ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02644668

A Study of CK-2127107 in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy

NCT02644668, Phase 2, Completed, Cytokinetics; results first posted 2020-08-31

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study of CK-2127107 in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Trials, record NCT02644668. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02644668

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study of CK-2127107 in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy
NCT number
NCT02644668
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
70 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Cytokinetics
Conditions
Spinal Muscular Atrophy
Interventions
Placebo, Reldesemtiv 150 mg, Reldesemtiv 450 mg
First posted
2016-01-01
Last updated
2020-08-31
Results first posted
2020-08-31

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes12

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)baseline and 8 weeks
FVC was measured using a calibrated spirometer (in units of liters). Patients were instructed to take as deep an inspiration as possible followed by a maximum exhalation (blowing out all the air in their lungs).
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)baseline and 8 weeks
MIP was measured (in units of cm H20) using a calibrated spirometer with an inspiratory pressure valve attached. For the test, patients were asked to inhale as forcefully as possible, to their maximum pressure.
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in Maximum Expiratory Pressure (MEP)baseline and 8 weeks
MEP was measured (in units of cm H20) using a calibrated spirometer with an exspiratory pressure valve attached. For the test, patients were asked to maximally inhale then perform a forced exhalation with as forcefully as possible.
PrimaryMuscle Strength Mega-Score at Week 8baseline and 8 weeks
Muscle strength of 3 muscle groups (elbow flexion, knee extension, and shoulder abduction) were measured bilaterally using a hand-held dynamometer. Muscle strength was measured twice for each body location; if the variability between the 2 measures was \> 15%, a third measure was obtained. The maximum muscle strength of the 2 measurements was identified and transformed as a percent change from baseline using the equation: (\[postbaseline value - baseline value\] / baseline value) × 100. The mega-score was a composite score that averaged strength across the 3 muscle groups. It was calculated as the mean of the non-missing transformed muscle strength scores among the 3 muscle groups each measure bilaterally (totaling 6 body locations).
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded (HFMS-E)baseline and 8 weeks
The HFMS-E evaluated the level of independent mobility and motor skills through assessment of 33 test-items, each scored from 0 (worse) to 2 (better). The total score was calculated as the sum of the scores among the 33 test items, and has a range from 0 to 66.
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM)baseline and 8 weeks
The RULM assessed motor function in the upper limbs (specifically shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand function) that related to activities of everyday life. The RULM consisted of 20 items, 1 of which was scored on a 7-point scale (from 0 to 6), 18 were scored on a 3-point scale (from 0 to 2), and 1 was scored on a 2-point scale (0 or 1). The total score was the sum of each response and could range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 43 points. Higher scores reflected better motor function.
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the TUG Testbaseline and 8 weeksThe TUG test measured the time (in seconds) it took for a patient to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair and sit down.
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the 6MWTbaseline and 8 weeksThe 6MWT measured the distance (in meters) a patient walked in 6 minutes.
PrimaryPatient Global Assessment at the End of Week 88 weeksPatients assessed whether they felt the same, better, or worse than prior to dosing on Day 1.
PrimaryInvestigator Global Assessment at the End of Week 88 weeksThe Investigator assessed whether patient appeared the same, better, or worse than prior to dosing on Day 1.

Outcomes12

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Week 8 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)baseline and 8 weeksThe analysis population includes patients who received at least 1 dose of reldesemtiv and had results from the relevant outcome measure at Week 8.litersLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Week 8 in Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)baseline and 8 weeksThe analysis population includes patients who received at least 1 dose of reldesemtiv and had results from the relevant outcome measure at Week 8.cm H2OLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Week 8 in Maximum Expiratory Pressure (MEP)baseline and 8 weeksThe analysis population includes patients who received at least 1 dose of reldesemtiv and had results from the relevant outcome measure at Week 8.cm H2OLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYMuscle Strength Mega-Score at Week 8baseline and 8 weeksThe analysis population includes patients who received at least 1 dose of reldesemtiv and had results from the relevant outcome measure at Week 8.percent changeLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded (HFMS-E)baseline and 8 weeksThe analysis population includes patients who received at least 1 dose of reldesemtiv and had results from the relevant outcome measure at Week 8.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Week 8 in Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM)baseline and 8 weeksThe analysis population includes patients who received at least 1 dose of reldesemtiv and had results from the relevant outcome measure at Week 8.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the TUG Testbaseline and 8 weeksThis test was evaluated in ambulatory patients only.secondsLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to Week 8 in the 6MWTbaseline and 8 weeksThis test was evaluated in ambulatory patients only.metersLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYPatient Global Assessment at the End of Week 88 weeksThe analysis population includes patients who received at least 1 dose of reldesemtiv and had results from the relevant outcome measure at Week 8.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYInvestigator Global Assessment at the End of Week 88 weeksThe analysis population includes patients who received at least 1 dose of reldesemtiv and had results from the relevant outcome measure at Week 8.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group46

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Placebo-0.02Standard Error 0.042liters
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Reldesemtiv 150 mg Twice Daily-0.03Standard Error 0.043liters
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Reldesemtiv 450 mg Twice Daily-0.07Standard Error 0.050liters
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)Placebo-2.62Standard Error 3.317cm H2O
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)Reldesemtiv 150 mg Twice Daily-5.56Standard Error 3.401cm H2O
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)Reldesemtiv 450 mg Twice Daily-1.63Standard Error 3.901cm H2O
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Maximum Expiratory Pressure (MEP)Placebo-4.22Standard Error 3.843cm H2O
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Maximum Expiratory Pressure (MEP)Reldesemtiv 150 mg Twice Daily7.47Standard Error 3.941cm H2O
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Maximum Expiratory Pressure (MEP)Reldesemtiv 450 mg Twice Daily8.93Standard Error 4.517cm H2O
Muscle Strength Mega-Score at Week 8Placebo14.34Standard Error 5.298percent change

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo26
Overall StudySTARTEDReldesemtiv 150 mg Twice Daily24
Overall StudySTARTEDReldesemtiv 450 mg Twice Daily20
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo24
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDReldesemtiv 150 mg Twice Daily24
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDReldesemtiv 450 mg Twice Daily17
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo2
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDReldesemtiv 150 mg Twice Daily0
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDReldesemtiv 450 mg Twice Daily3

Adverse events141

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo5265
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersReldesemtiv 150 mg Twice Daily6246
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersReldesemtiv 450 mg Twice Daily5207
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo0260
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersReldesemtiv 150 mg Twice Daily3243
otherConstipationGastrointestinal disordersReldesemtiv 450 mg Twice Daily2202
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo5265
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersReldesemtiv 150 mg Twice Daily3244
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersReldesemtiv 450 mg Twice Daily2202
otherDiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo2262

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo026
Total, all-cause mortalityReldesemtiv 150 mg Twice Daily024
Total, all-cause mortalityReldesemtiv 450 mg Twice Daily020
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo2426
Total, other adverse eventsReldesemtiv 150 mg Twice Daily2024
Total, other adverse eventsReldesemtiv 450 mg Twice Daily1720
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo026
Total, serious adverse eventsReldesemtiv 150 mg Twice Daily224
Total, serious adverse eventsReldesemtiv 450 mg Twice Daily220

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02644668

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02644668/results?page=2