Trial · NCT02700815
Capsaicin + Diclofenac Gel in Acute Back Pain or Neck Pain
NCT02700815, Phase 3, Completed, Boehringer Ingelheim; results first posted 2019-05-06
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Capsaicin + Diclofenac Gel in Acute Back Pain or Neck Pain. Trials, record NCT02700815. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02700815
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Capsaicin + Diclofenac Gel in Acute Back Pain or Neck Pain
- NCT number
- NCT02700815
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Phase 3
- Enrollment
- 746 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Conditions
- Acute Pain
- Interventions
- Diclofenac, Capsaicin, Placebo
- First posted
- 2016-03-07
- Last updated
- 2019-05-06
- Other registries' IDs
- eudract:2015-000404-25
- Results first posted
- 2019-05-06
- Limitations and caveats
A possible limitation of this study design related to the warming effect that is attributable to the topical application of capsaicin, which could potentially have led to inadvertent unblinding of treatment assignments in the study.
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes8
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in POM Between Baseline and Day 2 Evening, 1 Hour After Drug Application | Baseline and Day 2 | Pain on movement (POM) was used to assess pain measurement for back and neck pain. The standardized movements have been established for which the measurement was taken. POMwp was the POM measure that gave the highest score at baseline; i.e. POM of worst procedure. Pain intensity was assessed at rest after standing in an upright position relatively motionless for 1 minute. The pain was evaluated by asking patient 'How would you rate your pain right now?' and by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0-10 centimeters (cm) wherein 0 cm = no pain to 10 cm = worst pain possible. The results presented here are adjusted mean change from baseline and standard error for POMwp in cm. |
| Secondary | POMwp Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From 0 to 72 Hours (h) (POMwp AUC(0-72 h)) | 0 to 72 hours after start of treatment | This is a key secondary endpoint. AUC for POMwp calculated from 0 to 72 h that is for first three treatment days using the trapezoidal rule divided by the observation time. The results presented here are adjusted mean and standard error for POMwp AUC (0-72 h) in centimeters (cm). The AUC represents POMwp as an average over the first 3 treatment days (Day 1 until Day 4 morning) - it is not meant here as a pharmacokinetics (PK) parameter (concentration over time). |
| Secondary | POMwp Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From 0 to 120 Hours (h) (POMwp AUC(0-120 h)) | 0 to 120 hours after start of treatment | This is a key secondary endpoint. AUC for POMwp calculated from 0 to 120 h that is for first five treatment days using the trapezoidal rule divided by the observation time. The results presented here are adjusted mean and standard error for POMwp AUC (0-120 h) in centimeters (cm). The AUC represents POMwp as an average over the first 5 treatment days (Day 1 until Day 6 morning) - it is not meant here as a PK parameter (concentration over time). |
| Secondary | Number of Patients With Decrease in POMwp of at Least 30% From Baseline | Baseline and day 2 | This outcome measures the pattern of number of patients with a decrease in POMwp of at least 30% from baseline at 1 hour after dosing on Day 2 evening. |
| Secondary | Number of Patients With Decrease in POMwp of at Least 50% From Baseline | Baseline and day 2 | This outcome measures the pattern of number of patients with a decrease in POMwp of at least 50% from baseline at 1 hour after dosing on Day 2 evening. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in POMwp (cm) at Day 6 Morning | Baseline and Day 6 | Pain on movement (POM) was used to assess pain measurement for back and neck pain. The standardized movements have been established for which the measurement was taken. POMwp was the POM measure that gave the highest score at baseline; i.e. POM of worst procedure. Pain intensity was assessed at rest after standing in an upright position relatively motionless for 1 minute. The pain was evaluated by asking patient 'How would you rate your pain right now?' and by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0-10 cm wherein 0 cm = no pain to 10 cm = worst pain possible. The results presented here are adjusted mean change from baseline and standard error for POMwp in centimeters (cm). |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Pressure Algometry (PA) at Day 2 Evening, Before Drug Application | Baseline and Day 2 | PA is a method described to determine pressure pain threshold (PPT) by applying controlled pressure to a given body point. The results presented here are adjusted mean change from baseline and standard error for PA. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Pressure Algometry (PA) at Day 6 Morning | Baseline and Day 6 | PA is a method described to determine pressure pain threshold (PPT) by applying controlled pressure to a given body point. The results presented here are adjusted mean change from baseline and standard error for PA. |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Outcomes8
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Change in POM Between Baseline and Day 2 Evening, 1 Hour After Drug Application | Baseline and Day 2 | Full analysis set (FAS): All patients in treated set with a baseline value pre application for POMwp at Visit 1 and at least 1 POMwp value during assessment times at Visit 1 (Day 1 morning 1h after application), Visit 2 (Day 2, morning 1h after application), Visit 3 (Day 2 evening before application) or Visit 3 (Day 2 evening 1h after application) | Units on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | POMwp Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From 0 to 72 Hours (h) (POMwp AUC(0-72 h)) | 0 to 72 hours after start of treatment | Treated set (TS) | cm | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | POMwp Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From 0 to 120 Hours (h) (POMwp AUC(0-120 h)) | 0 to 120 hours after start of treatment | TS | cm | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Number of Patients With Decrease in POMwp of at Least 30% From Baseline | Baseline and day 2 | TS | Participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Number of Patients With Decrease in POMwp of at Least 50% From Baseline | Baseline and day 2 | TS | Participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in POMwp (cm) at Day 6 Morning | Baseline and Day 6 | TS | Units on a scale | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in Pressure Algometry (PA) at Day 2 Evening, Before Drug Application | Baseline and Day 2 | TS | Newton/centimeter square (N/cm^2) | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in Pressure Algometry (PA) at Day 6 Morning | Baseline and Day 6 | TS | Newton/centimeter square (N/cm^2) | LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN |
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Results by group32
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change in POM Between Baseline and Day 2 Evening, 1 Hour After Drug Application | Placebo Gel | -2.45 | Standard Error 0.252 | Units on a scale | |
| Change in POM Between Baseline and Day 2 Evening, 1 Hour After Drug Application | Capsaicin (0.075%) Gel | -3.26 | Standard Error 0.160 | Units on a scale | |
| Change in POM Between Baseline and Day 2 Evening, 1 Hour After Drug Application | Diclofenac (2%) Gel | -2.33 | Standard Error 0.160 | Units on a scale | |
| Change in POM Between Baseline and Day 2 Evening, 1 Hour After Drug Application | Diclofenac (2%) +Capsaicin (0.075%) Gel | -3.05 | Standard Error 0.159 | Units on a scale | |
| POMwp Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From 0 to 72 Hours (h) (POMwp AUC(0-72 h)) | Placebo Gel | 4.62 | Standard Error 0.213 | cm | |
| POMwp Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From 0 to 72 Hours (h) (POMwp AUC(0-72 h)) | Capsaicin (0.075%) Gel | 3.95 | Standard Error 0.145 | cm | |
| POMwp Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From 0 to 72 Hours (h) (POMwp AUC(0-72 h)) | Diclofenac (2%) Gel | 4.81 | Standard Error 0.145 | cm | |
| POMwp Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From 0 to 72 Hours (h) (POMwp AUC(0-72 h)) | Diclofenac (2%) +Capsaicin (0.075%) Gel | 4.25 | Standard Error 0.143 | cm | |
| POMwp Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From 0 to 120 Hours (h) (POMwp AUC(0-120 h)) | Placebo Gel | 3.92 | Standard Error 0.230 | cm | |
| POMwp Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From 0 to 120 Hours (h) (POMwp AUC(0-120 h)) | Capsaicin (0.075%) Gel | 3.10 | Standard Error 0.156 | cm |
1 to 10 of 32Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 32 results by groupParticipant flow12
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | STARTED | Placebo Gel | 75 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Capsaicin (0.075%) Gel | 223 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Diclofenac (2%) Gel | 223 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Diclofenac (2%) +Capsaicin (0.075%) Gel | 225 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Placebo Gel | 74 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Capsaicin (0.075%) Gel | 216 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Diclofenac (2%) Gel | 219 | |
| Overall Study | COMPLETED | Diclofenac (2%) +Capsaicin (0.075%) Gel | 218 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Placebo Gel | 1 | |
| Overall Study | NOT COMPLETED | Capsaicin (0.075%) Gel | 7 |
1 to 10 of 12Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 12 participant flowAdverse events12
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | Burning sensation | General disorders | Placebo Gel | 0 | 75 | |
| other | Burning sensation | General disorders | Capsaicin (0.075%) Gel | 16 | 223 | |
| other | Burning sensation | General disorders | Diclofenac (2%) Gel | 1 | 223 | |
| other | Burning sensation | General disorders | Diclofenac (2%) +Capsaicin (0.075%) Gel | 12 | 225 | |
| other | Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | Placebo Gel | 4 | 75 | |
| other | Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | Capsaicin (0.075%) Gel | 9 | 223 | |
| other | Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | Diclofenac (2%) Gel | 4 | 223 | |
| other | Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | Diclofenac (2%) +Capsaicin (0.075%) Gel | 3 | 225 | |
| other | Skin burning sensation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Placebo Gel | 0 | 75 | |
| other | Skin burning sensation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Capsaicin (0.075%) Gel | 7 | 223 |
1 to 10 of 12Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 12 adverse eventsAdverse event totals12
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | Placebo Gel | 0 | 75 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Capsaicin (0.075%) Gel | 0 | 223 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Diclofenac (2%) Gel | 0 | 223 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Diclofenac (2%) +Capsaicin (0.075%) Gel | 0 | 225 |
| Total, other adverse events | Placebo Gel | 4 | 75 |
| Total, other adverse events | Capsaicin (0.075%) Gel | 29 | 223 |
| Total, other adverse events | Diclofenac (2%) Gel | 7 | 223 |
| Total, other adverse events | Diclofenac (2%) +Capsaicin (0.075%) Gel | 26 | 225 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Placebo Gel | 0 | 75 |
| Total, serious adverse events | Capsaicin (0.075%) Gel | 0 | 223 |
1 to 10 of 12Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 12 adverse event totalsPapers1
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
| PMID | Listed as |
|---|---|
| 32221866 | DERIVED |
Source PubMed
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02700815
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02700815/results?page=2