ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02691494

Efficacy and Safety of Elagolix in Combination With Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate for the Management of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated With Uterine Fibroids in Premenopausal Women (Replicate Study)

NCT02691494, Phase 3, Completed, AbbVie; results first posted 2020-06-30

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Efficacy and Safety of Elagolix in Combination With Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate for the Management of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated With Uterine Fibroids in Premenopausal Women (Replicate Study). Trials, record NCT02691494. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02691494

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Efficacy and Safety of Elagolix in Combination With Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate for the Management of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated With Uterine Fibroids in Premenopausal Women (Replicate Study)
NCT number
NCT02691494
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
378 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
AbbVie
Conditions
Uterine Fibroids, Heavy Menstrual Bleeding
Interventions
Elagolix, Placebo for Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate, Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate, Placebo for Elagolix
First posted
2016-02-25
Last updated
2021-07-13
Results first posted
2020-06-30

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes7

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryPercentage of Participants Meeting the Criteria for ResponderFinal Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day), up to Month 6
Percentage of responders, defined as participants who met the following conditions: * Menstrual blood loss (MBL) volume \< 80 mL during the Final Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day, which is defined as the last visit date during the Treatment Period (last treatment visit date) or the last dose date if there are evaluable alkaline hematin data after the last treatment visit date and prior to or on the last dose date), and * ≥ 50% reduction in MBL volume from Baseline to the Final Month. Participants who prematurely discontinued study drug due to "lack of efficacy," "requires surgery or invasive intervention for treatment of uterine fibroids," or "adverse events" were considered non-responders regardless of whether she meets the two aforementioned responder criteria or not.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in MBL Volume to the Final MonthBaseline and Final Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day), up to Month 6
Baseline MBL volume was defined as the mean of total MBL volume from all the qualified menstrual cycles during the Screening Period, in which the total MBL volume is from all validated and non-validated sanitary products and the MBL volume of validated sanitary products only (excluding non-validated sanitary products) was greater than 80 mL. The Reference Day is defined as the last visit date during the Treatment Period (last treatment visit date) or the last dose date if there are evaluable alkaline hematin data after the last treatment visit date and prior to or on the last dose date.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Suppression of Bleeding at the Final MonthFinal Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day), up to Month 6
Suppression of bleeding is defined as having 0 days of bleeding (spotting is allowed) during the Final Month with the interval starting from Study Day 11. The Reference Day is defined as the last visit date during the Treatment Period (last treatment visit date) or the last dose date if there are evaluable alkaline hematin data after the last treatment visit date and prior to or on the last dose date.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 6Month 0 (Baseline), Month 6
Baseline MBL volume was defined as the mean of total MBL volume from all the qualified menstrual cycles during the Screening Period, in which the total MBL volume is from all validated and non-validated sanitary products and the MBL volume of validated sanitary products only (excluding non-validated sanitary products) was greater than 80 mL.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 3Month 0 (Baseline), Month 3
Baseline MBL volume was defined as the mean of total MBL volume from all the qualified menstrual cycles during the Screening Period, in which the total MBL volume is from all validated and non-validated sanitary products and the MBL volume of validated sanitary products only (excluding non-validated sanitary products) was greater than 80 mL.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Baseline Hemoglobin <= 10.5 g/dL Who Have an Increase in Hemoglobin > 2 g/dL at Month 6Month 0 (Baseline), Month 6
SecondaryChange From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 1Month 0 (Baseline), Month 1
Baseline MBL volume was defined as the mean of total MBL volume from all the qualified menstrual cycles during the Screening Period, in which the total MBL volume is from all validated and non-validated sanitary products and the MBL volume of validated sanitary products only (excluding non-validated sanitary products) was greater than 80 mL.

Outcomes7

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPercentage of Participants Meeting the Criteria for ResponderFinal Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day), up to Month 6All randomized and treated participants.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in MBL Volume to the Final MonthBaseline and Final Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day), up to Month 6All randomized and treated participants.mLLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Suppression of Bleeding at the Final MonthFinal Month (the last 28 days prior to and including the Reference Day), up to Month 6All randomized and treated participants with an assessmentpercentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 6Month 0 (Baseline), Month 6All randomized and treated participants with an assessment at given time point.mLLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 3Month 0 (Baseline), Month 3All randomized and treated participants with an assessment at given time point.mLLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYPercentage of Participants With Baseline Hemoglobin <= 10.5 g/dL Who Have an Increase in Hemoglobin > 2 g/dL at Month 6Month 0 (Baseline), Month 6All randomized and treated participants with baseline hemoglobin \<= 10.5 g/dL and an assessment at Month 6.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYChange From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 1Month 0 (Baseline), Month 1All randomized and treated participants with an assessment at given time point.mLLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group21

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Criteria for ResponderPlacebo10.5percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Criteria for ResponderElagolix76.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Meeting the Criteria for ResponderElagolix + E2/NETA76.5percentage of participants
Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to the Final MonthPlacebo-4.3Standard Error 15.44mL
Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to the Final MonthElagolix-198.8Standard Error 15.44mL
Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to the Final MonthElagolix + E2/NETA-168.8Standard Error 10.72mL
Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Bleeding at the Final MonthPlacebo4.7percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Bleeding at the Final MonthElagolix88.9percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Suppression of Bleeding at the Final MonthElagolix + E2/NETA61.0percentage of participants
Change From Baseline in MBL Volume to Month 6Placebo28.5Standard Error 16.68mL

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Treatment PeriodSTARTEDPlacebo94
Treatment PeriodSTARTEDElagolix95
Treatment PeriodSTARTEDElagolix + E2/NETA189
Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDPlacebo72
Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDElagolix69
Treatment PeriodCOMPLETEDElagolix + E2/NETA148
Treatment PeriodNOT COMPLETEDPlacebo22
Treatment PeriodNOT COMPLETEDElagolix26
Treatment PeriodNOT COMPLETEDElagolix + E2/NETA41
Post-Treatment Follow-Up PeriodSTARTEDPlacebo14

Adverse events72

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNAUSEAGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo99411
otherNAUSEAGastrointestinal disordersElagolix4954
otherNAUSEAGastrointestinal disordersElagolix + E2-NETA1418915
otherFATIGUEGeneral disordersPlacebo5945
otherFATIGUEGeneral disordersElagolix3953
otherFATIGUEGeneral disordersElagolix + E2-NETA1018910
otherNASOPHARYNGITISInfections and infestationsPlacebo8949
otherNASOPHARYNGITISInfections and infestationsElagolix4954
otherNASOPHARYNGITISInfections and infestationsElagolix + E2-NETA1018911
otherURINARY TRACT INFECTIONInfections and infestationsPlacebo5946

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo094
Total, all-cause mortalityElagolix095
Total, all-cause mortalityElagolix + E2-NETA0189
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo3494
Total, other adverse eventsElagolix5895
Total, other adverse eventsElagolix + E2-NETA80189
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo194
Total, serious adverse eventsElagolix495
Total, serious adverse eventsElagolix + E2-NETA7189

Papers6

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
31971678DERIVEDPubMed
33650259DERIVEDPubMed
34553161DERIVEDPubMed
34582715DERIVEDPubMed
34878624DERIVEDPubMed
39381651DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02691494

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02691494/results?page=2