ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02716818

Comparison of Chronocort® With Standard Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients With Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia

NCT02716818, Phase 3, Completed, Neurocrine UK Limited; results first posted 2019-09-04

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Comparison of Chronocort® With Standard Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients With Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. Trials, record NCT02716818. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02716818

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Comparison of Chronocort® With Standard Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients With Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia
NCT number
NCT02716818
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
122 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Neurocrine UK Limited
Conditions
Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia
Interventions
Chronocort®, standard glucocorticoid therapy
First posted
2016-03-23
Last updated
2026-10-02
Results first posted
2019-09-04
Limitations and caveats
A limitation of the pre-defined primary endpoint was that it included an unsigned SDS score over a 24-hour period.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline to 24 Weeks of the Mean of the 24-hour Standard Deviation Score (SDS) Profile for 17-OHP24 weeks
Change from baseline to 24 weeks of the mean of the 24-hour standard deviation score (SDS) - also referred to as a z-score - profile for 17-OHP (17-Hydroxyprogesterone). The primary efficacy variable was the natural logarithm of the mean of the 24-hour SDS for the natural logarithm of 17-OHP. The mean of the 24-hour SDS profile for each visit was the arithmetic mean of all the SDSs with the first and last (13th) weighted one half relative to the intermediate SDSs. For each of the 13 log-transformed 17-OHP values at each visit, an SDS was calculated by counting the number of SDs that were above or below the mean of the log-transformed range. A negative z-score indicated greater control of 17-OHP when compared to baseline (0).
SecondaryChange From Baseline to 24 Weeks of the Mean of the 24-hour Standard Deviation Score (SDS) Profile for A424 weeks
Change from baseline to 24 weeks of the mean of the 24-hour standard deviation score (SDS) - also referred to as a z-score - profile for A4 (androstenedione). This secondary efficacy variable was calculated as follows: the natural logarithm of the mean of the 24-hour SDS for the natural logarithm of A4. The mean of the 24-hour SDS profile for each visit was the arithmetic mean of all the SDSs with the first and last (13th) weighted one half relative to the intermediate SDSs. For each of the 13 log-transformed A4 values at each visit, an SDS was calculated by counting the number of SDs that were above or below the mean of the log-transformed range. A negative z-score indicated greater control of A4 when compared to baseline (0).
Secondary17-OHP and A4 by Individual Baseline Treatment Strata.24 weeks
17-OHP and A4 by individual baseline treatment strata presented in the same manner as the primary endpoint (using 24-hour SDS profile at 24 weeks). Change from baseline to 24 weeks of the mean of the 24-hour standard deviation score (SDS) - also referred to as a z-score - profile for 17-OHP and A4. This secondary efficacy variable was calculated as follows: the natural logarithm of the mean of the 24-hour SDS for the natural logarithm of 17-OHP and A4. The mean of the 24-hour SDS profile for each visit was the arithmetic mean of all the SDSs with the first and last (13th) weighted one half relative to the intermediate SDSs. For each of the 13 log-transformed 17-OHP and A4 values at each visit, an SDS was calculated by counting the number of SDs that were above or below the mean of the log-transformed range. A negative z-score indicated greater control of 17-OHP and A4 when compared to baseline (0).
SecondaryNumber of Participants With 17-OHP and A4 Levels in the Optimal Range at 9:00 at Week 24 Visit24 weeks
17-OHP and A4 levels at 09:00 at the week 24 visit, as a responder analysis (i.e. the number of participants achieving results in the optimal range). Optimal range for 17-OHP (male) = 1.2\* - 6.7 nmol/L (female) = 1.2\* - 8.6 Optimal range for A4 (male) = 1.4 - 5.2 nmol/L (female) = 1.0 - 7.0 nmol/L \* = There is no lower reference range available for 17-OHP, hence the lower limit of the optimal range was used in the derivation of the average Standard Deviation Score. This enabled calculation of an 'unsigned' SDS score which was used to assess potential over-treatment as well as under-treatment.
SecondaryChanges Relative to Standard Glucocorticoid Therapy in Body Composition (DEXA - Fat Mass and Lean Mass)Baseline and 24 weeksChanges relative to Standard glucocorticoid therapy in body composition (DEXA) (fat mass and lean mass) - measured at all sites except Germany.
SecondaryChanges Relative to Standard Glucocorticoid Therapy in Body Composition (DEXA - Bone Mineral Density) - Measured at All Sites Except Germany.Baseline and 24 weeksChanges relative to Standard glucocorticoid therapy in body composition (DEXA - bone mineral density only) - measured at all sites except Germany.

Outcomes6

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline to 24 Weeks of the Mean of the 24-hour Standard Deviation Score (SDS) Profile for 17-OHP24 weeks
The efficacy evaluable analysis set (EES) comprised all participants who were randomised into the study, who received at least one dose of Chronocort or standard GC therapy, and who had an evaluable Week 24 17-OHP 24-hour hormone profile, and who had no major protocol violations. Total sum of participants in the EES = 105.
Z-scoreMEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline to 24 Weeks of the Mean of the 24-hour Standard Deviation Score (SDS) Profile for A424 weeks
The efficacy evaluable analysis set (EES) comprised all participants who were randomised into the study, who received at least one dose of Chronocort or standard GC therapy, and who had an evaluable Week 24 17-OHP 24-hour hormone profile, and who had no major protocol violations. Total sum of participants in the EES = 105.
Z-scoreMEAN
SECONDARY17-OHP and A4 by Individual Baseline Treatment Strata.24 weeks
The efficacy evaluable analysis set (EES) comprised all participants who were randomised into the study, who received at least one dose of Chronocort or standard GC therapy, and who had an evaluable Week 24 17-OHP 24-hour hormone profile, and who had no major protocol violations. Total sum of participants in the EES = 105.
Z-scoreMEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Participants With 17-OHP and A4 Levels in the Optimal Range at 9:00 at Week 24 Visit24 weeks
The efficacy evaluable analysis set (EES) comprised all participants who were randomised into the study, who received at least one dose of Chronocort or standard GC therapy, and who had an evaluable Week 24 17-OHP 24-hour hormone profile, and who had no major protocol violations. Total sum of participants in the EES = 105.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChanges Relative to Standard Glucocorticoid Therapy in Body Composition (DEXA - Fat Mass and Lean Mass)Baseline and 24 weeks
The efficacy evaluable analysis set (EES) comprised all participants who were randomised into the study, who received at least one dose of Chronocort or standard GC therapy, and who had an evaluable Week 24 17-OHP 24-hour hormone profile, and who had no major protocol violations. German subjects were excluded from this analysis subset.
kilogramsMEAN
SECONDARYChanges Relative to Standard Glucocorticoid Therapy in Body Composition (DEXA - Bone Mineral Density) - Measured at All Sites Except Germany.Baseline and 24 weeks
The efficacy evaluable analysis set (EES) comprised all participants who were randomised into the study, who received at least one dose of Chronocort or standard GC therapy, and who had an evaluable Week 24 17-OHP 24-hour hormone profile, and who had no major protocol violations. German subjects were excluded from this analysis subset.
g/cm^2MEAN

Results by group26

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline to 24 Weeks of the Mean of the 24-hour Standard Deviation Score (SDS) Profile for 17-OHPChronocort®-0.403Standard Deviation 0.8499Z-score
Change From Baseline to 24 Weeks of the Mean of the 24-hour Standard Deviation Score (SDS) Profile for 17-OHPStandard Glucocorticoid Therapy-0.172Standard Deviation 0.7776Z-score
Change From Baseline to 24 Weeks of the Mean of the 24-hour Standard Deviation Score (SDS) Profile for A4Chronocort®0.113Standard Deviation 0.9221Z-score
Change From Baseline to 24 Weeks of the Mean of the 24-hour Standard Deviation Score (SDS) Profile for A4Standard Glucocorticoid Therapy-0.041Standard Deviation 0.7731Z-score
17-OHP and A4 by Individual Baseline Treatment Strata.Pre-Baseline - Hydrocortisone - 17-OHP-0.248Standard Deviation 0.7661Z-score
17-OHP and A4 by Individual Baseline Treatment Strata.Pre-Baseline - Prednisone/Prednisolone - 17-OHP-0.061Standard Deviation 0.8051Z-score
17-OHP and A4 by Individual Baseline Treatment Strata.Pre-Baseline - Dexamethasone - 17-OHP-0.245Standard Deviation 0.8522Z-score
17-OHP and A4 by Individual Baseline Treatment Strata.Pre-Baseline - Chronocort vs. Hydrocortisone - 17-OHP-0.431Standard Deviation 0.8727Z-score
17-OHP and A4 by Individual Baseline Treatment Strata.Pre-Baseline - Chronocort vs. Prednisone/Prednisolone - 17-OHP-0.320Standard Deviation 0.7627Z-score
17-OHP and A4 by Individual Baseline Treatment Strata.Pre-Baseline - Chronocort vs. Dexamethasone - 17-OHP-0.565Standard Deviation 1.2343Z-score

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDChronocort®61
Overall StudySTARTEDStandard Glucocorticoid Therapy61
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDChronocort®58
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDStandard Glucocorticoid Therapy59
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDChronocort®3
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDStandard Glucocorticoid Therapy2

Adverse events374

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAcute SinusitisInfections and infestationsChronocort®1611
otherAcute SinusitisInfections and infestationsStandard Glucocorticoid Therapy0610
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsChronocort®1611
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsStandard Glucocorticoid Therapy0610
otherConjunctivitis viralInfections and infestationsChronocort®1611
otherConjunctivitis viralInfections and infestationsStandard Glucocorticoid Therapy0610
otherCystitisInfections and infestationsChronocort®1611
otherCystitisInfections and infestationsStandard Glucocorticoid Therapy0610
otherEar infection fungalInfections and infestationsChronocort®1611
otherEar infection fungalInfections and infestationsStandard Glucocorticoid Therapy0610

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityChronocort®061
Total, all-cause mortalityStandard Glucocorticoid Therapy061
Total, other adverse eventsChronocort®5961
Total, other adverse eventsStandard Glucocorticoid Therapy4861
Total, serious adverse eventsChronocort®761
Total, serious adverse eventsStandard Glucocorticoid Therapy561

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
33527139DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Chronocort® vs Standard Glucocorticoid Therapy: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Chronocort® vs Standard Glucocorticoid Therapy: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02716818

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02716818/results?page=2