ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02858076

Anti-VEGF vs. Prompt Vitrectomy for VH From PDR

NCT02858076, Phase 2, Phase 3, Completed, Jaeb Center for Health Research; results first posted 2021-01-19

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Anti-VEGF vs. Prompt Vitrectomy for VH From PDR. Trials, record NCT02858076. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02858076

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Anti-VEGF vs. Prompt Vitrectomy for VH From PDR
NCT number
NCT02858076
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2, Phase 3
Enrollment
205 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Conditions
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy, Vitreous Hemorrhage
Interventions
2-mg Intravitreous Aflibercept Injection, Prompt Vitrectomy Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation
First posted
2016-08-08
Last updated
2021-04-20
Results first posted
2021-01-19

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes16

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryE-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score (Area Under the Curve From Baseline)24 weeks
The area under the curve (units = letters·weeks) was divided by 24 weeks (units = weeks) to obtain an average change in letter score (units = letters) over the 24-weekr follow-up. Best-corrected visual acuity following protocol-defined refraction. Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test on a scale from 100 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/10) to 0 letters (Snellen equivalent of \<20/800). Higher scores indicate better visual acuity and lower scores indicate worse visual acuity.
SecondaryE-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score4 Weeks
Best-corrected visual acuity following protocol-defined refraction. Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test on a scale from 100 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/10) to 0 letters (Snellen equivalent \<20/800). Higher scores indicate better visual acuity and lower scores indicate worse visual acuity.
SecondaryE-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score12 Weeks
Best-corrected visual acuity following protocol-defined refraction. Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test on a scale from 100 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/10) to 0 letters (Snellen equivalent \<20/800). Higher scores indicate better visual acuity and lower scores indicate worse visual acuity.
SecondaryE-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score24 Weeks
Best-corrected visual acuity following protocol-defined refraction. Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test on a scale from 100 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/10) to 0 letters (Snellen equivalent \<20/800). Higher scores indicate better visual acuity and lower scores indicate worse visual acuity.
SecondaryE-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score1-Year from participant randomization
Best-corrected visual acuity following protocol-defined refraction. Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test on a scale from 100 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/10) to 0 letters (Snellen equivalent \<20/800). Higher scores indicate better visual acuity and lower scores indicate worse visual acuity.
SecondaryE-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score2 Years
Best-corrected visual acuity following protocol-defined refraction. Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test on a scale from 100 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/10) to 0 letters (Snellen equivalent \<20/800). Higher scores indicate better visual acuity and lower scores indicate worse visual acuity.
SecondaryE-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score (Area Under the Curve From Baseline)2-Years
Best-corrected visual acuity following protocol-defined refraction. Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test on a scale from 100 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/10) to 0 letters (Snellen equivalent \<20/800). Higher scores indicate better visual acuity and lower scores indicate worse visual acuity. The area under the curve (units = letters·years) was divided by 2 years (units = years) to obtain an average change in letter score (units = letters) over the 2-year follow-up. Best-corrected visual acuity following protocol-defined refraction. Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test on a scale from 100 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/10) to 0 letters (Snellen equivalent of \<20/800). Higher scores indicate better visual acuity and lower scores indicate worse visual acuity.
SecondarySnellen Equivalent Range (Visual Acuity Score)4 weeks
Best-corrected visual acuity following protocol-defined refraction. Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test on a scale from 100 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/10) to 0 letters (Snellen equivalent \<20/800). Higher scores indicate better visual acuity and lower scores indicate worse visual acuity.
SecondarySnellen Equivalent Range (Visual Acuity Score)12 weeks
Best-corrected visual acuity following protocol-defined refraction. Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test on a scale from 100 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/10) to 0 letters (Snellen equivalent \<20/800). Higher scores indicate better visual acuity and lower scores indicate worse visual acuity.
SecondarySnellen Equivalent Range (Visual Acuity Score)24 weeks
Best-corrected visual acuity following protocol-defined refraction. Visual Acuity was measured with the Electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity test on a scale from 100 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/10) to 0 letters (Snellen equivalent \<20/800). Higher scores indicate better visual acuity and lower scores indicate worse visual acuity.

Outcomes16

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYE-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score (Area Under the Curve From Baseline)24 weeksunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYE-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score4 Weeksunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYE-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score12 Weeksunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYE-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score24 Weeksunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYE-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score1-Year from participant randomizationunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYE-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score2 Yearsunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYE-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score (Area Under the Curve From Baseline)2-Yearsunits on a scaleMEAN
SECONDARYSnellen Equivalent Range (Visual Acuity Score)4 weeksParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYSnellen Equivalent Range (Visual Acuity Score)12 weeksParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYSnellen Equivalent Range (Visual Acuity Score)24 weeksParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS

Results by group42

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score (Area Under the Curve From Baseline)Intravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections59.3Standard Deviation 21.9units on a scale
E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter Score (Area Under the Curve From Baseline)Prompt Vitrectomy Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation63.0Standard Deviation 21.7units on a scale
E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter ScoreIntravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections52.6Standard Deviation 29.4units on a scale
E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter ScoreVitrectomy With Panretinal Photocoagulation62.3Standard Deviation 26.8units on a scale
E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter ScoreIntravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections63.7Standard Deviation 25.0units on a scale
E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter ScorePrompt Vitrectomy Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation67.3Standard Deviation 24.7units on a scale
E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter ScoreIntravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections69.4Standard Deviation 23.8units on a scale
E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter ScorePrompt Vitrectomy Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation69.0Standard Deviation 23.1units on a scale
E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter ScoreIntravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections70.5Standard Deviation 20.3units on a scale
E-ETDRS Visual Acuity Letter ScorePrompt Vitrectomy Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation72.7Standard Deviation 20.3units on a scale

Participant flow6

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDIntravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections100
Overall StudySTARTEDVitrectomy With Panretinal Photocoagulation105
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDIntravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections90
Overall StudyCOMPLETEDVitrectomy With Panretinal Photocoagulation87
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDIntravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections10
Overall StudyNOT COMPLETEDVitrectomy With Panretinal Photocoagulation18

Adverse events1,102

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersIntravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections41004
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPrompt Vitrectomy Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation71058
otherAnemia of chronic diseaseBlood and lymphatic system disordersIntravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections11001
otherAnemia of chronic diseaseBlood and lymphatic system disordersPrompt Vitrectomy Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation11051
otherAnemia, unspecifiedBlood and lymphatic system disordersIntravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections11001
otherAnemia, unspecifiedBlood and lymphatic system disordersPrompt Vitrectomy Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation01050
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersIntravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections11001
otherLeukocytosisBlood and lymphatic system disordersPrompt Vitrectomy Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation11051
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersIntravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections01000
otherThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPrompt Vitrectomy Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation11051

Adverse event totals6

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityIntravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections6100
Total, all-cause mortalityPrompt Vitrectomy Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation3105
Total, other adverse eventsIntravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections97100
Total, other adverse eventsPrompt Vitrectomy Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation98105
Total, serious adverse eventsIntravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections44100
Total, serious adverse eventsPrompt Vitrectomy Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation45105

Papers3

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
33320223DERIVEDPubMed
33956075DERIVEDPubMed
37972038DERIVEDPubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons6

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

ComparisonSource
Intravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections vs Prompt Vitrectomy Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation: Retinal Neovascularization on Clinical ExamTrial comparisons
Intravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections vs Prompt Vitrectomy Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation: Recurrent Vitreous HemorrhageTrial comparisons
Intravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections vs Prompt Vitrectomy Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation: Retinal Neovascularization on Clinical ExamTrial comparisons
Intravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections vs Prompt Vitrectomy Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation: deaths from any causeTrial comparisons
Intravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections vs Prompt Vitrectomy Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation: Retinal Neovascularization on Clinical ExamTrial comparisons
Intravitreous 2 mg Aflibercept Injections vs Prompt Vitrectomy Plus Panretinal Photocoagulation: serious adverse eventsTrial comparisons

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02858076

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02858076/results?page=2