ConductScience.org, home

Trial ยท NCT02898454

Controlled Clinical Study of Dupilumab in Patients With Nasal Polyps

NCT02898454, Phase 3, Completed, Sanofi; results first posted 2019-10-23

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Controlled Clinical Study of Dupilumab in Patients With Nasal Polyps. Trials, record NCT02898454. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02898454

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Controlled Clinical Study of Dupilumab in Patients With Nasal Polyps
NCT number
NCT02898454
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
448 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Sanofi
Conditions
Chronic Rhinosinusitis Phenotype With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP)
Interventions
Dupilumab SAR231893 (REGN668), Placebo, Mometasone furoate nasal spray
First posted
2016-09-13
Last updated
2019-10-23
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2015-001314-10
Results first posted
2019-10-23

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes43

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryChange From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Symptom Severity ScoreBaseline, Week 24
NC symptom severity was assessed by the participants on a daily basis from visit 1 and throughout the study using an e-diary on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms, with higher scores indicated more severity. Least squares (LS) means and standard error (SE) were obtained from Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments.
PrimaryChange From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Polyp ScoreBaseline, Week 24
NPS: sum of right, left nostril scores, evaluated by nasal endoscopy. For each nostril, NPS was graded based on polyp size from 0 = no polyps to 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction of inferior nasal cavity; lower score = smaller sized polyps. Total NPS: sum of right and left nostril scores, ranges from 0 (no polyps) to 8 (large polyps), higher score = more severe disease. NPS was assessed by centralized, blinded, independent review of the nasal endoscopy video recordings. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments.
SecondaryChange From Baseline at Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund Mackay (LMK) ScoreBaseline, Week 24
The LMK scoring system rated each of both the left and right frontal, maxillary, sphenoid, ostiomeatal complex, anterior ethmoid and posterior ethmoid sinuses using following grading: 0 = normal, 1 = partial opacification, 2 = total opacification. The total score was the sum of scores from each side and ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified); higher score indicated more severe disease. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. NOTE: For Japan regulatory submission only, this endpoint is not included as a secondary outcome measure and is instead one of the co-primary outcome measures. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments.
SecondaryChange From Baseline at Week 24 in Total Symptom Score (TSS)Baseline, Week 24
The TSS was the sum of participant-assessed nasal symptom scores for NC/obstruction, decreased/loss of sense of smell, and rhinorrhea (anterior/posterior nasal discharge), each accessed on 0-3 categorical scale (where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms). Total score ranged from 0 (no symptoms) to 9 (severe symptoms). Higher score indicated more severe symptoms. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments.
SecondaryChange From Baseline at Week 24 in the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) ScoreBaseline, Week 24
The UPSIT was a 40-item test to measure the individual's ability to detect odors. Total score ranges from 0 (anosmia) to 40 (normal sense of smell), lower score indicated severe smell loss. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments.
SecondaryChange From Baseline at Week 24 in Severity of Decreased/Loss of Smell as Assessed by Participant DailyBaseline, Week 24
The severity of decreased/loss of sense of smell was reported by the participants using a 0 to 3 categorical scale (where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms), higher score indicated more severe symptoms. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments.
SecondaryChange From Baseline at Week 24 in 22-item Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) ScoresBaseline, Week 24
The SNOT-22 is a validated questionnaire was used to assess the impact of chronic rhinosinusitis phenotype with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). It is a 22 item questionnaire with each item assigned a score ranging from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score may range from 0 (no disease) to 110 (worst disease), lower scores representing better health related quality of life. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview. All participants randomized to receive Dupilumab had been on 300 mg q2w regimen until Week 24 and analyzed as a pooled population for Week 24 assessments.
SecondaryChange From Baseline at Week 52 in Nasal Polyp ScoreBaseline, Week 52
NPS was the sum of right and left nostril scores, as evaluated by means of nasal endoscopy. For each nostril, NPS was graded based on polyp size from 0 to 4 (0 = no polyps to 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction of the inferior nasal cavity), with a lower score indicating smaller-sized polyps. Total NPS was the sum of right and left nostril scores and ranges from 0 (no polyp) to 8 (large polyp), with highest score representing more severe disease. NPS was assessed by centralized, blinded, independent review of the nasal endoscopy video recordings. Data were analyzed using a hybrid method of the WOCF and MI. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview.
SecondaryChange From Baseline at Week 52 in Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Symptom Severity ScoreBaseline, Week 52
NC symptom severity was assessed by the participants on a daily basis from Visit 1 and throughout the study using an e-diary on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms, 2 = moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms, with higher scores indicated more severity. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview.
SecondaryChange From Baseline at Week 52 in 22-item Sino-nasal Outcome Test ScoresBaseline, Week 52
The SNOT-22 is a validated questionnaire that was used to assess the impact of CRSwNP on HRQoL. It is a 22 item questionnaire with each item assigned a score ranging from 0 (no problem) to 5 (problem as bad as it can be). The total score may range from 0 (no disease) to 110 (worst disease), lower scores representing better health related quality of life. LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model described in Statistical Analysis Overview.

Outcomes43

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYChange From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Symptom Severity ScoreBaseline, Week 24
The analysis was performed on intent-to-treat (ITT) population which included all randomized participants who were analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for the combined population of participants who received Dupilumab.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
PRIMARYChange From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Polyp ScoreBaseline, Week 24
Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for the combined population of participants who received Dupilumab.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline at Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund Mackay (LMK) ScoreBaseline, Week 24Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline at Week 24 in Total Symptom Score (TSS)Baseline, Week 24Analysis was performed on ITT population. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for the combined population of participants who received Dupilumab.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline at Week 24 in the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) ScoreBaseline, Week 24
Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for the combined population of participants who received Dupilumab.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline at Week 24 in Severity of Decreased/Loss of Smell as Assessed by Participant DailyBaseline, Week 24Analysis was performed on ITT population. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for the combined population of participants who received Dupilumab.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline at Week 24 in 22-item Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) ScoresBaseline, Week 24
Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Data for this outcome measure was planned to be analyzed for the combined population of participants who received Dupilumab.
score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline at Week 52 in Nasal Polyp ScoreBaseline, Week 52Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here, overall number of participants analyzed= participants evaluable for this outcome measure.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline at Week 52 in Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Symptom Severity ScoreBaseline, Week 52Analysis was performed on ITT population.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN
SECONDARYChange From Baseline at Week 52 in 22-item Sino-nasal Outcome Test ScoresBaseline, Week 52Analysis was performed on ITT population. Here, 'overall number of participants analyzed' = participants evaluable for this outcome measure.score on a scaleLEAST_SQUARES_MEAN

Results by group136

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Symptom Severity ScorePlacebo-0.38Standard Error 0.07score on a scale
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Symptom Severity ScoreDupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)-1.25Standard Error 0.06score on a scale
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Polyp ScorePlacebo0.10Standard Error 0.14score on a scale
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Nasal Polyp ScoreDupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)-1.71Standard Error 0.11score on a scale
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund Mackay (LMK) ScorePlacebo-0.09Standard Error 0.31score on a scale
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Measured by Lund Mackay (LMK) ScoreDupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)-5.21Standard Error 0.24score on a scale
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Total Symptom Score (TSS)Placebo-1.00Standard Error 0.20score on a scale
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in Total Symptom Score (TSS)Dupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)-3.45Standard Error 0.15score on a scale
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) ScorePlacebo-0.81Standard Error 0.71score on a scale
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) ScoreDupilumab 300 mg (24 Weeks Pooled Arm)9.71Standard Error 0.56score on a scale

Participant flow18

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Overall StudySTARTEDPlacebo153
Overall StudySTARTEDDupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w145
Overall StudySTARTEDDupilumab 300 mg q2w150
Overall StudyIntent-to-Treat (ITT) PopulationPlacebo153
Overall StudyIntent-to-Treat (ITT) PopulationDupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w145
Overall StudyIntent-to-Treat (ITT) PopulationDupilumab 300 mg q2w150
Overall StudyTreatedPlacebo152
Overall StudyTreatedDupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w145
Overall StudyTreatedDupilumab 300 mg q2w150
Overall StudySafety PopulationPlacebo150

Adverse events165

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherInjection Site ErythemaGeneral disordersPlacebo1115028
otherInjection Site ErythemaGeneral disordersDupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w1014826
otherInjection Site ErythemaGeneral disordersDupilumab 300 mg q2w1114925
otherInjection Site ReactionGeneral disordersPlacebo31504
otherInjection Site ReactionGeneral disordersDupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w814824
otherInjection Site ReactionGeneral disordersDupilumab 300 mg q2w514915
otherAcute SinusitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo1615018
otherAcute SinusitisInfections and infestationsDupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w51485
otherAcute SinusitisInfections and infestationsDupilumab 300 mg q2w51498
otherBronchitisInfections and infestationsPlacebo815013

Adverse event totals9

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityPlacebo0150
Total, all-cause mortalityDupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w1148
Total, all-cause mortalityDupilumab 300 mg q2w0149
Total, other adverse eventsPlacebo111150
Total, other adverse eventsDupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w95148
Total, other adverse eventsDupilumab 300 mg q2w90149
Total, serious adverse eventsPlacebo16150
Total, serious adverse eventsDupilumab 300 mg q2w Then q4w12148
Total, serious adverse eventsDupilumab 300 mg q2w8149

Papers28

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
31543428DERIVEDPubMed
33226139DERIVEDPubMed
33465455DERIVEDPubMed
33548517DERIVEDPubMed
33611847DERIVEDPubMed
33710614DERIVEDPubMed
33993501DERIVEDPubMed
34037993DERIVEDPubMed
34437720DERIVEDPubMed
34459002DERIVEDPubMed

1 to 10 of 28

See all 28 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02898454

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02898454/registered?page=2