ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02683785

A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of GSK3196165 in Inflammatory Hand Osteoarthritis

NCT02683785, Phase 2, Completed, GlaxoSmithKline; results first posted 2018-12-14

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of GSK3196165 in Inflammatory Hand Osteoarthritis. Trials, record NCT02683785. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02683785

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of GSK3196165 in Inflammatory Hand Osteoarthritis
NCT number
NCT02683785
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
44 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Conditions
Osteoarthritis
Interventions
GSK3196165, Placebo
First posted
2016-02-17
Last updated
2021-01-11
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2015-003089-96
Results first posted
2018-12-14

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes20

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline in 24-hour Average Hand Pain Intensity, Averaged Over the 7 Days Prior to Week 6Baseline (Day 1 Pre-dose) and Week 6
Participants were required to complete a daily pain NRS based on their 24-hour average hand pain intensity with the anchors "0" (no pain) and "10" (worst imaginable pain), which was averaged over the 7 days prior to assessment visit. The 7 day average score was calculated as sum of daily 24 hours average hand pain NRS scores in the 7 days prior to assessment visit, divided by number of entries recorded in those 7 days. Baseline visit was at Day 1 and Baseline value was defined as the average of the 7 days prior to baseline visit (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline is equal to post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Intent-To-Treat Population comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (GSK3196165 or placebo).
SecondaryChange From Baseline in 24 Hours Average Hand Pain Intensity Averaged Over the 7 Days Prior to Each VisitBaseline (Pre-dose Day 1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Participants were required to complete a daily pain NRS based on their 24-hour average hand pain intensity with the anchors "0" (no pain) and "10" (worst imaginable pain), which was averaged over the 7 days prior to assessment visit. The 7 day average score is calculated by sum of daily 24 hours average hand pain NRS scores in the 7 days prior to assessment visit, divided by number of entries recorded in those 7 days. Baseline visit was at Day 1 and Baseline value was defined as the average of the 7 days prior to baseline visit (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline is equal to post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
SecondaryChange From Baseline of Worst Hand Pain Intensity Over 24 Hours Averaged Over the 7 Days Prior to Each VisitBaseline (Pre-dose Day 1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12
Participants were required to complete a daily pain NRS based on their 24-hour worst hand pain intensity with the anchors "0" (no pain) and "10" (worst imaginable pain), which was averaged over the 7 days prior to assessment visit. The score is calculated as sum of daily 24 hours worst hand pain NRS scores in the 7 days prior to assessment visit, divided by number of entries recorded in those 7 days. Baseline visit was at Day 1 and Baseline value was defined as the average of the 7 days prior to baseline visit (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline is equal to post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving a 30 Percentage Reduction From Baseline in 24 Hours Average Hand Pain Intensity at Each VisitBaseline (Pre-dose, Day 1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and follow up (Week 22)
Participants were required to complete average pain NRS daily and rate the average hand pain over last 24 hours on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The percentage of participants who achieved at least 30 percentage reduction from Baseline in the 24-hours average hand pain intensity as measured by daily NRS and averaged over 7 days prior to each visit is reported.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving a 50 Percentage Reduction From Baseline in 24 Hours Average Hand Pain Intensity at Each VisitBaseline (Pre-dose, Day 1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and follow up (Week 22)
Participants were required to complete average pain NRS daily and rate the average hand pain over last 24 hours on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The percentage of participants who achieved at least 50 percentage reduction from Baseline in the 24-hours average hand pain intensity as measured by daily NRS and averaged over 7 days prior to each visit is presented.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving a 30 Percentage Reduction From Baseline in 24 Hours Worst Hand Pain Intensity at Each VisitBaseline (Pre-dose, Day 1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and follow up (Week 22)
Participants were required to complete worst pain NRS daily and rate the hand pain at its worst over last 24 hours on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The percentage of participants achieving at least 30 percentage reduction from Baseline in the 24-hours worst hand pain intensity as measured by daily NRS and averaged over 7 days prior to each visit is presented.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving a 50 Percentage Reduction From Baseline in 24 Hours Worst Hand Pain Intensity at Each VisitBaseline (Pre-dose, Day 1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and follow up (Week 22)
Participants were required to complete worst pain NRS daily and rate the hand pain at its worst over last 24 hours on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The percentage of participants achieving at least 50 percentage reduction from Baseline in the 24-hours worst hand pain intensity as measured by daily NRS and averaged over 7 days prior to each visit is presented.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Australian Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index (AUSCAN) 3.1 NRS Scores at Each Visit.Baseline (Day 1 Pre-dose), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
The AUSCAN Index is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of a 15-item scale which measures pain (5 items), stiffness (1 item) and degree of disability/physical function (9 items) during the preceding 48 hours. All items are rated on NRS scale with anchors "0" (none) to "10" (extreme). The scores for the pain and physical function components were calculated as simple summation of the item scores relating to that domain, so the Pain component ranges from 0 (i.e. all pain item scores are scored 0 \[none\]) to 50 (i.e. all pain item scores are scored 10 \[extreme\]), and the Physical Function component ranges from 0 (i.e. all physical function item scores are scored 0 \[none\]) to 90 (i.e. all physical function item scores are scored 10 \[extreme\]). The total AUSCAN score was calculated as simple summation of the 15 item scores and therefore ranges from 0 to 150. Baseline is defined as Day 1 pre-dose value. Change from Baseline is equal to post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Number of Soft Tissue Swollen Hand Joints at Each VisitBaseline (Day 1 Pre-dose), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Swollen Hand Joint Count was measured by the total number of soft tissue swollen hand joints out of a possible 30 joints: 8 distal interphalangeal, 8 proximal interphalangeal, 2 interphalangeal joints, 10 metacarpophalangeal joints, 2 carpometacarpal joint across both hands. In case of missing observations for soft tissue swollen hand joints then the remaining observations were assessed and weighted by dividing the number presented by the number of non-missing, and by multiplying by 30 for the joint count. Baseline is defined as Day 1 pre-dose value. Change from Baseline is equal to post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Number of Tender Hand Joints at Each VisitBaseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
Tender Hand Joint Count was measured by the total number of tender joints out of a possible 30 joints: 8 distal interphalangeal, 8 proximal interphalangeal, 2 interphalangeal joints, 10 metacarpophalangeal joints, 2 carpometacarpal joints across both hands. A joint was considered tender if it was scored \>0 on the tender joint severity scale. Joints were rated 0=no pain/tenderness, 1=mild pain, 2=moderate pain and 3=severe pain. Baseline is defined as Day 1 pre-dose value. Change from Baseline is equal to post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.

Outcomes20

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline in 24-hour Average Hand Pain Intensity, Averaged Over the 7 Days Prior to Week 6Baseline (Day 1 Pre-dose) and Week 6Intent To Treat Population. Only non-missing data is included MMRM model.Scores on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in 24 Hours Average Hand Pain Intensity Averaged Over the 7 Days Prior to Each VisitBaseline (Pre-dose Day 1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12Intent To Treat Population. n=X in category titles represents the number of participants with non-missing data at the specified time-point. Only non-missing data is included in the MMRM model.Scores on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline of Worst Hand Pain Intensity Over 24 Hours Averaged Over the 7 Days Prior to Each VisitBaseline (Pre-dose Day 1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12Intent-to-Treat Population. n=X in category titles represents the number of participants with non-missing data at the specified time-point. Only non-missing data is included in the MMRM model.Scores on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving a 30 Percentage Reduction From Baseline in 24 Hours Average Hand Pain Intensity at Each VisitBaseline (Pre-dose, Day 1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and follow up (Week 22)Intent-to-Treat Population. Participants with missing data at a particular visit had been assumed to be non-responders.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving a 50 Percentage Reduction From Baseline in 24 Hours Average Hand Pain Intensity at Each VisitBaseline (Pre-dose, Day 1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and follow up (Week 22)Intent-to-Treat Population. Participants with missing data at a particular visit had been assumed to be non-responders.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving a 30 Percentage Reduction From Baseline in 24 Hours Worst Hand Pain Intensity at Each VisitBaseline (Pre-dose, Day 1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and follow up (Week 22)Intent-to-Treat Population. Participants with missing data at a particular visit had been assumed to be non-responders.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants Achieving a 50 Percentage Reduction From Baseline in 24 Hours Worst Hand Pain Intensity at Each VisitBaseline (Pre-dose, Day 1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and follow up (Week 22)Intent-to-Treat Population. Participants with missing data at a particular visit had been assumed to be non-responders.Percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Australian Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index (AUSCAN) 3.1 NRS Scores at Each Visit.Baseline (Day 1 Pre-dose), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12Intent-to-Treat Population. n=X in category titles represents the number of participants with non-missing data at the specified time-point. Only non-missing data is included in the MMRM model.Scores on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Number of Soft Tissue Swollen Hand Joints at Each VisitBaseline (Day 1 Pre-dose), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12Intent-to-Treat Population. n=X in category titles represents the number of participants with non-missing data at the specified time-point. Only non-missing data is included in the MMRM model.Swollen jointsLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in Number of Tender Hand Joints at Each VisitBaseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12Intent-to-Treat Population. n=X in category titles represents the number of participants with non-missing data at the specified time-point. Only non-missing data was included in the MMRM model.Scores on scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group241

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline in 24-hour Average Hand Pain Intensity, Averaged Over the 7 Days Prior to Week 6Placebo-1.34Standard Error 0.325Scores on scale
Change From Baseline in 24-hour Average Hand Pain Intensity, Averaged Over the 7 Days Prior to Week 6GSK3196165 180mg-1.70Standard Error 0.334Scores on scale
Change From Baseline in 24 Hours Average Hand Pain Intensity Averaged Over the 7 Days Prior to Each VisitPlaceboWeek 1, n=22, 20-0.13Standard Error 0.152Scores on scale
Change From Baseline in 24 Hours Average Hand Pain Intensity Averaged Over the 7 Days Prior to Each VisitGSK3196165 180mgWeek 1, n=22, 20-0.59Standard Error 0.160Scores on scale
Change From Baseline in 24 Hours Average Hand Pain Intensity Averaged Over the 7 Days Prior to Each VisitPlaceboWeek 2, n=21, 20-0.48Standard Error 0.230Scores on scale
Change From Baseline in 24 Hours Average Hand Pain Intensity Averaged Over the 7 Days Prior to Each VisitGSK3196165 180mgWeek 2, n=21, 20-0.86Standard Error 0.239Scores on scale
Change From Baseline in 24 Hours Average Hand Pain Intensity Averaged Over the 7 Days Prior to Each VisitPlaceboWeek 3, n=21, 20-0.74Standard Error 0.279Scores on scale
Change From Baseline in 24 Hours Average Hand Pain Intensity Averaged Over the 7 Days Prior to Each VisitGSK3196165 180mgWeek 3, n=21, 20-1.24Standard Error 0.289Scores on scale
Change From Baseline in 24 Hours Average Hand Pain Intensity Averaged Over the 7 Days Prior to Each VisitPlaceboWeek 4, n=21, 20-0.91Standard Error 0.291Scores on scale
Change From Baseline in 24 Hours Average Hand Pain Intensity Averaged Over the 7 Days Prior to Each VisitGSK3196165 180mgWeek 4, n=21, 20-1.65Standard Error 0.301Scores on scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo22
Overall StudySTARTEDGSK3196165 180mg22
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDPlacebo21
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDGSK3196165 180mg18
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo1
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDGSK3196165 180mg4

Adverse events22

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherPALPITATIONSCardiac disordersPlacebo2222
otherPALPITATIONSCardiac disordersGSK3196165 180mg0220
otherINJECTION SITE ERYTHEMAGeneral disordersPlacebo0220
otherINJECTION SITE ERYTHEMAGeneral disordersGSK3196165 180mg2223
otherINJECTION SITE RASHGeneral disordersPlacebo0220
otherINJECTION SITE RASHGeneral disordersGSK3196165 180mg2226
otherCONJUNCTIVITISInfections and infestationsPlacebo0220
otherCONJUNCTIVITISInfections and infestationsGSK3196165 180mg2222
otherHERPES ZOSTERInfections and infestationsPlacebo0220
otherHERPES ZOSTERInfections and infestationsGSK3196165 180mg2222

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo022
Total, all-cause mortalityGSK3196165 180mg022
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo422
Total, other adverse eventsGSK3196165 180mg1022
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo122
Total, serious adverse eventsGSK3196165 180mg222

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
38273625DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
GSK3196165 180mg vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
GSK3196165 180mg vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02683785

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02683785/results?page=2