Trial · NCT02760498
Study of REGN2810 in Patients With Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
NCT02760498, Phase 2, Completed, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2024-12-11
3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0
Cite this record
ConductScience Library. Study of REGN2810 in Patients With Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Trials, record NCT02760498. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02760498
On this page
Trial
As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.
- Title
- Study of REGN2810 in Patients With Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- NCT number
- NCT02760498
- Status
- Completed
- Phases
- Phase 2
- Enrollment
- 432 participants, actual
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Conditions
- Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Interventions
- cemiplimab
- First posted
- 2016-05-03
- Last updated
- 2025-05-28
- Other registries' IDs
- eudract:2016-000105-36
- Results first posted
- 2024-12-11
Source ClinicalTrials.gov
Registered outcomes16
Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| List | Outcome | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Central Review | Up to 108 weeks | ORR was defined as percentage of participants with best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). For participants with metastatic disease, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 was used to determine BOR. For participants with unresectable locally advanced disease, clinical response criteria were used. RECIST v1.1 Criteria: -CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeter (mm) \<1 (centimeter (cm). -PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Clinical Response Criteria: -CR: All target and nontarget lesion(s) no longer visible, maintained for at least 4 weeks and no new lesions. -PR: Decrease of at least 50% in the sum the products of perpendicular longest dimensions of target lesion(s), maintained for at least 4 weeks and no new lesions. |
| Secondary | ORR by Investigator Assessment | Up to 108 weeks | ORR was defined as percentage of participants with BOR of CR or PR. For participants with metastatic disease, RECIST v1.1 was used to determine BOR. For participants with unresectable locally advanced disease, clinical response criteria were used. RECIST v1.1 Criteria: -CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm \<1 cm. -PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Clinical Response Criteria: -CR: All target and nontarget lesion(s) no longer visible, maintained for at least 4 weeks and no new lesions. -PR: Decrease of at least 50% in the sum the products of perpendicular longest dimensions of target lesion(s), maintained for at least 4 weeks and no new lesions. |
| Secondary | Duration of Response (DOR) by Independent Central Review | Up to approximately 65 months (treatment period + follow-up including survival follow-up) | DOR was measured from the time measurement criteria were first met for CR/PR, whichever was recorded first, until the first date of recurrent or Progressive Disease (PD) or death due to any cause in participants with BOR of CR or PR. For participants with metastatic disease, RECIST v1.1 was used to determine BOR. For participants with unresectable locally advanced disease, clinical response criteria were used. RECIST v1.1 Criteria: -PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions with the sum demonstrating an absolute increase of at least 5 mm (0.5 cm), or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Clinical Response Criteria: -PD: increase of ≥ 25% (WHO criteria) in the sum of the products of perpendicular longest dimensions of target lesion(s) and/or the appearance of new lesions. |
| Secondary | DOR by Investigator Assessment | Up to approximately 65 months (treatment period + follow-up including survival follow-up) | DOR was measured from the time measurement criteria were first met for CR/PR, as defined in Outcome Measure 1, whichever was recorded first, until the first date of recurrent or Progressive Disease (PD) or death due to any cause in participants with BOR of CR or PR. For participants with metastatic disease, RECIST v1.1 was used to determine BOR. For participants with unresectable locally advanced disease, clinical response criteria were used. RECIST v1.1 Criteria: -PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions with the sum demonstrating an absolute increase of at least 5 mm (0.5 cm), or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Clinical Response Criteria: -PD: increase of ≥ 25% (World Health Organization (WHO) criteria) in the sum of the products of perpendicular longest dimensions of target lesion(s) and/or the appearance of new lesions. |
| Secondary | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Independent Central Review | Up to approximately 65 months (treatment period + follow-up including survival follow-up) | PFS was measured from start of treatment until the first date of recurrent or PD, or death due to any cause. For participants with metastatic disease, RECIST v1.1 was used to determine PD. For participants with unresectable locally advanced disease, clinical response criteria were used. RECIST v1.1 Criteria: -PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions with the sum demonstrating an absolute increase of at least 5 mm (0.5 cm), or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Clinical Response Criteria: -PD: increase of ≥ 25% (WHO criteria) in the sum of the products of perpendicular longest dimensions of target lesion(s) and/or the appearance of new lesions. |
| Secondary | PFS by Investigator Assessment | Up to approximately 65 months (treatment period + follow-up including survival follow-up) | PFS was measured from start of treatment until the first date of recurrent or PD, or death due to any cause. For participants with metastatic disease, RECIST v1.1 was used to determine PD. For participants with unresectable locally advanced disease, clinical response criteria were used. RECIST v1.1 Criteria: -PD: At least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions with the sum demonstrating an absolute increase of at least 5 mm (0.5 cm), or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Clinical Response Criteria: -PD: increase of ≥ 25% (WHO criteria) in the sum of the products of perpendicular longest dimensions of target lesion(s) and/or the appearance of new lesions. |
| Secondary | Overall Survival (OS) | Up to approximately 65 months (treatment period + follow-up including survival follow-up) | OS was measured from start of treatment until death due to any cause. |
| Secondary | Complete Response (CR) Rate by Independent Central Review | Up to 108 weeks | CR rate was defined as percentage of participants with BOR of CR. For participants with metastatic disease, RECIST v1.1 was used to determine BOR. For participants with unresectable locally advanced disease, clinical response criteria were used. RECIST v1.1 Criteria: -CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm \<1 cm. Clinical Response Criteria: -CR: All target and nontarget lesion(s) no longer visible, maintained for at least 4 weeks and no new lesions. |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (GHS) Score | Baseline, Up to Cycle 12 Day 1 (Week 89) | EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life (QoL) in cancer participants. Items contributing to the GHS/QoL, were scored 1 ("very poor") to 7 ("excellent"). A linear transformation was applied to the raw scores so that transformed score lies between 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better global health status/functioning and a negative change from baseline indicated less improvement. |
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | Up to 108 weeks plus 105 days (5 half-lives) | An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) were defined as death, a life-threatening AE, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or an important medical event that jeopardized participant and required medical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed in this definition. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are defined as those not present at baseline or represent the exacerbation of a condition present at baseline during the on-treatment period or follow-up period. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all serious AEs, regardless of causality is located in Reported AE section. |
1 to 10 of 16Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 16 registered outcomesOutcomes16
Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.
| Type | Outcome | Time frame | Population | Units | Measured as |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY | Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Central Review | Up to 108 weeks | The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all enrolled participants. Only Groups 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 were planned for this analysis. | percentage of participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | ORR by Investigator Assessment | Up to 108 weeks | The FAS included all enrolled participants. Only Groups 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 were planned for this outcome measure. | percentage of participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Duration of Response (DOR) by Independent Central Review | Up to approximately 65 months (treatment period + follow-up including survival follow-up) | The FAS included all enrolled participants. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with confirmed CR or PR who were evaluable for this outcome measure. Only Groups 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 were planned for this outcome measure. | months | MEDIAN |
| SECONDARY | DOR by Investigator Assessment | Up to approximately 65 months (treatment period + follow-up including survival follow-up) | The FAS included all enrolled participants. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants with confirmed CR or PR that are evaluable for this outcome measure. Only Groups 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 were planned for this outcome measure. | months | MEDIAN |
| SECONDARY | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Independent Central Review | Up to approximately 65 months (treatment period + follow-up including survival follow-up) | The FAS included all enrolled participants. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who received at least one dose of cemiplimab and were evaluable for this outcome measure. Only Groups 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 were planned for this outcome measure. | months | MEDIAN |
| SECONDARY | PFS by Investigator Assessment | Up to approximately 65 months (treatment period + follow-up including survival follow-up) | The FAS included all enrolled participants. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who received at least one dose of cemiplimab and were evaluable for this outcome measure. Only Groups 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 were planned for this outcome measure. | months | MEDIAN |
| SECONDARY | Overall Survival (OS) | Up to approximately 65 months (treatment period + follow-up including survival follow-up) | The FAS included all enrolled participants. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants who received at least one dose of cemiplimab and were evaluable for this outcome measure. Only Groups 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 were planned for this outcome measure. | months | MEDIAN |
| SECONDARY | Complete Response (CR) Rate by Independent Central Review | Up to 108 weeks | The FAS included all enrolled participants. Only Groups 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 were planned for this outcome measure. | percentage of participants | NUMBER |
| SECONDARY | Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (GHS) Score | Baseline, Up to Cycle 12 Day 1 (Week 89) | The FAS included all enrolled participants. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed is the number evaluable at each time point. Only Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were planned for this outcome measure. | score on a scale | MEAN |
| SECONDARY | Number of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) | Up to 108 weeks plus 105 days (5 half-lives) | The Safety Analysis Set (SAF) included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug. | Participants | COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS |
1 to 10 of 16Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 16 outcomesResults by group126
Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.
| Outcome | Group | Category | Value | Spread | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Central Review | Group 1 (Participants With mCSCC): Cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W | 50.8 | 95% Confidence Interval 37.5 to 64.1 | percentage of participants | |
| Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Central Review | Group 2 (Participants With laCSCC): Cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W | 44.9 | 95% Confidence Interval 33.6 to 56.6 | percentage of participants | |
| Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Central Review | Group 3 (Participants With mCSCC): Cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W | 46.4 | 95% Confidence Interval 33.0 to 60.3 | percentage of participants | |
| Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Central Review | Group 4 (Participants With mCSCC and laCSCC): Cemiplimab 600 mg IV Q4W | 61.9 | 95% Confidence Interval 48.8 to 73.9 | percentage of participants | |
| Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Central Review | Group 6 (Participants With mCSCC and laCSCC): Cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W | 47.3 | 95% Confidence Interval 39.5 to 55.2 | percentage of participants | |
| ORR by Investigator Assessment | Group 1 (Participants With mCSCC): Cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W | 50.8 | 95% Confidence Interval 37.5 to 64.1 | percentage of participants | |
| ORR by Investigator Assessment | Group 2 (Participants With laCSCC): Cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W | 56.4 | 95% Confidence Interval 44.7 to 67.6 | percentage of participants | |
| ORR by Investigator Assessment | Group 3 (Participants With mCSCC): Cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W | 55.4 | 95% Confidence Interval 41.5 to 68.7 | percentage of participants | |
| ORR by Investigator Assessment | Group 4 (Participants With mCSCC and laCSCC): Cemiplimab 600 mg IV Q4W | 63.5 | 95% Confidence Interval 50.4 to 75.3 | percentage of participants | |
| ORR by Investigator Assessment | Group 6 (Participants With mCSCC and laCSCC): Cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W | 52.7 | 95% Confidence Interval 44.8 to 60.5 | percentage of participants |
1 to 10 of 126Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 126 results by groupParticipant flow30
How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.
| Period | Milestone | Group | Participants | Units counted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | STARTED | Group 1 (Participants With mCSCC): Cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W | 59 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Group 2 (Participants With laCSCC): Cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W | 78 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Group 3 (Participants With mCSCC): Cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W | 56 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Group 4 (Participants With mCSCC and laCSCC): Cemiplimab 600 mg IV Q4W | 63 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Group 5 (Participants With mCSCC and laCSCC): Cemiplimab 438 mg SC + 350 mg IV Q3W | 9 | |
| Overall Study | STARTED | Group 6 (Participants With mCSCC and laCSCC): Cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W | 167 | |
| Overall Study | Received at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug | Group 1 (Participants With mCSCC): Cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W | 59 | |
| Overall Study | Received at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug | Group 2 (Participants With laCSCC): Cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W | 78 | |
| Overall Study | Received at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug | Group 3 (Participants With mCSCC): Cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W | 56 | |
| Overall Study | Received at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug | Group 4 (Participants With mCSCC and laCSCC): Cemiplimab 600 mg IV Q4W | 63 |
1 to 10 of 30Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 30 participant flowAdverse events2,672
Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.
| Type | Event | Organ system | Group | Affected | At risk | Events |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| other | Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Group 1 (Participants With mCSCC): Cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W | 17 | 59 | 29 |
| other | Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Group 2 (Participants With laCSCC): Cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W | 23 | 78 | 42 |
| other | Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Group 3 (Participants With mCSCC): Cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W | 13 | 56 | 18 |
| other | Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Group 4 (Participants With mCSCC and laCSCC): Cemiplimab 600 mg IV Q4W | 17 | 63 | 23 |
| other | Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Group 5 (Participants With mCSCC and laCSCC): Cemiplimab 438 mg SC + 350 mg IV Q3W | 3 | 9 | 3 |
| other | Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Group 6 (Participants With mCSCC and laCSCC): Cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W | 39 | 165 | 58 |
| other | Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Group 6a (Participants With mCSCC and laCSCC): Cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W to 350 mg SC Q3W | 0 | 12 | 0 |
| other | Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Group 6b (Participants With mCSCC and laCSCC): Cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W to 1050 mg SC Q6W | 1 | 7 | 2 |
| other | Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Group 1 (Participants With mCSCC): Cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W | 14 | 59 | 17 |
| other | Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Group 2 (Participants With laCSCC): Cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W | 20 | 78 | 25 |
1 to 10 of 2,672Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 2,672 adverse eventsAdverse event totals24
The totals the trial posted for each group.
| Total | Group | Affected | At risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total, all-cause mortality | Group 1 (Participants With mCSCC): Cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W | 27 | 59 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Group 2 (Participants With laCSCC): Cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W | 19 | 78 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Group 3 (Participants With mCSCC): Cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W | 26 | 56 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Group 4 (Participants With mCSCC and laCSCC): Cemiplimab 600 mg IV Q4W | 23 | 63 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Group 5 (Participants With mCSCC and laCSCC): Cemiplimab 438 mg SC + 350 mg IV Q3W | 2 | 9 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Group 6 (Participants With mCSCC and laCSCC): Cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W | 59 | 165 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Group 6a (Participants With mCSCC and laCSCC): Cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W to 350 mg SC Q3W | 2 | 12 |
| Total, all-cause mortality | Group 6b (Participants With mCSCC and laCSCC): Cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W to 1050 mg SC Q6W | 0 | 7 |
| Total, other adverse events | Group 1 (Participants With mCSCC): Cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W | 56 | 59 |
| Total, other adverse events | Group 2 (Participants With laCSCC): Cemiplimab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W | 75 | 78 |
1 to 10 of 24Source ClinicalTrials.gov
See all 24 adverse event totalsPapers7
The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Grants0
The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.
None in this release.
Trial comparisons0
Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.
None in this release.
Tests0
The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.
None in this release.
Data dates
The day each source was copied for this release.
Sources 3
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
- ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
- ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
- ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
- NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)
ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.
For software
Read this trial from software.
The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02760498
GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02760498/results?page=2