ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02494583

Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) as First-Line Monotherapy and Combination Therapy for Treatment of Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma (MK-3475-062/KEYNOTE-062)

NCT02494583, Phase 3, Completed, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC; results first posted 2020-03-13

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) as First-Line Monotherapy and Combination Therapy for Treatment of Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma (MK-3475-062/KEYNOTE-062). Trials, record NCT02494583. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02494583

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) as First-Line Monotherapy and Combination Therapy for Treatment of Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma (MK-3475-062/KEYNOTE-062)
NCT number
NCT02494583
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
763 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Conditions
Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Interventions
Pembrolizumab, Cisplatin, 5-FU, Capecitabine, Placebo
First posted
2015-07-10
Last updated
2023-04-13
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2015-000972-88
Results first posted
2020-03-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
Primary
Pembro Combo vs SOC: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)
Up to approximately 36 months
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 based on BICR, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum had to demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. Per protocol, PFS in the pembro combo arm was compared to the SOC arm as a pre-specified primary analysis of the Intent-To-Treat (ITT) population. PFS is reported here for all participants in the pembro combo arm and SOC arm who were PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (all participants). Per protocol, PFS was compared separately between CPS ≥1 participants of the pembro mono arm and SOC arm and is presented later in the record.
PrimaryPembro Combo vs SOC: Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)Up to approximately 42 months
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. Per protocol, OS in the pembro combo arm was compared to the SOC arm as a pre-specified primary analysis of the ITT population. OS is reported here for all participants in the pembro combo arm and SOC arm who were PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (all participants). Per protocol, OS was compared separately between CPS ≥1 participants of the pembro mono arm and SOC arm and is presented later in the record.
PrimaryPembro Combo vs SOC: OS in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10Up to approximately 42 months
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. Per protocol, OS in the pembro combo arm was compared to the SOC arm as a pre-specified primary analysis of the ITT population. OS is reported here for all participants in the pembro combo arm and SOC arm who were PD-L1 CPS ≥10. Per protocol, OS was compared separately between CPS ≥10 participants of the pembro mono arm and SOC arm and is presented later in the record.
PrimaryPembro Mono vs SOC: OS in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)Up to approximately 42 months
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. Per protocol, OS in the pembro mono arm was compared to the SOC arm as a pre-specified primary analysis of the ITT population. OS is reported here for all participants in the pembro mono arm and SOC arm who were PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (all participants). Per protocol, OS was compared separately between CPS ≥1 participants of the pembro combo arm and SOC arm and is presented earlier in the record.
PrimaryPembro Mono vs SOC: OS in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10Up to approximately 42 months
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. Per protocol, OS in the pembro mono arm was compared to the SOC arm as a pre-specified primary analysis of the ITT population. OS is reported here for all participants in the pembro mono arm and SOC arm who were PD-L1 CPS ≥10. Per protocol, OS was compared separately between CPS ≥10 participants of the pembro combo arm and SOC arm and is presented earlier in the record.
SecondaryPembro Combo vs SOC: Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST 1.1 by BICR in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)Up to approximately 42 months
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis population who have a Complete Response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: ≥30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per RECIST 1.1. based upon BICR. Per protocol, ORR in the pembro combo arm was compared to the SOC arm as a pre-specified secondary analysis of the ITT population. The percentage of participants who experienced CR or PR is reported here as the ORR for all participants in the pembro combo arm and SOC arm who were PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (all participants). Per protocol, ORR was compared separately between CPS ≥1 participants of the pembro mono arm and SOC arm and is presented later in the record.
SecondaryPembro Combo vs SOC: Duration of Response (DOR) Per RECIST 1.1 by BICR in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)Up to approximately 42 months
For participants who demonstrated a confirmed CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per RECIST 1.1 based upon BICR, DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of confirmed CR or PR until PD or death, whichever occurred first. DOR for participants who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis was censored at the date of their last tumor assessment. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum had to demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. DOR is reported here for all participants in the pembro combo arm and SOC arm who were PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (all participants) and had CR or PR. Per protocol, DOR was compared separately between CPS ≥1 responders of the pembro mono arm and SOC arm and is presented later in the record.
SecondaryPembro Mono vs SOC: ORR Per RECIST 1.1 by BICR in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)Up to approximately 42 months
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants in the analysis population who have a CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or PR (≥30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per RECIST 1.1. based upon BICR. Per protocol, ORR in the pembro mono arm was compared to the SOC arm as a pre-specified secondary analysis of the ITT population. The percentage of participants who experienced CR or PR is reported here as the ORR for all participants in the pembro mono arm and SOC arm who were PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (all participants). Per protocol, ORR was compared separately between CPS ≥1 participants of the pembro combo arm and SOC arm and is presented earlier in the record.
SecondaryPembro Mono vs SOC: DOR Per RECIST 1.1 by BICR in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)Up to approximately 42 months
For participants who demonstrated a confirmed CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or PR (≥30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per RECIST 1.1 based upon BICR, DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of confirmed CR or PR until PD or death, whichever occurred first. DOR for participants who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis was censored at the date of their last tumor assessment. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum had to demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. DOR is reported here for all participants in the pembro mono arm and SOC arm who were PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (all participants) and had CR or PR. Per protocol, DOR was compared separately between CPS ≥1 responders of the pembro combo arm and SOC arm and is presented earlier in the record.
SecondaryPembro Mono vs SOC: PFS Per RECIST 1.1 by BICR in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)Up to approximately 42 months
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented PD per RECIST 1.1 based on BICR, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Per RECIST 1.1, PD was defined as ≥20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum had to demonstrate an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered PD. Per protocol, PFS in the pembro mono arm was compared to the SOC arm as a pre-specified secondary analysis of the ITT population. PFS is reported here for all participants in the pembro mono arm and SOC arm who were PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (all participants). Per protocol, PFS was compared separately between CPS ≥1 participants of the pembro combo arm and SOC arm and is presented earlier in the record.

Outcomes16

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARY
Pembro Combo vs SOC: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)
Up to approximately 36 months
All CPS ≥1 participants in the ITT population randomized to the pembro combo arm and SOC arm were analyzed. Per protocol, the pembro mono arm was compared to the SOC arm separately and not included in this analysis.
MonthsMEDIAN
PRIMARYPembro Combo vs SOC: Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)Up to approximately 42 months
All CPS ≥1 participants in the ITT population randomized to the pembro combo arm and SOC arm were analyzed. Per protocol, the pembro mono arm was compared to the SOC arm separately and not included in this analysis.
MonthsMEDIAN
PRIMARYPembro Combo vs SOC: OS in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10Up to approximately 42 months
All CPS ≥10 participants in the ITT population randomized to the pembro combo arm and SOC arm were analyzed. Per protocol, the pembro mono arm was compared to the SOC arm separately and not included in this analysis.
MonthsMEDIAN
PRIMARYPembro Mono vs SOC: OS in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)Up to approximately 42 months
All CPS ≥1 participants in the ITT population randomized to the pembro mono arm and SOC arm were analyzed. Per protocol, the pembro combo arm was compared to the SOC arm separately and not included in this analysis.
MonthsMEDIAN
PRIMARYPembro Mono vs SOC: OS in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10Up to approximately 42 months
All CPS ≥10 participants in the ITT population randomized to the pembro mono arm and SOC arm were analyzed. Per protocol, the pembro combo arm was compared to the SOC arm separately and not included in this analysis.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPembro Combo vs SOC: Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST 1.1 by BICR in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)Up to approximately 42 months
All CPS ≥1 participants in the ITT population randomized to the pembro combo arm and SOC arm were analyzed. Per protocol, the pembro mono arm was compared to the SOC arm separately and not included in this analysis.
Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPembro Combo vs SOC: Duration of Response (DOR) Per RECIST 1.1 by BICR in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)Up to approximately 42 months
All CPS ≥1 participants in the ITT population randomized to the pembro combo arm and SOC arm and who demonstrated a confirmed CR or PR were analyzed. Per protocol, the pembro mono arm was compared to the SOC arm separately and not included in this analysis.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPembro Mono vs SOC: ORR Per RECIST 1.1 by BICR in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)Up to approximately 42 months
All CPS ≥1 participants in the ITT population randomized to the pembro mono arm and SOC arm were analyzed. Per protocol, the pembro combo arm was compared to the SOC arm separately and not included in this analysis.
Percentage of ParticipantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPembro Mono vs SOC: DOR Per RECIST 1.1 by BICR in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)Up to approximately 42 months
All CPS ≥1 participants in the ITT population randomized to the pembro mono arm and SOC arm and who demonstrated a confirmed CR or PR were analyzed. Per protocol, the pembro combo arm was compared to the SOC arm separately and not included in this analysis.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYPembro Mono vs SOC: PFS Per RECIST 1.1 by BICR in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)Up to approximately 42 months
All CPS ≥1 participants in the ITT population randomized to the pembro mono arm and SOC arm were analyzed. Per protocol, the pembro combo arm was compared to the SOC arm separately and not included in this analysis.
MonthsMEDIAN

Results by group34

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Pembro Combo vs SOC: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)
Pembrolizumab + SOC Chemotherapy (Pembro Combo)6.995% Confidence Interval 5.7 to 7.3Months
Pembro Combo vs SOC: Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)
Placebo + SOC Chemotherapy (SOC)6.495% Confidence Interval 5.7 to 7.0Months
Pembro Combo vs SOC: Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)Pembrolizumab + SOC Chemotherapy (Pembro Combo)12.595% Confidence Interval 10.8 to 13.9Months
Pembro Combo vs SOC: Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)Placebo + SOC Chemotherapy (SOC)11.195% Confidence Interval 9.2 to 12.8Months
Pembro Combo vs SOC: OS in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10Pembrolizumab + SOC Chemotherapy (Pembro Combo)12.395% Confidence Interval 9.5 to 14.8Months
Pembro Combo vs SOC: OS in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10Placebo + SOC Chemotherapy (SOC)10.895% Confidence Interval 8.5 to 13.8Months
Pembro Mono vs SOC: OS in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)Pembrolizumab Monotherapy (Pembro Mono)10.695% Confidence Interval 7.7 to 13.8Months
Pembro Mono vs SOC: OS in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥1 (All Participants)Placebo + SOC Chemotherapy (SOC)11.195% Confidence Interval 9.2 to 12.8Months
Pembro Mono vs SOC: OS in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10Pembrolizumab Monotherapy (Pembro Mono)17.495% Confidence Interval 9.1 to 23.1Months
Pembro Mono vs SOC: OS in Participants With PD-L1 CPS ≥10Placebo + SOC Chemotherapy (SOC)10.895% Confidence Interval 8.5 to 13.8Months

Participant flow15

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPembrolizumab Monotherapy (Pembro Mono)256
Overall StudySTARTEDPembrolizumab + SOC Chemotherapy (Pembro Combo)257
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo + SOC Chemotherapy (SOC)250
Overall StudyReceived First Course of PembrolizumabPembrolizumab Monotherapy (Pembro Mono)254
Overall StudyReceived First Course of PembrolizumabPembrolizumab + SOC Chemotherapy (Pembro Combo)250
Overall StudyReceived First Course of PembrolizumabPlacebo + SOC Chemotherapy (SOC)244
Overall StudyReceived Second Course of PembrolizumabPembrolizumab Monotherapy (Pembro Mono)4
Overall StudyReceived Second Course of PembrolizumabPembrolizumab + SOC Chemotherapy (Pembro Combo)5
Overall StudyReceived Second Course of PembrolizumabPlacebo + SOC Chemotherapy (SOC)0
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPembrolizumab Monotherapy (Pembro Mono)0

Adverse events1,375

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab Monotherapy (Pembro Mono) First Course6125473
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab + SOC Chemotherapy (Pembro Combo)-First Course112250150
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo + SOC Chemotherapy (SOC)-First Course108244144
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab Monotherapy Second Course343
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab + SOC Chemotherapy-Second Course050
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab Monotherapy (Pembro Mono) First Course02540
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab + SOC Chemotherapy (Pembro Combo)-First Course2125052
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo + SOC Chemotherapy (SOC)-First Course2624451
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab Monotherapy Second Course040
otherLeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPembrolizumab + SOC Chemotherapy-Second Course050

Adverse event totals15

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPembrolizumab Monotherapy (Pembro Mono) First Course229256
Total, all-cause mortalityPembrolizumab + SOC Chemotherapy (Pembro Combo)-First Course232257
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo + SOC Chemotherapy (SOC)-First Course240250
Total, all-cause mortalityPembrolizumab Monotherapy Second Course24
Total, all-cause mortalityPembrolizumab + SOC Chemotherapy-Second Course15
Total, other adverse eventsPembrolizumab Monotherapy (Pembro Mono) First Course216254
Total, other adverse eventsPembrolizumab + SOC Chemotherapy (Pembro Combo)-First Course239250
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo + SOC Chemotherapy (SOC)-First Course234244
Total, other adverse eventsPembrolizumab Monotherapy Second Course34
Total, other adverse eventsPembrolizumab + SOC Chemotherapy-Second Course55

Papers6

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
32880601DERIVEDPubMed
33792646DERIVEDPubMed
35657979DERIVEDPubMed
36533429DERIVEDPubMed
37037952DERIVEDPubMed
40117530DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02494583

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02494583/results?page=2