ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02615249

Clinical Evaluation of Metal Panel Allergens: Dose Response Study

NCT02615249, Phase 2, Completed, Allerderm; results first posted 2020-08-11

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Clinical Evaluation of Metal Panel Allergens: Dose Response Study. Trials, record NCT02615249. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02615249

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Clinical Evaluation of Metal Panel Allergens: Dose Response Study
NCT number
NCT02615249
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
122 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Allerderm
Conditions
Dermatitis, Eczematous
Interventions
Metal Allergen Epicutaneous Patch
First posted
2015-11-26
Last updated
2020-08-25
Results first posted
2020-08-11

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes4

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Patch Test Responses21 days post patch application
Allergen patch test sites were scored at Visit 3 (day 3-4) Visit 4 (day 7-8) Visit 5 (day 10-14) and Visit 6 Day 19-23). Determination of positive or negative test response for each allergen dose was assessed by the investigator following the final visit.
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Panel AdhesionDay 2, visit 2 prior to panel removal
Panel Adhesion was measured at Visit 2 (day 2) prior to panel removal according to the following scale: Excellent- Skin contact good; all tape edges adherent; all allergens in contact with the skin, Good- Skin contact acceptable; some tape edges lifting; all allergens in contact with the skin, Poor- Little to no skin contact with panel; one or more allergens not in contact with the skin, Detached- Panel completely off the skin; none of the allergens in contact with the skin
SecondaryTape IrritationVisit 2 (day 2), visit 3 (day 3-4), visit 4 (day 7-8) visit 5 (day 10-14), visit 6 (day 19-23) with overall assessment by the Investigator following visit 6
Tape irritation was measured according to the following scale: None- No irritation, Weak- Faint to definite pink erythema, Moderate- Moderate erythema, definite redness, Strong- Severe erythema, very intense redness. Following visit 6, the Investigators rated tape irritation based on the overall trend observed at visits 2-6. Irritation at visit 2 that resolved by visit 3 was considered none. Skin under occlusion from an adhesive material would be expected to have minimal irritation shortly after the panel is removed. Irritation that persisted or increased in severity beyond visit 3 but resolved by the following visit would have been rated as irritant. An allergic response was considered if irritation persisted beyond visit 3, increased in severity and had symptoms consistent with criteria used to score positive skin reactions according to standard patch testing guidelines established by the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
SecondaryChip IrritationVisit 2 (day 2), visit 3 (day 3-4), visit 4 (day 7-8) visit 5 (day 10-14), visit 6 (day 19-23) with overall assessment by the Investigator following visit 6
Chip irritation was measured according to the following scale: None- No irritation, Weak- Faint to definite pink erythema, Moderate- Moderate erythema, definite redness, Strong- Severe erythema, very intense redness. Following visit 6, the Investigators rated Chip irritation based on the overall trend observed at visits 2-6. Irritation at visit 2 that resolved by visit 3 was considered none. Skin under occlusion from an adhesive material would be expected to have minimal irritation shortly after the panel is removed. Irritation that persisted or increased in severity beyond visit 3 but resolved by the following visit would have been rated as irritant. An allergic response was considered if irritation persisted beyond visit 3, increased in severity and had symptoms consistent with criteria used to score positive skin reactions according to standard patch testing guidelines established by the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYNumber of Participants With Patch Test Responses21 days post patch applicationNot all subjects tested all panels. No of subjects testing each panel; Panel 1- 105, Panel 2-111, Panel 3- 104, Panel 4- 109, Panel 5- 106ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects With Panel AdhesionDay 2, visit 2 prior to panel removalParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYTape IrritationVisit 2 (day 2), visit 3 (day 3-4), visit 4 (day 7-8) visit 5 (day 10-14), visit 6 (day 19-23) with overall assessment by the Investigator following visit 6ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChip IrritationVisit 2 (day 2), visit 3 (day 3-4), visit 4 (day 7-8) visit 5 (day 10-14), visit 6 (day 19-23) with overall assessment by the Investigator following visit 6ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group222

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Number of Participants With Patch Test ResponsesAll Subjects0.40 mg/cm2 aluminum chloride / Number Positive0Participants
Number of Participants With Patch Test ResponsesAll Subjects0.40 mg/cm2 aluminum chloride / Number Negative105Participants
Number of Participants With Patch Test ResponsesAll Subjects0.40 mg/cm2 aluminum chloride / Number not tested16Participants
Number of Participants With Patch Test ResponsesAll Subjects0.12 mg/cm2 alumunum chloride / Number Positive0Participants
Number of Participants With Patch Test ResponsesAll Subjects0.12 mg/cm2 alumunum chloride / Number Negative105Participants
Number of Participants With Patch Test ResponsesAll Subjects0.12 mg/cm2 alumunum chloride / Number not tested16Participants
Number of Participants With Patch Test ResponsesAll Subjects0.36 mg/cm2 aluminum chloride / Number Positive1Participants
Number of Participants With Patch Test ResponsesAll Subjects0.36 mg/cm2 aluminum chloride / Number Negative104Participants
Number of Participants With Patch Test ResponsesAll Subjects0.36 mg/cm2 aluminum chloride / Number not tested16Participants
Number of Participants With Patch Test ResponsesAll Subjects0.72 mg/cm2 aluminum chloride / Number Positive4Participants

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDAll Subjects122
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDAll Subjects121
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDAll Subjects1

Adverse events35

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherVertigoEar and labyrinth disordersAll Subjects11221
otherDry eyeEye disordersAll Subjects11221
otherHordeolumEye disordersAll Subjects11221
otherAbdominal pain, upperGastrointestinal disordersAll Subjects11221
otherGlossitisGastrointestinal disordersAll Subjects11221
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersAll Subjects21222
otherPeriodontal inflammationGastrointestinal disordersAll Subjects11221
otherToothacheGastrointestinal disordersAll Subjects11221
otherVomitingGastrointestinal disordersAll Subjects11221
otherApplication site erythemaGeneral disordersAll Subjects11221

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityAll Subjects0122
Total, other adverse eventsAll Subjects30122
Total, serious adverse eventsAll Subjects1122

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02615249

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02615249/results?page=2