ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02614729

The Consumption of Beef on Appetite and Cognitive Function

NCT02614729, Not applicable, Completed, University of Missouri-Columbia; results first posted 2019-07-08

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. The Consumption of Beef on Appetite and Cognitive Function. Trials, record NCT02614729. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02614729

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
The Consumption of Beef on Appetite and Cognitive Function
NCT number
NCT02614729
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
35 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
University of Missouri-Columbia
Conditions
Obesity, Poor Glycemic Control, Dietary Interventions
Interventions
Standard Protein-Plant, Even Distribution (SP-PLANT-EVEN), Standard Protein-Beef, Even Distribution (SP-BEEF-EVEN), High Protein-Beef, Even Distribution (HP-BEEF-EVEN), High Protein-Beef, Uneven Distribution (HP-BEEF-UNEVEN)
First posted
2015-11-25
Last updated
2019-07-08
Results first posted
2019-07-08

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryDaily Energy Intake: Total Daily Intake5 monthsEnergy intake during breakfast, lunch, dinner, and evening snacks of each day 7 testing day (separated by 3-4 weeks) will be measured.
SecondaryPerceived Fullness5 months
Questionnaires assessing fullness will be completed throughout each of the 12-hour testing days (which are separated by 3-4 weeks). The questionnaires contain validated visual analog scales (VAS) incorporating a 100 mm horizontal line rating scale for each response. The scale is 0 to 100mm. The questions are worded in the following manner "how strong is your feeling of" with anchors of "not at all" (indicated at 0 mm) to "extremely" (indicated at 100 mm). All measures are reported at area under the curve for 0 to 630 min.
SecondaryReaction Time as a Measure of Cognitive Performance Assessed Using the Stroop Test5 months
Cognitive function will be assessed during each of the 12-hour testing days using CNS Vital Signs, a validated computerized assessment. This system contains a core battery of tasks. Reaction Time is the outcome of interest measured with the Stroop Test. In the first part, the words RED, YELLOW, BLUE, \& GREEN (printed in black) appear at random on the screen, \& the participant presses the space bar as soon as the test subject sees the word. In the second part, the words RED, YELLOW, BLUE, \& GREEN appear on the screen, printed in color. The participant is asked to press the space bar when the color of the word matches what the word says. In the third part, the words RED, YELLOW, BLUE, \& GREEN appear on the screen, printed in color. The participant is asked to press the space bar when the color of the word does not match what the word says. Reaction time is in milliseconds.
SecondaryPerceived Alertness5 months
Alertness will be assessed during each of the 12-hour testing days (which are separated by 3-4 weeks) using the Profile of Mood States 2nd Edition (POMS2) with sub-categories of perceived vigor. POM2 is a self-report measure that allows for the quick assessment of transient, fluctuating feelings, and enduring affect states. There are 35 items. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The Alertness (Vigor-Activity) scale score indicates the extent to which individual felt alert (vigorous and/or energetic); the higher are her positive feelings and/or energy, the greater is her score (i.e., a low score indicates relatively fewer positive feelings and/or low energy). Ratings on this scale yielded a T-score of 25 (95% CI =18-32), which is ranked at the 1st percentile, and falls within the Very Low score range. The T scores were then used to calculate area under the curve.
SecondaryPerceived Hunger5 months
Questionnaires assessing hunger will be completed throughout each of the 12-hour testing days (which are separated by 3-4 weeks). The questionnaires contain validated visual analog scales (VAS) incorporating a 100 mm horizontal line rating scale for each response. The scale is 0 to 100mm. The questions are worded in the following manner "how strong is your feeling of" with anchors of "not at all" (indicated at 0 mm) to "extremely" (indicated at 100 mm). All measures are reported at area under the curve for 0 to 630 min.
SecondaryPerceived Prospective Food Consumption5 months
Questionnaires assessing prospective food consumption will be completed throughout each of the 12-hour testing days (which are separated by 3-4 weeks). The questionnaires contain validated visual analog scales (VAS) incorporating a 100 mm horizontal line rating scale for each response. The scale is 0 to 100mm. The questions are worded in the following manner "how strong is your feeling of" with anchors of "not at all" (indicated at 0 mm) to "extremely" (indicated at 100 mm). All measures are reported at area under the curve for 0 to 630 min.
SecondaryPerceived Desire to Eat5 months
Questionnaires assessing desire to eat will be completed throughout each of the 12-hour testing days (which are separated by 3-4 weeks). The questionnaires contain validated visual analog scales (VAS) incorporating a 100 mm horizontal line rating scale for each response. The scale is 0 to 100mm. The questions are worded in the following manner "how strong is your feeling of" with anchors of "not at all" (indicated at 0 mm) to "extremely" (indicated at 100 mm). All measures are reported at area under the curve for 0 to 630 min.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYDaily Energy Intake: Total Daily Intake5 monthskcalMEAN
SECONDARYPerceived Fullness5 monthsTotal Fullness AUC (mm*630 min)MEAN
SECONDARYReaction Time as a Measure of Cognitive Performance Assessed Using the Stroop Test5 monthsmsMEAN
SECONDARYPerceived Alertness5 monthsTotal AUC (T-score*min)MEAN
SECONDARYPerceived Hunger5 monthsTotal Fullness AUC (mm*630 min)MEAN
SECONDARYPerceived Prospective Food Consumption5 monthsTotal PFC AUC (mm*630 min)MEAN
SECONDARYPerceived Desire to Eat5 monthsTotal Desire to Eat AUC (mm*630 min)MEAN

Results by group56

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Daily Energy Intake: Total Daily IntakeEnergy Balance ComparisonSP-PLANT2859Standard Error 147kcal
Daily Energy Intake: Total Daily IntakeEnergy Restriction ComparisonSP-PLANT2313Standard Error 170kcal
Daily Energy Intake: Total Daily IntakeEnergy Balance ComparisonSP-BEEF2714Standard Error 219kcal
Daily Energy Intake: Total Daily IntakeEnergy Restriction ComparisonSP-BEEF2396Standard Error 181kcal
Daily Energy Intake: Total Daily IntakeEnergy Balance ComparisonHP-BEEF-EVEN2830Standard Error 214kcal
Daily Energy Intake: Total Daily IntakeEnergy Restriction ComparisonHP-BEEF-EVEN2820Standard Error 173kcal
Daily Energy Intake: Total Daily IntakeEnergy Balance ComparisonHP-BEEF-SKEW3039Standard Error 184kcal
Daily Energy Intake: Total Daily IntakeEnergy Restriction ComparisonHP-BEEF-SKEWNAStandard Error NAkcal
Perceived FullnessEnergy Balance ComparisonSP-PLANT: Daily Fullness38849Standard Error 2302Total Fullness AUC (mm*630 min)
Perceived FullnessEnergy Restriction ComparisonSP-PLANT: Daily Fullness32167Standard Error 2745Total Fullness AUC (mm*630 min)

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDEnergy Balance Comparison18
Overall StudySTARTEDEnergy Restriction Comparison17
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEnergy Balance Comparison17
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDEnergy Restriction Comparison17
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEnergy Balance Comparison1
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDEnergy Restriction Comparison0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEnergy Balance Comparison
Total, all-cause mortalityEnergy Restriction Comparison
Total, other adverse eventsEnergy Balance Comparison017
Total, other adverse eventsEnergy Restriction Comparison017
Total, serious adverse eventsEnergy Balance Comparison017
Total, serious adverse eventsEnergy Restriction Comparison017

Papers27

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
2980858BACKGROUNDPubMed
6764932BACKGROUNDPubMed
7498104BACKGROUNDPubMed
9920688BACKGROUNDPubMed
10100834BACKGROUNDPubMed
11836456BACKGROUNDPubMed
12566476BACKGROUNDPubMed
14988451BACKGROUNDPubMed
16002798BACKGROUNDPubMed
17014981BACKGROUNDPubMed

1 to 10 of 27

See all 27 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
Energy Balance Comparison vs Energy Restriction Comparison: serious adverse events

Tests1

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed as
Stroop Color-Word TestSecondary outcome

Source

Release
trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
Release manifest SHA-256
0f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4
Registry capture
2026-11-12
Results copy, AACT
2026-03-23
NIH clinical studies file
2026-11-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02614729

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02614729/results?page=2