ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02546323

A phase3 Study Measuring the Effect of Rosuvastatin 20 mg on Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Chinese Subjects With Subclinical Atherosclerosis

NCT02546323, Phase 3, Completed, AstraZeneca; results first posted 2019-12-11

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A phase3 Study Measuring the Effect of Rosuvastatin 20 mg on Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Chinese Subjects With Subclinical Atherosclerosis. Trials, record NCT02546323. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02546323

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A phase3 Study Measuring the Effect of Rosuvastatin 20 mg on Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Chinese Subjects With Subclinical Atherosclerosis
NCT number
NCT02546323
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
543 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Conditions
Atherosclerosis
Interventions
Rosuvastatin, Placebo
First posted
2015-09-10
Last updated
2019-12-11
Results first posted
2019-12-11

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryAnnualized Rate of Change in Mean of the Maximum (MeanMax) CIMT Measurements From Each of the 12 Carotid Artery Sites Based on All Scans Performed During the 104-Week Study PeriodFrom baseline (pre-randomization Week -2 and Week -4) to end-of-study (Week 104).
CIMT measurements were made from ultrasound images of the common carotid artery (CCA), carotid bulb and internal carotid artery (ICA). The thickness of the intima and media was determined as the distance from the interface between the vessel lumen and the intima, to the interface between the media and the adventitia. Twelve carotid artery sites were scanned at each visit and the 3 images recorded at the 3 interrogation angles were measured to determine the maximum of the CIMT for a specific segment. The annualized rate of change in the MeanMax CIMT measurements from each of the 12 sites, based on all scans performed during the study, was determined using a multi-level linear mixed effects regression model that estimated mean annualized rate of change (mm/year) over the 104-week study period. The model fitted regression lines to profiles of CIMT values consisting of 2 pre-randomization values, 3 values from visits during the treatment period, and 2 end-of-study visits.
SecondaryAnnualized Rate of Change in the MeanMax CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left CCAFrom baseline (pre-randomization Week -2 and Week -4) to end-of-study (Week 104).
CIMT measurements were made from ultrasound images of the near and far walls of the right and left CCA. The thickness of the intima and media was determined as the distance from the interface between the vessel lumen and the intima, to the interface between the media and the adventitia. The 3 images recorded at the 3 interrogation angles were measured to determine the maximum of the CIMT for this segment. The annualized rate of change in the MeanMax CIMT measurements, based on all scans performed during the study, was determined using a multi-level linear mixed effects regression model that estimated mean annualized rate of change (mm/year) over the 104-week study period. The model fitted regression lines to profiles of CIMT values consisting of 2 pre-randomization values, 3 values from visits during the treatment period, and 2 end-of-study visits.
SecondaryAnnualized Rate of Change in the MeanMax CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left Carotid BulbFrom baseline (pre-randomization Week -2 and Week -4) to end-of-study (Week 104).
CIMT measurements were made from ultrasound images of the near and far walls of the right and left carotid bulb. The thickness of the intima and media was determined as the distance from the interface between the vessel lumen and the intima, to the interface between the media and the adventitia. The 3 images recorded at the 3 interrogation angles were measured to determine the maximum of the CIMT for this segment. The annualized rate of change in the MeanMax CIMT measurements, based on all scans performed during the study, was determined using a multi-level linear mixed effects regression model that estimated mean annualized rate of change (mm/year) over the 104-week study period. The model fitted regression lines to profiles of CIMT values consisting of 2 pre-randomization values, 3 values from visits during the treatment period, and 2 end-of-study visits.
SecondaryAnnualized Rate of Change in the MeanMax CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left ICAFrom baseline (pre-randomization Week -2 and Week -4) to end-of-study (Week 104).
CIMT measurements were made from ultrasound images of the near and far walls of the right and left ICA. The thickness of the intima and media was determined as the distance from the interface between the vessel lumen and the intima, to the interface between the media and the adventitia. The 3 images recorded at the 3 interrogation angles were measured to determine the maximum of the CIMT for this segment. The annualized rate of change in the MeanMax CIMT measurements, based on all scans performed during the study, was determined using a multi-level mixed effects regression model that estimated mean annualized rate of change (mm/year) over the 104-week study period. The model fitted regression lines to profiles of CIMT values consisting of 2 pre-randomization values, 3 values from visits during the treatment period, and 2 end-of-study visits.
SecondaryAnnualized Rate of Change in the Mean of the Mean (MeanMean) CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left CCAFrom baseline (pre-randomization Week -2 and Week -4) to end-of-study (Week 104).
CIMT measurements were made from ultrasound images of the near and far walls of the right and left CCA. The thickness of the intima and media was determined as the distance from the interface between the vessel lumen and the intima, to the interface between the media and the adventitia. The 3 images recorded at the 3 interrogation angles were measured to determine the mean of the CIMT for this segment. The annualized rate of change in the MeanMean CIMT measurements, based on all scans performed during the study, was determined using a multi-level mixed effects regression model that estimated mean annualized rate of change (mm/year) over the 104-week study period. The model fitted regression lines to profiles of CIMT values consisting of 2 pre-randomization values, 3 values from visits during the treatment period, and 2 end-of-study visits.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid, Lipoprotein and Apolipoprotein Values at Final Visit: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)From baseline (Week 0) to end-of-study (Week 104).
The percent change from baseline at final visit for lipid and lipoprotein measurements (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol \[LDL-C\], total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol \[HDL-C\], triglycerides, non-HDL-C, non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio) and apolipoprotein measurements (apolipoprotein A-I \[ApoA-I\], apolipoprotein B \[ApoB\] and ApoB/ApoA-I ratio) was determined by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. In the evaluation of change from baseline (Week 0) to the final visit at Week 104, any missing observations were imputed by LOCF.
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid and Lipoprotein Values at Final Visit: Time Weighted AverageFrom baseline (Week 0) to end-of-study (Week 104).
The percent change from baseline at final visit for lipid and lipoprotein measurements (LDL-C, total cholesterol, HDL-C, triglycerides, non-HDL-C, non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio) was determined by ANCOVA with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. In the evaluation of change from baseline (Week 0), the time-weighted average value was calculated as the value multiplied by the number of days since the last assessment, summed for all observations, and divided by the sum of days between all visits.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYAnnualized Rate of Change in Mean of the Maximum (MeanMax) CIMT Measurements From Each of the 12 Carotid Artery Sites Based on All Scans Performed During the 104-Week Study PeriodFrom baseline (pre-randomization Week -2 and Week -4) to end-of-study (Week 104).The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized patients. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment to which they were randomized.mm/yearMEAN
SECONDARYAnnualized Rate of Change in the MeanMax CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left CCAFrom baseline (pre-randomization Week -2 and Week -4) to end-of-study (Week 104).The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized patients. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment to which they were randomized.mm/yearMEAN
SECONDARYAnnualized Rate of Change in the MeanMax CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left Carotid BulbFrom baseline (pre-randomization Week -2 and Week -4) to end-of-study (Week 104).The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized patients. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment to which they were randomized.mm/yearMEAN
SECONDARYAnnualized Rate of Change in the MeanMax CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left ICAFrom baseline (pre-randomization Week -2 and Week -4) to end-of-study (Week 104).The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized patients. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment to which they were randomized.mm/yearMEAN
SECONDARYAnnualized Rate of Change in the Mean of the Mean (MeanMean) CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left CCAFrom baseline (pre-randomization Week -2 and Week -4) to end-of-study (Week 104).The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized patients. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment to which they were randomized.mm/yearMEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid, Lipoprotein and Apolipoprotein Values at Final Visit: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)From baseline (Week 0) to end-of-study (Week 104).The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized patients. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment to which they were randomized.Percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercent Change From Baseline in Lipid and Lipoprotein Values at Final Visit: Time Weighted AverageFrom baseline (Week 0) to end-of-study (Week 104).The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized patients. Patients were analyzed according to the treatment to which they were randomized.Percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group40

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Annualized Rate of Change in Mean of the Maximum (MeanMax) CIMT Measurements From Each of the 12 Carotid Artery Sites Based on All Scans Performed During the 104-Week Study PeriodRosuvastatin 20 mg0.0038Standard Error 0.00312mm/year
Annualized Rate of Change in Mean of the Maximum (MeanMax) CIMT Measurements From Each of the 12 Carotid Artery Sites Based on All Scans Performed During the 104-Week Study PeriodPlacebo0.0142Standard Error 0.00317mm/year
Annualized Rate of Change in the MeanMax CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left CCARosuvastatin 20 mg-0.0031Standard Error 0.00310mm/year
Annualized Rate of Change in the MeanMax CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left CCAPlacebo0.0079Standard Error 0.00315mm/year
Annualized Rate of Change in the MeanMax CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left Carotid BulbRosuvastatin 20 mg0.0067Standard Error 0.00634mm/year
Annualized Rate of Change in the MeanMax CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left Carotid BulbPlacebo0.0228Standard Error 0.00643mm/year
Annualized Rate of Change in the MeanMax CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left ICARosuvastatin 20 mg0.0077Standard Error 0.00502mm/year
Annualized Rate of Change in the MeanMax CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left ICAPlacebo0.0120Standard Error 0.00511mm/year
Annualized Rate of Change in the Mean of the Mean (MeanMean) CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left CCARosuvastatin 20 mg-0.0011Standard Error 0.00191mm/year
Annualized Rate of Change in the Mean of the Mean (MeanMean) CIMT of the Near and Far Walls of the Right and Left CCAPlacebo0.0075Standard Error 0.00194mm/year

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDRosuvastatin 20 mg272
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo271
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentRosuvastatin 20 mg272
Overall StudyReceived TreatmentPlacebo268
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDRosuvastatin 20 mg212
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo205
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDRosuvastatin 20 mg60
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo66

Adverse events158

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherToothacheGastrointestinal disordersRosuvastatin 20 mg2327239
otherToothacheGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo1526823
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsRosuvastatin 20 mg5227279
otherNasopharyngitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo5626877
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsRosuvastatin 20 mg4927274
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo5426871
otherBlood glucose increasedInvestigationsRosuvastatin 20 mg2427224
otherBlood glucose increasedInvestigationsPlacebo1826818
otherProtein urine presentInvestigationsRosuvastatin 20 mg1627216
otherProtein urine presentInvestigationsPlacebo926810

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRosuvastatin 20 mg0272
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo1268
Total, other adverse eventsRosuvastatin 20 mg144272
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo142268
Total, serious adverse eventsRosuvastatin 20 mg38272
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo34268

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
33176842DERIVEDPubMed
36017704DERIVEDPubMed
37565307DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Rosuvastatin 20 mg vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Rosuvastatin 20 mg vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02546323

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02546323/results?page=2