ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02806895

Study Assessing Effects of JZP-110 on Driving Performance in the Treatment of Excessive Sleepiness in OSA

NCT02806895, Phase 2, Completed, Jazz Pharmaceuticals; results first posted 2020-06-16

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study Assessing Effects of JZP-110 on Driving Performance in the Treatment of Excessive Sleepiness in OSA. Trials, record NCT02806895. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02806895

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study Assessing Effects of JZP-110 on Driving Performance in the Treatment of Excessive Sleepiness in OSA
NCT number
NCT02806895
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
34 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Jazz Pharmaceuticals
Conditions
Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Excessive Sleepiness
Interventions
JZP-110, Placebo
First posted
2016-06-21
Last updated
2021-01-14
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2015-003930-28
Results first posted
2020-06-16

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes27

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryStandard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP) at 2 Hours Post-dose (Approximately at Tmax)2 hours post-dose
Subjects were instructed to drive with steady lateral position between the delineated boundaries of the slower (right) traffic lane, while maintaining a constant speed of 95 kilometers (km) per hour (hr). Deviation was measured by the vehicle's speed and lateral distance to the left lane line and was continuously recorded. Individual improvement was defined as a decrease in SDLP below the negative value of threshold; individual impairment was defined as an increase in SDLP above the threshold or failure to complete the driving test due to sleepiness or subjects related safety concerns.
SecondarySDLP at 6 Hours Post-dose6 hours post-dose
Subjects were instructed to drive with steady lateral position between the delineated boundaries of the slower (right) traffic lane, while maintaining a constant speed of 95 kilometers (km) per hour (hr). Deviation was measured by the vehicle's speed and lateral distance to the left lane line and was continuously recorded. Individual improvement was defined as a decrease in SDLP below the negative value of threshold; individual impairment was defined as an increase in SDLP above the threshold or failure to complete the driving test due to sleepiness or subjects related safety concerns.
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 1 Centimeter (cm) on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 2 Hours Post-dose2 hours post-dose
Individual changes (solriamfetol minus placebo) in driving performance were measured by SDLP at 2 hours postdose. The Maximum McNemar symmetry analyses was used to detect an asymmetry in the distribution of the change in driving performance at 2 hours postdose. The test examined the differences in the proportions of impaired drivers and improved drivers following treatment using a generalized single McNemar test statistics were obtained at each threshold (1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 cm), which was the vehicle weaving amount. Changes in SDLP exceeding 2.4 cm have been evaluated as clinically relevant. Improvement was defined as a decrease in SDLP comparing JZP-110 and placebo below the threshold and impairment was defined as an increase in SDLP above the threshold or failure to complete the driving test due to sleepiness or subjects related safety concerns.
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 1.5 cm on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 2 Hours Post-dose2 hours post-dose
Individual changes (solriamfetol minus placebo) in driving performance were measured by SDLP at 2 hours postdose. The Maximum McNemar symmetry analyses was used to detect an asymmetry in the distribution of the change in driving performance at 2 hours postdose. The test examined the differences in the proportions of impaired drivers and improved drivers following treatment using a generalized single McNemar test statistics were obtained at each threshold (1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 cm), which was the vehicle weaving amount. Changes in SDLP exceeding 2.4 cm have been evaluated as clinically relevant. Improvement was defined as a decrease in SDLP comparing JZP-110 and placebo below the threshold and impairment was defined as an increase in SDLP above the threshold or failure to complete the driving test due to sleepiness or subjects related safety concerns.
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 2.0 cm on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 2 Hours Post-dose2 hours post-dose
Individual changes (solriamfetol minus placebo) in driving performance were measured by SDLP at 2 hours postdose. The Maximum McNemar symmetry analyses was used to detect an asymmetry in the distribution of the change in driving performance at 2 hours postdose. The test examined the differences in the proportions of impaired drivers and improved drivers following treatment using a generalized single McNemar test statistics were obtained at each threshold (1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 cm), which was the vehicle weaving amount. Changes in SDLP exceeding 2.4 cm have been evaluated as clinically relevant. Improvement was defined as a decrease in SDLP comparing JZP-110 and placebo below the threshold and impairment was defined as an increase in SDLP above the threshold or failure to complete the driving test due to sleepiness or subjects related safety concerns.
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 2.5 cm on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 2 Hours Post-dose2 hours post-dose
Individual changes (solriamfetol minus placebo) in driving performance were measured by SDLP at 2 hours postdose. The Maximum McNemar symmetry analyses was used to detect an asymmetry in the distribution of the change in driving performance at 2 hours postdose. The test examined the differences in the proportions of impaired drivers and improved drivers following treatment using a generalized single McNemar test statistics were obtained at each threshold (1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 cm), which was the vehicle weaving amount. Changes in SDLP exceeding 2.4 cm have been evaluated as clinically relevant. Improvement was defined as a decrease in SDLP comparing JZP-110 and placebo below the threshold and impairment was defined as an increase in SDLP above the threshold or failure to complete the driving test due to sleepiness or subjects related safety concerns.
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 3.0 cm on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 2 Hours Post-dose2 hours post-dose
Individual changes (solriamfetol minus placebo) in driving performance were measured by SDLP at 2 hours postdose. The Maximum McNemar symmetry analyses was used to detect an asymmetry in the distribution of the change in driving performance at 2 hours postdose. The test examined the differences in the proportions of impaired drivers and improved drivers following treatment using a generalized single McNemar test statistics were obtained at each threshold (1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 cm), which was the vehicle weaving amount. Changes in SDLP exceeding 2.4 cm have been evaluated as clinically relevant. Improvement was defined as a decrease in SDLP comparing JZP-110 and placebo below the threshold and impairment was defined as an increase in SDLP above the threshold or failure to complete the driving test due to sleepiness or subjects related safety concerns.
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 3.5 cm on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 2 Hours Post-dose2 hours post-dose
Individual changes (solriamfetol minus placebo) in driving performance were measured by SDLP at 2 hours postdose. The Maximum McNemar symmetry analyses was used to detect an asymmetry in the distribution of the change in driving performance at 2 hours postdose. The test examined the differences in the proportions of impaired drivers and improved drivers following treatment using a generalized single McNemar test statistics were obtained at each threshold (1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 cm), which was the vehicle weaving amount. Changes in SDLP exceeding 2.4 cm have been evaluated as clinically relevant. Improvement was defined as a decrease in SDLP comparing JZP-110 and placebo below the threshold and impairment was defined as an increase in SDLP above the threshold or failure to complete the driving test due to sleepiness or subjects related safety concerns.
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 1.0 cm on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 6 Hours Post-dose6 hours post-dose
Individual changes (solriamfetol minus placebo) in driving performance were measured by SDLP at 6 hours postdose. The Maximum McNemar symmetry analyses was used to detect an asymmetry in the distribution of the change in driving performance at 6 hours postdose. The test examined the differences in the proportions of impaired drivers and improved drivers following treatment using a generalized single McNemar test statistics were obtained at each threshold (1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 cm), which was the vehicle weaving amount. Changes in SDLP exceeding 2.4 cm have been evaluated as clinically relevant. Improvement was defined as a decrease in SDLP comparing JZP-110 and placebo below the threshold and impairment was defined as an increase in SDLP above the threshold or failure to complete the driving test due to sleepiness or subjects related safety concerns.
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 1.5 cm on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 6 Hours Post-dose6 hours post-dose
Individual changes (solriamfetol minus placebo) in driving performance were measured by SDLP at 6 hours postdose. The Maximum McNemar symmetry analyses was used to detect an asymmetry in the distribution of the change in driving performance at 6 hours postdose. The test examined the differences in the proportions of impaired drivers and improved drivers following treatment using a generalized single McNemar test statistics were obtained at each threshold (1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 cm), which was the vehicle weaving amount. Changes in SDLP exceeding 2.4 cm have been evaluated as clinically relevant. Improvement was defined as a decrease in SDLP comparing JZP-110 and placebo below the threshold and impairment was defined as an increase in SDLP above the threshold or failure to complete the driving test due to sleepiness or subjects related safety concerns.

Outcomes27

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYStandard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP) at 2 Hours Post-dose (Approximately at Tmax)2 hours post-doseOne subject participated in only Treatment Period 1 and did not receive placebo resulting in 33 subjects in placebo group.centimeter (cm)LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYSDLP at 6 Hours Post-dose6 hours post-doseSubjects in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population who did not have an assessment for a particular endpoint were excluded in the analysis of that endpoint.cmLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 1 Centimeter (cm) on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 2 Hours Post-dose2 hours post-dose
The arms/group titles are combined as (solriamfetol minus placebo) for this outcome measure. Pre-specified McNemar test results were defined by driving study completion status per participant as impaired or improved (JZP-110 minus Placebo). The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis population was comprised of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication and had evaluable SDLP data at 2 hours postdose in any post-baseline visit.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 1.5 cm on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 2 Hours Post-dose2 hours post-dose
The arms/group titles are combined as (solriamfetol minus placebo) for this outcome measure. Pre-specified McNemar test results were defined by driving study completion status per participant as impaired or improved (JZP-110 minus Placebo). The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis population was comprised of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication and had evaluable SDLP data at 2 hours postdose in any post-baseline visit.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 2.0 cm on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 2 Hours Post-dose2 hours post-dose
The arms/group titles are combined as (solriamfetol minus placebo) for this outcome measure. Pre-specified McNemar test results were defined by driving study completion status per participant as impaired or improved (JZP-110 minus Placebo). The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis population was comprised of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication and had evaluable SDLP data at 2 hours postdose in any post-baseline visit.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 2.5 cm on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 2 Hours Post-dose2 hours post-dose
The arms/group titles are combined as (solriamfetol minus placebo) for this outcome measure. Pre-specified McNemar test results were defined by driving study completion status per participant as impaired or improved (JZP-110 minus Placebo). The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis population was comprised of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication and had evaluable SDLP data at 2 hours postdose in any post-baseline visit.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 3.0 cm on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 2 Hours Post-dose2 hours post-dose
The arms/group titles are combined as (solriamfetol minus placebo) for this outcome measure. Pre-specified McNemar test results were defined by driving study completion status per participant as impaired or improved (JZP-110 minus Placebo). The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis population was comprised of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication and had evaluable SDLP data at 2 hours postdose in any post-baseline visit.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 3.5 cm on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 2 Hours Post-dose2 hours post-dose
The arms/group titles are combined as (solriamfetol minus placebo) for this outcome measure. Pre-specified McNemar test results were defined by driving study completion status per participant as impaired or improved (JZP-110 minus Placebo). The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis population was comprised of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication and had evaluable SDLP data at 2 hours postdose in any post-baseline visit.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 1.0 cm on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 6 Hours Post-dose6 hours post-dose
The arms/group titles are combined as (solriamfetol minus placebo) for this outcome measure. Pre-specified McNemar test results were defined by driving study completion status per participant as impaired or improved (JZP-110 minus Placebo). The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis population was comprised of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication and had evaluable SDLP data at 2 hours postdose in any post-baseline visit.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYNumber of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 1.5 cm on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 6 Hours Post-dose6 hours post-dose
The arms/group titles are combined as (solriamfetol minus placebo) for this outcome measure. Pre-specified McNemar test results were defined by driving study completion status per participant as impaired or improved (JZP-110 minus Placebo). The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis population was comprised of all randomized subjects who received at least one dose of study medication and had evaluable SDLP data at 2 hours postdose in any post-baseline visit.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group54

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP) at 2 Hours Post-dose (Approximately at Tmax)Placebo19.92Standard Error 0.630centimeter (cm)
Standard Deviation of Lateral Position (SDLP) at 2 Hours Post-dose (Approximately at Tmax)JZP-11018.83Standard Error 0.627centimeter (cm)
SDLP at 6 Hours Post-dosePlacebo20.04Standard Error 0.632cm
SDLP at 6 Hours Post-doseJZP-11019.24Standard Error 0.631cm
Number of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 1 Centimeter (cm) on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 2 Hours Post-doseDifference (JZP-110 -Placebo)Improved15Participants
Number of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 1 Centimeter (cm) on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 2 Hours Post-doseDifference (JZP-110 -Placebo)Impaired5Participants
Number of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 1.5 cm on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 2 Hours Post-doseDifference (JZP-110 -Placebo)Improved13Participants
Number of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 1.5 cm on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 2 Hours Post-doseDifference (JZP-110 -Placebo)Impaired5Participants
Number of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 2.0 cm on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 2 Hours Post-doseDifference (JZP-110 -Placebo)Improved12Participants
Number of Subjects With Improved or Impaired Driving at a Threshold 2.0 cm on JZP-110 Compared to Placebo 2 Hours Post-doseDifference (JZP-110 -Placebo)Impaired5Participants

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTED(Treatment Period 1) JZP-110/Placebo17
Overall StudySTARTED(Treatment Period 2) Placebo/JZP-11017
Overall StudyCOMPLETED(Treatment Period 1) JZP-110/Placebo16
Overall StudyCOMPLETED(Treatment Period 2) Placebo/JZP-11017
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETED(Treatment Period 1) JZP-110/Placebo1
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETED(Treatment Period 2) Placebo/JZP-1100

Adverse events8

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersPlacebo2332
otherNauseaGastrointestinal disordersJZP-1104344
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersPlacebo2332
otherDizzinessNervous system disordersJZP-1103343
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersPlacebo4334
otherHeadacheNervous system disordersJZP-1104344
otherInsomniaPsychiatric disordersPlacebo0330
otherInsomniaPsychiatric disordersJZP-1104344

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo033
Total, all-cause mortalityJZP-110034
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo833
Total, other adverse eventsJZP-1101534
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo033
Total, serious adverse eventsJZP-110034

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
36494591DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons2

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
JZP-110 vs Placebo: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
JZP-110 vs Placebo: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests1

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

TestNamed as
Psychomotor Vigilance TaskSecondary outcome

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02806895

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02806895/registered?page=2