ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02623972

A Phase 2 Study of Eribulin Followed by AC as Preoperative Therapy for HER2-negative Inflammatory Breast Cancer

NCT02623972, Phase 2, Active not recruiting, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; results first posted 2022-12-28

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Phase 2 Study of Eribulin Followed by AC as Preoperative Therapy for HER2-negative Inflammatory Breast Cancer. Trials, record NCT02623972. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02623972

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Phase 2 Study of Eribulin Followed by AC as Preoperative Therapy for HER2-negative Inflammatory Breast Cancer
NCT number
NCT02623972
Status
Active not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
22 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Conditions
Inflammatory Breast Cancer, Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 Negative Carcinoma of Breast
Interventions
Eribulin, Adriamycin, Cyclophosphamide
First posted
2015-12-08
Last updated
2026-07-06
Results first posted
2022-12-28

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPathologic Complete Response Rate
Assessed after preoperative therapy with either 4 cycles of eribulin mesylate (3 wks) followed by 4 cycles of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (2 wks) or after 4 cycles of AC(2 wks) followed by 4 cycles of eribulin(3 wks). As such up to 20 weeks.
Complete pathologic disease response (pCR) is defined as absence of invasive carcinoma within the breast and axillary lymph nodes following preoperative therapy, based upon pathological assessment of surgical specimens. Those with invasive carcinoma present within the breast and axillary lymph nodes, and participants whose disease is not surgically resectable following preoperative treatment are considered as not having pCR.
SecondaryDisease Free Survival
DFS is assessed every cycle for 8 cycles. After protocol therapy, assessed every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months for 4 years, then annually until death.The DFS measurement duration is anticipated to last for at least 5 years.
Disease-free survival (DFS) is defined for the participants who undergo surgery, as the duration of time from surgery until ipsilateral local-regional, contralateral or distant invasive recurrence or death from any cause; in the absence of an event, DFS will be censored at the date last know alive and free from recurrence.
SecondaryTime to Treatment Failure
TTF is assessed every cycle for 8 cycles. After protocol therapy, assessed every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months for 4 years, then annually until death. The TTF measurement duration is anticipated to last for at least 5 years.
Time to treatment failure (TTF) will be defined among all participants, as the duration of time from treatment initiation to a DFS event or progressive disease during preoperative therapy or treatment disease that is not surgically resectable; in the absence of an event, TTF will be censored at the date last know alive and free from recurrence or progression.
SecondaryOverall Survival
OS is assessed every cycle for 8 cycles. After protocol therapy, assessed every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months for 4 years, then annually until death. The OS measurement duration is anticipated to last for at least 5 years.
Overall Survival (OS) will be defined two ways: among patients who undergo surgery, as time from surgery until death from any cause; and among all patients, as the time from treatment initiation until death from any cause. Censoring will use the date last known alive.
SecondaryResidual Cancer Burden (RCB)
Assessed after preoperative therapy with either 4 cycles of eribulin mesylate (3 wks) followed by 4 cycles of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (2 wks) or after 4 cycles of AC(2 wks) followed by 4 cycles of eribulin(3 wks). As such summed up to 20 weeks.
Residual cancer burden is calculated and then categorized based on level of residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy and several other factors as assessed by pathologists. This method uses tumor size, the proportion of that tumor that is invasive carcinoma, the number of axillary lymph nodes containing metastatic carcinoma and the diameter of the largest metastasis in an axillary lymph node. This index is divided into 4 categories: RCB-0, RCB-I, RCB-II, and RCB-III.(RCB category "Unknown" if unable to determine RCB or missing data.) The previous categories are in order of increasing severity of RCB. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden can predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPathologic Complete Response Rate
Assessed after preoperative therapy with either 4 cycles of eribulin mesylate (3 wks) followed by 4 cycles of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (2 wks) or after 4 cycles of AC(2 wks) followed by 4 cycles of eribulin(3 wks). As such up to 20 weeks.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDisease Free Survival
DFS is assessed every cycle for 8 cycles. After protocol therapy, assessed every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months for 4 years, then annually until death.The DFS measurement duration is anticipated to last for at least 5 years.
SECONDARYTime to Treatment Failure
TTF is assessed every cycle for 8 cycles. After protocol therapy, assessed every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months for 4 years, then annually until death. The TTF measurement duration is anticipated to last for at least 5 years.
SECONDARYOverall Survival
OS is assessed every cycle for 8 cycles. After protocol therapy, assessed every 3 months for 1 year, then every 6 months for 4 years, then annually until death. The OS measurement duration is anticipated to last for at least 5 years.
SECONDARYResidual Cancer Burden (RCB)
Assessed after preoperative therapy with either 4 cycles of eribulin mesylate (3 wks) followed by 4 cycles of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (2 wks) or after 4 cycles of AC(2 wks) followed by 4 cycles of eribulin(3 wks). As such summed up to 20 weeks.
percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group12

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Pathologic Complete Response RateArm A: Eribulin followed by AC6.2580% Confidence Interval 0.66 to 22.22percentage of participants
Pathologic Complete Response RateArm B: AC followed by Eribulin080% Confidence Interval 0 to 31.87percentage of participants
Residual Cancer Burden (RCB)Arm A: Eribulin followed by ACRCB-06.2580% Confidence Interval 0.66 to 22.22percentage of participants
Residual Cancer Burden (RCB)Arm B: AC followed by EribulinRCB-0080% Confidence Interval 0 to 31.87percentage of participants
Residual Cancer Burden (RCB)Arm A: Eribulin followed by ACRCB-I12.580% Confidence Interval 3.37 to 29.96percentage of participants
Residual Cancer Burden (RCB)Arm B: AC followed by EribulinRCB-I080% Confidence Interval 0 to 31.87percentage of participants
Residual Cancer Burden (RCB)Arm A: Eribulin followed by ACRCB-II2580% Confidence Interval 11.38 to 43.89percentage of participants
Residual Cancer Burden (RCB)Arm B: AC followed by EribulinRCB-II5080% Confidence Interval 20.09 to 79.91percentage of participants
Residual Cancer Burden (RCB)Arm A: Eribulin followed by ACRCB-III56.2580% Confidence Interval 37.5 to 73.71percentage of participants
Residual Cancer Burden (RCB)Arm B: AC followed by EribulinRCB-III33.3380% Confidence Interval 9.26 to 66.68percentage of participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDArm A: Eribulin followed by AC16
Overall StudySTARTEDArm B: AC followed by Eribulin6
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm A: Eribulin followed by AC16
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDArm B: AC followed by Eribulin6
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDArm A: Eribulin followed by AC0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDArm B: AC followed by Eribulin0

Adverse events160

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm A: Eribulin followed by AC216
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm B: AC followed by Eribulin06
otherLymph node painBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm A: Eribulin followed by AC016
otherLymph node painBlood and lymphatic system disordersArm B: AC followed by Eribulin16
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersArm A: Eribulin followed by AC116
otherPalpitationsCardiac disordersArm B: AC followed by Eribulin06
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersArm A: Eribulin followed by AC116
otherTinnitusEar and labyrinth disordersArm B: AC followed by Eribulin06
otherHearing impairedEar and labyrinth disordersArm A: Eribulin followed by AC016
otherHearing impairedEar and labyrinth disordersArm B: AC followed by Eribulin16

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityArm A: Eribulin followed by AC116
Total, all-cause mortalityArm B: AC followed by Eribulin06
Total, other adverse eventsArm A: Eribulin followed by AC1616
Total, other adverse eventsArm B: AC followed by Eribulin66
Total, serious adverse eventsArm A: Eribulin followed by AC516
Total, serious adverse eventsArm B: AC followed by Eribulin16

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
41024110DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Arm A: Eribulin followed by AC vs Arm B: AC followed by Eribulin: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Arm A: Eribulin followed by AC vs Arm B: AC followed by Eribulin: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02623972

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02623972/events?page=2