ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02876302

Study Of Ruxolitinib (INCB018424) With Preoperative Chemotherapy For Triple Negative Inflammatory Breast Cancer

NCT02876302, Phase 2, Completed, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; results first posted 2024-04-18

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study Of Ruxolitinib (INCB018424) With Preoperative Chemotherapy For Triple Negative Inflammatory Breast Cancer. Trials, record NCT02876302. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02876302

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study Of Ruxolitinib (INCB018424) With Preoperative Chemotherapy For Triple Negative Inflammatory Breast Cancer
NCT number
NCT02876302
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Enrollment
23 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Conditions
Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC)
Interventions
Ruxolitinib, Paclitaxel, Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide
First posted
2016-08-23
Last updated
2026-07-24
Results first posted
2024-04-18

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes9

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryBiologic Response To 7-Day Run-In Window Phase Treatment of Ruxolitinib Alone or Ruxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel7 days
Biologic response to 7-day run-in phase treatment, defined as a change in phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3) expression from moderate/high positive (pSTAT3-positive) in pre-run-in phase sample to negative or weakly positive/equivocal (pSTAT3-negative) in post-run-in samples. pSTAT3 status was determined by evaluating the percent positive cells and the strength of staining (weak vs. strong/moderate) in relation to positive and negative controls. A T-score was calculated based on percent-stained cells and intensity of staining and interpreted as follows: Scores 0-4 are negative/weakly positive (pStat3 negative) and 5-8 are moderate/high positive (pStat3 positive). Hence, pStat3 negative indicates a biologic response or a decrease in pSTAT3 levels.
SecondaryPathologic Complete Response Rate (pCR) After Preoperative Therapy28 weeksPathologic Complete Response rate (pCR) is defined as the absence of invasive carcinoma within the breast and axillary lymph nodes following preoperative therapy.
SecondaryAssess Change in STAT3 Gene Expression Following run-in Treatment7 Days
Change of STAT3 gene expression between pretreatment and post-ruxolitinib run-in (after 7 days of ruxolitinib alone or with one dose of weekly paclitaxel) biopsy specimens. RNA-seq was performed on a subset of tumor pairs (n=4 per run-in treatment group). Enrichment analysis for JAK-STAT and IL-6 Hallmark signatures obtained a Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA) enrichment score as a measure of STAT3 gene expression. The GSVA enrichment score is a continuous unitless measure that summarizes joint expression of multiple genes into a single value. A positive value indicates greater, and a negative value a lesser, enrichment of pathway signatures; thus a negative pre- to post-runin change in the value indicates a decrease in the STAT3 expression after the treatment, and a positive values indicates increase in STAT3 expression after treatment.
SecondaryDetermine Efficacy Defined as Disease-Free Survival (DFS)2 years
Disease-Free Survival (DFS) is defined as time of surgery, among the subset of patients who underwent surgery (n=21), until occurrence of recurrence, contralateral cancer, death attributable to any cause, second primary cancer other than breast. DFS was censored at date of last assessment.
SecondaryDetermine Efficacy Defined as Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)2 years
The endpoint is now more commonly known as event-free survival (EFS). Defined as time of treatment initiation until occurrence of recurrence, contralateral cancer, death attributable to any cause, second primary cancer other than breast or occurrence of progressive disease during preoperative therapy or treatment of disease that is not surgically resectable; otherwise censored at last disease follow-up.
SecondaryDetermine Efficacy Defined as Overall Survival (OS)2 yearsOverall survival (OS) is defined as time from surgery until death from any cause or from treatment initiation until death from any cause.
SecondaryAssess Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) Differences After Preoperative Therapy28 weeks
Residual cancer burden (RCB) is a continuous variable (RCB0 through RCB-IV) derived from the primary tumor dimensions, cellularity of the tumor bed, and axillary nodal burden as described in Symmans et al, 2007; where RCB-0 equals pathologic complete response (pCR) and considered the best prognosis and RCB-IV is considered the worst prognosis.
SecondaryChanges in Interleukin 6 (IL-6) Plasma Levels During Treatment28 weeks
Elevations in interleukin (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) have been associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with breast cancer. To determine whether STAT3 pathways were changed in the treatment groups, enrichment of JAKSTAT3 or IL-6 pathway-related gene signatures in the post-window phase samples compared to pre-window phase samples was analyzed. Enrichment analysis for JAK-STAT and IL-6 hallmark signatures were calculated using gene set variation analysis (GSVA) package. Each hospital followed their institutional guidelines for CRP and IL-6 measurements.
SecondaryChanges in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Plasma Levels During Treatment28 weeks
Systemic biologic responses to ruxolitinib were assessed using serum IL-6 and c-reactive protein (CRP) levels. CRP levels are associated with poor prognosis and increased inflammatory response. Therefore, CRP levels in combination with pSTAT3 staining, could potentially be used as a more reliable method to select patients who would benefit from ruxolitinib treatment. To further analyze the effect of ruxolitinib throughout treatment, serum for CRP assessment was collected from patients at pre-window phase, post-window-phase, following 12-week neoadjuvant paclitaxel with or without ruxolitinib and immediately before surgery (pre-surgery). Each hospital followed their institutional guidelines for CRP measurements.

Outcomes9

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYBiologic Response To 7-Day Run-In Window Phase Treatment of Ruxolitinib Alone or Ruxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel7 days
A total of 23 patients were enrolled across 4 centers from January 24, 2018, to February 5, 2021. During the window phase of the trial, 11 patients received 7 days of ruxolitinib and 12 received ruxolitinib plus paclitaxel. Among 23 patients, 20 had baseline biopsy samples stained.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYPathologic Complete Response Rate (pCR) After Preoperative Therapy28 weeks
Neoadjuvant treatment phase population including those who received single agent ruxolitinib during the window phase treatment and then proceeded to neoadjuvant therapy with daily ruxolitinib plus weekly paclitaxel for 12 weeks (n=5) and those patients who had received the combination of ruxolitinib plus paclitaxel during the window phase continued to receive it for a total of 12 weeks (n=12).
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYAssess Change in STAT3 Gene Expression Following run-in Treatment7 DaysTo assess global transcriptomic changes during treatment, RNA-seq was performed on paired pre- and post-run-in phase tumor biopsy samples (n=4 per run-in treatment group).GSVA enrichment scoreMEAN
SECONDARYDetermine Efficacy Defined as Disease-Free Survival (DFS)2 yearsTwo patients whose disease progressed during neoadjuvant therapy did not have surgery; the other 21 patients proceeded to surgery and radiation therapy.ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYDetermine Efficacy Defined as Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)2 yearsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYDetermine Efficacy Defined as Overall Survival (OS)2 yearsParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYAssess Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) Differences After Preoperative Therapy28 weeks
Subset (n=15, patients allocated to ruxolitinib plus paclitaxel given as neoadjuvant therapy) of the overall patient population allocated to ruxolitinib plus paclitaxel given as neoadjuvant therapy (n=17) who had tumor samples at both baseline and 28 wk timepoints.
ParticipantsCOUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS
SECONDARYChanges in Interleukin 6 (IL-6) Plasma Levels During Treatment28 weeks
Subset (n=4, patients allocated to paclitaxel alone as neoadjuvant therapy; n=13, patients allocated to ruxolitinib plus paclitaxel given as neoadjuvant therapy) of the overall population allocated to neoadjuvant therapy (n=6; n=17, respectively) who had blood samples successfully assayed at both baseline and 28 wk timepoints.
picograms per milliliterMEDIAN
SECONDARYChanges in C-reactive Protein (CRP) Plasma Levels During Treatment28 weeks
Subset (n=4, patients allocated to paclitaxel alone as neoadjuvant therapy; n=14, patients allocated to ruxolitinib plus paclitaxel given as neoadjuvant therapy) of the overall population allocated to neoadjuvant therapy (n=6; n=17, respectively) who had blood samples successfully assayed at both baseline and 28 wk timepoints.
milligram per literMEDIAN

Results by group40

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Biologic Response To 7-Day Run-In Window Phase Treatment of Ruxolitinib Alone or Ruxolitinib Plus PaclitaxelRuxolitinib Alone FirstpStat3 negative2Participants
Biologic Response To 7-Day Run-In Window Phase Treatment of Ruxolitinib Alone or Ruxolitinib Plus PaclitaxelRuxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel FirstpStat3 negative3Participants
Biologic Response To 7-Day Run-In Window Phase Treatment of Ruxolitinib Alone or Ruxolitinib Plus PaclitaxelRuxolitinib Alone FirstpStat3 positive9Participants
Biologic Response To 7-Day Run-In Window Phase Treatment of Ruxolitinib Alone or Ruxolitinib Plus PaclitaxelRuxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel FirstpStat3 positive6Participants
Biologic Response To 7-Day Run-In Window Phase Treatment of Ruxolitinib Alone or Ruxolitinib Plus PaclitaxelRuxolitinib Alone FirstBaseline pStat3 status not available0Participants
Biologic Response To 7-Day Run-In Window Phase Treatment of Ruxolitinib Alone or Ruxolitinib Plus PaclitaxelRuxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel FirstBaseline pStat3 status not available3Participants
Pathologic Complete Response Rate (pCR) After Preoperative TherapyPaclitaxel Alone Given As Neoadjuvant Therapy, After Ruxolitinib Alone FirstpCR in breast and lymph nodes - No5Participants
Pathologic Complete Response Rate (pCR) After Preoperative TherapyRuxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel Given As Neoadjuvant TherapypCR in breast and lymph nodes - No16Participants
Pathologic Complete Response Rate (pCR) After Preoperative TherapyPaclitaxel Alone Given As Neoadjuvant Therapy, After Ruxolitinib Alone FirstpCR in breast and lymph nodes - Yes1Participants
Pathologic Complete Response Rate (pCR) After Preoperative TherapyRuxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel Given As Neoadjuvant TherapypCR in breast and lymph nodes - Yes1Participants

Participant flow16

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Run-In Treatment PhaseSTARTEDRuxolitinib Alone First11
Run-In Treatment PhaseSTARTEDRuxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel First12
Run-In Treatment PhaseCOMPLETEDRuxolitinib Alone First11
Run-In Treatment PhaseCOMPLETEDRuxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel First12
Run-In Treatment PhaseNOT COMPLETEDRuxolitinib Alone First0
Run-In Treatment PhaseNOT COMPLETEDRuxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel First0
Neoadjuvant Treatment PhaseSTARTEDRuxolitinib Alone First11
Neoadjuvant Treatment PhaseSTARTEDRuxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel First12
Neoadjuvant Treatment PhaseTreated with neoadjuvant paclitaxel OnlyRuxolitinib Alone First6
Neoadjuvant Treatment PhaseTreated with neoadjuvant paclitaxel OnlyRuxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel First0

Adverse events264

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRuxolitinib Alone First011
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRuxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel First012
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersPaclitaxel Alone Given As Neoadjuvant Therapy16
otherAnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersRuxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel Given As Neoadjuvant Therapy1117
otherLymph node painBlood and lymphatic system disordersRuxolitinib Alone First011
otherLymph node painBlood and lymphatic system disordersRuxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel First012
otherLymph node painBlood and lymphatic system disordersPaclitaxel Alone Given As Neoadjuvant Therapy16
otherLymph node painBlood and lymphatic system disordersRuxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel Given As Neoadjuvant Therapy017
otherDry eyeEye disordersRuxolitinib Alone First011
otherDry eyeEye disordersRuxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel First012

Adverse event totals12

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityRuxolitinib Alone First011
Total, all-cause mortalityRuxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel First012
Total, all-cause mortalityPaclitaxel Alone Given As Neoadjuvant Therapy36
Total, all-cause mortalityRuxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel Given As Neoadjuvant Therapy517
Total, other adverse eventsRuxolitinib Alone First411
Total, other adverse eventsRuxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel First912
Total, other adverse eventsPaclitaxel Alone Given As Neoadjuvant Therapy66
Total, other adverse eventsRuxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel Given As Neoadjuvant Therapy1717
Total, serious adverse eventsRuxolitinib Alone First011
Total, serious adverse eventsRuxolitinib Plus Paclitaxel First212

Papers1

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed as
38297352DERIVED

Source PubMed

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02876302

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02876302/results?page=2