ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02683239

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Any Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)Baseline up to week 52
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Any Serious TEAEBaseline up to week 52
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) up to Week 72Baseline up to week 72
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Any Serious AE up to Week 72Baseline up to week 72
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA)Baseline up to week 52 and week 72
Adjudicated arthropathy (AA) is a composite term that encompasses the following conditions: Rapidly progressive OA type 1 and 2, Subchondral insufficiency fractures, and Primary Osteonecrosis. AAs were also evaluated to determine if they met Destructive Arthropathy criteria.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) CriteriaBaseline up to week 52 and week 72
DA is a unique clinical form of rapidly destructive arthropathy over and above that seen in the normal progression of OA. DA criteria can be associated with Rapidly Progressive OA type 2, Subchondral Insufficiency fracture, and Primary Osteonecrosis confirmed by an arthropathy adjudication committee.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With at Least One Peripheral Sensory Event That Required a Neurology ConsultationBaseline up to week 72Any participant with a peripheral sensory event that persisted for 2 months was referred for a neurology or other specialty consultation and reported as an adverse event of special interest (AESI).
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) DysfunctionBaseline up to week 72
Potential events of sympathetic nervous system (SNS) dysfunction were monitored throughout the study through physical examination, AE reporting, assessment of orthostatic hypotension, and the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms. Sympathetic nervous system dysfunction was diagnosed after consultation with an appropriate specialist, such as a neurologist and/or cardiologist.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) SurgeryBaseline up to weeks 52, 72, and end of study (52 weeks post last dose)All joint replacement surgery events regardless of cause at weeks 52 and 72. An end of study phone contact was also conducted approximately 52 weeks following the last dose of study drug.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52Baseline to week 52
Number of participants with potentially clinically significant abnormal values in hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis during the treatment period were reported. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72End of treatment up to week 72
Number of participants with potentially clinically significant abnormal values in hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis during the post-treatment period were reported. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72Baseline up to week 72
Immunogenicity was characterized by ADA responses \& titers. Responses categories: Negative - ADA negative response at all time points, regardless of missing samples; Pre-existing immunoreactivity - ADA positive response at baseline with all post first dose negative results or positive response at baseline with all post first dose ADA responses less than (\<) 9-fold over baseline titer levels; Treatment-boosted response - positive response in the assay post first dose, greater than or equal to (≥) 9-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results are positive; Treatment-emergent response - ADA positive response in the fasinumab ADA assay post first dose when baseline results = negative or missing.
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 16 in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain Subscale ScoreBaseline to Week 16
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations.
PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 16 in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale ScoreBaseline to Week 16
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations.
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 16 in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Score of OsteoarthritisBaseline to Week 16The PGA of OA is a patient-rated assessment of current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = fair; 4 = poor; and 5 = very poor).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With ≥30% Reduction From Baseline to Week 16 in the WOMAC Pain Subscale ScoreBaseline to Week 16
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. Participants who achieved a response, where response was defined as an improvement by ≥30% in WOMAC pain subscale score

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02683239/registered