ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02527200

Effect of Liraglutide for Weight Management in Paediatric Subjects With Prader-Willi Syndrome

NCT02527200, Phase 3, Completed, Novo Nordisk A/S; results first posted 2022-02-03

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Effect of Liraglutide for Weight Management in Paediatric Subjects With Prader-Willi Syndrome. Trials, record NCT02527200. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02527200

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Effect of Liraglutide for Weight Management in Paediatric Subjects With Prader-Willi Syndrome
NCT number
NCT02527200
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
56 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Novo Nordisk A/S
Conditions
Metabolism and Nutrition Disorder, Obesity
Interventions
liraglutide, placebo
First posted
2015-08-18
Last updated
2023-07-06
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2014-004415-37
Results first posted
2022-02-03

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes106

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS) From Baseline to 16 WeeksWeek 0, Week 16
Change in BMI SDS from baseline to week 16 is presented. BMI SDS also called Z-scores, was calculated using the following formula: Z=\[(y / M)\^L - 1\] / S\*L; where L, M and S are median (M), Box-cox power (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents', y= individual BMI. BMI provided for each sex and age. For each participant, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. Possible values range from -3 to +3, a negative score being beneficial.
PrimaryChange in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS) From Baseline to 52 WeeksWeek 0, Week 52
Change in BMI SDS from baseline to week 52 is presented. BMI SDS also called Z-scores, was calculated using the following formula: Z=\[(y / M)\^L - 1\] / S\*L; where L, M and S are median (M), Box-cox power (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents', y= individual BMI. BMI provided for each sex and age. For each participant, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. Possible values range from -3 to +3, a negative score being beneficial.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 5% Reduction in Baseline BMI at Week 16At week 16
Percentage of participants achieving more than or equal to (≥) 5% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 16 is presented. In below table, 'Yes' infers percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 5% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 16 and 'No' infers percentage of participants who did not achieve ≥ 5% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 16.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 5% Reduction in Baseline BMI at Week 52At week 52
Percentage of participants achieving more than or equal to (≥) 5% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 52 is presented. In below table, 'Yes' infers percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 5% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 52 and 'No' infers percentage of participants who did not achieve ≥ 5% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 52.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 10% Reduction in Baseline BMI at Week 16At week 16
Percentage of participants achieving more than or equal to (≥) 10% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 16 is presented. In below table, 'Yes' infers percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 10% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 16 and 'No' infers percentage of participants who did not achieve ≥ 10% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 16.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 10% Reduction in Baseline BMI at Week 52At week 52
Percentage of participants achieving more than or equal to (≥) 10% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 52 is presented. In below table, 'Yes' infers percentage of participants who achieved ≥ 10% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 52 and 'No' infers percentage of participants who did not achieve ≥ 10% reduction in their baseline (week 0) BMI at week 52.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With no Increase in BMI SDS at Week 16At week 16
Percentage of participants with no increase in BMI SDS at week 16 is presented. In below table, 'Yes' infers percentage of participants with no increase in BMI SDS at week 16 and 'No' infers percentage of participants with increase in BMI SDS at week 16.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With no Increase in BMI SDS at Week 52At week 52
Percentage of participants with no increase in BMI SDS at week 52 is presented. In below table, 'Yes' infers percentage of participants with no increase in BMI SDS at week 52 and 'No' infers percentage of participants with increase in BMI SDS at week 52.
SecondaryChange in BMI From Baseline at Week 16Week 0, week 16Change in body mass index (BMI) from baseline to week 16 is presented.
SecondaryChange in BMI From Baseline at Week 52Week 0, week 52Change in body mass index (BMI) from baseline to week 52 is presented.

Outcomes106

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS) From Baseline to 16 WeeksWeek 0, Week 16
Full analysis set (FAS) which included all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product and had any post-randomisation data. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants who contributed to the analysis. Combined data of Part A and B for liraglutide and placebo was planned to be reported.
SDS scoreMEAN
PRIMARYChange in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS) From Baseline to 52 WeeksWeek 0, Week 52
FAS which included all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product and had any post-randomisation data. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants who contributed to the analysis. Combined data of Part A and B for liraglutide and placebo was planned to be reported.
SDS scoreMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 5% Reduction in Baseline BMI at Week 16At week 16
FAS which included all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product and had any post-randomisation data. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants who contributed to the analysis. Combined data of Part A and B for liraglutide and placebo was planned to be reported.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 5% Reduction in Baseline BMI at Week 52At week 52
FAS which included all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product and had any post-randomisation data. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants who contributed to the analysis. Combined data of Part A and B for liraglutide and placebo was planned to be reported.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 10% Reduction in Baseline BMI at Week 16At week 16
FAS which included all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product and had any post-randomisation data. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants who contributed to the analysis. Combined data of Part A and B for liraglutide and placebo was planned to be reported.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 10% Reduction in Baseline BMI at Week 52At week 52
FAS which included all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product and had any post-randomisation data. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants who contributed to the analysis. Combined data of Part A and B for liraglutide and placebo was planned to be reported.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With no Increase in BMI SDS at Week 16At week 16
FAS which included all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product and had any post-randomisation data. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants who contributed to the analysis. Combined data of Part A and B for liraglutide and placebo was planned to be reported.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With no Increase in BMI SDS at Week 52At week 52
FAS which included all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product and had any post-randomisation data. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants who contributed to the analysis. Combined data of Part A and B for liraglutide and placebo was planned to be reported.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange in BMI From Baseline at Week 16Week 0, week 16
FAS which included all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product and had any post-randomisation data. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants who contributed to the analysis. Combined data of Part A and B for liraglutide and placebo was planned to be reported.
kilogram per meter square (kg/m^2)MEAN
SECONDARYChange in BMI From Baseline at Week 52Week 0, week 52
FAS which included all randomised participants who received at least one dose of trial product and had any post-randomisation data. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed = number of participants who contributed to the analysis. Combined data of Part A and B for liraglutide and placebo was planned to be reported.
kg/m^2MEAN

Results by group2,178

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS) From Baseline to 16 WeeksPart A: Liraglutide-0.18Standard Deviation 0.21SDS score
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS) From Baseline to 16 WeeksPart A: Placebo-0.18Standard Deviation 0.23SDS score
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS) From Baseline to 16 WeeksPart B: Liraglutide-0.50Standard Deviation 0.65SDS score
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS) From Baseline to 16 WeeksPart B: Placebo-0.48Standard Deviation 0.39SDS score
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS) From Baseline to 16 WeeksPart A+B: Liraglutide-0.33Standard Deviation 0.49SDS score
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS) From Baseline to 16 WeeksPart A+B: Placebo-0.29Standard Deviation 0.32SDS score
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS) From Baseline to 52 WeeksPart A: Liraglutide-0.27Standard Deviation 0.37SDS score
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS) From Baseline to 52 WeeksPart A: Placebo-0.13Standard Deviation 0.25SDS score
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS) From Baseline to 52 WeeksPart B: Liraglutide-0.79Standard Deviation 1.21SDS score
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS) From Baseline to 52 WeeksPart B: Placebo-0.71Standard Deviation 0.68SDS score

Participant flow20

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPart A: Liraglutide20
Overall StudySTARTEDPart A: Placebo12
Overall StudySTARTEDPart B: Liraglutide17
Overall StudySTARTEDPart B: Placebo7
Overall StudySafety Analysis Set (SAS)Part A: Liraglutide20
Overall StudySafety Analysis Set (SAS)Part A: Placebo12
Overall StudySafety Analysis Set (SAS)Part B: Liraglutide17
Overall StudySafety Analysis Set (SAS)Part B: Placebo7
Overall StudyFull Analysis Set (FAS)Part A: Liraglutide19
Overall StudyFull Analysis Set (FAS)Part A: Placebo12

Adverse events460

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAbdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersPart A: Liraglutide0200
otherAbdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersPart B: Liraglutide1173
otherAbdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersPart A: Placebo0120
otherAbdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersPart B: Placebo070
otherAbdominal injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsPart A: Liraglutide1201
otherAbdominal injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsPart B: Liraglutide0170
otherAbdominal injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsPart A: Placebo0120
otherAbdominal injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complicationsPart B: Placebo070
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersPart A: Liraglutide6208
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersPart B: Liraglutide31712

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPart A: Liraglutide020
Total, all-cause mortalityPart B: Liraglutide017
Total, all-cause mortalityPart A: Placebo012
Total, all-cause mortalityPart B: Placebo07
Total, other adverse eventsPart A: Liraglutide1620
Total, other adverse eventsPart B: Liraglutide1717
Total, other adverse eventsPart A: Placebo1012
Total, other adverse eventsPart B: Placebo47
Total, serious adverse eventsPart A: Liraglutide120
Total, serious adverse eventsPart B: Liraglutide217

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
36181471RESULT

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02527200

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02527200/registered?page=2