ConductScience.org, home

Trial · NCT02914522

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in the Induction and Maintenance of Remission in Adults With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

NCT02914522, Phase 3, Completed, Gilead Sciences; results first posted 2021-04-21

3 sourcestrials-2026-11-12-0.5.0

Download JSON
Cite this record

ConductScience Library. Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in the Induction and Maintenance of Remission in Adults With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis. Trials, record NCT02914522. Release trials-2026-11-12-0.5.0, 12 Nov 2026. https://conductscience.org/library/trials/NCT02914522

On this page

Trial

As registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, in the graph's capture of the registry.

Title
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in the Induction and Maintenance of Remission in Adults With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
NCT number
NCT02914522
Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Enrollment
1,351 participants, actual
Lead sponsor
Gilead Sciences
Conditions
Ulcerative Colitis
Interventions
Filgotinib, PTM filgotinib
First posted
2016-09-26
Last updated
2021-04-21
Other registries' IDs
eudract:2016-001392-78
Results first posted
2021-04-21

Source ClinicalTrials.gov

Registered outcomes18

Each outcome the trial registered, primary first, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

ListOutcomeTime frameDescription
PrimaryInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopy/Bleeding/Stool Frequency (EBS) Remission at Week 10Week 10
EBS remission was defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1; rectal bleeding subscore of 0; and at least a 1-point decrease in stool frequency from baseline to achieve a subscore of 0 or 1. Endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration); rectal bleeding subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes; stool frequency subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal. Total score for EBS ranged from 0 to 9 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
PrimaryMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EBS Remission at Week 58Week 58
EBS remission was defined as an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1; rectal bleeding subscore of 0; and at least a 1-point decrease in stool frequency from baseline to achieve a subscore of 0 or 1. Endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration); rectal bleeding subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes; stool frequency subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal. Total score for EBS ranged from 0 to 9 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
SecondaryInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission at Week 10Week 10
MCS remission was defined as having a MCS of 2 or less and no single subscore higher than 1. The MCS was composed of subscores from endoscopy (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]), rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), and physician's global assessment (PGA). The PGA acknowledged the participant's daily recollection of abdominal discomfort and general sense of wellbeing, and other observations, such as physical findings and the participant's performance status. The PGA score ranged from 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
SecondaryInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Week 10Week 10Endoscopic subscore range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).
SecondaryInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Geboes Histologic Remission at Week 10Week 10
Geboes histologic remission was assessed using the Geboes histologic scores for evaluation of disease severity in ulcerative colitis and classifies histologic changes. Remission was defined as having Grade 0 of \<= 0.3, Grade 1 of \<= 1.1, Grade 2A of \<= 2A.3, Grade 2B of 2B.0, Grade 3 of 3.0, Grade 4 of 4.0, and Grade 5 of 5.0. Possible scores are Grade 0: Architectural changes (0.0=No abnormality to 0.3=Severe diffuse or multifocal abnormalities); Grade 1: Chronic inflammatory infiltrate (1.0=No increase to 1.3=Marked increase); Grade 2A: Eosinophils in lamina propria (2A.0=No increase to 2A.3-=Marked increase; Grade 2B: Neutrophils in lamina propria (2B.0= No increase to 2B.3=Marked increase); Grade 3: Neutrophils in epithelium (3.0=None to 3.3=\>50% crypts involved); Grade 4: Crypt destruction (4.0=none to 4.3=Unequivocal crypt destruction), and Grade 5: Erosions and ulcerations: (5.0=No erosion, ulceration or granulation to 5.4=Ulcer or granulation tissue).
SecondaryInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 10Week 10
MCS remission (alternative definition) was defined as having rectal bleeding, stool frequency, and PGA subscores of 0 and an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1; overall MCS of ≤ 1. MCS possible subscores: rectal bleeding (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = no blood seen and 3 = blood alone passes), stool frequency (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal number of stools and 3 = at least 5 stools more than normal), PGA subscore (range: 0 to 3 with higher score indicating the severe disease), and an endoscopic subscore (range: 0 to 3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease and 3 = severe disease \[spontaneous bleeding, ulceration\]. Total score for MCS ranged from 0 to 12 (sum of all subscores), with higher scores indicating more severe disease.
SecondaryInduction Study: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours postdose at a single visit between Week 2 and Week 10Cmax is defined as the maximum observed concentration of drug.
SecondaryInduction Study: PK Parameter: Tmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours postdose at a single visit between Week 2 and Week 10Tmax is defined as the time to reach maximum observed concentration of drug.
SecondaryInduction Study: PK Parameter: AUCtau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours postdose at a single visit between Week 2 and Week 10AUCtau is defined as concentration of drug over time (the area under the concentration verses time curve over the dosing interval).
SecondaryInduction Study: PK Parameter: AUClast of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours postdose at a single visit between Week 2 and Week 10AUClast is defined as the concentration of drug from time zero to the last observable concentration.

Outcomes18

Each outcome the trial posted results for, in ClinicalTrials.gov's words.

TypeOutcomeTime framePopulationUnitsMeasured as
PRIMARYInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopy/Bleeding/Stool Frequency (EBS) Remission at Week 10Week 10Full Analysis Set for the Induction study (Cohorts A and B) included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug in the corresponding Induction study.percentage of participantsNUMBER
PRIMARYMaintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EBS Remission at Week 58Week 58
Full Analysis Set for the Maintenance Study included all participants randomized to either the filgotinib 200 mg or filgotinib 100 mg treatment groups in the Induction Study (Cohorts A and B) who achieved EBS remission or MCS response at Week 10, were rerandomized, and took at least 1 dose of study drug in the Maintenance Study.
percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission at Week 10Week 10Participants in the Full Analysis Set for the Induction Study (Cohorts A and B) were analyzed.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Week 10Week 10Participants in the Full Analysis Set for the Induction Study (Cohorts A and B) were analyzed.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Geboes Histologic Remission at Week 10Week 10Participants in the Full Analysis Set for the Induction study (Cohorts A and B) were analyzed.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYInduction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved MCS Remission (Alternative Definition) at Week 10Week 10Participants in the Full Analysis Set for the Induction Study (Cohorts A and B) were analyzed.percentage of participantsNUMBER
SECONDARYInduction Study: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Cmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours postdose at a single visit between Week 2 and Week 10
PK Substudy Analysis Set included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of filgotinib, participated in the PK substudy, and had at least 1 nonmissing intensive concentration value for filgotinib and/or GS-829845 with available data were analyzed.
nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)MEAN
SECONDARYInduction Study: PK Parameter: Tmax of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-829845Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours postdose at a single visit between Week 2 and Week 10Participants in the PK Substudy Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.hour (h)MEDIAN
SECONDARYInduction Study: PK Parameter: AUCtau of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours postdose at a single visit between Week 2 and Week 10Participants in the PK Substudy Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.hour*nanograms per milliliter (h*ng/mL)MEAN
SECONDARYInduction Study: PK Parameter: AUClast of Filgotinib and Its Metabolite GS-82984Predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 hours postdose at a single visit between Week 2 and Week 10Participants in the PK Substudy Analysis Set with available data were analyzed.h*ng/mLMEAN

Results by group106

Each measurement the trial posted, group by group, in the words and numbers it posted.

OutcomeGroupCategoryValueSpreadUnits
Induction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopy/Bleeding/Stool Frequency (EBS) Remission at Week 10Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mg26.195% Confidence Interval 20.4 to 31.8percentage of participants
Induction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopy/Bleeding/Stool Frequency (EBS) Remission at Week 10Induction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mg19.195% Confidence Interval 14.3 to 23.9percentage of participants
Induction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopy/Bleeding/Stool Frequency (EBS) Remission at Week 10Induction Study (Cohort A): Placebo15.395% Confidence Interval 8.9 to 21.7percentage of participants
Induction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopy/Bleeding/Stool Frequency (EBS) Remission at Week 10Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mg11.595% Confidence Interval 7.4 to 15.5percentage of participants
Induction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopy/Bleeding/Stool Frequency (EBS) Remission at Week 10Induction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 100 mg9.595% Confidence Interval 5.9 to 13.0percentage of participants
Induction Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Endoscopy/Bleeding/Stool Frequency (EBS) Remission at Week 10Induction Study (Cohort B): Placebo4.295% Confidence Interval 0.6 to 7.9percentage of participants
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EBS Remission at Week 58Maintenance Study: Filgotinib 200 mg From Induction Filgotinib 200 mg37.295% Confidence Interval 30.2 to 44.2percentage of participants
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EBS Remission at Week 58Maintenance Study: Placebo From Induction Filgotinib 200 mg11.295% Confidence Interval 4.5 to 18.0percentage of participants
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EBS Remission at Week 58Maintenance Study: Filgotinib 100 mg From Induction Filgotinib 100 mg23.895% Confidence Interval 17.2 to 30.5percentage of participants
Maintenance Study: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved EBS Remission at Week 58Maintenance Study: Placebo From Induction Filgotinib 100 mg13.595% Confidence Interval 5.8 to 21.1percentage of participants

Participant flow66

How many started, completed or left each group, period by period.

PeriodMilestoneGroupParticipantsUnits counted
Induction Study: Up to Week 11STARTEDInduction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mg245
Induction Study: Up to Week 11STARTEDInduction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mg278
Induction Study: Up to Week 11STARTEDInduction Study (Cohort A): Placebo137
Induction Study: Up to Week 11STARTEDInduction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mg262
Induction Study: Up to Week 11STARTEDInduction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 100 mg286
Induction Study: Up to Week 11STARTEDInduction Study (Cohort B): Placebo143
Induction Study: Up to Week 11STARTEDMaintenance Study: Filgotinib 200 mg From Induction Filgotinib 200 mg0
Induction Study: Up to Week 11STARTEDMaintenance Study: Placebo From Induction Filgotinib 200 mg0
Induction Study: Up to Week 11STARTEDMaintenance Study: Filgotinib 100 mg From Induction Filgotinib 100 mg0
Induction Study: Up to Week 11STARTEDMaintenance Study: Placebo From Induction Filgotinib 100 mg0

Adverse events847

Each adverse event the trial posted, group by group: the participants affected out of those at risk.

TypeEventOrgan systemGroupAffectedAt riskEvents
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersInduction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mg6245
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersInduction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mg10277
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersInduction Study (Cohort A): Placebo4137
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersInduction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mg12262
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersInduction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 100 mg11285
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersInduction Study (Cohort B): Placebo10142
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersMaintenance Study: Filgotinib 200 mg From Induction Filgotinib 200 mg4202
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersMaintenance Study: Placebo From Induction Filgotinib 200 mg099
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersMaintenance Study: Filgotinib 100 mg From Induction Filgotinib 100 mg4179
otherAnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disordersMaintenance Study: Placebo From Induction Filgotinib 100 mg191

Adverse event totals33

The totals the trial posted for each group.

TotalGroupAffectedAt risk
Total, all-cause mortalityInduction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 200 mg0245
Total, all-cause mortalityInduction Study (Cohort A): Filgotinib 100 mg0278
Total, all-cause mortalityInduction Study (Cohort A): Placebo0137
Total, all-cause mortalityInduction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 200 mg0262
Total, all-cause mortalityInduction Study (Cohort B): Filgotinib 100 mg0286
Total, all-cause mortalityInduction Study (Cohort B): Placebo0143
Total, all-cause mortalityMaintenance Study: Filgotinib 200 mg From Induction Filgotinib 200 mg2202
Total, all-cause mortalityMaintenance Study: Placebo From Induction Filgotinib 200 mg099
Total, all-cause mortalityMaintenance Study: Filgotinib 100 mg From Induction Filgotinib 100 mg0179
Total, all-cause mortalityMaintenance Study: Placebo From Induction Filgotinib 100 mg091

Papers12

The papers the trial lists on ClinicalTrials.gov.

PMIDListed asSource
34090625DERIVEDPubMed
36006011DERIVEDPubMed
36756874DERIVEDPubMed
36928705DERIVEDPubMed
36946138DERIVEDPubMed
37540206DERIVEDPubMed
37718932DERIVEDPubMed
38019901DERIVEDPubMed
39452892DERIVEDPubMed
39656830DERIVEDPubMed

1 to 10 of 12

See all 12 papers

Grants0

The grants NIH RePORTER links to the trial, newest funded first: NIH's, and some of AHRQ's, CDC's, FDA's and VA's. Each shows its title, principal investigators, organization and funder in its newest year.

None in this release.

Trial comparisons0

Comparisons of the trial's two groups, calculated by ConductScience from the counts it posted.

None in this release.

Tests0

The ConductCognition tests this trial's registered outcomes name, as ScienceGraph matched them in trial-tests-2026-11-12-0.2.1.

None in this release.

Data dates

The day each source was copied for this release.

ClinicalTrials.gov
2026-11-12
ClinicalTrials.gov
Results, from AACT
2026-03-23
AACT
NIH grant links
2026-11-13
NIH RePORTER

Sources 3

  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTFreely available. Acknowledgement requested
  • ClinicalTrials.govNo license stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain
Each source's terms
  • ClinicalTrials.gov's posted results, through CTTI's AACTClinicalTrials.gov data via Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT), CTTI. CTTI makes its materials freely available and requests acknowledgement. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/documentation/299
  • ClinicalTrials.govnone stated
  • NIH RePORTER's clinical studies and project filesPublic domain (NIH RePORTER)

ClinicalTrials.gov's data carry an international copyright outside the United States: https://clinicaltrials.gov/about-site/terms-conditions.

For software

Read this trial from software.

The record and each of its lists are JSON, twenty rows a page. No key.

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02914522

GET https://conductscience.org/api/trials/v1/NCT02914522/results?page=2