Trial · NCT02666664
Registered outcomes30
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
1 to 20 of 30
Download this page as JSON| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Up to approximately 52 weeks | TEAEs, defined as adverse events (AEs) that began or worsened in severity after the first dose of double-blind study drug and up to 30 days after receiving the last dose of double-blind study drug, were collected and reported. |
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Adjudicated Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event | Up to approximately 52 weeks | TEAEs, defined as AEs that began or worsened in severity after the first dose of double-blind study drug and up to 30 days after receiving the last dose of double-blind study drug, were collected and reported. Cardiovascular events were considered as adverse events of special interest. Treatment-emergent = TE. |
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Event of Special Interest: Creatine Kinase Elevations | Up to approximately 52 weeks | TEAEs of special interest (AESIs) were predefined and monitored throughout the study. Creatine kinase elevations were assessed using the following preferred term: Blood creatine phosphokinase increased (system organ class: investigations). |
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Event of Special Interest: Hepatic Disorders | Up to approximately 52 weeks | Treatment-emergent AESIs were predefined and monitored throughout the study. TEAEs potentially related to hepatic events were assessed using the following preferred terms and laboratory abnormalities: aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increased, Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased, Hepatic enzyme increased, Blood bilirubin increased, liver function test (LFT) abnormal, LFT increased, hepatic enzyme abnormal, transaminases increased, potential Hy's Law cases (PHLC) \[AST and (\&)/or ALT \>3 x upper limit of normal (ULN) with concurrent total bilirubin \>2 x ULN\], AST and/or ALT \>3 x ULN, and total bilirubin \>2 x ULN (system organ class: investigations). AST and ALT values were repeated and confirmed. "Repeated and confirmed" was defined as a participant having the last on-study LFT \> x ULN, the last on-treatment LFT \> x ULN, or LFT \> x ULN followed by another LFT \> x ULN. |
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Event of Special Interest: Hypoglycemia | Up to approximately 52 weeks | Treatment-emergent AESIs were predefined and monitored throughout the study. Hypoglycemia was assessed using the following preferred terms: hypoglycaemia (system organ class: metabolism and nutrition disorders); blood glucose abnormal and blood glucose decreased (system organ class: investigations). The percentage of unique participants is reported in the "Overall hypoglycemia AESIs" category; a participant could have been represented in more than one of the individual hypoglycemia AESIs. |
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Event of Special Interest: Metabolic Acidosis | Up to approximately 52 weeks | Treatment-emergent AESIs were predefined and monitored throughout the study. Metabolic acidosis was assessed using the preferred term metabolic acidosis (system organ class: metabolism and nutrition disorders). |
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Event of Special Interest: Muscular Disorder | Up to approximately 52 weeks | Treatment-emergent AESIs were predefined and monitored throughout the study. Muscular safety was assessed using the following preferred terms and laboratory abnormalities: myalgia, muscle spasms, pain in extremity, muscular weakness (system organ class: musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders), and creatine kinase \>5 ULN (repeated and confirmed). The percentage of unique participants is reported in the "Overall muscular disorder AESIs" category; a participant could have been represented in more than one of the individual muscular disorder AESIs. |
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Event of Special Interest: Neurocognitive Disorder | Up to approximately 52 weeks | Treatment-emergent AESIs were predefined and monitored throughout the study. Neurocognitive disorder was assessed using the following preferred terms: memory impairment, amnesia, and cognitive disorder (system organ class: nervous system disorders); confusional state and disorientation (system organ class: psychiatric disorders). The percentage of unique participants is reported in the "Overall neurocognitive disorder AESIs" category; a participant could have been represented in more than one of the individual neurocognitive disorder AESIs. |
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Event of Special Interest: New Onset or Worsening Diabetes Mellitus | Up to approximately 52 weeks | Treatment-emergent AESIs were predefined and monitored throughout the study. New onset or worsening diabetes was assessed using the following preferred terms: type 2 diabetes mellitus, diabetes mellitus, hyperglycaemia, glucose tolerance impaired, diabetes mellitus inadequate control, and impaired fasting glucose (system organ class: metabolism and nutrition disorders); blood glucose increased, glycosylated haemoglobin increased, blood glucose abnormal, and glucose urine present (system organ class: investigations); and glycosuria (system organ class: renal and urinary disorders). The percentage of unique participants is reported in the "Overall new onset/worsening diabetes mellitus AESIs" category; a participant could have been represented in more than one of the individual new onset/worsening diabetes mellitus AESIs. |
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With the Indicated Event of Special Interest: Renal Disorder | Up to approximately 52 weeks | Treatment-emergent AESIs were predefined and monitored throughout the study. TEAEs potentially related to renal events were assessed using the following preferred terms: renal failure, renal impairment, acute kidney injury (system organ class: renal and urinary disorders); blood creatinine increased, glomerular filtration rate decreased, blood urea increased, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<30 milliliter per minute per 1.73 square meter (ml/min/1.73m\^2), and change from baseline in creatinine \>1 mg/dL (system organ class: investigations); and gout (system organ class: metabolism and nutrition disorders). The percentage of unique participants is reported in the "Overall renal disorder AESIs" category; a participant could have been represented in more than one of the individual renal disorder AESIs. |
| Primary | Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Uric Acid (Urate) Level | Baseline and Week 52 | Blood samples were drawn at defined time points during the course of the study to monitor uric acid (urate) levels. |
| Primary | Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Creatinine Level | Baseline and Week 52 | Blood samples were drawn at defined time points during the course of the study to monitor creatinine levels. |
| Primary | Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Hemoglobin Level | Baseline and Week 52 | Blood samples were drawn at defined time points during the course of the study to monitor hemoglobin levels. |
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) | Baseline; Week 12 | Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for LDL-C. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values at screening (Week -2) and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: \[(LDL-C value at Week 12 minus Baseline value) divided by (Baseline Value)\] multiplied by 100. Missing data were imputed with the use of a pattern-mixture model to account for adherence to the trial regimen. Least Square mean= LS mean. Percent change was analyzed using the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) method, which included treatment, randomization stratum as factors, and baseline value as covariate. |
| Secondary | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in LDL-C | Baseline; Week 12 | Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for LDL-C. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values at screening (Week -2) and predose Day 1/Week 0. Absolute change from baseline was calculated as: LDL-C value at Week 12 minus Baseline value. Missing data were imputed with the use of a pattern-mixture model to account for adherence to the trial regimen. |
| Other | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in LDL-C | Baseline; Week 24 | Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for LDL-C. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values at screening (Week -2) and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: \[(LDL-C value at Week 24 minus Baseline value) divided by (Baseline Value)\] multiplied by 100. Missing data were imputed with the use of a pattern-mixture model to account for adherence to the trial regimen. Percent change was analyzed using the ANCOVA method, which included treatment, randomization stratum as factors, and baseline value as covariate. |
| Other | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) | Baseline; Week 12 | Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for non-HDL-C. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values at screening (Week -2) and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: \[(non-HDL-C value at Week 12 minus Baseline value) divided by (Baseline Value)\] multiplied by 100. Missing data were imputed with the use of a pattern-mixture model to account for adherence to the trial regimen. Percent change was analyzed using the ANCOVA method, which included treatment, randomization stratum as factors, and baseline value as covariate. |
| Other | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Cholesterol (TC) | Baseline; Week 12 | Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for TC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the values at screening (Week -2) and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: \[(TC value at Week 12 minus Baseline value) divided by (Baseline Value)\] multiplied by 100. Missing data were imputed with the use of a pattern-mixture model to account for adherence to the trial regimen. Percent change was analyzed using the ANCOVA method, which included treatment, randomization stratum as factors, and baseline value as covariate. |
| Other | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein B (apoB) | Baseline; Week 12 | Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for apoB. Baseline was defined as the last value prior to first dose of study drug. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: \[(apoB value at Week 12 minus Baseline value) divided by (Baseline Value)\] multiplied by 100. Missing data were imputed with the use of a pattern-mixture model to account for adherence to the trial regimen. Percent change was analyzed using the ANCOVA method, which included treatment, randomization stratum as factors, and baseline value as covariate. |
| Other | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) | Baseline; Week 12 | Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for hsCRP. Baseline was defined as the last value prior to first dose of study drug. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: \[(hsCRP value at Week 12 minus Baseline value) divided by (Baseline Value)\] multiplied by 100. Observed data was used for the analysis, no imputation for the missing data was performed. Percent change was analyzed using the ANCOVA method, which included treatment, randomization stratum as factors, and baseline value as covariate. |
Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this list from software.
Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02666664/registered