ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02558231

The Efficacy and Safety of Initial Triple Versus Initial Dual Oral Combination Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

NCT02558231, Phase 3, Completed, Actelion; results first posted 2020-09-11

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. The Efficacy and Safety of Initial Triple Versus Initial Dual Oral Combination Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. Trials, record NCT02558231. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02558231

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
The Efficacy and Safety of Initial Triple Versus Initial Dual Oral Combination Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
NCT number
NCT02558231
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
247 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Actelion
Conditions
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Interventions
Macitentan, Tadalafil, Selexipag
First posted
2015-09-23
Last updated
2025-03-30
Results first posted
2020-09-11
Limitations and caveats
The main limitation of the sponsor's findings was that analyses of disease progression and mortality were exploratory due to the testing hierarchy and the post hoc nature of the analyses. The study was not powered to show significant differences for the disease progression related endpoint. Another limitation was the availability of hemodynamic assessments only for Week 26 timepoint.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes10

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 26 in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR)Baseline, Week 26
Change from baseline to Week 26 in PVR was expressed as the ratio of Week 26 to baseline PVR value (Week 26 divided by baseline) using re-calculated PVR. PVR was determined by right heart catheterization (RHC). A geometric least square mean ratio of Week 26 to baseline PVR less than (\<) 1 corresponds to a reduction in PVR from baseline. Missing values were imputed using a last observation carried forward (LOCF) approach.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 26 in 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD)Baseline, Week 26
The change from baseline to Week 26 in 6MWD was calculated as Week 26 minus baseline. The test measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 26 in N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) LevelsBaseline, Week 26
The change from baseline to Week 26 in NT-proBNP was expressed as the ratio of Week 26 to baseline NT-proBNP (Week 26 divided by baseline). A geometric least square mean ratio of Week 26 to baseline NT-proBNP \<1 corresponds to a reduction in NT-proBNP from baseline. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Absence of Worsening From Baseline to Week 26 in World Health Organization (WHO) Functional Class (FC)Week 26
WHO FC is a classification graded from Class I to IV which reflects disease severity based on symptoms. Worsening was defined as death or hospitalization due to PAH. Class I: No limitation of activity; Class II: slight limitation with ordinary activities; Class III: may not have symptoms at rest but greatly limited activities; Class IV: symptoms at rest and inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 26 in Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure (mPAP)Baseline, Week 26
Change from baseline to Week 26 in mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure (mPAP) was measured. The pulmonary artery pressure is a measure of the blood pressure found in the main pulmonary artery. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 26 in Mean Right Atrial Pressure (mRAP)Baseline, Week 26Change from baseline to Week 26 in mean Right Atrial Pressure (mRAP) was measured. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 26 in Total Pulmonary ResistanceBaseline, Week 26
Change from baseline to Week 26 in total pulmonary resistance was measured. Total pulmonary resistance was calculated as mPAP/CO\*80, where CO is cardiac output. Re-calculated values were used for analysis and missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 26 in Cardiac IndexBaseline, Week 26
Change from baseline to Week 26 in cardiac index was measured. Cardiac index is the amount of blood pumped by the heart, per minute, per meter square of body surface area. Re-calculated values were used for analysis and missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 26 in Venous Oxygen Saturation (%)Baseline, Week 26Change from baseline to Week 26 in venous oxygen saturation was measured. Missing values were imputed using a LOCF approach.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Disease Progression EventWeek 26, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Month 30, and End of Analysis Period (up to 40 months)
Number of participants with disease progression event were reported. Disease progression event as adjudicated by the CEC, defined as any of the following: a. Death (all causes; adjudicated for PAH relationship); b. Hospitalization for worsening PAH; c. Initiation of prostacyclin, a prostacyclin analog, or a prostacyclin receptor agonist for worsening PAH; d. Clinical worsening defined as a post-baseline decrease in 6MWD by more than (\>) 15 percent (%) from the highest 6MWD obtained at or after baseline, accompanied by WHO FC III or IV (both conditions confirmed at two consecutive post-baseline visits separated by 1-21 days).

Outcomes10

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Week 26 in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR)Baseline, Week 26Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants.ratioGEOMETRIC_LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 26 in 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD)Baseline, Week 26Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure.meterLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 26 in N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) LevelsBaseline, Week 26Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure.ratioGEOMETRIC_LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Absence of Worsening From Baseline to Week 26 in World Health Organization (WHO) Functional Class (FC)Week 26
FAS included all randomized participants. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure. Participants with WHO FC IV at baseline were excluded from this analysis as they could not shift to a worse category.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 26 in Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure (mPAP)Baseline, Week 26Full analysis set included all randomized participants.millimeters of mercury (mmHg)LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 26 in Mean Right Atrial Pressure (mRAP)Baseline, Week 26Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure.mmHgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 26 in Total Pulmonary ResistanceBaseline, Week 26Full analysis set included all randomized participants.dynes*second per centimeter^5LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 26 in Cardiac IndexBaseline, Week 26Full analysis set included all randomized participants.liters per minute per meter squareLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to Week 26 in Venous Oxygen Saturation (%)Baseline, Week 26Full analysis set included all randomized participants. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure.percentage of oxygen saturationLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With Disease Progression EventWeek 26, Month 12, Month 18, Month 24, Month 30, and End of Analysis Period (up to 40 months)Full analysis set included all randomized participants.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group30

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR)Triple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)0.4695% Confidence Interval 0.422 to 0.503ratio
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR)Double Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)0.4895% Confidence Interval 0.441 to 0.526ratio
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD)Triple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)54.9695% Confidence Interval 40.419 to 69.501meter
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD)Double Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)56.3995% Confidence Interval 41.447 to 71.327meter
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) LevelsTriple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)0.2695% Confidence Interval 0.206 to 0.328ratio
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) LevelsDouble Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)0.2595% Confidence Interval 0.200 to 0.320ratio
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Worsening From Baseline to Week 26 in World Health Organization (WHO) Functional Class (FC)Triple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)99.2percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Worsening From Baseline to Week 26 in World Health Organization (WHO) Functional Class (FC)Double Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)97.5percentage of participants
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure (mPAP)Triple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)-12.9295% Confidence Interval -14.609 to -11.235millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure (mPAP)Double Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)-12.2095% Confidence Interval -13.881 to -10.515millimeters of mercury (mmHg)

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDTriple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)123
Overall StudySTARTEDDouble Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)124
Overall StudyTreatedTriple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)123
Overall StudyTreatedDouble Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)123
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDTriple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)98
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDDouble Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)98
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDTriple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)25
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDDouble Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)26

Adverse events488

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTriple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)14119
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersDouble Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)11127
otherIron Deficiency AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersTriple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)6119
otherIron Deficiency AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersDouble Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)5127
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersTriple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)14119
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersDouble Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)11127
otherAbdominal DistensionGastrointestinal disordersTriple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)6119
otherAbdominal DistensionGastrointestinal disordersDouble Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)4127
otherAbdominal PainGastrointestinal disordersTriple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)7119
otherAbdominal PainGastrointestinal disordersDouble Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)6127

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityTriple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)4119
Total, all-cause mortalityDouble Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)12127
Total, other adverse eventsTriple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)118119
Total, other adverse eventsDouble Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)119127
Total, serious adverse eventsTriple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag)58119
Total, serious adverse eventsDouble Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo)48127

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
34593120DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Triple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag) vs Double Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo): deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Triple Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Selexipag) vs Double Oral Therapy (Macitentan, Tadalafil, and Placebo): serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02558231

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02558231/results?page=2