ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02576509

An Investigational Immuno-therapy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Sorafenib as a First Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

NCT02576509, Phase 3, Completed, Bristol-Myers Squibb; results first posted 2020-06-26

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. An Investigational Immuno-therapy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Sorafenib as a First Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Trials, record NCT02576509. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02576509

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
An Investigational Immuno-therapy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Sorafenib as a First Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT number
NCT02576509
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
743 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Conditions
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Interventions
Nivolumab, Sorafenib
First posted
2015-10-15
Last updated
2025-02-17
Results first posted
2020-06-26

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryOverall Survival (OS)time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause, assessed up to June 2019 (approximately 41 months)
OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause in all randomized participants. Participants who are alive will be censored at the last known alive dates. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates.
SecondaryObjective Response Rate (ORR) Per BICR RECIST 1.1
the date of randomization and the date of first objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurs first, assessed up to May 2019 (approximately 40 months)
ORR is defined as the proportion of participants whose best overall response (BOR) is either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). BOR is defined as the best response designation, as determined based on BICR-assessed tumor response according to RECIST 1.1, recorded between the date of randomization and the date of first objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurs first. For participants without documented progression or subsequent anti-cancer therapy, all available response designations will contribute to the BOR determination. For a BOR of CR or PR, the initial response assessment must be confirmed by a consecutive assessment no less than 4 weeks (28 days) later. Estimate of (Nivolumab - Sorafenib) is based on CMH method of weighting, stratified by stratification factors
SecondaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS)time from the date of randomization to the date of the first objectively documented tumor progression or death, assessed up to May 2019 (approximately 40 months)
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first objectively documented tumor progression as assessed by BICR according to RECIST 1.1 or death due to any cause in all randomized participants. Participants who die without a reported prior progression and without initiation of subsequent anti-cancer therapy will be considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Participants who did not progress or die will be censored on the date of their last tumor assessment. Participants who did not have baseline tumor assessment will be censored on the date they were randomized. Participants who did not have any on study tumor assessments and did not die will be censored on the date they were randomized. Participants who started any subsequent anti-cancer therapy without a prior reported progression will be censored at the last tumor assessment prior to subsequent anti-cancer therapy.
SecondaryEfficacy Based on PD-L1 Expression - OS and PFS
the date of randomization and the date of first objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurs first, assessed up to May 2019 (approximately 40 months)
PD-L1 expression is defined as the percent of tumor cell membrane staining in a minimum of 100 evaluable tumor cells per Dako PD-L1 IHC assay unless otherwise specified. This is referred as quantifiable PD-L1 expression. If the PD-L1 staining could not be quantified, it is further classifies as: Indeterminate: Tumor cell membrane staining hampered for reasons attributed to the biology of the tumor biopsy specimen and not because of improper sample preparation or handling. Not evaluable: Tumor biopsy specimen was not optimally collected or prepared (e.g. PD-L1 expression is neither quantifiable nor indeterminate). PD-L1 status is a dichotomized variable using an X% cut-off for quantifiable PD-L1 expression: * PD-L1 \> X %: ≥ X % PD-L1 expression * PD-L1 \< X %: \< X % PD-L1 expression where X% denotes the PD-L1 expression cut-off of 1%. Additional cut off values may also be explored. Confidence interval based on the Clopper and Pearson method.
SecondaryEfficacy Based on PD-L1 Expression - ORR
the date of randomization and the date of first objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurs first, assessed up to May 2019 (approximately 40 months)
PD-L1 expression is defined as the percent of tumor cell membrane staining in a minimum of 100 evaluable tumor cells per Dako PD-L1 IHC assay unless otherwise specified. This is referred as quantifiable PD-L1 expression. If the PD-L1 staining could not be quantified, it is further classifies as: Indeterminate: Tumor cell membrane staining hampered for reasons attributed to the biology of the tumor biopsy specimen and not because of improper sample preparation or handling. Not evaluable: Tumor biopsy specimen was not optimally collected or prepared (e.g. PD-L1 expression is neither quantifiable nor indeterminate). PD-L1 status is a dichotomized variable using an X% cut-off for quantifiable PD-L1 expression: * PD-L1 \> X %: ≥ X % PD-L1 expression * PD-L1 \< X %: \< X % PD-L1 expression where X% denotes the PD-L1 expression cut-off of 1%. Additional cut off values may also be explored. Confidence interval based on the Clopper and Pearson method.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYOverall Survival (OS)time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause, assessed up to June 2019 (approximately 41 months)all randomized participantsMonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYObjective Response Rate (ORR) Per BICR RECIST 1.1
the date of randomization and the date of first objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurs first, assessed up to May 2019 (approximately 40 months)
all randomized participantsPercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProgression-Free Survival (PFS)time from the date of randomization to the date of the first objectively documented tumor progression or death, assessed up to May 2019 (approximately 40 months)all randomized participantsMonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYEfficacy Based on PD-L1 Expression - OS and PFS
the date of randomization and the date of first objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurs first, assessed up to May 2019 (approximately 40 months)
all randomized participants with a \>=1% PD-L1 expression all randomized participants with a \<1% PD-L1 expression all randomized participants without PD-L1 quantifiableMonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYEfficacy Based on PD-L1 Expression - ORR
the date of randomization and the date of first objectively documented progression or the date of subsequent anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurs first, assessed up to May 2019 (approximately 40 months)
all randomized participants with a \>=1% PD-L1 expression all randomized participants with a \<1% PD-L1 expression all randomized participants without PD-L1 quantifiable Note: odds ratio for participants without PD-L1 quantifiable cannot be estimated based on the data
Percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group24

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Overall Survival (OS)Nivolumab 240 mg16.3995% Confidence Interval 13.93 to 18.37Months
Overall Survival (OS)Sorafenib 400 mg14.6995% Confidence Interval 11.89 to 17.22Months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per BICR RECIST 1.1Nivolumab 240 mg15.495% Confidence Interval 11.8 to 19.4Percentage of participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per BICR RECIST 1.1Sorafenib 400 mg7.095% Confidence Interval 4.6 to 10.1Percentage of participants
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Nivolumab 240 mg3.6895% Confidence Interval 3.06 to 3.88Months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Sorafenib 400 mg3.7595% Confidence Interval 3.71 to 4.47Months
Efficacy Based on PD-L1 Expression - OS and PFSNivolumab 240 mg>=1%, OS16.0795% Confidence Interval 8.41 to 22.34Months
Efficacy Based on PD-L1 Expression - OS and PFSSorafenib 400 mg>=1%, OS8.6295% Confidence Interval 5.72 to 16.30Months
Efficacy Based on PD-L1 Expression - OS and PFSNivolumab 240 mg>=1%, PFS3.8495% Confidence Interval 2.10 to 7.62Months
Efficacy Based on PD-L1 Expression - OS and PFSSorafenib 400 mg>=1%, PFS3.5895% Confidence Interval 1.97 to 5.36Months

Participant flow12

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Pre-Treatment PeriodSTARTEDNivolumab 240 mg371
Pre-Treatment PeriodSTARTEDSorafenib 400 mg372
Pre-Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDNivolumab 240 mg367
Pre-Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDSorafenib 400 mg363
Pre-Treatment PeriodNOT COMPLETEDNivolumab 240 mg4
Pre-Treatment PeriodNOT COMPLETEDSorafenib 400 mg9
Treatment PeriodSTARTEDNivolumab 240 mg367
Treatment PeriodSTARTEDSorafenib 400 mg363
Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDNivolumab 240 mg0
Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDSorafenib 400 mg0

Adverse events660

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersNivolumab 240 mg35367
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSorafenib 400 mg30363
otherHypothyroidismEndocrine disordersNivolumab 240 mg29367
otherHypothyroidismEndocrine disordersSorafenib 400 mg12363
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersNivolumab 240 mg15367
otherAbdominal distensionGastrointestinal disordersSorafenib 400 mg22363
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersNivolumab 240 mg69367
otherAbdominal painGastrointestinal disordersSorafenib 400 mg82363
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersNivolumab 240 mg42367
otherAbdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disordersSorafenib 400 mg50363

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityNivolumab 240 mg321371
Total, all-cause mortalitySorafenib 400 mg335372
Total, other adverse eventsNivolumab 240 mg339367
Total, other adverse eventsSorafenib 400 mg351363
Total, serious adverse eventsNivolumab 240 mg216367
Total, serious adverse eventsSorafenib 400 mg216363

Papers6

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
34914889DERIVEDPubMed
35101942DERIVEDPubMed
36111952DERIVEDPubMed
36852452DERIVEDPubMed
39560477DERIVEDPubMed
42762856DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Nivolumab 240 mg vs Sorafenib 400 mg: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Nivolumab 240 mg vs Sorafenib 400 mg: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02576509

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02576509/results?page=2