ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02609984

Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of CMB305 With Atezolizumab to Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Sarcoma (IMDZ-C232/V943A-002)

NCT02609984, Phase 2, Terminated, Immune Design, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA); results first posted 2020-05-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of CMB305 With Atezolizumab to Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Sarcoma (IMDZ-C232/V943A-002). Trials, record NCT02609984. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02609984

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of CMB305 With Atezolizumab to Atezolizumab Alone in Participants With Sarcoma (IMDZ-C232/V943A-002)
NCT number
NCT02609984
Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
89 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Immune Design, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)
Conditions
Sarcoma, Myxoid/Round Cell Liposarcoma, Synovial Sarcoma, Metastatic Sarcoma, Recurrent Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Locally Advanced Sarcoma, Liposarcoma
Interventions
CMB305, atezolizumab
First posted
2015-11-20
Last updated
2020-07-07
Results first posted
2020-05-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)Up to approximately 36.1 months
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, per RECIST 1.1 modified to use immune-related response criteria (irRC) confirmation and unidimensional tumor measurements as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR). PD was defined as ≥20% increase in tumor burden compared with nadir (at any single time point) in 2 consecutive observations ≥4 weeks apart. If there was no disease progression or death, participants were censored at the date of their last disease assessment. The PFS was analyzed using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
PrimaryOverall Survival (OS)Up to approximately 36.1 months
OS was determined for all participants and was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants were censored at the date of their last follow-up. The OS was analyzed using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Experiencing a Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT)Up to approximately 42 days
DLTs will be evaluated during the safety run-in period. Any treatment emergent Grade 3 or higher adverse event (AE) that occurs in the first 42 days after initiation of study treatment, that is deemed possibly, probably or definitely related to the combination of CMB305 and atezolizumab will be considered a DLT with the following exceptions: * Alopecia or vomiting (unless not controlled by optimal anti-emetics) * Hepatic enzyme elevations associated with the baseline Grade 2 abnormalities * Grade 3 laboratory AEs that are asymptomatic and return to baseline or to Grade 1 within 3 days, unless identified specifically as DLT by the investigator or the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) * Grade 3 fatigue * Grade 3 systemic reactions (such as fever, headache, influenza like symptoms, myalgia, malaise, or nausea) that return to baseline or Grade 1 within 3 days of study inoculation
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Experienced At Least One Adverse Event (AE)Up to approximately 36.1 months
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the study treatment or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of study treatment, was also an AE. The number of participants who experienced at least one AE is presented.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event (AE)Up to approximately 24 months
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the study treatment or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of study treatment, was also an AE. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is presented.
SecondaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 3 Per Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)Month 3
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, per RECIST 1.1 modified to use irRC confirmation and unidimensional tumor measurements as assessed by BICR. PD was defined as ≥20% increase in tumor burden compared with nadir (at any single time point) in 2 consecutive observations ≥4 weeks apart. If there was no disease progression or death, participants were censored at the date of their last disease assessment. The PFS was analyzed using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. Participants were evaluated every 6 weeks with radiographic imaging to assess their response to treatment. The PFS rate was calculated as the percentage of participants with PFS at Month 3.
SecondaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 6 Per Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)Month 6
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, per RECIST 1.1 modified to use irRC confirmation and unidimensional tumor measurements as assessed by BICR. PD was defined as ≥20% increase in tumor burden compared with nadir (at any single time point) in 2 consecutive observations ≥4 weeks apart. If there was no disease progression or death, participants were censored at the date of their last disease assessment. The PFS was analyzed using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data. Participants were evaluated every 6 weeks with radiographic imaging to assess their response to treatment. The PFS rate was calculated as the percentage of participants with PFS at Month 6.
SecondaryTime to Next Treatment (TTNT)Up to approximately 36.1 months
TTNT was the time from date of randomization to the start date of subsequent treatment. Participants were treated for up to approximately 2 years and then followed until next treatment or death. Participants who did not receive subsequent treatment were censored at the date of last contact or death. The TTNT was analyzed using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
SecondaryDistant Metastasis Free Survival (DMFS)Up to approximately 36.1 months
DMFS was the time between the date of randomization and the date of first distant metastasis or date of death (whatever the cause), whichever occurs first. Participants without metastasis and death were censored at the date of last contact or death. The DMFS was analyzed using the product-limit (Kaplan-Meier) method for censored data.
SecondaryNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-New York Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma-1 (NY-ESO-1) Antibody at BaselineBaseline (Day 1)
The number of participants with anti-NY-ESO-1 antibodies at baseline was measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with recombinant NY-ESO1 protein. A titer of \>1:100 was considered positive. The number of participants that were anti-NY-ESO-1 antibody positive at baseline is presented.

Outcomes14

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)Up to approximately 36.1 months
The analysis population included all randomized participants who met eligibility criteria for the study and had data recorded in the electronic Case Report Form (eCRF). Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized.
MonthsMEDIAN
PRIMARYOverall Survival (OS)Up to approximately 36.1 months
The analysis population included all randomized participants who met eligibility criteria for the study and had data recorded in the eCRF. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Experiencing a Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT)Up to approximately 42 daysThe analysis population included all participants who participated in the safety run-in period and received ≥1 dose of any of the CMB305 components (LV305, G305) or atezolizumab.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Experienced At Least One Adverse Event (AE)Up to approximately 36.1 monthsThe analysis population included all participants who received ≥1 dose of any of the CMB305 components (LV305, G305) or atezolizumab.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event (AE)Up to approximately 24 monthsThe analysis population included all participants who received ≥1 dose of any of the CMB305 components (LV305, G305) or atezolizumab.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 3 Per Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)Month 3
The analysis population included all randomized participants who met eligibility criteria for the study and had data recorded in the eCRF. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYProgression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate at Month 6 Per Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)Month 6
The analysis population included all randomized participants who met eligibility criteria for the study and had data recorded in the eCRF. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYTime to Next Treatment (TTNT)Up to approximately 36.1 monthsThe analysis population included all participants who received ≥1 dose of any of the CMB305 components (LV305, G305) or atezolizumab.MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYDistant Metastasis Free Survival (DMFS)Up to approximately 36.1 months
The analysis population included all randomized participants who met eligibility criteria for the study and had data recorded in the eCRF. Participants were included in the treatment group to which they were randomized.
MonthsMEDIAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants Positive for Anti-New York Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma-1 (NY-ESO-1) Antibody at BaselineBaseline (Day 1)The analysis population included all participants who received ≥1 dose of any of the CMB305 components (LV305, G305) or atezolizumab and had data available for baseline antibody analysis.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group28

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)CMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab2.695% Confidence Interval 1.4 to 2.9Months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)Atezolizumab1.695% Confidence Interval 1.5 to 2.7Months
Overall Survival (OS)CMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab18.295% Confidence Interval 10.1 to 22.1Months
Overall Survival (OS)Atezolizumab18.095% Confidence Interval 15.3 to 26.5Months
Number of Participants Experiencing a Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT)CMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab1Participants
Number of Participants Experiencing a Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT)Atezolizumab1Participants
Number of Participants Who Experienced At Least One Adverse Event (AE)CMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab44Participants
Number of Participants Who Experienced At Least One Adverse Event (AE)Atezolizumab43Participants
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event (AE)CMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab6Participants
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event (AE)Atezolizumab6Participants

Participant flow8

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDCMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab45
Overall StudySTARTEDAtezolizumab44
Overall StudyTreatedCMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab45
Overall StudyTreatedAtezolizumab43
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDCMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab1
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAtezolizumab5
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDCMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab44
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAtezolizumab39

Adverse events154

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersCMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab4456
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersAtezolizumab6437
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersCMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab3453
otherLymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disordersAtezolizumab0430
otherSinus tachycardiaCardiac disordersCMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab3453
otherSinus tachycardiaCardiac disordersAtezolizumab1431
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersCMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab94510
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersAtezolizumab5436
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersCMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab124515
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersAtezolizumab74311

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityCMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab3145
Total, all-cause mortalityAtezolizumab2744
Total, other adverse eventsCMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab4245
Total, other adverse eventsAtezolizumab4243
Total, serious adverse eventsCMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab1745
Total, serious adverse eventsAtezolizumab943

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
34260265DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons9

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
CMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab vs Atezolizumab: Number of Participants Positive for Anti-New York Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma-1 (NY-ESO-1) Antibody at BaselineTrial comparisons
CMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab vs Atezolizumab: Number of Participants Experiencing a Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT)Trial comparisons
CMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab vs Atezolizumab: Number of Participants Positive for Anti-New York Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma-1 (NY-ESO-1) Antibody After Induction With Treatment
Trial comparisons
CMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab vs Atezolizumab: Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an Adverse Event (AE)Trial comparisons
CMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab vs Atezolizumab: Number of Participants Positive for Anti-New York Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma-1 (NY-ESO-1) T Cells After Induction With Treatment
Trial comparisons
CMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab vs Atezolizumab: Number of Participants Who Experienced At Least One Adverse Event (AE)Trial comparisons
CMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab vs Atezolizumab: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
CMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab vs Atezolizumab: Number of Participants Positive for Anti-New York Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma-1 (NY-ESO-1) T Cells at BaselineTrial comparisons
CMB305 (Sequentially Administered LV305 and G305)+Atezolizumab vs Atezolizumab: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02609984

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02609984/results?page=2