ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02510014

Safety and Tolerability Study of Depot Buprenorphine in Treatment Seeking Subjects With Opioid Use Disorder

NCT02510014, Phase 3, Completed, Indivior Inc.; results first posted 2018-03-29

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Safety and Tolerability Study of Depot Buprenorphine in Treatment Seeking Subjects With Opioid Use Disorder. Trials, record NCT02510014. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02510014

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Safety and Tolerability Study of Depot Buprenorphine in Treatment Seeking Subjects With Opioid Use Disorder
NCT number
NCT02510014
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
775 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Indivior Inc.
Conditions
Opioid Use Disorder, Opioid-related Disorders
Interventions
SUBOXONE sublingual film, RBP-6000
First posted
2015-07-28
Last updated
2018-03-29
Results first posted
2018-03-29

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes8

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Treatment PeriodDay 1 to Week 49 (De novo arm); Day 1 to Week 25 (Roll-over arm)
TEAE=any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity after dispensation of the study drug and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= a marked limitation in activity. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in this definition.
PrimaryPercentage Change From Baseline to End of Study (Weeks 25 and 49) in Vital SignsBaseline (Day 1 predose) End of Study: Week 49 (De novo arm); Week 25 (Roll-over arm)
Vital signs include * systolic blood pressure (mmHg) * diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) * respiratory rate (breaths/minute) * weight (kg) * body mass index (kg/m\^2) * waist-to-hip ratio Baseline is defined as the last non-missing value prior to subcutaneous injection of RBP-6000 on Day 1.
PrimaryShifts in Suicidality Using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) From Baseline to Most Severe Assessment During the Treatment PeriodBaseline (Screening visit, days -21 to -15), End of Study: Week 49 (De novo arm); Week 25 (Roll-over arm)
The C-SSRS asks questions of study participants regarding whether they had suicidal ideation and/or suicidal behavior since the last visit using the electronic version of the scale. Only the most severe assessment is reported in this summary. Participants who experienced suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior are only summarized in the suicidal behavior since behavior is more severe than ideation. C-SSRS baseline version was completed during the screening visit. C-SSRS 'since-last-visit' version was completed weekly for the first month and at least every month until the end of the study. Shift table category titles are structured as: baseline category/treatment category. The category 'No Suicidal Ideation or Behaviour' has been abbreviated as 'No Suicidal I or B'.
PrimaryWorst Local Injection Site Pain From Injections as Measured by Participant-Reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS)De Novo Subjects: Days 1, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169, 197, 225, 253, 281 and 309 Roll-over Subjects: Days 1, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141
Injection site pain as measured by participant-reported VAS. The participant-reported VAS for injection site pain was measured on a 100 mm scale with 'no pain' at 0 mm and 'strongest pain ever' at 100 mm (total scale of 0-100). Participants marked where along the scale reflected their localized injection pain. The injection site pain VAS scores were obtained (after the completion of the injection) within 1 minute and at 5, 10, 15, 30 and 60 minutes (+- 5 minutes). The timing of the injection site pain VAS should have been measured from the end of the injection. Data represents the worst pain recorded for each participant across all injections and all VAS records. The mean value is presented. De Novo subjects were given injections on Days 1, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169, 197, 225, 253, 281 and 309. Roll-over subjects were given injections on Days 1, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) at End of Study (Weeks 25 and 49)Baseline (Day 1 predose), End of Study: Week 49 (De novo arm); Week 25 (Roll-over arm)
COWS is an 11-item instrument used to assess signs and symptoms of opioid withdrawal. The score is the sum of the responses for a total range of 0-48. The COWS is commonly used by clinicians treating patients with buprenorphine to monitor the severity of withdrawal. COWS scores below 5 are considered not indicative of withdrawal. Scores from 5 to 12 are considered mild withdrawal; from 13 to 24 moderate withdrawal; 25 to 36 moderately severe withdrawal, and 37-48 severe withdrawal. Negative change from baseline values indicate a lessening of withdrawal symptoms. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to subcutaneous injection on Day 1. Baseline value is reported as an observed actual value. Weeks 25 and 49 represent change from baseline values.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) at End of Study (Weeks 25 and 49)Baseline (Day 1 predose), End of Study: Week 49 (De novo arm); Week 25 (Roll-over arm)
The Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) contains 16 symptoms whose intensity the participant rates on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) for a full scale of 0 (no withdrawal symptoms) to 64 (extreme withdrawal symptoms). Negative change from baseline values indicate a lessening of withdrawal symptoms. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to subcutaneous injection on Day 1. Baseline value is reported as an observed actual value. Weeks 25 and 49 represent change from baseline values.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Opioid Craving Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at End of Study (Weeks 25 and 49)Baseline (Day 1 predose), End of Study: Week 49 (De novo arm); Week 25 (Roll-over arm)
The opioid craving scale was a 100 mm scale with 'no craving' indicated by 0 mm and 'strongest craving ever' indicated by 100 mm. Participants marked where along the scale reflected their craving for opioids. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value prior to subcutaneous injection on Day 1. Baseline value is reported as an observed actual value. Weeks 25 and 49 represent change from baseline values.
SecondaryCumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of the Percentage Abstinence Collected From Week 1 Through End of Study (Weeks 25 and 49)Weekly during Month 1, Every other week from Month 2-6, Monthly from Month 7-12. De novo arm stopped at Week 49. Roll-over arm stopped at Week 25
Participants' self-reported illicit opioid drug use from the timeline followback (TLFB) interview and results from the urine drug screens (UDS) for opioids were combined into a single endpoint. Opioids assessed included codeine, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, opiates, oxycodone, and oxymorphone (by UDS) and amphetamine/methadone, buprenorphine, methadone, and opioids in the TLFB. Data represent the count of participants at various percentage abstinence levels. Abstinence was defined as urine samples being negative for opioids AND negative self-reports (obtained from Timeline Followback (TLFB) interviews) for illicit opioid use. The endpoint was based on visits in which paired urine samples and self-reports were expected for each subject as specified in the schedule of events. All missing reports for opioids were considered nonnegative.

Outcomes8

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Treatment PeriodDay 1 to Week 49 (De novo arm); Day 1 to Week 25 (Roll-over arm)Safety analysis setParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYPercentage Change From Baseline to End of Study (Weeks 25 and 49) in Vital SignsBaseline (Day 1 predose) End of Study: Week 49 (De novo arm); Week 25 (Roll-over arm)Safety analysis set of participants with both a baseline and end of study readingpercentage change from baselineMEAN
PRIMARYShifts in Suicidality Using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) From Baseline to Most Severe Assessment During the Treatment PeriodBaseline (Screening visit, days -21 to -15), End of Study: Week 49 (De novo arm); Week 25 (Roll-over arm)Safety population. Four de novo subjects and one roll-over subject are not reported because they used the C-SSRS baseline version throughout the study.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYWorst Local Injection Site Pain From Injections as Measured by Participant-Reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS)De Novo Subjects: Days 1, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141, 169, 197, 225, 253, 281 and 309 Roll-over Subjects: Days 1, 29, 57, 85, 113, 141Safety analysis setunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) at End of Study (Weeks 25 and 49)Baseline (Day 1 predose), End of Study: Week 49 (De novo arm); Week 25 (Roll-over arm)Safety analysis setunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) at End of Study (Weeks 25 and 49)Baseline (Day 1 predose), End of Study: Week 49 (De novo arm); Week 25 (Roll-over arm)Safety analysis setunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in the Opioid Craving Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at End of Study (Weeks 25 and 49)Baseline (Day 1 predose), End of Study: Week 49 (De novo arm); Week 25 (Roll-over arm)Safety analysis setunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYCumulative Distribution Function (CDF) of the Percentage Abstinence Collected From Week 1 Through End of Study (Weeks 25 and 49)Weekly during Month 1, Every other week from Month 2-6, Monthly from Month 7-12. De novo arm stopped at Week 49. Roll-over arm stopped at Week 25Safety analysis setParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group101

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Treatment PeriodDe Novo Subjects>=1 TEAE302Participants
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Treatment PeriodRoll-over Subjects>=1 TEAE145Participants
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Treatment PeriodDe Novo Subjects>=1 TEAE related to study drug172Participants
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Treatment PeriodRoll-over Subjects>=1 TEAE related to study drug61Participants
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Treatment PeriodDe Novo Subjects>=1 serious TEAE16Participants
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Treatment PeriodRoll-over Subjects>=1 serious TEAE9Participants
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Treatment PeriodDe Novo Subjects>=1 serious study treatment-related TEAE0Participants
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Treatment PeriodRoll-over Subjects>=1 serious study treatment-related TEAE0Participants
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Treatment PeriodDe Novo SubjectsDeath0Participants
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Treatment PeriodRoll-over SubjectsDeath0Participants

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Run-In Period (Days -14 to Day -1)STARTEDDe Novo Subjects508
Run-In Period (Days -14 to Day -1)STARTEDRoll-over Subjects267
Run-In Period (Days -14 to Day -1)COMPLETEDDe Novo Subjects412
Run-In Period (Days -14 to Day -1)COMPLETEDRoll-over Subjects257
Run-In Period (Days -14 to Day -1)NOT COMPLETEDDe Novo Subjects96
Run-In Period (Days -14 to Day -1)NOT COMPLETEDRoll-over Subjects10
Treatment PeriodSTARTEDDe Novo Subjects412
Treatment PeriodSTARTEDRoll-over Subjects257
Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDDe Novo Subjects206
Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDRoll-over Subjects200

Adverse events68

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersDe Novo Subjects47412
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersRoll-over Subjects9257
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersDe Novo Subjects37412
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersRoll-over Subjects10257
otherInjection site painGeneral disordersDe Novo Subjects39412
otherInjection site painGeneral disordersRoll-over Subjects7257
otherInsomniaPsychiatric disordersDe Novo Subjects27412
otherInsomniaPsychiatric disordersRoll-over Subjects10257
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersDe Novo Subjects31412
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersRoll-over Subjects5257

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDe Novo Subjects0412
Total, all-cause mortalityRoll-over Subjects0257
Total, other adverse eventsDe Novo Subjects146412
Total, other adverse eventsRoll-over Subjects42257
Total, serious adverse eventsDe Novo Subjects16412
Total, serious adverse eventsRoll-over Subjects9257

Papers2

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
35287034DERIVEDPubMed
37657559DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
De Novo Subjects vs Roll-over Subjects: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
De Novo Subjects vs Roll-over Subjects: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02510014

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02510014/results?page=2