ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02526160

Study of KRN23 in Adults With X-linked Hypophosphatemia (XLH)

NCT02526160, Phase 3, Completed, Kyowa Kirin, Inc.; results first posted 2021-02-05

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of KRN23 in Adults With X-linked Hypophosphatemia (XLH). Trials, record NCT02526160. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02526160

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of KRN23 in Adults With X-linked Hypophosphatemia (XLH)
NCT number
NCT02526160
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
134 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Kyowa Kirin, Inc.
Conditions
X-linked Hypophosphatemia
Interventions
burosumab, Placebo
First posted
2015-08-18
Last updated
2024-06-18
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2014-005529-11
Results first posted
2021-02-05

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes33

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
Primary
Percentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above the LLN (2.5 mg/dL [0.81 mmol/L]) at the Mid-Point of the Dose Interval, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24
Baseline through Week 24
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Question 3 (Q3; Worst Pain in Past 24 Hours) ScoreBaseline, 24 weeks
The BPI evaluates the condition of all pain over the previous 24 hours. Two dimensions are measured: pain severity (worst, least, average, and now) and the impact of pain on functioning (pain interference with general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep). Question 3 of the short-form BPI (BPI-Q3) asks subjects to rate their pain at its worst in the last 24 hours on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). From the generalized estimating equation (GEE) model, which includes the change from Baseline for the endpoint of interest as the dependent variable; region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification (not included for analysis of BPI Worst Pain), and visit by treatment as fixed factors; and Baseline value for the endpoint of interest as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness ScoreBaseline, 24 weeks
The WOMAC is a 24-item participant-reported questionnaire with two domains, Stiffness (2 questions) and Physical Function (17 questions) over the previous 48 hours. The WOMAC is administered in a 5-point Likert-scale format using descriptors of none, mild, moderate, severe, and extreme corresponding to an ordinal scale of 0-4. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse stiffness and functional limitations. Scores are normalized to a 0-100 metric where 0 was the best health state and 100 the worst. The GEE estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for WOMAC Stiffness as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of WOMAC Stiffness as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in the WOMAC Physical Function ScoreBaseline, 24 weeks
The WOMAC is a 24-item participant-reported questionnaire with two domains, Stiffness (2 questions) and Physical Function (17 questions) over the previous 48 hours. The WOMAC is administered in a 5-point Likert-scale format using descriptors of none, mild, moderate, severe, and extreme corresponding to an ordinal scale of 0-4. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse stiffness and functional limitations. Scores are normalized to a 0-100 metric where 0 was the best health state and 100 the worst. The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for WOMAC Physical Function as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of WOMAC Physical Function as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Worst Pain ScoreBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96
Change from baseline to post-baseline visits in BPI-Q3 (Worst Pain) score as averaged from daily diary scores recorded over 1 week and the study visit score. The BPI evaluates the condition of all pain over the previous 24 hours. Two dimensions are measured: pain severity (worst, least, average, and now) and the impact of pain on functioning (pain interference with general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep). Question 3 of the short-form BPI (BPI-Q3) asks subjects to rate their pain at its worst in the last 24 hours on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for BPI worst pain as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of BPI Worst Pain as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Severity ScoreBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96
Change from baseline to post-baseline visits in BPI pain severity score as averaged from daily diary scores recorded over 1 week and the study visit score. The BPI evaluates the condition of all pain over the previous 24 hours. Two dimensions are measured: pain severity (worst, least, average, and now) and the impact of pain on functioning (pain interference with general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep). The severity of pain in the last 24 hours is rated on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for each BPI endpoint as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of each BPI endpoint as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Interference ScoreBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96
Change from baseline to post-baseline visits in BPI pain interference score as recorded on the day of the study visit. The BPI evaluates the condition of all pain over the previous 24 hours. Two dimensions are measured: pain severity (worst, least, average, and now) and the impact of pain on functioning (pain interference with general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep). Pain interference in the last 24 hours is rated on a scale of 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for each BPI endpoint as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of each BPI endpoint as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Stiffness ScoreBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144
The WOMAC is a 24-item participant-reported questionnaire with two domains, Stiffness (2 questions) and Physical Function (17 questions) over the previous 48 hours. The WOMAC is administered in a 5-point Likert-scale format using descriptors of none, mild, moderate, severe, and extreme corresponding to an ordinal scale of 0-4. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse stiffness and functional limitations. Scores are normalized to a 0-100 metric where 0 was the best health state and 100 the worst. The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for WOMAC Stiffness as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of WOMAC Stiffness as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Physical Function ScoreBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144
The WOMAC is a 24-item participant-reported questionnaire with two domains, Stiffness (2 questions) and Physical Function (17 questions) over the previous 48 hours. The WOMAC is administered in a 5-point Likert-scale format using descriptors of none, mild, moderate, severe, and extreme corresponding to an ordinal scale of 0-4. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse stiffness and functional limitations. Scores are normalized to a 0-100 metric where 0 was the best health state and 100 the worst. The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for WOMAC Stiffness as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of WOMAC Stiffness as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Worst Fatigue ScoreBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96
Change from baseline to post-baseline visits in Brief Fatigue Inventory Question 3 (Worst Fatigue in Past 24 Hours; BFI-Q3) as averaged from daily diary scores recorded over 1 week and the study visit score. The BFI is a self-reported questionnaire consisting of 9 items related to fatigue rated on a 0 to 10 numerical scale with a recall period of 24 hours. Two dimensions are measured: fatigue severity and the interference of fatigue on daily life (activity, mood, walking ability, work, relations with others, and enjoyment of life). Participants are asked to rate their worst fatigue over the past 24 hours from 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (as bad a you can imagine). The GEE Estimates are from the GEE model which includes the change from baseline for each BFI endpoint as the dependent variable, region, visit, treatment, actual randomization stratification and visit by treatment as fixed factors, and baseline of each BFI endpoint as a covariate, with compound symmetry covariance structure.

Outcomes33

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above the LLN (2.5 mg/dL [0.81 mmol/L]) at the Mid-Point of the Dose Interval, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24
Baseline through Week 24Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period.percentage of participantsMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Question 3 (Q3; Worst Pain in Past 24 Hours) ScoreBaseline, 24 weeksPrimary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 24 in the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness ScoreBaseline, 24 weeksPrimary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 24 in the WOMAC Physical Function ScoreBaseline, 24 weeksPrimary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Worst Pain ScoreBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Severity ScoreBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline Over Time in BPI Pain Interference ScoreBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Stiffness ScoreBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline Over Time in WOMAC Physical Function ScoreBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline Over Time in BFI Worst Fatigue ScoreBaseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96Primary Analysis Set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug during the Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period. Participants with an assessment at given time point.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group468

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above the LLN (2.5 mg/dL [0.81 mmol/L]) at the Mid-Point of the Dose Interval, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24
Placebo7.695% Confidence Interval 3.3 to 16.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Mean Serum Phosphorus Levels Above the LLN (2.5 mg/dL [0.81 mmol/L]) at the Mid-Point of the Dose Interval, as Averaged Across Dose Cycles Between Baseline and Week 24
Burosumab92.695% Confidence Interval 83.9 to 96.8percentage of participants
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Question 3 (Q3; Worst Pain in Past 24 Hours) ScorePlacebo-0.32Standard Error 0.222score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Question 3 (Q3; Worst Pain in Past 24 Hours) ScoreBurosumab-0.79Standard Error 0.211score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness ScorePlacebo0.46Standard Error 3.139score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness ScoreBurosumab-7.85Standard Error 3.034score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the WOMAC Physical Function ScorePlacebo1.79Standard Error 2.722score on a scale
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the WOMAC Physical Function ScoreBurosumab-3.11Standard Error 2.553score on a scale
Change From Baseline Over Time in BPI Worst Pain ScorePlaceboChange at Week 12-0.37Standard Error 0.216score on a scale
Change From Baseline Over Time in BPI Worst Pain ScoreBurosumab 1 mg/kgChange at Week 12-0.62Standard Error 0.208score on a scale

Participant flow24

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Double-Blind (Placebo-Controlled) PeriodSTARTEDPlacebo66
Double-Blind (Placebo-Controlled) PeriodSTARTEDBurosumab 1 mg/kg68
Double-Blind (Placebo-Controlled) PeriodCOMPLETEDPlacebo66
Double-Blind (Placebo-Controlled) PeriodCOMPLETEDBurosumab 1 mg/kg67
Double-Blind (Placebo-Controlled) PeriodNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo0
Double-Blind (Placebo-Controlled) PeriodNOT COMPLETEDBurosumab 1 mg/kg1
Open-label Treatment Continuation PeriodSTARTEDPlacebo66
Open-label Treatment Continuation PeriodSTARTEDBurosumab 1 mg/kg67
Open-label Treatment Continuation PeriodCOMPLETEDPlacebo63
Open-label Treatment Continuation PeriodCOMPLETEDBurosumab 1 mg/kg63

Adverse events428

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo (DB Period)166
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersPlacebo -> Burosumab (OL Period)466
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersBurosumab -> Burosumab (Combined DB and OL Period)368
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersTotal Burosumab (Combined DB and OL Period)7134
otherHyperparathyroidism SecondaryEndocrine disordersPlacebo (DB Period)066
otherHyperparathyroidism SecondaryEndocrine disordersPlacebo -> Burosumab (OL Period)366
otherHyperparathyroidism SecondaryEndocrine disordersBurosumab -> Burosumab (Combined DB and OL Period)468
otherHyperparathyroidism SecondaryEndocrine disordersTotal Burosumab (Combined DB and OL Period)7134
otherAbdominal DiscomfortGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo (DB Period)066
otherAbdominal DiscomfortGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo -> Burosumab (OL Period)366

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo (DB Period)066
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo -> Burosumab (OL Period)066
Total, all-cause mortalityBurosumab -> Burosumab (Combined DB and OL Period)168
Total, all-cause mortalityTotal Burosumab (Combined DB and OL Period)1134
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo (DB Period)5766
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo -> Burosumab (OL Period)6366
Total, other adverse eventsBurosumab -> Burosumab (Combined DB and OL Period)6868
Total, other adverse eventsTotal Burosumab (Combined DB and OL Period)131134
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo (DB Period)166
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo -> Burosumab (OL Period)1066

Papers6

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
29947083RESULTPubMed
31165191RESULTPubMed
34548383DERIVEDPubMed
35927518DERIVEDPubMed
36854566DERIVEDPubMed
39151033DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02526160

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02526160/registered?page=2