ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02786537

Study of Oral Treatments for Hepatitis C

NCT02786537, Phase 4, Completed, University of Florida; results first posted 2020-11-24

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study of Oral Treatments for Hepatitis C. Trials, record NCT02786537. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02786537

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study of Oral Treatments for Hepatitis C
NCT number
NCT02786537
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Enrollment
1,275 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
University of Florida
Conditions
Chronic Hepatitis C
Interventions
SOF/LDV (sofosbuvir/ledipasvir), PrOD (ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir with dasabuvir) (Phase 1 only), EBR/GZR (elbasvir/grazoprevir), Ribavirin
First posted
2016-06-01
Last updated
2021-12-06
Results first posted
2020-11-24
Limitations and caveats
This pragmatic trial allowed patients who were randomized to SOF/LDV but unable to obtain SOF/LDV (due to limitations in access from insurance, etc.) to be treated with the accessible, alternative DAA regimens. This contributed to the variance from 'as randomized' population to the 'as treated' population. Rapidly changing HCV landscape led to discontinuation of PrOD treatment regimen and modification of initial analysis plan including reduction of original sample size.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes28

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimarySustained Virologic Response (SVR12) mITT With Imputation-Phase 1 and 2 EBR/GZR, SOF/LDV12 weeks post-treatment
SVR (Sustained Virologic Response) 12 will be defined as undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at 12 week follow-up visit (12 -24 weeks after HCV treatment discontinuation at discretion of provider). mITT with imputation (missing=failure). Total number of subjects reflects participants from EBR/GZR with or without RBV and SOF/LDV with or without RBV randomized during Phase 1 and Phase 2.
PrimaryPhase 1/2 Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12-mITT Without Imputation)12-24 weeks post HCV treatment
SVR (Sustained Virologic Response) 12 will be defined as undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at 12 week follow-up visit (12 -24 weeks after HCV treatment discontinuation as dictated by standard of care at each individual site). Number of subjects reflects participants who started EBR/GZR or SOF/LDV- based treatment (with or without RBV) during Phase 1 and 2.
PrimaryPhase 1-Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12) mITT With Imputation12 weeks post-treatment
SVR (Sustained Virologic Response) 12 will be defined as patients who have undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at 12 week follow-up visit (12 -24 weeks after HCV treatment discontinuation as dictated by standard of care at each individual site). mITT with imputation (missing=failure). Total number of subjects reflects participants from Phase 1 only.
PrimaryPhase 1 Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12-mITT Without Imputation)12 -24 weeks post-treatment
SVR (Sustained Virologic Response) 12 will be defined as undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at 12 week follow-up visit (12 -24 weeks after HCV treatment discontinuation as dictated by standard of care at each individual site). Number of subjects reflects participants randomized during Phase 1 only.
PrimaryMean Change in Headache-PRO Scores -Phase 1Baseline to On-Treatment
Headache was evaluated by the HIT-6 score, a validated, Patient Reported Outcomes survey (PROs) 'PROMIS Headache Impact Test (HIT)' with scores ranging from 36 to 78 with higher score reflecting greater impact. Mean change in headache side effect was evaluated using difference between baseline value of HIT-6 score to the highest (worst) score during treatment. Estimates of mean change and differences obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated baseline score as one of outcomes. Negative values for mean change represent improvement in symptom.
PrimaryMean Change in Headache-EBR/GZR and SOF/LDVBaseline to On-Treatment
Headache was evaluated by the HIT-6 score, a validated, Patient Reported Outcomes survey (PROs) 'PROMIS Headache Impact Test (HIT)' with scores ranging from 36 to 78 with higher score reflecting greater impact. Mean change in headache side effect was evaluated using difference between baseline value of HIT-6 score to the highest (worst) score during treatment. Estimates of mean change and differences obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated baseline score as one of outcomes. Negative values for mean change represent improvement, while negative values for 'difference' indicate LDV/SOF performed better than PrOD
PrimaryMedian Change in Headache -Phase 112 weeks (Baseline and Average On-treatment Score)
Headache was evaluated by the HIT-6 score, a validated, Patient Reported Outcomes survey (PROs) 'PROMIS Headache Impact Test (HIT)' with scores ranging from 36 to 78 with higher score reflecting greater impact. Median change in headache side effect was evaluated using difference between baseline value of HIT-6 score to the highest (worst) score during treatment. Estimates of mean change and differences obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated baseline score as one of outcomes. Negative values for change represent improvement, while negative values for 'difference' indicate LDV/SOF performed better than PrOD
PrimaryMedian Change in Headache-Phase 2Baseline -on Treatment (12-16 weeks)
Headache was evaluated by the HIT-6 score, a validated, Patient Reported Outcomes survey (PROs) 'PROMIS Headache Impact Test (HIT)' with scores ranging from 36 to 78 with higher score reflecting greater impact. Median change in headache side effect was evaluated using difference between baseline value of HIT-6 score to the highest (worst) score during treatment. Estimates of median change and differences obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated baseline score as one of outcomes. Negative values for mean change represent improvement, while negative values for 'difference' indicate LDV/SOF performed better than PrOD
PrimaryMean Change in Nausea/Vomiting PRO Score -Phase 1Baseline to On-Treatment
Patients completed the PROMIS® Nausea Short Form at Baseline (T1) and on-treatment. PROMIS raw scores from each of the completed questionnaires were converted to standardized T-scores. Change was calculated as the difference between baseline and on-treatment score. T-scores for the PROMIS Nausea and Vomiting 4a scale range from 45.0 - 80.1. Higher scores indicate worse nausea. Negative values for mean change represent improvement. The estimates of mean change and differences were obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated the baseline score as one of the outcomes. The model expressed mean score as a function of DAA regimen, cirrhosis status, HCV genotype, sex, age, race, and previous treatment status.
PrimaryMean Change in Nausea/Vomiting PROMIS Score -EBR/GZR vs. LDV/SOFBaseline and Average On-Treatment Score
Participants completed the Patient Reported Outcomes surveys (PROs) 'PROMIS Nausea/Vomiting -4 Short Form' at baseline and during treatment. Raw scores are converted to standardized T-scores with a range of 45.0-80.1. Higher scores indicate worse nausea/vomiting. Results presented as mean difference from baseline to average of on Treatment Scores (highest/worst) score during treatment. A negative (-) PROMIS change score is suggestive of symptom improvement or lack of drug side effect. Estimates of mean change were obtained from a constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects model that treated the baseline score as one of the outcomes.

Outcomes28

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYSustained Virologic Response (SVR12) mITT With Imputation-Phase 1 and 2 EBR/GZR, SOF/LDV12 weeks post-treatmentmITT with imputation, Missing SVR data = Failure. Numbers represent participants according to arm randomized (Period 1). Population excludes participants who did not start any HCV treatment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYPhase 1/2 Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12-mITT Without Imputation)12-24 weeks post HCV treatment
All mITT without imputation (missing data excluded). Includes only number of participants for whom SVR12 data is available and based on study drug as randomized (Period 1). Participants for whom SVR 12 is not available are excluded from this table.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYPhase 1-Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12) mITT With Imputation12 weeks post-treatmentmITT with imputation, Missing SVR data =failure. Numbers represent participants according to arm randomized (period 1). Population excludes participants who did not start any HCV treatment.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYPhase 1 Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12-mITT Without Imputation)12 -24 weeks post-treatmentParticipants analyzed based on HCV treatment as assigned by randomization.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
PRIMARYMean Change in Headache-PRO Scores -Phase 1Baseline to On-TreatmentAnalysis limited to patients who completed a baseline and on-treatment PRO and as treated (Period 2) during Phase 1 only.units on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYMean Change in Headache-EBR/GZR and SOF/LDVBaseline to On-TreatmentAnalysis limited to participants who completed both baseline and end of treatment PROunits on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYMedian Change in Headache -Phase 112 weeks (Baseline and Average On-treatment Score)Analysis limited to patients randomized up to last patient randomized to PrOD and participants who completed baseline and on-treatment survey.units on a scaleMEDIAN
PRIMARYMedian Change in Headache-Phase 2Baseline -on Treatment (12-16 weeks)Analysis limited to patients randomized to EBR/GZR regimen or SOF/LDV regimen and participants who completed both baseline and on treatment survey.units on a scaleMEDIAN
PRIMARYMean Change in Nausea/Vomiting PRO Score -Phase 1Baseline to On-TreatmentAnalysis is limited to patients who completed at least one baseline and one end of treatment PRO survey during Phase 1 (end date corresponds to last PrOD patient start date)units on a scaleMEAN
PRIMARYMean Change in Nausea/Vomiting PROMIS Score -EBR/GZR vs. LDV/SOFBaseline and Average On-Treatment ScorePatients with Baseline PROMIS Nausea/vomiting score who started treatment by arm as treated and completed baseline and on-treatment survey.units on a scaleMEAN

Results by group137

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12) mITT With Imputation-Phase 1 and 2 EBR/GZR, SOF/LDVEBR/GZR With RBV40Participants
Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12) mITT With Imputation-Phase 1 and 2 EBR/GZR, SOF/LDVEBR/GZR516Participants
Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12) mITT With Imputation-Phase 1 and 2 EBR/GZR, SOF/LDVSOF/LDV With RBV14Participants
Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12) mITT With Imputation-Phase 1 and 2 EBR/GZR, SOF/LDVSOF/LDV335Participants
Phase 1/2 Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12-mITT Without Imputation)EBR/GZR With RBV40Participants
Phase 1/2 Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12-mITT Without Imputation)EBR/GZR516Participants
Phase 1/2 Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12-mITT Without Imputation)SOF/LDV With RBV14Participants
Phase 1/2 Number of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12-mITT Without Imputation)SOF/LDV335Participants
Phase 1-Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12) mITT With ImputationEBR/GZR With RBV9Participants
Phase 1-Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12) mITT With ImputationEBR/GZR108Participants

Participant flow36

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
As RandomizedSTARTEDEBR/GZR With RBV56
As RandomizedSTARTEDEBR/GZR644
As RandomizedSTARTEDSOF/LDV With RBV15
As RandomizedSTARTEDSOF/LDV413
As RandomizedSTARTEDPrOD/RBV(Phase 1 Only)99
As RandomizedSTARTEDPrOD (Phase 1 Only)48
As RandomizedCOMPLETEDEBR/GZR With RBV50
As RandomizedCOMPLETEDEBR/GZR582
As RandomizedCOMPLETEDSOF/LDV With RBV15
As RandomizedCOMPLETEDSOF/LDV378

Adverse events456

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEBR/GZR26642
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersEBR/GZR With RBV175617
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSOF/LDV With RBV2152
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersSOF/LDV03940
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPrOD With RBV209920
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPrOD0470
otherAbdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersEBR/GZR76647
otherAbdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersEBR/GZR With RBV1561
otherAbdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersSOF/LDV With RBV1151
otherAbdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disordersSOF/LDV23942

Adverse event totals18

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEBR/GZR6664
Total, all-cause mortalityEBR/GZR With RBV056
Total, all-cause mortalitySOF/LDV With RBV015
Total, all-cause mortalitySOF/LDV4394
Total, all-cause mortalityPrOD With RBV199
Total, all-cause mortalityPrOD047
Total, other adverse eventsEBR/GZR298664
Total, other adverse eventsEBR/GZR With RBV4656
Total, other adverse eventsSOF/LDV With RBV815
Total, other adverse eventsSOF/LDV184394

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
34255381DERIVEDPubMed
35182741DERIVEDPubMed
35657133DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons1

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

Comparison
EBR/GZR Regimen vs SOF/LDV Regimen: Number of Participants With Adverse Events That Caused Treatment Discontinuation-EBR/GZR vs. LDV/SOF

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02786537

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02786537/registered?page=2