ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02653391

A Study Investigating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Elamipretide Topical Ophthalmic Solution for the Treatment of Fuchs' Corneal Endothelial Dystrophy (FCED)

NCT02653391, Phase 1, Phase 2, Completed, Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.; results first posted 2021-09-17

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study Investigating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Elamipretide Topical Ophthalmic Solution for the Treatment of Fuchs' Corneal Endothelial Dystrophy (FCED). Trials, record NCT02653391. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02653391

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study Investigating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Elamipretide Topical Ophthalmic Solution for the Treatment of Fuchs' Corneal Endothelial Dystrophy (FCED)
NCT number
NCT02653391
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1, Phase 2
Enrollment
22 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Stealth BioTherapeutics Inc.
Conditions
Fuchs' Corneal Endothelial Dystrophy (FCED)
Interventions
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution, Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution, Part A Placebo, Part B Placebo
First posted
2016-01-12
Last updated
2021-09-17
Results first posted
2021-09-17

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes24

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryIncidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Screening Visit, Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16The incidence and severity of ocular treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs)
PrimaryThe Incidence and Severity of Systemic Adverse EventsScreening Visit, Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16The incidence and severity of systemic treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs)
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ABaseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16
Number of participants who had a change from baseline from normal or abnormal not clinically significant, to abnormal clinically significant (CS) findings for slit lamp examinations (SLE) for Part A. Part B is reported as separate outcome since unit of measure is number of eyes.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BBaseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16
Number of eyes with a change from baseline from normal or abnormal not clinically significant, to abnormal clinically significant (CS) findings for slit lamp examinations (SLE) for Part B. Part A is reported as separate outcome.
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part ABaseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Change from Baseline in intraocular pressure (IOP) using Goldmann applanation tonometry for Part A
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part BBaseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 , and Week 16 or early discontinuation visitChange from Baseline in intraocular pressure (IOP) using Goldmann applanation tonometry for Part B. Part A is reported separately.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part ABaseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16Change from Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit as measured by Pachymetry for Part A. Part B is reported as a separate outcome measure.
SecondaryCentral Corneal Thickness Part BBaseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16, or Early discontinuation visitCentral Corneal Thickness: by-subject data as measured by Pachymetry and Pentacam. Part A is reported as a separate outcome measure.
SecondaryChange From Baseline Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage Over All 12 Weeks for Part ABaseline, Week 1, 4, 8, and 12
Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage Over All 12 Weeks for Part A. Specular microscopy is a noninvasive photographic technique that allows visualization and analyzation the corneal endothelium. Using computer-assisted morphometry, specular microscopes analyzes the size, shape and population of the endothelial cells. Histologically, healthy corneal cells initially have a hexagonal shape. As endothelial cells die, neighboring cells enlarge to cover the empty space once occupied by the cell. This, in turn, causes the remaining cells to lose their hexagonal shape. Assessments were performed using the flex center and full auto methods for Part A and data from the flex center method was summarized. The flex center method was used for Part B. The percent of Part B is entered as a separate outcome measure. A decrease from baseline in % cell hexagonality means worse outcome, a increase from baseline means better outcome.
SecondaryCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BBaseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 or early discontinuation visit
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage by-subject data: Part B. Data was only listed in weeks where images were good enough quality to quantify. Specular microscopy is a noninvasive photographic technique that allows visualization and analyzation the corneal endothelium. Using computer-assisted morphometry, specular microscopes analyzes the size, shape and population of the endothelial cells. Histologically, healthy corneal cells initially have a hexagonal shape. As endothelial cells die, neighboring cells enlarge to cover the empty space once occupied by the cell. This, in turn, causes the remaining cells to lose their hexagonal shape. The flex center method was used for Part B. A decrease in percent of cell hexagonality from baseline means worse outcome, an increase from baseline means better outcome.

Outcomes24

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYIncidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Screening Visit, Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16All participants for whom ocular TEAEs were measured.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYThe Incidence and Severity of Systemic Adverse EventsScreening Visit, Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16All participants for whom systemic TEAEs were measured. For Part A systemic events were not necessarily attributed to either intervention or placebo.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part ABaseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16All participants for whom slit lamp outcomes were measured.participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part BBaseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16All participants for whom slit lamp outcomes were measured with both baseline and post-baseline measurements.participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part ABaseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12All participants for whom intraocular pressure was measured. Part B is reported as a separate Outcome Measure.mmHgLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part BBaseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 , and Week 16 or early discontinuation visitAll participants for whom intraocular pressures were measured.mmHgMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part ABaseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16All participants for whom central corneal thickness was measured. Part B is reported as a separate Outcome Measure.µmMEAN
SECONDARYCentral Corneal Thickness Part BBaseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16, or Early discontinuation visitAll participants for whom Central Corneal Thickness was measured. Part A is reported as a separate Outcome Measure.µmNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage Over All 12 Weeks for Part ABaseline, Week 1, 4, 8, and 12All participants had images taken; data was analyzed for those whose images were of sufficient quality.percentage of hexagonalityLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYCorneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part BBaseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 or early discontinuation visit
All participants for whom Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality was measured. Part A is reported as a separate Outcome Measure. For images with poor quality or too few cells to register, there was no data available.
µmNUMBER

Results by group713

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Incidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Part A PlaceboOcular mild TEAEs3Participants
Incidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionOcular mild TEAEs6Participants
Incidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Part B PlaceboOcular mild TEAEs1Participants
Incidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionOcular mild TEAEs1Participants
Incidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Part A PlaceboOcular moderate TEAEs0Participants
Incidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionOcular moderate TEAEs0Participants
Incidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Part B PlaceboOcular moderate TEAEs0Participants
Incidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic SolutionOcular moderate TEAEs2Participants
Incidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Part A PlaceboOcular severe TEAEs0Participants
Incidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic SolutionOcular severe TEAEs0Participants

Participant flow9

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDElamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution and Placebo Part A (Cohort 1)1836
Overall StudySTARTEDElamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution Part B (Cohort 2)36
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo Part B (Cohort 2)12
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDElamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution and Placebo Part A (Cohort 1)1632
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDElamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution Part B (Cohort 2)12
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo Part B (Cohort 2)12
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDElamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution and Placebo Part A (Cohort 1)24
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDElamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution Part B (Cohort 2)24
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo Part B (Cohort 2)00

Adverse events170

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherVision blurredEye disordersPart A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution and Placebo018
otherVision blurredEye disordersPart A Placebo Only018
otherVision blurredEye disordersPart A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution Only118
otherVision blurredEye disordersPart B Placebo11
otherVision blurredEye disordersPart B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution03
otherDry EyeEye disordersPart A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution and Placebo018
otherDry EyeEye disordersPart A Placebo Only118
otherDry EyeEye disordersPart A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution Only118
otherDry EyeEye disordersPart B Placebo11
otherDry EyeEye disordersPart B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution03

Adverse event totals15

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPart A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution and Placebo018
Total, all-cause mortalityPart A Placebo Only018
Total, all-cause mortalityPart A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution Only018
Total, all-cause mortalityPart B Placebo01
Total, all-cause mortalityPart B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution03
Total, other adverse eventsPart A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution and Placebo718
Total, other adverse eventsPart A Placebo Only318
Total, other adverse eventsPart A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution Only618
Total, other adverse eventsPart B Placebo11
Total, other adverse eventsPart B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution33

Papers0

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

None in this release.

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02653391

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02653391/registered?page=2