ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02847598

Outcomes36

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYPart A: Change From Baseline in Active Joint Count (28-joint Assessment) to Week 24Baseline to Week 24
MITT population included all randomized participants in Part A who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (whether or not the participants adhered to the protocol). Here, number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.
jointsMEAN
PRIMARYPart B: Percent Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity (CLASI-A) Score to Week 16Baseline to Week 16
MITT population included all randomized participants in Part B who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (whether or not the participants adhered to the protocol). Here, number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.
percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPart A : Percentage of Participants With Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity- 50 (CLASI-50) Response at Week 24Week 24
MITT population included all randomized participants in Part A who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (whether or not the participants adhered to the protocol). Here, number of participants analyzed signifies those with baseline CLASI-A \>=8 following protocol amendment.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPart B: Percentage of Participants With Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity- 50 (CLASI-50) Response at Week 12 and 16Week 12, Week 16
MITT population included all randomized participants in Part B who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (whether or not the participants adhered to the protocol). Here, number analyzed signifies number of participants analyzed at specific timepoint.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPart A: Percent Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity (CLASI-A) Score at Week 12, 16 and 24Baseline, Week 12, 16 and 24
MITT population included all randomized participants in Part A who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (whether or not the participants adhered to the protocol). Here, number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure and number analyzed signifies number of participants analyzed at specific timepoint.
percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPart B: Percent Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity (CLASI-A) Score at Week 12Baseline, Week 12
MITT population included all randomized participants in Part B who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (whether or not the participants adhered to the protocol). Here, number of participants analyzed signifies number of participant analyzed in this outcome measure.
percent changeMEAN
SECONDARYPart A: Percentage of Participants With a >=4-point Reduction From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity (CLASI-A) Score at Week 24Week 24
MITT population included all randomized participants in Part A who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (whether or not the participants adhered to the protocol). Here, number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPart B: Percentage of Participants With a >=4-point Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity (CLASI-A) Score at Week 12 and 16Week 12, Week 16
MITT population included all randomized participants in Part B who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (whether or not the participants adhered to the protocol). Here, number of analyzed signifies number of participants analyzed at specific timepoint.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPart A: Percentage of Participants With a >=7-point Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity (CLASI-A) Score at Week 24Week 24
MITT population included all randomized participants in Part A who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (whether or not the participants adhered to the protocol). Here, number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPart B: Percentage of Participants With a >=7-point Change From Baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity (CLASI-A) Score at Week 12 and 16Week 12, Week 16
MITT population included all randomized participants in Part B who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (whether or not the participants adhered to the protocol). Here, number analyzed signifies number of participants analyzed at specific timepoint.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPart A: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index >=4 (SRI-4) at Week 24Week 24MITT population included all randomized participants in Part A who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (whether or not the participants adhered to the protocol).percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPart A: Change From Baseline in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) Score at Week 24Baseline to Week 24
MITT population included all randomized participants in Part A who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (whether or not the participants adhered to the protocol). Here, number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPart A: Percentage of Participants With no New Organ System Affected at Week 24Week 24MITT population included all randomized participants in Part A who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (whether or not the participants adhered to the protocol).percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYPart A: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of SLE Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Week 24Baseline to Week 24
MITT population included all randomized participants in Part A who had received at least 1 dose of study treatment (whether or not the participants adhered to the protocol). Here, number of participants analyzed signifies number of participants analyzed in this outcome measure.
score on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYPart A: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to Week 36Safety population included all the randomized participants in Part A who had received at least one dose of randomized study treatment and was based on the actual treatment received.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPart B: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to Week 28Safety population included all the randomized participants in Part B who had received at least one dose of randomized study treatment and was based on the actual treatment received.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPart A: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Assessment AbnormalitiesBaseline up to Week 36Safety population included all the randomized participants in Part A who had received at least one dose of randomized study treatment and was based on the actual treatment received.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPart B: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Assessment AbnormalitiesBaseline up to Week 28Safety population included all the randomized participants in Part B who had received at least one dose of randomized study treatment and was based on the actual treatment received.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPart A: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesBaseline up to Week 36Safety population included all the randomized participants in Part A who had received at least one dose of randomized study treatment and was based on the actual treatment received.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPart B: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign AbnormalitiesBaseline up to Week 28Safety population included all the randomized participants in Part B who had received at least one dose of randomized study treatment and was based on the actual treatment received.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Source ClinicalTrials.govtrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this list from software.

Twenty rows a page, as JSON. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02847598/outcomes