ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02678689

Registered outcomes14

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryMotor Language (ML) Scale: Rate of Decline in the 0 to 6-point ML Score.Baseline to Last assessment (Week 169)
Rate of decline in 0 to 6-point ML score, \& primary analysis was based on up to 3-1 matching of Study 190-901 evaluable participants with Study 190-203 ITT participants. Rate of decline =(-1)x(48x7)x(Ending score - Starting score)/(Ending date - Starting date) A positive rate of decline means that subject declined, a negative rate of decline means that subject improved. The combined motor/gait and language (ML) score, as derived from Hamburg CLN2 rating scale, immediately preceding first infusion. The combined ML score is determined as sum of 0-3 point motor(M) \& language(L) subscales where 0 represents no function, \& 3 represents normal function, \& can range from 0(severely impaired) to 6(normal). Thus,high scores describe better function \& low scores describe poor function. The starting assessment is baseline ML assessment \& ending assessment is last ML score \>0. Note for Study 190-901, baseline ML assessment is defined as assessment of matching to Study 190-203 subj.
PrimaryProbability of Unreversed 2-Point Decline in Motor-language (ML) Score or Score of 0Baseline to Last assessment (Week 169)
An unreversed 2-point decline is any decline of 2 points or more that had not reversed to a 1-point decline (or better) at last recorded observation. An unreversed score of 0 is a decline to 0 that had not increased to a score \>0 at last recorded observation ML score decline is measured by motor \& language domains on CLN2 rating scale. Combined motor/gait \&language (ML) score, as derived from Hamburg CLN2 rating scale, immediately preceding first infusion. Combined ML score is determined as sum of the 0-3 point motor(M)\&language(L) where 0 represents no function, \& 3 represents normal function, \& can range from 0 (severely impaired) to 6 (normal). Thus, high scores describe better function \& low scores describe poor function Model includes data up to week 169. Estimates from the model are presented for Wks 49, 97 \& 145 No.analyzed is no.of subj out of overall no.of participants analyzed who have not been censored/had unreversed 2-point decline/score of 0 at given time points.
PrimaryProbability of Decline of Unreversed Motor-language (ML) Score of 0Baseline to Last assessment (Week 169)
The combined motor/gait and language (ML) score, as derived from the Hamburg CLN2 rating scale, immediately preceding the first infusion. The combined ML score is determined as the sum of the 0-3 point motor (M) and language (L) subscales where 0 represents no function, and 3 represents normal function, and can range from 0 (severely impaired) to 6 (normal). Thus, high scores describe better function and low scores describe poor function. Model includes data up to week 169. Estimates from the model are presented for Weeks 49, 97 and 145. No.analyzed is no.of subj out of overall no.of participants analyzed who have not been censored/had unreversed decline/score of 0 at given time points
PrimaryRate of Decline in Individual Motor DomainsBaseline to Last assessment (Week 169)
Rate of decline = (-1) x (48 x 7) x (Ending score - Starting score)/(Ending date - Starting date). A positive rate of decline means that the subject declined, a negative rate of decline means that the subject improved. The 0-3 point motor (M) subscales, as derived from the Hamburg CLN2 rating scale, where 0 represents no function, and 3 represents normal function. Thus, high scores describe better function, and low scores describe poor function.
PrimaryRate of Decline in Individual Language DomainsBaseline to Last assessment (Week 169)
Rate of decline = (-1) x (48 x 7) x (Ending score - Starting score)/(Ending date - Starting date). A positive rate of decline means that the subject declined, a negative rate of decline means that the subject improved. The 0-3 point language (L) subscales, as derived from the Hamburg CLN2 rating scale, where 0 represents no function, and 3 represents normal function. Thus, high scores describe better function and low scores describe poor function. Patients with baseline score of 0 are excluded.
SecondaryProbability of Decline of Disease Manifestation at Week 49 & 97Baseline to Last assessment (Week 169)
Disease manifestation is defined as post-baseline consecutive measurements of M,L,V/S scores\<3, measured atleast 22days apart. Combined motor-language-vision-seizure(MLVS)score as derived from Hamburg CLN2 rating scale, is determined as sum of 0-3 point motor(M)language(L)visio(V)\&seizure(S) subscales where 0 represents no function,\&3 represents normal function,\&can range from 0(severely impaired)to12(normal).Thus, high scores describe better function \& low scores describe poor function. 901 subj weighted according to no.of matches:weights for 3,2,\&1 study 901 subj matched to a given study 203 subj are 1/3,1/2, \&1 times N901/N203 respectively. N901 is no.of 901 subj matched to 203 subj(ie.18)\&N203 is no.203 subj who had matches (i.e.7).203 subj who had matches were assigned weight of 1. No.analyzed is no.of subj out of overall no.of participants analyzed who have not been censored/had decline of disease manifestation at given time points
SecondaryProbability of Decline of Disease Manifestation at Week 145Baseline to Week 145
Disease manifestation is defined as post-baseline consecutive measurements of M,L,V/S scores\<3,measured atleast 22days apart Combined MLVS score,as derived from Hamburg CLN2 rating scale,is determined as sum of 0-3 point motor(M)language(L)vision(V)\&seizure(S) subscales where 0 represents no function,\&3 represents normal function,\&can range from 0(severely impaired) to 12(normal).Thus,high scores describe better function\&low scores describe poor function 901 subj weighted according to no.of matches:weights for 3,2,\&1 study 901 subj matched to given study 203 subj are 1/3,1/2, \&1 times N901/N203 respectively.N901 is no.of 901 subj matched to 203 subj(ie.18)\&N203 is no.203 subj who had matches(i.e.7).203 subj who had matches were assigned weight of 1 Model includes data upto wk169.Estimates from model are presented for Wk145 No.analyzed is no.of subj out of overall no.of participants analyzed who have not been censored/had decline of disease manifestation at given time point
SecondaryChange From Baseline in ML Scale ScoreBaseline to Week 49, Week 97, Week 145, & Week 169
The combined motor/gait and language (ML) score, as derived from the Hamburg CLN2 rating scale, immediately preceding the first infusion. The combined ML score is determined as the sum of the 0-3 point motor (M) and language (L) subscales where 0 represents no function, and 3 represents normal function, and can range from 0 (severely impaired) to 6 (normal). Thus, high scores describe better function and low scores describe poor function. Some participants did not have follow-up at all time points.
SecondaryChanges From Baseline in MLV Scale ScoreBaseline to Week 49, Week 97, Week 145, & Week 169
The combined motor-language-vision (MLV) score, as derived from the Hamburg CLN2 rating scale, is determined as the sum of the 0-3 point motor (M), language (L) \& vision (V) subscales where 0 represents no function, and 3 represents normal function, and can range from 0 (severely impaired) to 9 (normal). Thus, high scores describe better function and low scores describe poor function. Some participants did not have follow-up at all time points.
SecondaryChanges From Baseline in the 0-12 Point MLVS Motor, Language, Vision, and Seizure Subscales (MLVS) Score.Baseline to Week 49, Week 97, Week 145, & Week 169
The combined motor-language-vision-seizure (MLVS) score, as derived from the Hamburg CLN2 rating scale, is determined as the sum of the 0-3 point motor (M) and language (L) vision (V) and seizure (S) subscales where 0 represents no function, and 3 represents normal function, and can range from 0 (severely impaired) to 12 (normal). Thus, high scores describe better function and low scores describe poor function. Some participants did not have follow-up at all time points.
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline to Last Assessment: Volume of Cerebrospinal Fluid (mL)Baseline to Last assessment (Week 169)
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline to Last Assessment: Volume of Total Cortical Gray Matter (mL)Baseline to Last assessment (Week 169)
SecondaryPercentage Change From Baseline to Last Assessment: Volume of Total White Matter (mL)Baseline to Last assessment (Week 169)
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Last Assessment: Whole Brain Apparent Diffusion Coefficient ValueBaseline to Last assessment (Week 169)
The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) represents the calculated diffusion coefficient of water molecules in the direction of the applied gradients measured during diffusion MRI, a technique used to explore the architecture and microstructural properties of both the white and gray matter of the brain.

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02678689/registered