ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02794428

Chemoprevention of Gastric Carcinogenesis

NCT02794428, Phase 2, Completed, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center; results first posted 2024-04-05

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Chemoprevention of Gastric Carcinogenesis. Trials, record NCT02794428. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02794428

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Chemoprevention of Gastric Carcinogenesis
NCT number
NCT02794428
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
91 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Conditions
Gastric Cancer, Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia
Interventions
Eflornithine, Eflornithine placebo
First posted
2016-06-09
Last updated
2026-09-02
Results first posted
2024-04-05

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes6

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryGastric Epithelial Cell DNA Damage, at 6 Months Versus BaselineBaseline up to 6 months
The cell DNA damage is measured by the percent positive gastric epithelial cells, as assessed by IHC for gamma H2AX. The mean differences at 6 months versus baseline of the percent positive gastric epithelial cells is compared between the two groups.
SecondaryGastric Epithelial Cell DNA Damage, at 18 Months Versus BaselineBaseline up to 18 months
The cell DNA damage is measured using the percent positive gastric epithelial cells, as assessed by IHC for gamma H2AX. The mean differences in percent positive gastric epithelial cells at 18 months versus baseline is compared between the two groups.
SecondaryGastric Epithelial Cell DNA Damage, at 24 Months Versus BaselineBaseline up to 24 months
The cell DNA damage is measured by the percent positive gastric epithelial cells, as assessed by IHC for gamma H2AX. The mean differences at 24 months versus baseline of the percent positive gastric epithelial cells is compared between the two groups.
SecondaryChange in Gastric Histopathology Score, at 6 Months Versus BaselineBaseline up to 6 months
The mean differences in the gastric histopathology score at 6 months versus baseline are calculated, with comparison of the eflornithine and placebo groups. The changes in histology stage are assessed with the validated Correa Histopathology Score system (ranges represent differences in severity and extent): normal mucosa 1, non-atrophic gastritis 2, multifocal atrophic gastritis without intestinal metaplasia 3.25-4.0, gastric intestinal metaplasia 4.3-5.0, dysplasia 5.25-5.75, and cancer 6. The Correa Histopathology Score is based upon the Updated Sydney System biopsy protocol (5 biopsies). The most advanced lesion (highest Correa score) in the stomach represents the summary Correa score for the patient at the given time point.
SecondaryChange in Gastric Histology Score, at 18 Months Versus BaselineBaseline up to 18 months
The mean differences in the gastric histopathology score at 18 months versus baseline are calculated, with comparison of the eflornithine and placebo groups. The changes in histology stage are assessed with the validated Correa Histopathology Score system (ranges represent differences in severity and extent): normal mucosa 1, non-atrophic gastritis 2, multifocal atrophic gastritis without intestinal metaplasia 3.25-4.0, gastric intestinal metaplasia 4.3-5.0, dysplasia 5.25-5.75, and cancer 6. The Correa Histopathology Score is based upon the Updated Sydney System biopsy protocol (5 biopsies). The most advanced lesion (highest Correa score) in the stomach represents the summary Correa score for the patient at the given time point.
SecondaryChange in Gastric Histology Score, at 24 Months Versus BaselineBaseline up to 24 months
The mean differences in the gastric histopathology score at 24 months versus baseline are calculated, with comparison of the eflornithine and placebo groups. The changes in histology stage are assessed with the validated Correa Histopathology Score system (ranges represent differences in severity and extent): normal mucosa 1, non-atrophic gastritis 2, multifocal atrophic gastritis without intestinal metaplasia 3.25-4.0, gastric intestinal metaplasia 4.3-5.0, dysplasia 5.25-5.75, and cancer 6. The Correa Histopathology Score is based upon the Updated Sydney System biopsy protocol (5 biopsies). The most advanced lesion (highest Correa score) in the stomach represents the summary Correa score for the patient at the given time point.

Outcomes4

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYThe Difference in Cell DNA Damage, Based on Percent Positive Cells, Between Patients Treated With DFMO and Patients Treated With Placebo at 6 Months.at 6 monthsPercentage of positive cellsMEAN
SECONDARYThe Difference in Cell DNA Damage Between Patients Treated With DFMO and Patients Treated With Placebo for 18 Months, and Then Followed for an Additional 6 Months.at 18 and 24 months
SECONDARYThe Differences in the Gastritis Histopathology Score Between Patients Treated With DFMO and Patients Treated With Placebo for a Total of 18 Months, and Followed for an Additional 6 Months.at 6, 18 and 24 months
SECONDARYNumber of Patients With Quantitative Toxicities.at 6, 18, and 24 months

Results by group2

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
The Difference in Cell DNA Damage, Based on Percent Positive Cells, Between Patients Treated With DFMO and Patients Treated With Placebo at 6 Months.Eflornithine5.07Standard Deviation 21.05Percentage of positive cells
The Difference in Cell DNA Damage, Based on Percent Positive Cells, Between Patients Treated With DFMO and Patients Treated With Placebo at 6 Months.Eflornithine Placebo7.32Standard Deviation 21.60Percentage of positive cells

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
6 Months (Primary End Point)STARTEDEflornithine45
6 Months (Primary End Point)STARTEDEflornithine Placebo46
6 Months (Primary End Point)COMPLETEDEflornithine36
6 Months (Primary End Point)COMPLETEDEflornithine Placebo42
6 Months (Primary End Point)NOT COMPLETEDEflornithine9
6 Months (Primary End Point)NOT COMPLETEDEflornithine Placebo4
18 Months (Secondary Endpoint)STARTEDEflornithine36
18 Months (Secondary Endpoint)STARTEDEflornithine Placebo42
18 Months (Secondary Endpoint)COMPLETEDEflornithine31
18 Months (Secondary Endpoint)COMPLETEDEflornithine Placebo38

Adverse events10

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersEflornithine2452
otherDiarrheaGastrointestinal disordersEflornithine Placebo3463
seriousHypertensive urgencyCardiac disordersEflornithine0450
seriousHypertensive urgencyCardiac disordersEflornithine Placebo1461
seriousAppendicitisGastrointestinal disordersEflornithine0450
seriousAppendicitisGastrointestinal disordersEflornithine Placebo1461
seriousCOVID-19Infections and infestationsEflornithine1451
seriousCOVID-19Infections and infestationsEflornithine Placebo0460
seriousDiverticulitisGastrointestinal disordersEflornithine1451
seriousDiverticulitisGastrointestinal disordersEflornithine Placebo0460

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityEflornithine045
Total, all-cause mortalityEflornithine Placebo046
Total, other adverse eventsEflornithine245
Total, other adverse eventsEflornithine Placebo346
Total, serious adverse eventsEflornithine245
Total, serious adverse eventsEflornithine Placebo246

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
41801147RESULT

Source PubMed

Grants1

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

ProjectTitlePrincipal investigatorsOrganizationFunderFiscal years
R01CA190612Targeted chemoprevention of gastric carcinogenesis in high risk populationsWILSON, KEITH T.; MORGAN, DOUGLASVANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTERNATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE2014 to 2018

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Eflornithine vs Eflornithine Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Eflornithine vs Eflornithine Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02794428

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02794428/registered