ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02641730

An Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in Participants With Palmoplantar Pustulosis

NCT02641730, Phase 3, Completed, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.; results first posted 2019-02-21

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. An Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in Participants With Palmoplantar Pustulosis. Trials, record NCT02641730. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02641730

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
An Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab in Participants With Palmoplantar Pustulosis
NCT number
NCT02641730
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
159 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.
Conditions
Palmoplantar Pustulosis
Interventions
Guselkumab, Placebo
First posted
2015-12-29
Last updated
2025-02-04
Results first posted
2019-02-21

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes20

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) Total Score at Week 16Baseline and Week 16
PPPASI assesses severity of palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) lesions and response to therapy. In PPPASI, palms, soles are divided into 4 regions: right palm(RP), left palm(LP), right sole(RS), left sole(LS), that account for 20 percent (%), 20%,30%,30%, respectively, of total surface area(TSA) of palms, soles. Each area is assessed separately for erythema(E), pustules/vesicles (P), desquamation/scales (D), each rated on a scale (0-4). PPPASI produces score range of 0-72 using formula, PPPASI=(E+P+D)Area\*0.2(RP)+(E+P+D)Area\*0.2 (LP)+(E+P+D)Area\*0.3(RS)+(E+P+D)Area\*0.3(LS). Higher a score more the severe disease. Participants who discontinue study agent as they met treatment failure(TF) criterion(lack of efficacy/AE of worsening of PPP/who started a protocol-prohibited medication/therapy that could improve PPP), their baseline value carried forward to post baseline attending visits before and at Week 16 and after TF were applied, remaining missing data were handled with LOCF till Week 60.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Palmoplantar Severity Index (PPSI) Total Score at Week 16Baseline and Week 16
PPSI assesses the severity of PPP lesions and their response to therapy with a score ranging from 0 to 12. A higher score indicates more severe disease. In the PPSI system, the more severely affected location (palms or soles) were to be identified as the evaluation sites at screening that to be assessed at all subsequent visits. Evaluation sites were assessed separately for erythema, pustules/vesicles and desquamation/scale, for most severe skin lesion rated on a scale of 0 to 4. Participants who discontinue study agent as they met a TF criterion, their baseline value carried forward to the post-baseline attending visits before and at Week 16 and after TF were applied, remaining missing data were handled with LOCF till Week 60.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PPPASI-50 Response at Week 16Week 16
PPPASI assesses severity of PPP lesions and their response to therapy. In PPPASI system, palms and soles are divided into 4 regions: right palm, left palm, right sole, and left sole, that account for 20%, 20%, 30%, and 30%, respectively, of TSA of palms and soles. Each of these areas is assessed separately for erythema, pustules/vesicles, and desquamation/scales, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. PPPASI produces a score range from 0 to 72. Higher score indicates more severe disease. PPPASI-50 response represents participants who achieved at least a 50% improvement from baseline in the PPPASI score. Participants who discontinue study agent as they met a TF criterion were considered as non-responders at Week 16 and after TF were applied, remaining missing data were handled with LOCF till Week 60.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in PPPASI Total ScoreBaseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 72 and Week 84
PPPASI assesses severity of PPP lesions and their response to therapy. In PPPASI system, palms and soles are divided into 4 regions: right palm, left palm, right sole, and left sole, which account for 20%, 20%, 30%, and 30%, respectively, of TSA of palms and soles. Each of these areas is assessed separately for erythema, pustules/vesicles, and desquamation/scales, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. PPPASI produces a score range from 0 to 72. Higher score indicates more severe disease. PPPASI-50 response represents participants who achieved at least a 50% improvement from baseline in the PPPASI score. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment at Week 0 or 16. Participants who discontinue study agent as they met a TF criterion, their baseline value carried forward to the post-baseline attending visits before and at Week 16 and after TF were applied, remaining missing data were handled with LOCF till Week 60.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in PPSI Total ScoreBaseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 72 and Week 84
PPSI assesses the severity of PPP lesions and their response to therapy with a score ranging from 0 to 12. A higher score indicates more severe disease. In the PPSI system, the more severely affected location (palms or soles) were to be identified as the evaluation sites at screening that to be assessed at all subsequent visits. Evaluation sites were assessed separately for erythema, pustules/vesicles and desquamation/scale, for most severe skin lesion rated on a scale of 0 to 4. Participants who discontinue study agent as they met a TF criterion, their baseline value carried forward to the post-baseline attending visits before and at Week 16 and after TF were applied, remaining missing data were handled with LOCF till Week 60.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PPPASI-50 ResponseWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 72 and Week 84
PPPASI assesses severity of PPP lesions and their response to therapy. In PPPASI system, palms and soles are divided into 4 regions: right palm, left palm, right sole, and left sole, that account for 20%, 20%, 30%, and 30%, respectively, of TSA of palms and soles. Each of these areas is assessed separately for erythema, pustules/vesicles, and desquamation/scales, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. PPPASI produces a score range from 0 to 72. Higher score indicates more severe disease. PPPASI-50 response represents participants who achieved at least a 50% improvement from baseline in the PPPASI score. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment at Week 0 or 16. Participants who discontinue study agent as they met a TF criterion were considered as non-responders at Week 16 and after TF were applied, remaining missing data were handled with LOCF till Week 60.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PPPASI-75 ResponseWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 72 and Week 84
PPPASI assesses severity of PPP lesions and their response to therapy. In PPPASI system, palms and soles are divided into 4 regions: right palm, left palm, right sole, and left sole, that account for 20%, 20%, 30%, and 30%, respectively, of TSA of palms and soles. Each of these areas is assessed separately for erythema, pustules/vesicles, and desquamation/scales, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. PPPASI produces a score range from 0 to 72. Higher score indicates more severe disease. PPPASI-75 response represents participants who achieved at least a 75% improvement from baseline in the PPPASI score. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment at Week 0 or 16. Participants who discontinue study agent as they met a TF criterion were considered as nonresponders at Week 16 and after TF were applied, remaining missing data were handled with LOCF till Week 60.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PPPASI-90 ResponseWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 72 and Week 84
PPPASI assesses severity of PPP lesions and their response to therapy. In PPPASI system, palms and soles are divided into 4 regions: right palm, left palm, right sole, and left sole, that account for 20%, 20%, 30%, and 30%, respectively, of TSA of palms and soles. Each of these areas is assessed separately for erythema, pustules/vesicles, and desquamation/scales, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. PPPASI produces a score range from 0 to 72. Higher score indicates more severe disease. PPPASI-90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90% improvement from baseline in the PPPASI score. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment at Week 0 or 16. Participants who discontinue study agent as they met a TF criterion were considered as non-responders at Week 16 and after TF were applied, remaining missing data were handled with LOCF till Week 60.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PPPASI-100 ResponseWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 72 and Week 84
PPPASI assesses severity of PPP lesions and their response to therapy. In PPPASI system, palms and soles are divided into 4 regions: right palm, left palm, right sole, and left sole, that account for 20%, 20%, 30%, and 30%, respectively, of TSA of palms and soles. Each of these areas is assessed separately for erythema, pustules/vesicles, and desquamation/scales, each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. PPPASI produces a score range from 0 to 72. Higher score indicates more severe disease. PPPASI-100 response represents participants who achieved at least a 100% improvement from baseline in the PPPASI score. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment at Week 0 or 16. Participants who discontinue study agent as they met a TF criterion were considered as non-responders at Week 16 and after TF were applied, remaining missing data were handled with LOCF till Week 60.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PPSI-50 ResponseWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 72 and Week 84
PPSI assesses the severity of PPP lesions and their response to therapy with a score ranging from 0 to 12. A higher score indicates more severe disease. In the PPSI system, the more severely affected location (palms or soles) were to be identified as the evaluation sites at screening that to be assessed at all subsequent visits. Evaluation sites were assessed separately for erythema, pustules/vesicles and desquamation/scale, for most severe skin lesion rated on a scale of 0 to 4. Participants who discontinue study agent as they met a TF criterion, their baseline value carried forward to the post-baseline attending visits before and at Week 16 and after TF were applied, remaining missing data were handled with LOCF till Week 60.

Outcomes20

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) Total Score at Week 16Baseline and Week 16
Randomized analysis set: all randomized participants at Week 0, whether they received study treatment or not and had any post-baseline efficacy assessment. Missing values were imputed based on TF criterion, last observation carried forward (LOCF) method till Week 60;no imputation performed for missing data after Week 60 (in observational period).
Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Palmoplantar Severity Index (PPSI) Total Score at Week 16Baseline and Week 16
Population included Randomized analysis set. The missing values were imputed based on Treatment Failure (TF) criterion and last scheduled observation carried forward (LOCF) method until Week 60; no imputation performed for missing data after Week 60 (in observational period).
Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PPPASI-50 Response at Week 16Week 16
Population included Randomized analysis set. The missing values were imputed based on TF criterion and LOCF method until Week 60; no imputation performed for missing data after Week 60 (in observational period).
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in PPPASI Total ScoreBaseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 72 and Week 84
Population included Randomized analysis set. The missing values were imputed based on TF criterion and LOCF method until Week 60; no imputation performed for missing data after Week 60 (in observational period). Here 'n' signifies the number of participants analyzed at the specified time point.
Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in PPSI Total ScoreBaseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 72 and Week 84
Population included Randomized analysis set. The missing values were imputed based on TF criterion and LOCF method until Week 60; no imputation performed for missing data after Week 60 (in observational period). Here 'n' signifies the number of participants analyzed at the specified time point.
Units on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PPPASI-50 ResponseWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 72 and Week 84
Population included Randomized analysis set. The missing values were imputed based on TF criterion and LOCF method until Week 60; no imputation performed for missing data after Week 60 (in observational period). Here 'n' signifies the number of participants analyzed at the specified time point.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PPPASI-75 ResponseWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 72 and Week 84
Population included Randomized analysis set. The missing values were imputed based on TF criterion and LOCF method until Week 60; no imputation performed for missing data after Week 60 (in observational period). Here 'n' signifies the number of participants analyzed at the specified time point.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PPPASI-90 ResponseWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 72 and Week 84
Population included Randomized analysis set. The missing values were imputed based on TF criterion and LOCF method until Week 60; no imputation performed for missing data after Week 60 (in observational period). Here 'n' signifies the number of participants analyzed at the specified time point.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PPPASI-100 ResponseWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 72 and Week 84
Population included Randomized analysis set. The missing values were imputed based on TF criterion and LOCF method until Week 60; no imputation performed for missing data after Week 60 (in observational period). Here 'n' signifies the number of participants analyzed at the specified time point.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a PPSI-50 ResponseWeek 2, 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 60, 72 and Week 84
Population included Randomized analysis set. The missing values were imputed based on TF criterion and LOCF method until Week 60; no imputation performed for missing data after Week 60 (in observational period). Here 'n' signifies the number of participants analyzed at the specified time point.
Percentage of participantsNUMBER

Results by group1,210

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) Total Score at Week 16Placebo-7.79Standard Deviation 10.596Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) Total Score at Week 16Guselkumab 100 mg-15.08Standard Deviation 11.252Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) Total Score at Week 16Guselkumab 200 mg-11.07Standard Deviation 7.779Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Palmoplantar Severity Index (PPSI) Total Score at Week 16Placebo-2.0Standard Deviation 2.41Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Palmoplantar Severity Index (PPSI) Total Score at Week 16Guselkumab 100 mg-3.9Standard Deviation 2.94Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Palmoplantar Severity Index (PPSI) Total Score at Week 16Guselkumab 200 mg-3.0Standard Deviation 2.57Units on a scale
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PPPASI-50 Response at Week 16Placebo34.0Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PPPASI-50 Response at Week 16Guselkumab 100 mg57.4Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PPPASI-50 Response at Week 16Guselkumab 200 mg36.5Percentage of participants
Change From Baseline in PPPASI Total ScorePlaceboChange at week 2-3.58Standard Deviation 5.303Units on a scale

Participant flow45

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0 - 16)STARTEDPlacebo53
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0 - 16)STARTEDPlacebo Then Guselkumab 100 mg0
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0 - 16)STARTEDPlacebo Then Guselkumab 200 mg0
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0 - 16)STARTEDGuselkumab 100 mg54
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0 - 16)STARTEDGuselkumab 200 mg52
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0 - 16)COMPLETEDPlacebo51
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0 - 16)COMPLETEDPlacebo Then Guselkumab 100 mg0
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0 - 16)COMPLETEDPlacebo Then Guselkumab 200 mg0
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0 - 16)COMPLETEDGuselkumab 100 mg53
Placebo Controlled Period (Week 0 - 16)COMPLETEDGuselkumab 200 mg50

Adverse events590

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo053
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo Then Guselkumab 100 mg025
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPlacebo Then Guselkumab 200 mg026
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersGuselkumab 100 mg254
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersGuselkumab 200 mg052
otherVentricular ExtrasystolesCardiac disordersPlacebo053
otherVentricular ExtrasystolesCardiac disordersPlacebo Then Guselkumab 100 mg025
otherVentricular ExtrasystolesCardiac disordersPlacebo Then Guselkumab 200 mg126
otherVentricular ExtrasystolesCardiac disordersGuselkumab 100 mg054
otherVentricular ExtrasystolesCardiac disordersGuselkumab 200 mg052

Adverse event totals15

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo053
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo Then Guselkumab 100 mg025
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo Then Guselkumab 200 mg026
Total, all-cause mortalityGuselkumab 100 mg054
Total, all-cause mortalityGuselkumab 200 mg052
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo3453
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo Then Guselkumab 100 mg2325
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo Then Guselkumab 200 mg2226
Total, other adverse eventsGuselkumab 100 mg4454
Total, other adverse eventsGuselkumab 200 mg4952

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
31268476DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02641730

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02641730/results?page=2