ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02694185

Secondary Event Prevention Using Population Risk Management After PCI and for Anti-Rheumatic Medications

NCT02694185, Not applicable, Completed, VA Office of Research and Development; results first posted 2021-06-25

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.4.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Secondary Event Prevention Using Population Risk Management After PCI and for Anti-Rheumatic Medications. Trials, record NCT02694185. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02694185

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Secondary Event Prevention Using Population Risk Management After PCI and for Anti-Rheumatic Medications
NCT number
NCT02694185
Status
Completed
Phases
Not applicable
Enrollment
5,269 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Conditions
Myocardial Ischemia, Rheumatic Diseases
Interventions
Caplan IVR
First posted
2016-02-29
Last updated
2026-05-27
Results first posted
2021-06-25

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes3

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryProportion of Days Covered (PDC)1 year
Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) is measured by looking at the number of doses of medication a patient has versus days in the month (if a patient has 20 days of medication for a 30 day period their PDC is 20/30, 2/3, or 66.7%). Used to assess the effectiveness of the intervention, PDC will be tested among IHD patients in the year after PCI and among rheumatology clinic patients chronically prescribed DMARDs.
SecondaryCardiovascular Events (CVE)1 year
Cardiovascular Events (CVEs) such as mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization among IHD patients at 12 months post-PCI and progressive erosive disease demonstrated in patients with rheumatic disease will be monitored. CVEs will be monitored to determine if there is a reduction in the occurrence of those events as a result of the intervention.
SecondaryIncremental Cost Effectiveness (ICE)through study completion, an average of 1 year
To establish the cost to implement and maintain the intervention, above the cost of usual care. Incremental Cost Effectiveness (ICE) is the cost to achieve a 10% improvement in PDC, and the cost of CVE prevented.

Outcomes3

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYProportion of Days Covered (PDC)1 yearParticipant numbers differ below because not all subjects are taking an anti-platelet, beta-blocker, and statin medication.percentage of days coveredMEAN
SECONDARYCardiovascular Events (CVE)1 yearCardiovascular eventsMEAN
SECONDARYIncremental Cost Effectiveness (ICE)through study completion, an average of 1 yeardollars per patientMEDIAN

Results by group10

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Proportion of Days Covered (PDC)Experimental GroupAnti-platelet82.695% Confidence Interval 77.9 to 86.2percentage of days covered
Proportion of Days Covered (PDC)Control GroupAnti-platelet75.695% Confidence Interval 69.7 to 79.9percentage of days covered
Proportion of Days Covered (PDC)Experimental GroupBeta-Blocker78.495% Confidence Interval 71.5 to 82.7percentage of days covered
Proportion of Days Covered (PDC)Control GroupBeta-Blocker73.395% Confidence Interval 66.8 to 77.1percentage of days covered
Proportion of Days Covered (PDC)Experimental GroupStatin78.895% Confidence Interval 71.8 to 83.4percentage of days covered
Proportion of Days Covered (PDC)Control GroupStatin71.295% Confidence Interval 64.9 to 75.1percentage of days covered
Cardiovascular Events (CVE)Experimental Group15.295% Confidence Interval 10.9 to 25.5Cardiovascular events
Cardiovascular Events (CVE)Control Group14.395% Confidence Interval 12.3 to 16.7Cardiovascular events
Incremental Cost Effectiveness (ICE)Experimental Group821.45Inter-Quartile Range 158.18 to 1541.91dollars per patient
Incremental Cost Effectiveness (ICE)Control Group893.55Inter-Quartile Range 437.85 to 1460.85dollars per patient

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDExperimental Group476
Overall StudySTARTEDControl Group4,793
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDExperimental Group431
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDControl Group4,793
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDExperimental Group45
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDControl Group0

Adverse events0

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

None in this release.

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityExperimental Group23476
Total, all-cause mortalityControl Group2094,793
Total, other adverse eventsExperimental Group0476
Total, other adverse eventsControl Group04,793
Total, serious adverse eventsExperimental Group0476
Total, serious adverse eventsControl Group04,793

Papers7

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
29483016BACKGROUNDPubMed
29664818BACKGROUNDPubMed
30418120BACKGROUNDPubMed
30499229BACKGROUNDPubMed
31957348BACKGROUNDPubMed
32333313BACKGROUNDPubMed
32869533BACKGROUNDPubMed

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
I01HX001604Secondary Event Prevention using Population Risk Management After PCICAPLAN, LIRON; HO, P. MICHAELVA EASTERN COLORADO HEALTH CARE SYSTEMVeterans Affairs2019 to 2020

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Experimental Group vs Control Group: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Experimental Group vs Control Group: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Source

Release
trials-2026-11-12-0.4.0
Release manifest SHA-256
0f4a8d8c48aee2a7573ae0fa94ecbeab70c1adbe449bbc95c424bc7d3e97b9d4
Registry capture
2026-11-12
Results copy, AACT
2026-03-23
NIH clinical studies file
2026-11-13

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02694185

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02694185/registered