ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02628743

A Study to Evaluate Long Term Safety, Tolerability, and Effectiveness of Olesoxime in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

NCT02628743, Phase 2, Completed, Hoffmann-La Roche; results first posted 2019-08-09

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Evaluate Long Term Safety, Tolerability, and Effectiveness of Olesoxime in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). Trials, record NCT02628743. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02628743

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Evaluate Long Term Safety, Tolerability, and Effectiveness of Olesoxime in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
NCT number
NCT02628743
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
131 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Conditions
Muscular Atrophy, Spinal
Interventions
Olesoxime
First posted
2015-12-11
Last updated
2019-08-09
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2015-001589-25
Results first posted
2019-08-09

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes21

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to approximately 3 years
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Motor Function Measure (MFM) Dimension 1 (D1) + Dimension 2 (D2) ScoreBaseline (Week 1), Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and 130
The MFM scale evaluated motor function in three dimensions. D1 evaluates functions related to standing and transfer, D2 evaluates axial and proximal function in supine and sitting position on mat and chair and D3 evaluates distal motor function. The scoring of each task uses a 4-point Likert scale based on the participant's maximal abilities without assistance: 0, cannot initiate the task or maintain the starting position; 1, performs the task partially; 2, performs the task incompletely or imperfectly (with compensatory/uncontrolled movements or slowness); and 3, performs the task fully and "normally". The scores are summed to yield a total score expressed as the percentage of the maximum possible score (the one obtained with no physical impairment); the lower the total score, the more severe the impairment.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in MFM Total Score (D1+ D2 + Dimension 3 [D3]) ScoreBaseline (Week 1), Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and 130
The MFM scale evaluated motor function in three dimensions. D1 evaluates functions related to standing and transfer, D2 evaluates axial and proximal function in supine and sitting position on mat and chair and D3 evaluates distal motor function. The scoring of each task uses a 4-point Likert scale based on the participant's maximal abilities without assistance: 0, cannot initiate the task or maintain the starting position; 1, performs the task partially; 2, performs the task incompletely or imperfectly (with compensatory/uncontrolled movements or slowness); and 3, performs the task fully and "normally". The scores are summed to yield a total score expressed as the percentage of the maximum possible score (the one obtained with no physical impairment); the lower the total score, the more severe the impairment.
SecondaryPlasma Concentrations of OlesoximePre-dose (Hour 0) at Weeks 1, 13, 26, 39, 52, 78, 104 and 130Values are reported separately for QD and BID doses. Dose increase occurred after Week 104.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Generic Core Scale Version 4.0 ScoreBaseline (Week 1), Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and 130
The PedsQL Generic Core Scale includes 23 items using self-report and/or parent report (ages 5+). The instrument covers physical, emotional, social and school functioning. Scale items are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale (0 = 100, 1 = 75, 2 = 50, 3 = 25, and 4 = 0) so that higher scores indicate better health related quality of life.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Caregiver PedsQL Generic Core Scales Version 4.0 ScoreBaseline (Week 1), Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and 130
The PedsQL Generic Core Scale includes 23 items. The instrument covers physical, emotional, social and school functioning. Scale items are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale (0 = 100, 1 = 75, 2 = 50, 3 = 25, and 4 = 0) so that higher scores indicate better health related quality of life. Questionnaire was completed by the caregiver.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in PedsQL Neuromuscular Module Version 3.0 Scale ScoreBaseline (Week 1), Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and 130
The PedsQL Neuromuscular Module (Version 3.0) includes 25 items using self-report (ages 5 - 18) and/or parent report (ages 5 -18). The instrument covers problems related to neuromuscular disease, communication and family resources. Scale items are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale (0 = 100, 1 = 75, 2 = 50, 3 = 25, and 4 = 0) so that higher scores indicate better health related quality of life.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Caregiver PedsQL Neuromuscular Module Version 3.0 Scale ScoreBaseline (Week 1), Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and 130
The PedsQL Neuromuscular Module (Version 3.0) includes 25 items using self-report (ages 5 - 18) and/or parent report (ages 5 -18). The instrument covers problems related to neuromuscular disease, communication and family resources. Scale items are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale (0 = 100, 1 = 75, 2 = 50, 3 = 25, and 4 = 0) so that higher scores indicate better health related quality of life. Questionnaire was completed by the caregiver.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire Index Score - Total ScoreBaseline (Week 1), Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and 130
The EQ-5D-5L is a self-reported health status questionnaire that consists of six questions used to calculate a health utility score for use in health economic analysis. There are two components to the EQ-5D-5L: a five-item health state profile that assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression used to obtain an Index Utility Score, as well as a visual analogue scale (VAS) that measures health state. Overall scores range from 0 to 1, with low scores representing a higher level of dysfunction.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Caregiver Proxy EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire Index Score - Total ScoreBaseline (Week 1), Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and 130
The EQ-5D-5L is a self-reported health status questionnaire that consists of six questions used to calculate a health utility score for use in health economic analysis. There are two components to the EQ-5D-5L: a five-item health state profile that assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression used to obtain an Index Utility Score, as well as a visual analogue scale (VAS) that measures health state. Overall scores range from 0 to 1, with low scores representing a higher level of dysfunction. The questionnaire was completed by the caregiver.

Outcomes21

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to approximately 3 yearsSafety population included all patients who received at least one dose of study medication.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Motor Function Measure (MFM) Dimension 1 (D1) + Dimension 2 (D2) ScoreBaseline (Week 1), Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and 130Intent-to-Treat Population (ITT) includes all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and have at least one post-baseline assessment of MFM.percentage of maximum scoreMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in MFM Total Score (D1+ D2 + Dimension 3 [D3]) ScoreBaseline (Week 1), Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and 130ITT population includes all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and have at least one post-baseline assessment of MFMpercentage of maximum scoreMEAN
SECONDARYPlasma Concentrations of OlesoximePre-dose (Hour 0) at Weeks 1, 13, 26, 39, 52, 78, 104 and 130Included participants in the safety population that received at least one dose of the study drug and had measurable concentration values.ng/mLMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Generic Core Scale Version 4.0 ScoreBaseline (Week 1), Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and 130Intent-to-Treat Population (ITT) includes all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and have at least one post-baseline assessment of MFM.score on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Caregiver PedsQL Generic Core Scales Version 4.0 ScoreBaseline (Week 1), Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and 130
Intent-to-Treat Population (ITT) includes all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and have at least one post-baseline assessment of MFM. Scale scores were not computed if more than 50% of items in the scale were missing.
score on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in PedsQL Neuromuscular Module Version 3.0 Scale ScoreBaseline (Week 1), Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and 130
Intent-to-Treat Population (ITT) includes all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and have at least one post-baseline assessment of MFM. Scale scores were not computed if more than 50% of items in the scale were missing.
score on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Caregiver PedsQL Neuromuscular Module Version 3.0 Scale ScoreBaseline (Week 1), Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and 130
Intent-to-Treat Population (ITT) includes all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and have at least one post-baseline assessment of MFM. Scale scores were not computed if more than 50% of items in the scale were missing.
score on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire Index Score - Total ScoreBaseline (Week 1), Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and 130
Intent-to-Treat Population (ITT) includes all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and have at least one post-baseline assessment of MFM. The number analyzed represents participants who completed the questionnaire.
score on scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Caregiver Proxy EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire Index Score - Total ScoreBaseline (Week 1), Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and 130
Intent-to-Treat Population (ITT) includes all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and have at least one post-baseline assessment of MFM. The number analyzed represents participants who completed the questionnaire.
score on scaleMEAN

Results by group286

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)OlesoximeSAEs27.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)OlesoximeAEs91.6percentage of participants
Change From Baseline in Motor Function Measure (MFM) Dimension 1 (D1) + Dimension 2 (D2) ScoreOlesoximeBaseline30.01Standard Deviation 12.77percentage of maximum score
Change From Baseline in Motor Function Measure (MFM) Dimension 1 (D1) + Dimension 2 (D2) ScoreOlesoximeWeek 26-0.06Standard Deviation 4.75percentage of maximum score
Change From Baseline in Motor Function Measure (MFM) Dimension 1 (D1) + Dimension 2 (D2) ScoreOlesoximeWeek 52-0.31Standard Deviation 4.61percentage of maximum score
Change From Baseline in Motor Function Measure (MFM) Dimension 1 (D1) + Dimension 2 (D2) ScoreOlesoximeWeek 78-1.26Standard Deviation 5.64percentage of maximum score
Change From Baseline in Motor Function Measure (MFM) Dimension 1 (D1) + Dimension 2 (D2) ScoreOlesoximeWeek 104-3.32Standard Deviation 7.08percentage of maximum score
Change From Baseline in Motor Function Measure (MFM) Dimension 1 (D1) + Dimension 2 (D2) ScoreOlesoximeWeek 130-4.87Standard Deviation 9.91percentage of maximum score
Change From Baseline in MFM Total Score (D1+ D2 + Dimension 3 [D3]) ScoreOlesoximeBaseline41.21Standard Deviation 12.81percentage of maximum score
Change From Baseline in MFM Total Score (D1+ D2 + Dimension 3 [D3]) ScoreOlesoximeWeek 260.31Standard Deviation 4.35percentage of maximum score

Participant flow3

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDOlesoxime131
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDOlesoxime0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDOlesoxime131

Adverse events62

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherABDOMINAL PAIN UPPERGastrointestinal disordersOlesoxime813112
otherCONSTIPATIONGastrointestinal disordersOlesoxime913113
otherDIARRHOEAGastrointestinal disordersOlesoxime2013134
otherNAUSEAGastrointestinal disordersOlesoxime913113
otherVOMITINGGastrointestinal disordersOlesoxime2313143
otherPYREXIAGeneral disordersOlesoxime2813140
otherBRONCHITISInfections and infestationsOlesoxime1513122
otherGASTROENTERITISInfections and infestationsOlesoxime1313118
otherINFLUENZAInfections and infestationsOlesoxime1313114
otherNASOPHARYNGITISInfections and infestationsOlesoxime3013157

Adverse event totals3

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityOlesoxime0131
Total, other adverse eventsOlesoxime105131
Total, serious adverse eventsOlesoxime36131

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
36288197DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02628743

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02628743/registered?page=2