ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02611323

A Study of Obinutuzumab, Rituximab, Polatuzumab Vedotin, and Venetoclax in Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma (FL) or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

NCT02611323, Phase 1, Phase 2, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2023-10-10

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of Obinutuzumab, Rituximab, Polatuzumab Vedotin, and Venetoclax in Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma (FL) or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). Trials, record NCT02611323. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02611323

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of Obinutuzumab, Rituximab, Polatuzumab Vedotin, and Venetoclax in Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma (FL) or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
NCT number
NCT02611323
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1, Phase 2
Enrollment
133 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Interventions
Obinutuzumab, Rituximab, Polatuzumab Vedotin, Venetoclax
First posted
2015-11-20
Last updated
2023-10-10
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2015-001998-40
Results first posted
2023-10-10

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes22

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With CR at EOI Determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) on the Basis of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Computed Tomography (CT) Scans6 to 8 weeks after Day 1 of Cycle 6 (up to approximately 23 weeks) (1 cycle=21 days)
CR at EOI was assessed by the IRC according to modified Lugano Response Criteria (MLRC) for Malignant Lymphoma 2014 using PET-CT scan. Per MLRC, CR was defined as complete metabolic response (MR) in lymph nodes and extra lymphatic sites (ELS) with a score of 1, 2, or 3, with or without a residual mass on PET 5-point scale (5-PS), where 1=no uptake above background; 2= uptake ≤mediastinum; 3= uptake \> mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4=uptake moderately \> liver; 5=uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions. No new lesions; no evidence of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease in bone marrow. 90% confidence interval (CI) for percentage of responders was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off to the first decimal point.
PrimaryFL Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From study start to 24 months after last dose of study drug (approximately 56 months)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any new disease or worsening of an existing disease were also considered as AEs. An SAE was defined as any AE that was fatal, life threatening, requires prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in significant disability or resulted in a congenital anomaly to a mother exposed to study treatment. AEs and SAEs were reported based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs, version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE, v4.0). Percentages have been rounded off to the first decimal point.
PrimaryDLBCL Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With AEs and SAEsFrom study start to 3 months after last dose of study drug (approximately 21 months)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any new disease or worsening of an existing disease were also considered as AEs. An SAE was defined as any AE that was fatal, life threatening, requires prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in significant disability or resulted in a congenital anomaly to a mother exposed to study treatment. AEs and SAEs were reported based on the NCI-CTCAE, v4.0. Percentages have been rounded off to the first decimal point.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Day 1 of Cycle 1 to Day 1 of Cycle 2 (1 cycle=21 days) in dose-escalation phase
DLT=any one of the events that occurred in first treatment cycle \& per the investigator was related to study treatment. Any AE that lead to a delay of \> 14 days in start of next treatment cycle; Any Grade 3/4 non-hematologic AE with few exceptions; Any increase in hepatic transaminase \>3×baseline(BL) \& increase in direct bilirubin \>2×upper limit of normal (ULN), without any findings of cholestasis/jaundice/signs of hepatic dysfunction \& in absence of other contributory factors; Grade1 alanine transaminase (ALT)/aspartate transaminase (AST) elevation at BL as result of liver metastases, only a Grade ≥3 elevation, also ≥3×BL lasting \>7 days; Hematologic AE meeting protocol specified criteria. Events were graded per NCI CTCAE v4.0. Grade 1:Mild; asymptomatic/mild symptoms; Grade 2:Moderate;minimal,local/non-invasive intervention indicated; Grade 3:Severe/medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4:Life-threatening consequences/urgent intervention indicated.
PrimaryRP2D of Polatuzumab VedotinDay 1 of Cycle 1 to Day 1 of Cycle 2 (1 cycle=21 days) in dose-escalation phase
RP2D was defined as the highest dose with acceptable toxicity as determined from dose-escalation phase. The RP2D of polatuzumab vedotin when given in combination with fixed dose of obinutuzumab in participants with FL was determined.
PrimaryRP2D of VenetoclaxDay 1 of Cycle 1 to Day 1 of Cycle 2 (1 cycle=21 days) in dose-escalation phase
RP2D was defined as the highest dose with acceptable toxicity as determined from dose-escalation phase. The RP2D of venetoclax when given in combination with fixed dose of polatuzumab vedotin in participants with FL and DLBCL was determined.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With CR at EOI, Determined by the Investigator on the Basis of PET-CT Scans6 to 8 weeks after Day 1 of Cycle 6 (up to approximately 23 weeks) (1 cycle=21days)
CR at EOI was assessed by Investigator according to MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on PET-CT was defined as complete MR in lymph nodes and ELS with a score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass, on 5PS where 1=no uptake above background; 2=uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3=uptake \> mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4=uptake moderately \> liver; 5=uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. 90% CI for percentage of responders was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off to the first decimal point.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With CR at EOI, Determined by the IRC on the Basis of CT Scans Alone6 to 8 weeks after Day 1 of Cycle 6 (up to approximately 23 weeks) (1 cycle=21days)
CR at EOI was determined by IRC according to the MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on CT was defined as complete radiologic response in lymph nodes and ELS with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to ≤ 1.5 centimeters (cm) in longest transverse diameter (LDi) and no ELS of disease; organ enlargement regressing to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow by morphology, if indeterminate, immunohistochemistry (IHC) negative. 90% CI for percentage of responders was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off to the first decimal point.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With CR at EOI, Determined by the Investigator on the Basis of CT Scans Alone6 to 8 weeks after Day 1 of Cycle 6 (up to approximately 23 weeks) (1 cycle=21days)
CR at EOI was determined by Investigator according to the MLRC. Per MLRC, CR based on CT was defined as complete radiologic response in lymph nodes and ELS with target nodes/nodal masses regressing to ≤ 1.5 cm in LDi and no ELS of disease; organ enlargement regressing to normal; no new lesions; normal bone marrow by morphology, if indeterminate, IHC negative. 90% CI for percentage of responders was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) at EOI, Determined by an IRC on the Basis of PET and CT Scans6 to 8 weeks after Day 1 of Cycle 6 (up to approximately 23 weeks) (1 cycle=21days)
OR=percentage of participants with CR or PR as assessed by the IRC according to MLRC. Per MLRC CR based on PET-CT=complete MR in lymph nodes \& ELS with score of 1, 2, or 3 with or without residual mass on 5PS, where 1=no uptake above background; 2=uptake ≤ mediastinum; 3=uptake\> mediastinum but ≤ liver; 4=uptake moderately \> liver; 5=uptake markedly higher than liver and/or new lesions; no new lesions \& no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. PR based on PET-CT=partial MR in lymph nodes \& ELS with score of 4 or 5 with reduced uptake compared with baseline \& residual masses of any size: at interim (suggest responding disease) or at end of treatment (indicate residual disease), residual uptake higher than uptake in normal bone marrow but reduced compared with baseline (diffuse uptake compatible with reactive changes from chemotherapy allowed). 90% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off to the first decimal point.

Outcomes22

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With CR at EOI Determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) on the Basis of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Computed Tomography (CT) Scans6 to 8 weeks after Day 1 of Cycle 6 (up to approximately 23 weeks) (1 cycle=21 days)
Efficacy evaluable population included participants in the dose expansion arms who received at least one dose of any component of the combination. As pre-specified in the protocol, participants who received polatuzumab vedotin and venetoclax at recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) in dose-escalation phase were also analyzed in addition to expansion phase participants for efficacy analysis.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYFL Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)From study start to 24 months after last dose of study drug (approximately 56 months)
Safety-evaluable population included all participants who received at least one dose of any component of the combination. The safety-evaluable population in the FL cohorts were assessed in this outcome measure.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYDLBCL Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With AEs and SAEsFrom study start to 3 months after last dose of study drug (approximately 21 months)
Safety-evaluable population included all participants who received at least one dose of any component of the combination. The safety-evaluable population in the DLBCL cohorts were assessed in this outcome measure.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Day 1 of Cycle 1 to Day 1 of Cycle 2 (1 cycle=21 days) in dose-escalation phase
Safety-evaluable population included all participants who received at least one dose of any component of the combination. The safety-evaluable population in the dose-escalation cohorts cohorts were assessed in this outcome measure.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYRP2D of Polatuzumab VedotinDay 1 of Cycle 1 to Day 1 of Cycle 2 (1 cycle=21 days) in dose-escalation phase
Safety-evaluable population included all participants who received at least one dose of any component of the combination. The safety-evaluable population in the FL cohorts were assessed in this outcome measure.
mg/kgNUMBER
PRIMARYRP2D of VenetoclaxDay 1 of Cycle 1 to Day 1 of Cycle 2 (1 cycle=21 days) in dose-escalation phase
Safety-evaluable population included all participants who received at least one dose of any component of the combination. The safety-evaluable population in the DLBCL cohorts were assessed in this outcome measure.
mgNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With CR at EOI, Determined by the Investigator on the Basis of PET-CT Scans6 to 8 weeks after Day 1 of Cycle 6 (up to approximately 23 weeks) (1 cycle=21days)
Efficacy evaluable population included participants in the dose expansion arms who received at least one dose of any component of the combination. As pre-specified in the protocol, participants who received polatuzumab vedotin and venetoclax at RP2D in dose-escalation phase were also analyzed in addition to expansion phase participants for efficacy analysis.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With CR at EOI, Determined by the IRC on the Basis of CT Scans Alone6 to 8 weeks after Day 1 of Cycle 6 (up to approximately 23 weeks) (1 cycle=21days)
Efficacy evaluable population included participants in the dose expansion arms who received at least one dose of any component of the combination. As pre-specified in the protocol, participants who received polatuzumab vedotin and venetoclax at RP2D in dose-escalation phase were also analyzed in addition to expansion phase participants for efficacy analysis. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With CR at EOI, Determined by the Investigator on the Basis of CT Scans Alone6 to 8 weeks after Day 1 of Cycle 6 (up to approximately 23 weeks) (1 cycle=21days)
Efficacy evaluable population included participants in the dose expansion arms who received at least one dose of any component of the combination. As pre-specified in the protocol, participants who received polatuzumab vedotin and venetoclax at RP2D in dose-escalation phase were also analyzed in addition to expansion phase participants for efficacy analysis.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Objective Response (OR) at EOI, Determined by an IRC on the Basis of PET and CT Scans6 to 8 weeks after Day 1 of Cycle 6 (up to approximately 23 weeks) (1 cycle=21days)
Efficacy evaluable population included participants in the dose expansion arms who received at least one dose of any component of the combination. As pre-specified in the protocol, participants who received polatuzumab vedotin and venetoclax at RP2D in dose-escalation phase were also analyzed in addition to expansion phase participants for efficacy analysis.
percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group583

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With CR at EOI Determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) on the Basis of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Computed Tomography (CT) ScansFL Dose Escalation: 1.8P+800V+1000G10090% Confidence Interval 68.77 to 100.00percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With CR at EOI Determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) on the Basis of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Computed Tomography (CT) ScansFL: Dose Expansion: 1.8P+800V+1000G51.290% Confidence Interval 37.44 to 64.86percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With CR at EOI Determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) on the Basis of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Computed Tomography (CT) ScansDLBCL Dose Escalation: 1.8P+800V+375R2590% Confidence Interval 4.64 to 59.97percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With CR at EOI Determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) on the Basis of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Computed Tomography (CT) ScansDLBCL Dose Expansion: 1.8P+800V+375R32.590% Confidence Interval 20.41 to 46.63percentage of participants
FL Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)FL Dose Escalation: 1.4P+400V+1000GAEs100percentage of participants
FL Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)FL Dose Escalation: 1.4P+200V+1000GAEs100percentage of participants
FL Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)FL Dose Escalation: 1.8P+400V+1000GAEs100percentage of participants
FL Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)FL Dose Escalation: 1.4P+600V+1000GAEs100percentage of participants
FL Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)FL Dose Escalation: 1.8P+600V+1000GAEs100percentage of participants
FL Cohorts: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)FL Dose Escalation: 1.8P+800V+1000GAEs100percentage of participants

Participant flow33

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDFL Dose Escalation: 1.4P+400V+1000G7
Overall StudySTARTEDFL Dose Escalation: 1.4P+200V+1000G3
Overall StudySTARTEDFL Dose Escalation: 1.8P+400V+1000G3
Overall StudySTARTEDFL Dose Escalation: 1.4P+600V+1000G3
Overall StudySTARTEDFL Dose Escalation: 1.8P+600V+1000G9
Overall StudySTARTEDFL Dose Escalation: 1.8P+800V+1000G8
Overall StudySTARTEDFL: Dose Expansion: 1.8P+800V+1000G41
Overall StudySTARTEDDLBCL: Dose Escalation: 1.8P+400V+375R3
Overall StudySTARTEDDLBCL Dose Escalation: 1.8P+600V+375R6
Overall StudySTARTEDDLBCL Dose Escalation: 1.8P+800V+375R8

Adverse events3,784

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersFL Dose Escalation: 1.4P+400V+1000G171
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersFL Dose Escalation: 1.4P+200V+1000G030
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersFL Dose Escalation: 1.8P+400V+1000G131
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersFL Dose Escalation: 1.4P+600V+1000G030
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersFL Dose Escalation: 1.8P+600V+1000G090
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersFL Dose Escalation: 1.8P+800V+1000G286
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersFL: Dose Expansion: 1.8P+800V+1000G74113
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersDLBCL: Dose Escalation: 1.8P+400V+375R131
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersDLBCL Dose Escalation: 1.8P+600V+375R263
otherANAEMIABlood and lymphatic system disordersDLBCL Dose Escalation: 1.8P+800V+375R384

Adverse event totals33

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityFL Dose Escalation: 1.4P+400V+1000G37
Total, all-cause mortalityFL Dose Escalation: 1.4P+200V+1000G13
Total, all-cause mortalityFL Dose Escalation: 1.8P+400V+1000G03
Total, all-cause mortalityFL Dose Escalation: 1.4P+600V+1000G03
Total, all-cause mortalityFL Dose Escalation: 1.8P+600V+1000G19
Total, all-cause mortalityFL Dose Escalation: 1.8P+800V+1000G18
Total, all-cause mortalityFL: Dose Expansion: 1.8P+800V+1000G841
Total, all-cause mortalityDLBCL: Dose Escalation: 1.8P+400V+375R03
Total, all-cause mortalityDLBCL Dose Escalation: 1.8P+600V+375R46
Total, all-cause mortalityDLBCL Dose Escalation: 1.8P+800V+375R68

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02611323

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02611323/registered?page=2