ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02573883

Clobetasol Propionate Versus Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser for the Treatment of Lichen Sclerosus

NCT02573883, Phase 3, Completed, Medstar Health Research Institute; results first posted 2021-10-12

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Clobetasol Propionate Versus Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser for the Treatment of Lichen Sclerosus. Trials, record NCT02573883. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02573883

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Clobetasol Propionate Versus Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser for the Treatment of Lichen Sclerosus
NCT number
NCT02573883
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
52 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Medstar Health Research Institute
Conditions
Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus
Interventions
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser, Clobetasol Propionate 0.05% ointment
First posted
2015-10-12
Last updated
2021-10-12
Results first posted
2021-10-12
Limitations and caveats
The study was unblinded for patients and evaluators and only performed at a single center. The steroid group had more non-compliant patients (25% vs 4%). We limited our investigation to only postmenopausal women Further research using placebo and sham lasers for treatment blinding is needed. Patients previously using topical vaginal estrogen were continued on prior treatment, groups were not stratified based on estrogen exposure, however there where equal numbers between groups.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes15

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange in SkinDEX-29 ScoreChange from baseline score to score at six months
The Skindex-29 is a validated questionnaire for assessing acute dermatologic symptoms over a 4-week period. The Skindex-29 is a 29 question version of the original SkinDEX questionnaire. Total numeric score is reported ranging from 0-100. Scores reported as a change between six months and baseline with more negative scores indicating greater improvement in symptoms (better outcome).
SecondaryChange in Subjective Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ)Baseline to six months
Subjective measure of vulvar symptoms of itching, burning, dyspareunia of Lichen Sclerosus. VSQ is a 21-item instrument and scores range from 0 to 20 with increased scores indicating increased vulvovaginal symptom bother. The change in VSQ is reported with more negative scores indicating greater improvement.
SecondaryChange in Subjective Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ)Six month to one year after treatment
Subjective measure of vulvar symptoms of itching, burning, dyspareunia of Lichen Sclerosus. VSQ is a 21-item instrument and scores range from 0 to 20 with increased scores indicating increased vulvovaginal symptom bother. The change in VSQ is reported with more negative scores indicating greater improvement.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Considered Satisfied as Assessed by Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) ScoreSix months from treatmentPatient global impression of satisfaction total score on visual analog scale (very satisfied or satisfied) ranging from 1-5 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Considered Satisfied as Assessed by Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Score1 year from treatmentPatient global impression of satisfaction total score on visual analog scale (very satisfied or satisfied) ranging from 1-5 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
SecondaryChange Vaginal Health Index (VHI) ScoreBaseline to 6 months after treatment
The Vaginal Health Index is a five item scale with scores ranging from 5-25 with lower scores indicating greater urogenital atrophy. The change in VHI is express with more negative scores indicating greater improvement between study time points.
SecondaryChange Vaginal Health Index (VHI) ScoreSix month to one year after treatment
The Vaginal Health Index is a five item scale with scores ranging from 5-25 with lower scores indicating greater urogenital atrophy. The change in VHI is express with more negative scores indicating greater improvement between study time points.
SecondaryChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreBaseline to 6 months after treatment
Patient subjective scale of symptoms of Lichen Sclerosus. Each item scaled 0-10 with greater severity of symptoms indicated by higher score. Results expressed as change with more negative values indicating greater improvement.
SecondaryChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreSix months to one year after treatment
Patient subjective scale of symptoms of Lichen Sclerosus. Each item scaled 0-10 with greater severity of symptoms indicated by higher score. Results expressed as change with more negative values indicating greater improvement in symptoms (better outcome).
SecondaryChange SkinDEX-29 ScoreSix months to one year from treatment
The Skindex-29 is a validated questionnaire for assessing acute dermatologic symptoms over a 4-week period. The Skindex-29 is a 29 question version of the original SkinDEX questionnaire. Total numeric score is reported ranging from 0-100. Scores reported as a change between six months and baseline with more negative scores indicating greater improvement.

Outcomes15

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange in SkinDEX-29 ScoreChange from baseline score to score at six monthsscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Subjective Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ)Baseline to six monthsscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange in Subjective Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ)Six month to one year after treatmentscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Considered Satisfied as Assessed by Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) ScoreSix months from treatmentParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Considered Satisfied as Assessed by Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Score1 year from treatmentParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChange Vaginal Health Index (VHI) ScoreBaseline to 6 months after treatmentscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange Vaginal Health Index (VHI) ScoreSix month to one year after treatmentscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreBaseline to 6 months after treatmentscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange Vulvar Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ScoreSix months to one year after treatmentscore on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange SkinDEX-29 ScoreSix months to one year from treatmentscore on a scaleMEAN

Results by group128

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change in SkinDEX-29 ScoreFractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser-16.83Standard Deviation 18.09score on a scale
Change in SkinDEX-29 ScoreClobetasol Propionate-5.92Standard Deviation 5.81score on a scale
Change in Subjective Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ)Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser-3.92Standard Deviation 4.12score on a scale
Change in Subjective Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ)Clobetasol Propionate-0.58Standard Deviation 5.11score on a scale
Change in Subjective Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ)Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser- No Crossover0.44Standard Deviation 4.43score on a scale
Change in Subjective Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ)Clobetasol Propionate- No Crossover0.3Standard Deviation 2.41score on a scale
Change in Subjective Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ)Clobetasol Propionate to Laser Crossover-1.82Standard Deviation 3.66score on a scale
Change in Subjective Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ)Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol Crossover-2.9Standard Deviation 3.98score on a scale
Number of Participants Considered Satisfied as Assessed by Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) ScoreFractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser21Participants
Number of Participants Considered Satisfied as Assessed by Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) ScoreClobetasol Propionate9Participants

Participant flow24

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Six Month Follow UpSTARTEDClobetasol Propionate- No Crossover25
Six Month Follow UpSTARTEDFractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser- No Crossover27
Six Month Follow UpSTARTEDClobetasol Propionate to Laser Crossover0
Six Month Follow UpSTARTEDFractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol Crossover0
Six Month Follow UpCOMPLETEDClobetasol Propionate- No Crossover24
Six Month Follow UpCOMPLETEDFractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser- No Crossover27
Six Month Follow UpCOMPLETEDClobetasol Propionate to Laser Crossover0
Six Month Follow UpCOMPLETEDFractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol Crossover0
Six Month Follow UpNOT COMPLETEDClobetasol Propionate- No Crossover1
Six Month Follow UpNOT COMPLETEDFractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser- No Crossover0

Adverse events12

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherminor burning and blistering at treatment siteReproductive system and breast disordersClobetasol Propionate- 0-6 Months0270
otherminor burning and blistering at treatment siteReproductive system and breast disordersFractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser- 0-6 Months1241
otherminor burning and blistering at treatment siteReproductive system and breast disordersClobetasol Propionate to Laser Crossover 6-12 Months0110
otherminor burning and blistering at treatment siteReproductive system and breast disordersFractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol Crossover 6-12 Months0100
otherminor burning and blistering at treatment siteReproductive system and breast disordersClobetasol Propionate - No Crossover 6-12 Months0110
otherminor burning and blistering at treatment siteReproductive system and breast disordersFractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser- No Crossover 6-12 Months0160
otherActivation Genital HerpesReproductive system and breast disordersClobetasol Propionate- 0-6 Months1271
otherActivation Genital HerpesReproductive system and breast disordersFractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser- 0-6 Months0240
otherActivation Genital HerpesReproductive system and breast disordersClobetasol Propionate to Laser Crossover 6-12 Months0110
otherActivation Genital HerpesReproductive system and breast disordersFractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol Crossover 6-12 Months0100

Adverse event totals18

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityClobetasol Propionate- 0-6 Months027
Total, all-cause mortalityFractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser- 0-6 Months024
Total, all-cause mortalityClobetasol Propionate to Laser Crossover 6-12 Months011
Total, all-cause mortalityFractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol Crossover 6-12 Months010
Total, all-cause mortalityClobetasol Propionate - No Crossover 6-12 Months011
Total, all-cause mortalityFractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser- No Crossover 6-12 Months016
Total, other adverse eventsClobetasol Propionate- 0-6 Months127
Total, other adverse eventsFractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser- 0-6 Months124
Total, other adverse eventsClobetasol Propionate to Laser Crossover 6-12 Months011
Total, other adverse eventsFractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser to Clobetasol Crossover 6-12 Months010

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
22161424BACKGROUNDPubMed
24605832BACKGROUNDPubMed
25539748BACKGROUNDPubMed
33957642DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons3

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser vs Clobetasol Propionate: Number of Patients With Adverse OutcomesTrial comparisons
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser vs Clobetasol Propionate: Number of Participants Considered Satisfied as Assessed by Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) ScoreTrial comparisons
Fractionated Carbon Dioxide Laser vs Clobetasol Propionate: Number of Patients With Adverse OutcomesTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02573883

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02573883/results?page=2