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomised and treated subjects who had at least one baseline and at least one postbaseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter. The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised.
Percentage of SubjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects With GH ≤2.5 Micrograms Per Litre (mcg/L) at the EOST/EW VisitBaseline to EOST/EW Visit (up to Week 33 for the lanreotide Autogel group and up to Week 32 for the lanreotide PR group).
The ITT population consisted of all randomised and treated subjects who had at least one baseline and at least one postbaseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter. The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised.
Percentage of SubjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYThe Percentage of Subjects With GH ≤1 mcg/L at the EOST/EW VisitBaseline to EOST/EW Visit (up to Week 33 for the lanreotide Autogel group and up to Week 32 for the lanreotide PR group).
The ITT population consisted of all randomised and treated subjects who had at least one baseline and at least one postbaseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter. The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised.
Percentage of SubjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects With Normal Age-adjusted IGF-1 Levels and Who Have GH Levels >1 mcg/L and ≤2.5 mcg/L at the EOST/EW VisitBaseline to EOST/EW Visit (up to Week 33 for the lanreotide Autogel group and up to Week 32 for the lanreotide PR group).
The ITT population consisted of all randomised and treated subjects who had at least one baseline and at least one postbaseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter. The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised.
Percentage of SubjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYMean Change From Baseline in GH Values at the EOST/EW VisitBaseline to EOST/EW Visit (up to Week 33 for the lanreotide Autogel group and up to Week 32 for the lanreotide PR group).
The ITT population consisted of all randomised and treated subjects who had at least one baseline and at least one postbaseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter. The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised. Subjects with data available at time of analysis are presented.
mcg/LMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects With at Least 20% Reduction in Tumour Volume at EOST/EW Visit Compared to BaselineBaseline to EOST/EW Visit (up to Week 33 for the lanreotide Autogel group and up to Week 32 for the lanreotide PR group).
The ITT population consisted of all randomised and treated subjects who had at least one baseline and at least one postbaseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter. The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised. Data is presented for the subgroup of subjects in the ITT population who had solid tumours at baseline.
Percentage of SubjectsNUMBER
SECONDARYMedian Percentage Change From Baseline in Tumour Volume at the EOST/EW VisitBaseline to EOST/EW Visit (up to Week 33 for the lanreotide Autogel group and up to Week 32 for the lanreotide PR group).
The ITT population consisted of all randomised and treated subjects who had at least one baseline and at least one postbaseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter. The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised. Data is presented for the subgroup of subjects in the ITT population who had solid tumours at baseline.
Percentage change in tumour volumeMEDIAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Subjects With at Least One Symptom of Acromegaly at Week 13 and at the EOST/EW Visit Compared to BaselineBaseline, Week 13 Visit and EOST/EW Visit (up to Week 33 for the lanreotide Autogel group and up to Week 32 for the lanreotide PR group).
The ITT population consisted of all randomised and treated subjects who had at least one baseline and at least one postbaseline assessment of the primary efficacy parameter. The ITT population was analysed using subjects as randomised.
Percentage of SubjectsNUMBER

Results by group22

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Standardised Mean Change From Baseline in Age-adjusted IGF-1 Levels at the EOST/EW VisitLanreotide AutogelWithout back-transformation-0.84Standard Error 0.15SDS
Standardised Mean Change From Baseline in Age-adjusted IGF-1 Levels at the EOST/EW VisitLanreotide PRWithout back-transformation-0.52Standard Error 0.17SDS
Standardised Mean Change From Baseline in Age-adjusted IGF-1 Levels at the EOST/EW VisitLanreotide AutogelWith back transformation0.43Standard Error 1.16SDS
Standardised Mean Change From Baseline in Age-adjusted IGF-1 Levels at the EOST/EW VisitLanreotide PRWith back transformation0.59Standard Error 1.19SDS
Percentage of Subjects With Normal Age-adjusted IGF-1 Levels at the EOST/EW VisitLanreotide Autogel15.6Percentage of Subjects
Percentage of Subjects With Normal Age-adjusted IGF-1 Levels at the EOST/EW VisitLanreotide PR9.4Percentage of Subjects
Percentage of Subjects With GH ≤2.5 Micrograms Per Litre (mcg/L) at the EOST/EW VisitLanreotide Autogel29.7Percentage of Subjects
Percentage of Subjects With GH ≤2.5 Micrograms Per Litre (mcg/L) at the EOST/EW VisitLanreotide PR31.3Percentage of Subjects
The Percentage of Subjects With GH ≤1 mcg/L at the EOST/EW VisitLanreotide Autogel10.9Percentage of Subjects
The Percentage of Subjects With GH ≤1 mcg/L at the EOST/EW VisitLanreotide PR9.4Percentage of Subjects

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDLanreotide Autogel64
Overall StudySTARTEDLanreotide PR64
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLanreotide Autogel62
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLanreotide PR57
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLanreotide Autogel2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDLanreotide PR7

Adverse events94

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersLanreotide Autogel5164194
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersLanreotide PR4664337
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersLanreotide Autogel226467
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersLanreotide PR2764146
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersLanreotide Autogel186440
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersLanreotide PR2064114
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersLanreotide Autogel136432
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersLanreotide PR166437
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersLanreotide Autogel7647
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersLanreotide PR166469

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityLanreotide Autogel064
Total, all-cause mortalityLanreotide PR064
Total, other adverse eventsLanreotide Autogel5964
Total, other adverse eventsLanreotide PR6264
Total, serious adverse eventsLanreotide Autogel164
Total, serious adverse eventsLanreotide PR264

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
32366244DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Lanreotide Autogel vs Lanreotide PR: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Lanreotide Autogel vs Lanreotide PR: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02493517

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02493517/results?page=2