ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02559206

Trial of Linaclotide in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C)

NCT02559206, Phase 2, Completed, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; results first posted 2020-04-24

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Trial of Linaclotide in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C). Trials, record NCT02559206. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02559206

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Trial of Linaclotide in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C)
NCT number
NCT02559206
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
759 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Conditions
Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation
Interventions
Linaclotide, Matching Placebo
First posted
2015-09-24
Last updated
2020-04-24
Results first posted
2020-04-24

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. PlaceboBaseline, up to Week 12
Abdominal pain assessment was based on an 11-point numerical rating scale (0=No symptom; 10=Worst possible) assessing the symptom "at its worst in past 24 hours." A participant's weekly abdominal pain score is the average of the nonmissing abdominal pain scores reported by the participant during each week.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. PlaceboBaseline, up to Week 12
Abdominal pain assessment was based on an 11-point numerical rating scale (0=No symptom; 10=Worst possible) assessing the symptom "at its worst in past 24 hours." A participant's weekly abdominal pain score is the average of the nonmissing abdominal pain scores reported by the participant during each week.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Weekly CSBM Frequency Rate Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. PlaceboBaseline, up to Week 12A participant's weekly CSBM frequency rate is the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Weekly CSBM Frequency Rate Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. PlaceboBaseline, up to Week 12A participant's weekly CSBM frequency rate is the CSBM rate (CSBMs/week) calculated over that week.
PrimaryNumber of 6/12 Week Abdominal Pain and Constipation (APC) +1 Responders Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. Placeboup to Week 12
A 6/12 Week APC +1 Responder is a participant who meets the Weekly APC +1 Responder criteria for at least 6 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. * Weekly APC +1 Responder: A participant who meets the criteria to be a Weekly Abdominal Pain Responder and a Weekly CSBM +1 Responder. * Weekly Abdominal Pain Responder: A participant who has a decrease from baseline of ≥30% in the mean daily worst abdominal pain scores for that week. * Weekly CSBM +1 Responder: A participant who has an increase from baseline of ≥1 in the CSBM weekly rate for that week. A participant with \<4 days of completed eDiary data for that week is not considered a responder for that week.
PrimaryNumber of 6/12 Week Abdominal Pain and Constipation (APC) +1 Responders Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. Placeboup to Week 12
A 6/12 Week APC +1 Responder is a participant who meets the Weekly APC +1 Responder criteria for at least 6 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. * Weekly APC +1 Responder: A participant who meets the criteria to be a Weekly Abdominal Pain Responder and a Weekly CSBM +1 Responder. * Weekly Abdominal Pain Responder: A participant who has a decrease from baseline of ≥30% in the mean daily worst abdominal pain scores for that week. * Weekly CSBM +1 Responder: A participant who has an increase from baseline of ≥1 in the CSBM weekly rate for that week. A participant with \<4 days of completed eDiary data for that week is not considered a responder for that week.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. PlaceboBaseline, up to Week 12Intent to Treat Population: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug (evaluated according to assigned treatment).score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. PlaceboBaseline, up to Week 12Intent to Treat Population: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug (evaluated according to assigned treatment).score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Weekly CSBM Frequency Rate Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. PlaceboBaseline, up to Week 12Intent to Treat Population: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug (evaluated according to assigned treatment).CSBMs/weekLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Weekly CSBM Frequency Rate Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. PlaceboBaseline, up to Week 12Intent to Treat Population: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug (evaluated according to assigned treatment).CSBMs/weekLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYNumber of 6/12 Week Abdominal Pain and Constipation (APC) +1 Responders Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. Placeboup to Week 12Intent to Treat Population: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug (evaluated according to assigned treatment).ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYNumber of 6/12 Week Abdominal Pain and Constipation (APC) +1 Responders Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. Placeboup to Week 12Intent to Treat Population: all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug (evaluated according to assigned treatment).ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group40

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. PlaceboPlacebo-1.370Standard Error 0.241score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. PlaceboLinaclotide IR 290 μg-1.938Standard Error 0.241score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. PlaceboLinaclotide DR1 30 μg-1.667Standard Error 0.234score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. PlaceboLinaclotide DR1 100 μg-1.656Standard Error 0.240score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR1 or IR vs. PlaceboLinaclotide DR1 300 μg-2.140Standard Error 0.236score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. PlaceboPlacebo-1.370Standard Error 0.241score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. PlaceboLinaclotide IR 290 μg-1.938Standard Error 0.241score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. PlaceboLinaclotide DR2 30 μg-1.825Standard Error 0.238score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. PlaceboLinaclotide DR2 100 μg-1.669Standard Error 0.235score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Pain Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period: DR2 or IR vs. PlaceboLinaclotide DR2 300 μg-1.628Standard Error 0.239score on a scale

Participant flow24

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo66
Overall StudySTARTEDLinaclotide IR 290 μg66
Overall StudySTARTEDLinaclotide DR1 30 μg67
Overall StudySTARTEDLinaclotide DR1 100 μg67
Overall StudySTARTEDLinaclotide DR1 300 μg67
Overall StudySTARTEDLinaclotide DR2 30 μg67
Overall StudySTARTEDLinaclotide DR2 100 μg66
Overall StudySTARTEDLinaclotide DR2 300 μg66
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo58
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDLinaclotide IR 290 μg54

Adverse events40

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo166
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersLinaclotide IR 290 μg966
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersLinaclotide DR1 30 μg267
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersLinaclotide DR1 100 μg567
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersLinaclotide DR1 300 μg767
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersLinaclotide DR2 30 μg067
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersLinaclotide DR2 100 μg166
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersLinaclotide DR2 300 μg266
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo066
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersLinaclotide IR 290 μg166

Adverse event totals24

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo066
Total, all-cause mortalityLinaclotide IR 290 μg066
Total, all-cause mortalityLinaclotide DR1 30 μg067
Total, all-cause mortalityLinaclotide DR1 100 μg067
Total, all-cause mortalityLinaclotide DR1 300 μg067
Total, all-cause mortalityLinaclotide DR2 30 μg067
Total, all-cause mortalityLinaclotide DR2 100 μg066
Total, all-cause mortalityLinaclotide DR2 300 μg066
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo166
Total, other adverse eventsLinaclotide IR 290 μg1066

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
33065589DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02559206

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02559206/results?page=2