ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02636699

Efficacy and Safety of Viaskin Peanut in Children With Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-Mediated Peanut Allergy

NCT02636699, Phase 3, Completed, DBV Technologies; results first posted 2021-10-15

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of Viaskin Peanut in Children With Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-Mediated Peanut Allergy. Trials, record NCT02636699. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02636699

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of Viaskin Peanut in Children With Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-Mediated Peanut Allergy
NCT number
NCT02636699
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
500 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
DBV Technologies
Conditions
Peanut Allergy
Interventions
Viaskin Peanut 250mcg, Placebo
First posted
2015-12-22
Last updated
2025-06-18
Results first posted
2021-10-15

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes5

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryDifference in Percentages of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in the Overall PopulationAt Month 12
The Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Food Challenges (DBPCFCs) to determine Eliciting Dose (ED) were performed at screening and Month 12, with each challenge occurring over 2 days. The participant was gradually fed increasing amounts of standardized blinded oral formulas containing either peanut protein (during 1 of the 2 days of the challenge), or without any peanut protein (during the other day of the challenge). A participant was defined as a treatment responder if: * ED was ≥300 mg peanut protein at Month 12 DBPCFC (for screening ED subgroup 1), or * ED was ≥1,000 mg peanut protein at Month 12 DBPCFC (for screening ED subgroup 2). Participants with missing treatment response at Month 12 were imputed as non-responders. The percentage of treatment responders at Month 12 is presented. Analysis of the difference in response rates between treatment groups is presented in the subsequent statistical analysis table. Analysis was performed in the overall population.
SecondaryDifference in Percentages of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Each Screening Eliciting Dose (ED) SubgroupAt Month 12
The Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Food Challenges (DBPCFCs) to determine Eliciting Dose (ED) were performed at screening and Month 12, with each challenge occurring over 2 days. The participant was gradually fed increasing amounts of blinded oral formulas containing either peanut protein (during 1 of the 2 days of the challenge), or without any peanut protein (during the other day of the challenge). A participant was defined as a treatment responder if: * ED was ≥300 mg peanut protein at Month 12 DBPCFC (for screening ED subgroup 1), or * ED was ≥1,000 mg peanut protein at Month 12 DBPCFC (for screening ED subgroup 2). Participants with missing treatment response at Month 12 were imputed as non-responders. The percentage of treatment responders at Month 12 is presented below. Analysis of the difference in response rates between treatment groups is presented in the subsequent statistical analysis table. Analysis was performed for each separate screening ED subgroup.
SecondaryCumulative Reactive Dose (CRD) of Peanut Protein at Baseline and Month 12Baseline and Month 12
The CRD was calculated as the sum of all doses given (including any repeated and partial doses). The median CRD of peanut protein at baseline and Month 12 is presented. Analysis was performed using the modified baseline observation carried forward method to impute missing data at Month 12.
OtherRelative Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) Over TimeBaseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Venous blood samples were drawn to assess peanut-specific IgE levels at baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12. The median relative changes from baseline in IgE levels for each timepoint are presented. Relative change from baseline=100×(value at the visit-value at baseline)/value at baseline.
OtherRelative Changes From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin G4 Subtype (IgG4) Over TimeBaseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Venous blood samples were drawn to assess peanut-specific IgG4 levels at baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12. The median relative changes from baseline in IgG4 levels for each timepoint are presented. Relative change from baseline=100×(value at the visit-value at baseline)/value at baseline.

Outcomes5

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYDifference in Percentages of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in the Overall PopulationAt Month 12The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population was comprised of all participants who were randomized.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYDifference in Percentages of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Each Screening Eliciting Dose (ED) SubgroupAt Month 12The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population was comprised of all participants who were randomized.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYCumulative Reactive Dose (CRD) of Peanut Protein at Baseline and Month 12Baseline and Month 12The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population was comprised of all participants who were randomized.mgMEDIAN
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDRelative Change From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin E (IgE) Over TimeBaseline and Months 3, 6 and 12The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population was comprised of all participants who were randomized. Only those with non-missing data were included in the analysis.Percent of changeMEDIAN
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIEDRelative Changes From Baseline in Peanut-specific Immunoglobulin G4 Subtype (IgG4) Over TimeBaseline and Months 3, 6 and 12The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population was comprised of all participants who were randomized. Only those with non-missing data were included in the analysis.Percent of changeMEDIAN

Results by group22

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Difference in Percentages of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in the Overall PopulationDBV712 250 μg35.395% Confidence Interval 29.5 to 41.6percentage of participants
Difference in Percentages of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in the Overall PopulationPlacebo13.695% Confidence Interval 8.5 to 20.9percentage of participants
Difference in Percentages of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Each Screening Eliciting Dose (ED) SubgroupDBV712 250 μgScreening ED subgroup 139.095% Confidence Interval 25.7 to 54.3percentage of participants
Difference in Percentages of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Each Screening Eliciting Dose (ED) SubgroupPlaceboScreening ED subgroup 120.095% Confidence Interval 8.1 to 41.6percentage of participants
Difference in Percentages of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Each Screening Eliciting Dose (ED) SubgroupDBV712 250 μgScreening ED subgroup 234.595% Confidence Interval 28.2 to 41.4percentage of participants
Difference in Percentages of Treatment Responders at Month 12; Analyzed in Each Screening Eliciting Dose (ED) SubgroupPlaceboScreening ED subgroup 212.295% Confidence Interval 7.1 to 20.2percentage of participants
Cumulative Reactive Dose (CRD) of Peanut Protein at Baseline and Month 12DBV712 250 μgBaseline144.0Inter-Quartile Range 44.0 to 444.0mg
Cumulative Reactive Dose (CRD) of Peanut Protein at Baseline and Month 12PlaceboBaseline144.0Inter-Quartile Range 44.0 to 444.0mg
Cumulative Reactive Dose (CRD) of Peanut Protein at Baseline and Month 12DBV712 250 μgMonth 12444.0Inter-Quartile Range 144.0 to 1444.0mg
Cumulative Reactive Dose (CRD) of Peanut Protein at Baseline and Month 12PlaceboMonth 12144.0Inter-Quartile Range 44.0 to 444.0mg

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Screening PeriodSTARTEDDBV712 250 μg0
Screening PeriodSTARTEDPlacebo0
Screening PeriodSTARTEDScreened500
Screening PeriodCOMPLETEDDBV712 250 μg0
Screening PeriodCOMPLETEDPlacebo0
Screening PeriodCOMPLETEDScreened356
Screening PeriodNOT COMPLETEDDBV712 250 μg0
Screening PeriodNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo0
Screening PeriodNOT COMPLETEDScreened144
Treatment and Follow-up PeriodsSTARTEDDBV712 250 μg238

Adverse events135

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsDBV712 250 μg73238134
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo3011848
otherUpper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsScreened1650016
otherViral upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsDBV712 250 μg4223882
otherViral upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsPlacebo2011840
otherViral upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestationsScreened85008
otherGastroenteritisInfections and infestationsDBV712 250 μg2023823
otherGastroenteritisInfections and infestationsPlacebo1011811
otherGastroenteritisInfections and infestationsScreened25002
otherViral infectionInfections and infestationsDBV712 250 μg1923821

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityDBV712 250 μg0238
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo0118
Total, all-cause mortalityScreened0500
Total, other adverse eventsDBV712 250 μg222238
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo96118
Total, other adverse eventsScreened83500
Total, serious adverse eventsDBV712 250 μg10238
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo6118
Total, serious adverse eventsScreened9500

Papers4

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
30794314RESULTPubMed
31442495DERIVEDPubMed
32502548RESULTPubMed
33259921DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02636699

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02636699/results?page=2